throbber

`
`
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Miguel Gomez
`
`2178 Sirah Ct., Livermore CA 94550
`miguel@rockslideanalytics.com
`ph. 415.793.4103
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mr. Gomez has thirty nine years of experience in the design and development of hardware and software
`technology used in telecommunications, data communications, networking and storage infrastructure. He
`also is highly skilled in the use of microelectronics simulation software, ASIC & FPGA coding and
`Verilog. Mr. Gomez has designed and coded digital switching, optical encoders, and semiconductor
`memory hardware and software.
`
`
`
`
`
`Expertise
`
` ASIC & FPGA Design
` Computer Architecture
` Computer Buses, Cache, and I/O
` Hardware Emulators
` Hardware Programming Languages
` Hardware Verification & Test
` Software Programming Languages
` Network Protocols
` Telecom Protocols
` Storage, Raid Controllers
` Digital Switching Technology
`
`
`Consulting Areas
`
`
`
`
`Computer Architectures
` Data General
`IBM PC
`
` MIP 3000, 4000
`Intel 8051, x86, Pentium II
`
` Motorola 68000
` TI TMS320Cxx (DSP)
` PowerPC
`
`
`Computer Buses:
` USB
`I2C
`
` PCI
`ISA
`
` EISA
` PCMCIA
` SBUS
` VME
` S100
`
` Modems
` Security in place, security in motion
` Compression Algorithms,
` Optical Encoders
` Video Capture and Display Systems
` Semiconductor Memories
` Power supply design
` Power Inverter design.
` Computer Vision
`
`
`
`Hardware Programming Languages:
` PALASM
` ABEL
` AHDL
` VHDL
` Verilog
`
`Hardware Simulation and Compilation
` Synopsys VCD
` Synplicity
` ModelSim
` VerilogNC
` Spice, Hspice
`
`ASIC and FPGA Design:
` Actel
` Altera
` Xilinx
`
`
`Page 1 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 001
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Networking Protocols:
` ATM
` TCP/IP
` Ethernet
` VOIP
` HTTP/HTML
`
`
`Software Programming Languages:
` C,C++
` BASIC, VISUAL BASIC
` Assembly and Machine Languages
` FORTRAN
`Java
`
` Pascal
` Python/Django/bootstrap
`
`
`Operating Systems:
` MSDOS
` Windows 3.1/NT/9x/2000/XP/CE
` UNIX
`
`
`Communications
` Spread Spectrum (802.11a,b,g,n)
` LTE
` ODFM
` RF Transmission and reception
`
`Power Electronics
` Solar Inverters
` 3-phase motors
`
`Education
`
`
`
`
`
`
`College or University
`Year
` 1983 Yale University
`
`
`CAD Tools
` Max+Plus II, Quartus (Altera)
` XACT, ISE (Xilinx)
` Mentor
` Orcad
` Allegro
` Viewlogic
` Schema
` P-Cad
`
`
`Hardware Emulators
` Quickturn
`Ikos
`
` Zycad
`
`
`
`Computer Memories
` SDRAM
` Rambus
` DDR I,II
` SDR
`
`
`Compression:
` ADPCM
`
` H.264
`
`
`Degree
`BSEE
`
`Page 2 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 002
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Engineering Experience
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`
`April 2013
`Present
`Rockslide Analytics, LLC.
`CEO
`Mr. Gomez founded Rockslide Analytics in order to develop and eventually sell a
`depth sensing camera. A depth sensing camera can image a scene in three
`dimensions. Currently Rockslide Analytics is also used to promote Mr. Gomez's
`consulting and expert work.
`
`
`August 2006
`March 30, 2009
`ActSolar Inc.
`VP Engineering and System Architect
`Mr. Gomez has designed and built a 400 watt power inverter which takes an input
`voltage of 30 volts DC and converts it to 240 VAC. Included in the design is an
`energy compensation circuit that recovers up to 40% of power normally lost due to
`power factor correction issues. Included as part of the inverter system was rooftop
`data collection for power and temperature with wireless connections to cloud
`management services.
`
`ActSolar was sold to National Semiconductor Corp. on March 19, 2009.
`
`
`September 2004
`August 2005
`BridgeWave Inc.
`Consultant
`Mr. Gomez built a 10 gig Ethernet test platform to facilitate manufacturing tests of
`Bridgewave’s high speed wireless network system. This system replaced the Smart
`Bits Ethernet test analyzer in the manufacturing test environment.
`• Built test generator: Ethernet packet generator which generated packets of
`various sizes, address spaces, payload and checksums.
`• Built test receiver and analyzer which detected various failure mechanisms,
`maintained statistics and reported them to a user interface written in Lab
`View.
`• Used the Xilinx Vertex II in the 2003 version. Used Xilinx Spartan 3e in
`2004 version.
`
`September 2004
`September 2004
`PA Consulting Group
`Consultant
`
`Page 3 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 003
`
`

