`____________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`Case IPR2022-00442
`Patent 10,820,147
`______________
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEES
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00442
`Patent 10,820,147
`
`On January 18, 2022, Petitioner Google LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 10,820,147 (Paper 1) and paid the USPTO a
`
`total of $41,500, which included a $19,000 request fee and a $22,500 post-institution
`
`fee.
`
`On July 11, 2022, the Board entered a decision denying institution of the
`
`requested inter partes review. (Paper 7).
`
`Therefore, Petitioner hereby requests a refund of the $22,500 post-institution
`
`fee submitted with the Petition. Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board credit
`
`the refunded post-institution fee to Deposit Account No. 06-0916.
`
`
`Dated: August 12, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Kara A. Specht/
`Kara A. Specht
`Reg. No. 69,560
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`
`IPR2022-00442
`Patent 10,820,147
`
`
`REQUEST FOR POST-INSTITUTION FEES was served electronically via email
`
`on August 12, 2022, in its entirety on to the following:
`
`William P. Ramey, III
`Jacob B. Henry
`RAMEY AND SCHWALLER, LLP
`5020 Montrose Blvd, Suite 800
`Houston, TX 77006
`wramey@rameyfirm.com
`jhenry@rameyfirm.com
`uspto@rameyfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`By: /William Esper/
`William Esper
`Case Manager and PTAB Coordinator
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