`

`
`
`Miguel Gomez has provided hardware evaluation services for corporate mergers and
`acquisitions. These services include systems and hardware reviews in the following
`areas:
`• Analysis of system performance to cost of the hardware implementation.
`Costs include development time, flexibility of the system for future growth
`and final product costs.
`• Review of the VHDL and Verilog code implementations, documentation and
`development strategies.
`• VHDL and Verilog code management including compilation processes,
`simulation, test coverage, bug tracking and source code control.
`• FPGA and ASIC tool chain management.
`• Circuit board design and layout for production environments
`• Circuit board certification testing for FCC, UL, and Environmental tests
`• Review of production line management including assembly and test
`processes.
`
`Jan 2003
`May 2003
`Santel Networks
`Consultant
`Mr. Gomez Developed an optical duo-binary (ODB) encoder. At 10.7 Giga bits per
`second (GBps) ODB reduces the spectral spread to ½ of the ordinary NRZ format.
`This format allows high spectral efficiency over long distances by reducing nonlinear
`penalties due to narrower channel spacing and allows a higher bit rate or increases
`transmission distances. The project was implemented in a Xilinx FPGA running at
`667 Mbs with a 10.7 GHz Mux/Demux feeding 16 LVDS streams to the FPGA. The
`ODB behavior was simulated in a C-coded simulation. The circuit board’s highest
`clock speed was 10.7 Gigahertz and was modeled in HSPICE. Board level simulation
`was performed using NCVerilog. Several Patents were applied for and the board was
`shown at the Optical Fiber Communication Conference & Exposition in March of
`2003.
`
`
`
`Summary:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
` March 2001
`December 2002
`Extreme Networks, Inc.
`Director of Hardware, Content Networking Division
`Mr. Gomez managed a team of Hardware and Software engineers, which developed
`and maintained a Layer 5 Content Addressable Switch. The switch is capable of L2,
`L3, L4 switching as well as L5 switching which uses HTTP headers to make routing
`decisions. All routing decisions were made in real time (1 GBPs) by hardware in
`FPGAs while a Power PC provided a user interface, configuration management and
`housekeeping diagnostics. Communications between the hardware elements and the
`PowerPC CPU was via a PCI bus.
`
`
`
`January 2000
`From:
`March 2001
`To:
`Organization: Webstacks, Inc. (Now Extreme Networks, Inc.)
`
`Page 4 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 004
`
`

`

`
`
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`Director of Hardware
`Extreme Networks and several venture founding partners commissioned Webstacks to
`build a Content Addressable Switch. As the number four employee Mr. Gomez was
`hired to be the system architect and to in-turn to hire the hardware team which would
`implement it. He hired 13 ASIC, FPGA and software engineers into his department
`and managed them for the duration of the project. Time to development was one year
`and at that time functionality was proven to Extreme, which then bought Webstacks for
`$68MM cash and stock.
`
`February 1997
`December 1999
`Philips Semiconductor
`Consultant
` Developed the certification environment which was used by Philips
`Semiconductor and Microsoft to verify operation of Philips’ Poseidon handheld
`chipset running Windows CE. This included board development, FPGA coding
`and simulation as well as porting Windows CE.
` Supported development of Philip’s version of the Mips 4000 along with several
`of the peripheral devices that made up the system on a chip and the bus
`interconnect.
` Miguel Gomez also developed the ASIC logic and board level hardware for a
`56Kbs software modem while at Philips.
`
`
`
`September 1994
`From:
`January 1997
`To:
`Organization: Minden Group, Inc.
`Title:
`President & Founder
`Summary:
`After founding The Minden Group, Miguel Gomez developed several types of
`memory adapters used to adapt various sizes and types of memory sticks into Personal
`Computers. These were sold through retail stores throughout the nation. Over
`250,000 memory adapters were sold at stores such as Fry’s, CompUSA, Computer
`City and Future Shop. Miguel Gomez also designed a video conferencing system
`including a low cost video capture board and modified drivers. This system was also
`sold through the retail channels.
`After developing these products he organized and managed a small team of 10 to 15
`product managers and sales personal. Manufacturing was done in Taiwan with final
`assembly and distribution in the United States.
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`April 1989
`August 1994
`Spectrum Analysis, Inc.
`Founder & President
`Consulting services company, which Mr. Gomez founded and operated with three
`other partners. Specialized in electrical circuit design with emphasis on ASIC, FPGA
`and ASIC emulation and complex PCB level designs. Responsibilities as founder were
`to identify specific business opportunities as well as to manage and implement portions
`of the technical projects.
`
`Page 5 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 005
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`August 1987
`From:
`March 1989
`To:
`Organization: Quickturn Systems, Inc.
`Title:
`Applications Manager
`Summary:
`Quickturn developed an ASIC emulator using Xilinx FPGAs. Mr. Gomez was hired as
`Quickturn's first applications engineer, and was initially responsible for developing the
`training and demonstration systems for Quickturn's initial customers. Later as the
`company matured, he managed the customer support team. Since this ASIC emulator
`worked at a fraction of clock speed, he developed a methodology of slowing board
`designs to 100s of KHz while maintaining clock and memory (DRAM) integrity.
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`July 1987
`September 1988
`Telestream Corporation
`Applications Engineer
`Applications engineer responsible for demonstration system development, training and
`sales support
`
`March 1985
`April 1987
`Stratacom, Inc.
`Design Engineer
`Responsible for development and maintenance of an Adaptive Differential Pulse Code
`Modulation (ADPCM) voice compression board. This system allowed twice as many
`calls to be placed on Tl transmission lines, the board was used in Stratacom's network
`management system, a precursor to frame-relay.
`
`
`
`June 1983
`From:
`March 1985
`To:
`Organization: ROLM Corporation
`Title:
`Design Engineer
`Summary:
`Responsible for the development of a multiplex/demultiplex hardware board used in
`the ROLM BUS 295 telephone switch. A novel elastic buffer was used to
`automatically determine the length of an inter-cabinet data bus, whose length varied
`based on the customer's requirements. This eliminated the need for manufacturing
`technicians to manually adjust clock skew.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 006
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Litigation Support Experience
`
`
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Fabricant LLP
`Rampart Asset Management v. NXP, Renesas, Texas Instruments,
`Huawei and Silicon Motion.
`6:20-cv-01031
`
`Supported Rampart Asset Management
`
`Investigated infringement related to PCIe equalization circuits.
`
`January 2022 - February 2022
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Fish and Richards
`Ikorongo v. Bumble Trading LLC
`6:20-cv-00256
`
`Supported Bumble Trading LLC
`
`Investigated infringement related to collecting geographic location data
`from cell phones.
`
`October 2021 - November 2021
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Folio Law PLLC
`K.Mizra v. Cisco Systems
`6:20-cv-01031
`
`Supported K.Mizra
`
`Investigated infringement related to contagion detection, isolation and
`repair.
`
`June 2021 - October 2021
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`
`Page 7 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 007
`
`

`

`
`
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`Mintz
`Philips v. MediaTek, RealTek
`337-TA-1222
`
`Supported Philips
`
`Investigated infringement related to securing digital video.
`
`January 2021 - July 2021
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Russ August & Kabat
`EcoFactor v. Google, ecobee, Alarm, Vivent
`337-TA-1185
`
`Supported EcoFactor
`
`Investigated infringement related to smart thermostat devices.
`
`February 2020 - September 2020
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Russ August & Kabat
`Pavo Technologies v. Kingston
`8:14-cv-1352-JLS
`
`Supported Pavo
`
`Investigated infringement related to USB Flash Drives. I provided a
`written opinion, defended my opinions in a deposition and testified at
`trial.
`
`February 2019 - February 2020
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick
`Infinity Computer Products Inc. v. Toshiba America Business Solutions’
`2:12-cv-06796-NIQA
`
`Supported Konica Minolta Business Solutions (Defendant).
`
`Investigated infringement related to fax/business copy solutions
`
`
`Page 8 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 008
`
`

`

`
`
`April 2019 - June 2019
`
`
`Contracts Dispute
`HorizonIP
`Smith v. ORBCOMM
`
`Supported ORBCOMM
`
`Investigated geolocation services for asset tracking.
`
`March 2019 - July 2019
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Russ August & Kabat
`SPEX Technologies v. Kingston
`
`Supported SPEX
`
`Investigated infringement related to secure disk drives. I provided a
`written opinion, defended my opinions in three depositions and testified
`at trial.
`
`
`January 2017 - February 2022
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics
`Inv.
`
`Supported Synopsys
`
`Analyzed FPGA based hardware emulators relative to patent infringement
`allegations. Provided written statements.
`
`December 2014 – September 2017
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts
`NA
`
`Services Provided: Researched prior art related to video conferencing systems.
`
`Page 9 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 009
`
`

`

`
`
`
`May 2016 – March 2017
`
`
`Patent Infringement and Trade Secret Cases
`Russ August & Kabat
`VIA Technologies, Inc., et al. v. ASUS Computer International, Inc.Case No.
`5:14-cv-03586-BLF
`
`Supported VIA Technologies.
`
`Analyzed hardware infringement of USB and PCIE drivers. Analyzed trade
`secrets theft of the same hardware. Provided written statements and oral
`testimony. I provided a written opinion, defended my opinions in three
`depositions and presented our positions at an arbitration hearing.
`
`
`June 2015 – August 2017
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY P.C.
`Smartflash LLC, et al. v Google Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 6:14-cv-435- KNM
`
`Analyzed Google in-app purchase client-server software.
`
`January 2015 – November 2015
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices with Graphics
`Processing and Graphics Processing Units Therein
`
`Nvidia v. Qualcomm, Samsung, Imagination
`Inv. No. 337-TA-932
`
`Supported Nvidia
`
`Analyzed thread execution and video processing in graphics integrated
`circuits.
`
`December 2014 – May 2015
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 010
`
`

`

`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY P.C.
`Smartflash LLC, et al. v Apple Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 6:13-cv-447-MHS-KNM
`
`Supported Smartflash
`
`Analyzed Apple in-app purchase client-server software.
`
`June 2014 – August 2014
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C.
`Durie Tangri
`Narada Systems, LLC v. Tabula Inc.
`Case No. 6:13-cv-336-LED
`
`Supported Tabula Inc.
`
`Analyzed prior art related to FPGA switch and routing fabrics.
`
`February 2014 – April 2014
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Morrison Foerster
`Intellectual Ventures I & II, LLC et al. v. Altera Corporation et al.
`Case No. 10cv 01065-LPS
`
`Supported Altera and Xilinx
`
`Analyzed prior art related to systems on a chip.
`
`September 2012 – May 2014
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McKool Smith, Dallas Texas
`ParkerVision Inc. Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated.
`
`Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-719-J-37-TEM
`
`Supported ParkerVision
`
`Page 11 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 011
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`
`Reviewed schematics related to the down conversion of a radio
`frequency signal to a base band signal.
`
`September 2012 – May 2013
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McKool Smith, Dallas Texas
`WI-LAN INC., v. HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., and
`EXEDEA, INC.
`
`Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-68
`Supported WiLAN
`
`Investigated patent infringement related to the decoding and encoding of
`broadband transmission. I investigated VHDL, Verilog, C, and C++
`source code related to Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing and
`SC-OFDMA
`
`September 2012 – August 2013
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`Lantiq Deutschland GmbH v. Ralink Technology Corp., et al.
`
`Civil Action No. 11-cv-00234-EJD
`Supported Ralink
`
`Investigated patent infringement related to fractional phase lock loops and
`integer phase lock loops embedded in Ethernet and DSL circuits.
`
`May 2012 – September 2012
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Morrison and Foerster
`Sonic v. Arteris
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 11-CV-05311 MEJ
`
`
`Page 12 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 012
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dates:
`
`
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates:
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`
`Supporting Sonic
`
`Investigating infringement of hardware patents related to integrated
`circuit interconnections.
`
`March 2012 – February 2013
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Quinn Emanuel
`MotionPoint v. Transperfect
`
`Supported MotionPoint
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to language
`translation. Offered an opinion regarding MotionPoint’s product
`infringement on the asserted patent and invalidity thereof. Testified at
`trial in the United States District Court, Northern District of California
`Oakland Division.
`
`August 2012 – July 1 2013
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Faegre Baker Daniels
`Honeywell International, Inc, v. Nest Labs Inc., and Best Buy Co. Inc.
`Case No. 12-cv-299 (SRN/JSM)
`
`Supporting Honeywell International
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware patents related to power stealing.
`
`July 2012 – August 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`
`Page 13 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 013
`
`

`

`
`
`DLAPiper
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORP.
`v. TIVO Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`Civil Action No. 5:11-00053-DF
`
`Supported Motorola
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to Personal Video
`Recording devices.
`
`February 2012 – August 2012
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C. Washington
`D.C.
`TiVo Inc. v Verizon Communications Inc. et al.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
`Case No. 2:09-cv-257-DF (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Supported Verizon
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to digital video
`recording.
`
`April 2012 – June 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`Dates:
`
`
`
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates:
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McDermott Will & Emery
`MotionPoint v. Transperfect
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 4:10-cv-02590-CW (JCS)
`
`Supported MotionPoint
`
`Services Provided: Investigated infringement of software patents related to language
`
`Page 14 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 014
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Dates:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates:
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`translation.
`
`January 2012 – June 2012
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`DLA Piper LLP
`Freescale Semiconductor v. Funai Electric, MediaTek Inc., Zoran Corporation
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Case No. ITC 337-TA-786
`Supporting Funai, MediaTek, Zoran.
`
`Supported Zoran
`
`None
`
`October 2011 – June 2012
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Morrison and Foerster
`Altera v. LSI
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 11-cv-03139 CW
`Supported Altera
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware patents related to integrated circuit power
`management, clock recovery and high-speed bus implementations.
`
`June 2011 – September 2011
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Jones Day
`Nielsen. v comScore Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`Case No. 1:11-cv-290-LMB-TRJ
`Supported Nielsen
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to the collection of
`demographic information from survey panels and automated user identification.
`I investigated C, C++, C#, Java and SQL code residing on servers and personal
`computers.
`
`Page 15 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 015
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`
`
`
`June 2011 – September 2011
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C. Washington D.C.
`Active Video Networks Inc. v Verizon Communications Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
`Case No. 2:10-cv-248-RAJ-FBS
`
`Supported Verizon
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to communications
`between the set-top box and content providing servers at the communications
`head-end.
`
`December 2010 – March 2011
`
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.C. Washington D.C.
`HTC v. Apple Computers in the matter of Certain Portable Electronic Devices
`and Related Software.
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON D.C.
`Case 337-TA-721
`
`Supported HTC
`
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to power management in
`smart phones.
`
`November 2010 – January 2011.
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C. Washington D.C.
`Verizon Communications Inc. in the matter of Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON D.C.
`Case 337-TA-712
`Case 337-TA-717
`
`
`Page 16 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 016
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Supported Verizon
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to communications
`between the set-top box and content providing servers at the communications
`head-end.
`
`June 2010 – September 2010
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McKool Smith, Dallas Texas
`WiLAN Inc. v. Acer, et. al.
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 2-07CV-473 (E.D. Tex.)
`WiLAN Inc. v. Acer, et. al.
`
`Civil Action No. 2-07CV-473 (E.D. Tex.)
`WiLAN Inc. v. Westell Technologies Inc.
`
`Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-247 (TJW)
`WiLAN Inc. v. RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION,
` RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD.,
` MOTOROLA, INC., UTSTARCOM, INC.,
` LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM
` U.S.A., AND LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`Case No. 5:08-CV-04555-JW
`WiLan v. Intel
`
`Supported WiLAN
`
`These cases consisted of 802.11a,b,g,n and Bluetooth investigations. In
`as much I investigated infringement of hardware patents related to the
`decoding and encoding of broadband transmission. Investigated Verilog,
`C, and C++ source code related to Bluetooth piconets, Orthogonal
`Frequency Division Multiplexing and Complementary Code Key
`incorporated in various integrated circuits. In addition to the above
`investigations, I was deposed and was asked to testify. This case settled
`before trial.
`
`May 2009 – March 2011
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Jones Day, Palo Alto CA.
`Agere Systems Inc. and LSI Corp. vs. Xilinx, Inc.
`
`Page 17 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 017
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN D1STR[CT OF NEW YORK
`Case 09 Civ. 9717 (JSR)
`Case 09 Civ. 9719 (JSR)
`
`Supported Xilinx
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware patents related to the
`implementation of Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs).
`
`February 2010 – April 2010
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`MedioStream, Inc. v. Acer, et al.
`Consolidated Case No. 2:08-CV-369-CE, Eastern District of Texas
`
`Supported MedioStream
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to the decoding and
`encoding of video in Apple Computer products. Investigated C, C++ and
`Objective C source code in various video transcoding applications.
`
`July 2009 – October 2010
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice.
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs. AOL LLC, et. al.
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division
`C.A. No. 1:08-cv-01009-GBL-IDD
`
`Supported Rembrandt Data Technologies.
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware and software patents related to the
`transmission of data, voice and video over cable networks.
`
`Miguel Gomez performed the following tasks:
`Investigated assembly level source code for a V.34 modem physical layer
`
`modulation and de-modulation circuit.
` Gave testimony at deposition.
`
`
`April 2009 – June 2009
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`
`Page 18 of 24 Pages
`
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 018
`
`

`

`
`
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kellogg, Huber, Todd, Evans & Figel Washington D.C.
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs. Comcast, et. al.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`2:06-cv-00047-TJW-CE
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
` Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
` SHARP CORPORATION and
` SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP.
`
`Case No. 2:06CV507 (LED)
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
` CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., )
` CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS )
` OPERATING, LLC, and COXCOM, INC.
`
`2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
` CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC,
` CHARIER COMMUNICATIONS
` OPERATING, LLC, COX
` COMMUNICATIONS, INC, COXCOM,
` INC, COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC
` HOLDINGS, INC, and CABLEVISION
` SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
`
`THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`Case No. 02-41729 (REG)
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
` Adelphia Communications Corporation; )
` Century-TCI California, LP; )
` Century-TCI California Communications, LP; )
` Century-TCI Distribution Company, LLC; )
` Century-TCI Holdings, LLC; )
` Parnassos, LP; )
` Parnassos Communications, LP; )
` Parnassos Distribution Company I, LLC; )
` Parnassos Distribution Company II, LLC; )
` Parnassos Holdings, LLC; )
` Western NY Cablevision, LP
`
`Supported Rembrandt Data Technologies.
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware and software patents related to the
`transmission of data, voice and video over cable networks.
`
`Miguel Gomez performed the following tasks:
`Investigated Verilog source code used to implement a modem physical
`
`layer modulation and de-modulation circuit.
`
`Page 19 of 24 Pages
`
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2008, IPR2022-00413
`Page 019
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dates
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`
`
`Investigated C and C++ software used to implement cable modems.
`
`
`
`September 2008 – Feb

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket