IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`RFCYBER CORP.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00916-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendant.
`
`APPLE’S PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 29), Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
`
`hereby serves its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (the “Invalidity Contentions”) for U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 8,118,218 (the “’218 patent”), 8,448,855 (the “’855 patent”), 9,189,787 (the “’787
`
`patent”), 9,240,009 (the “’009 patent”), 10,600,046 (the “’046 patent”), 11,018,724 (the “’724
`
`patent”) (collectively the “asserted patents”).
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiff RFCyber Corp.’s (“RFCyber”) Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
`
`Contentions (the “Infringement Contentions”) served on December 21, 2021, is insufficient
`
`under the local rule, vague and incomplete, and fails to provide the specificity necessary to allow
`
`Apple to adequately respond. For example, RFCyber states that “any version or variant of Apple
`
`Wallet, Apple Pay and/or Apple Cash infringe at least one claim of the [asserted patents].” See
`
`Infringement Contentions, Pg. 2. RFCyber does not identify specific products for specific patents
`
`or claims such that Apple may adequately respond to or understand RFCyber’s allegations.
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`1
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 001
`
`

`

`The Court’s Order Governing Proceedings for Patent Cases states that “Plaintiff shall
`
`produce [] all documents evidencing conception and reduction to practice for each claimed
`
`invention,” but RFCyber has failed to identify documents responsive to its alleged priority date
`
`for any specific claim. RFCyber’s assertion of a “no later than” conception date is improper and
`
`unduly prejudicial to Apple. See Infringement Contentions, pg. 5-6 (“[Each Asserted Claim] has
`
`a priority date (i.e., earliest invention date) at least as early as August 1, 2004, with diligent
`
`reduction to practice at least through its September 24, 2006 filing date.”). The prejudice to
`
`Apple of an uncertain conception date is compounded by RFCyber’s statement that “[Each
`
`claim] further is entitled to the priority date of its earliest application, U.S. Patent Application
`
`No. 11/534,653, with a filing date of September 24, 2006.” Id. RFCyber’s refusal to commit to a
`
`conception date is prejudicial to Apple’s preparation of these Preliminary Invalidity Contentions,
`
`at least because Apple lacks the information necessary to adequately assess and respond to
`
`RFCyber’s claims.
`
`Many of the Asserted Claims have an effective filing date after September 24, 2006. At
`
`least the asserted claims (Claims 1, 2, and 5) of the ’046 patent have an effective filing date after
`
`March 16, 2013, as noted by the Patent Office in the related PGR2021-00028 proceedings.
`
`Apple’s preliminary invalidity contentions regarding the ’046 patent rely on an effective filing
`
`date of March 29, 2013, the filing date of U.S. Patent No. 9,047,601 to which the ’046 patent
`
`claims priority. The asserted claims of the ’724 patent have an effective filing date no earlier
`
`than March 1, 2013, the filing date of the ’724 patent. Apple’s preliminary invalidity contentions
`
`regarding the asserted claims of the ’724 patent rely on an effective filing date of March 1, 2013.
`
`Apple’s preliminary invalidity contentions for all other asserted claims, rely on
`
`RFCyber’s stated September 24, 2006 effective filing date. Apple’s reliance on the September
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`2
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 002
`
`

`

`24, 2006 should not be understood as an admission that is it correct or proper for any of the
`
`asserted claims. To the extent Plaintiff is allowed to assert a different effective filing date for any
`
`asserted claim, Defendant reserves the right to identify and rely upon additional prior art and
`
`amend its contentions accordingly. Specifically, Apple reserves the right to identify and rely on
`
`additional prior art references that predate the effective filing dates relied on in these preliminary
`
`contentions.
`
`The Court’s Order Governing Proceedings for Patent Cases also required RFCyber to
`
`serve infringement contentions “in the form of a chart setting forth where in the accused
`
`product(s) each element of the asserted claim(s) are found.” See Dkt. 29. RFCyber failed to do so.
`
`RFCyber accused multiple different devices and different functionalities of each device but does
`
`not specify which functionalities and devices are specific to each claim. RFCyber further relies
`
`on circular logic in an attempt to identify a representative product. See, e.g., Infringement
`
`Contentions, Appendix A (’218 Chart), pg. 1 (“[T]he Apple iPhone 13 Pro is representative of all
`
`Accused Devices which practice the Asserted Claims in a manner consistent with the Apple
`
`iPhone 13 Pro.”) Apple thus lacks information sufficient to allow it to fairly understand or map
`
`RFCyber’s allegations from each asserted claim to specific accused products or functionalities
`
`such that Apple can adequately understand RFCyber’s allegations.
`
`For multiple claim limitations, RFCyber’s Infringement Contentions provide no
`
`explanation for its infringement allegations and fail to fairly apprise Apple of RFCyber’s
`
`infringement theories. For several claim elements, RFCyber makes only bald accusations that the
`
`claim element is satisfied without identifying or pointing to any particular evidence. RFCyber’s
`
`failure to identify what it contends to meet the claim limitations has prejudiced Apple’s ability to
`
`prepare these Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. Moreover, Apple prepared these Preliminary
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`3
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 003
`
`

`

`Invalidity Contentions without the benefit of knowing the positions RFCyber may take
`
`regarding the scope of the asserted claims, how RFCyber may interpret the Court’s claim
`
`constructions, or how RFCyber may attempt to read the claims onto the accused products.
`
`As a result of the insufficiencies and failures identified above, Apple specifically
`
`reserves the right to amend these Preliminary Invalidity Contentions; and Apple reserves the
`
`right to contend that the Infringement Contentions are insufficient and in violation of the Local
`
`Patent Rules.
`
`Apple understands that RFCyber has asserted the following claims of the Asserted
`
`Patents, which are collectively referred to herein as the “Asserted Claims.”
`
`Patent
`8,118,218
`8,448,855
`9,189,787
`9,240,009
`10,600,046
`11,018,724
`
`Claims
`Claims 1-18
`Claims 1-17
`Claims 1-19
`Claims 1-17
`Claims 1-2 and 5
`Claims 1-11
`
`These Preliminary Invalidity Contentions are responsive to the Preliminary Infringement
`
`Contentions and are illustrative. As such, where these Preliminary Invalidity Contentions rely on
`
`or otherwise embody particular constructions of terms or phrases in the Asserted Claims,
`
`Defendant is not proposing any such constructions as proper constructions of those terms or
`
`phrases. Specifically, the invalidity positions put forth in this document are predicated on
`
`Plaintiff’s incorrect and overly broad interpretation of its claims as evidenced by its Infringement
`
`Contentions. Those positions are not intended to and do not necessarily reflect the true and
`
`proper scope of Plaintiff’s claims, and Defendant reserves the right to adopt claim construction
`
`positions that differ from or even conflict with various positions put forth in this document.
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`4
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 004
`
`

`

`Apple offers these Preliminary Invalidity Contentions in response to RFCyber’s
`
`Infringement Contentions, notwithstanding the deficiencies therein, without prejudice to any
`
`position Apply may ultimately take as to any claim construction issues. Apple’s Preliminary
`
`Invalidity Contentions should not be interpreted as suggesting that RFCyber’s reading of the
`
`Asserted Claims is correct, that any of the Asserted Claims are not indefinite, or as an admission
`
`that any of Apple’s products or technology infringe any claim of the Asserted Patent. Apple
`
`specifically denies any such infringement.
`
`These Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, including the attached exhibits, are subject to
`
`modification, amendment, and/or supplementation in the event that RFCyber provides any
`
`information that it failed to provide in its Infringement Contentions or attempts to cure any
`
`deficiencies in its Infringement Contentions, in light of RFCyber’s Infringement Contentions, in
`
`view of any Court’s ruling regarding the construction or scope of the Asserted Claims, in view of
`
`any Court’s ruling regarding any findings as to the priority, conception, or reduction to practice
`
`date of the Asserted Claims, and/or positions that RFCyber or its expert witness(es) may take
`
`concerning claim construction, infringement, and/or invalidity issues. Further, because discovery
`
`is not complete, Apple reserves the right to revise, amend, and/or supplement the information
`
`provided herein, including identifying and relying on additional references, should Apple’s further
`
`search and analysis yield additional information or references, consistent with the applicable rules
`
`and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`The Preliminary Invalidity Contentions herein are based on Apple’s present knowledge
`
`and Apple reserves the right to amend these contentions if it identifies new material despite
`
`Apple’s reasonable efforts to prepare these contentions. Apple’s investigation regarding
`
`invalidity of the Asserted patents over prior art and regarding other grounds of invalidity,
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`5
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 005
`
`

`

`including those based on the public use and on-sale bars under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), anticipation
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102, obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103, failure to comply with 35 U.S.C. §
`
`112, derivation and improper inventorship under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f), and prior invention under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(g), is not yet complete. There may be products that were known or in public use
`
`prior to the filing dates of the applications leading to the asserted patents, but Apple must first
`
`obtain additional information regarding these products using available discovery tools.
`
`Moreover, prior art not included in this disclosure, whether known or unknown to Apple,
`
`may become relevant. In particular, Apple is currently unaware of the extent, if any, to which
`
`RFCyber will contend that limitations of the Asserted Claims are not disclosed in the prior art
`
`identified by Apple or will contend that any of the identified references does not qualify as prior
`
`art under § 102. To the extent that such issues arise, Apple reserves the right to identify
`
`additional teachings in the same references or in other references that anticipate or would have
`
`made the addition of the allegedly missing limitation to the apparatus or method obvious.
`
`The identification of any patents as prior art shall be deemed to include identification of
`
`any foreign counterpart patents. The identification of any patent applications as prior art shall be
`
`deemed to include identification of any resulting issued patents. Apple reserves the right to rely
`
`on any reference listed on the face of any charted patent reference at least to disclose and
`
`describe the state of the art at the time
`
`Apple incorporates herein by reference any and all IPRs and related materials that have
`
`been or in the future are filed against the asserted patents to supplement these invalidity
`
`contentions, including but not limited to IPR2021-00957, IPR2021-00979, IPR2021-00954,
`
`IPR2021-00978, IPR2021-00955, IPR2021-00980, IPR2022-00412, IPR2021-00956, IPR2021-
`
`00981, IPR2022-00413, PGR2021-00028, PGR2021-00029, and PGR2022-00003.
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`6
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 006
`
`

`

`Apple incorporates by reference any and all invalidity defenses and related materials filed
`
`by other defendants in any other prior or future litigation involving one or more of the Asserted
`
`Patents, including, but not limited to, EDTX-2-20-cv-00274, EDTX-2-20-cv-00336, and EDTX-
`
`2-20-cv-00335. Apple reserves the right to identify and rely on any prior art references identified
`
`or referenced in any other related litigation.
`
`A.
`
`Prior Art
`
`Apple identifies at least the documents, materials, and systems identified within these
`
`contentions, within the associated charts, and the associated production, including all documents
`
`and things within Bates range APL-RFC0916-PA-00000001 - APL-RFC0916-PA-00021141, as
`
`prior art to one or more of the Asserted Claims of the Asserted Patents. Exemplary, but not
`
`exhaustive, lists are included below.
`
`Table 1: References Currently Charted Against the Asserted Patents
`
`Chart
`A-1
`A-2
`A-3
`B-1
`B-2
`B-3
`C-1
`C-2
`C-3
`D-1
`D-2
`D-3
`E-4
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`Patent
`’218
`’218
`’218
`’855
`’855
`’855
`’787
`’787
`’787
`’009
`’009
`’009
`’046
`
`Reference
`Staib
`Dua
`Atlanta NFC Trial System
`Staib
`Dua
`Atlanta NFC Trial System
`Staib
`Dua
`Atlanta NFC Trial System
`Staib
`Dua
`Atlanta NFC Trial System
`Kulasooriya
`
`7
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 007
`
`

`

`Chart
`E-2
`E-3
`F-1
`F-2
`
`Patent
`’046
`’046
`’724
`’724
`
`Reference
`Keith
`Square Systems
`Behren
`VivoTech systems
`
`Table 2: Exemplary Relevant Patent Prior Art
`
`Filed Date Pub./Issue
`Date
`3/21/2012 Makoto Jogu Kou
`9/22/2020
`Square Inc.
`Henderson et
`al.
`Aaron et al.
`Babu
`Lamba
`Lamba
`Henderson et
`al.
`McKelvey
`Lamba
`Fuqua
`Sun et al
`Laracey
`Hammad
`McKelvey
`Dorsey
`Keith
`
`Pub. No.
`
`JP 0004902053
`US10783531
`
`US20130185124A1
`US9016572
`US9262757
`US9286635
`US9373112
`
`US9443237
`US9495676
`US20060287004A1
`US20080166997A1
`US20110251892A1
`US20120209749A1
`US8500018
`US8615445
`US8720771
`
`US9082101
`US9292870
`US9916581
`WO2004066228A1
`WO2009116954A2
`WO2001058174A2
`US20040049451A1
`US5649118
`EP1021801B1
`
`6/13/2001
`3/29/2016
`
`1/18/2012
`1/21/2011
`11/17/2011
`11/17/2011
`9/26/2012
`
`3/6/2015
`11/17/2011
`6/17/2005
`5/24/2007
`7/30/2010
`2/16/2012
`1/24/2011
`7/27/2011
`3/13/2013
`
`2/14/2012
`6/3/2011
`11/17/2011
`1/22/2004
`3/18/2009
`2/6/2001
`7/9/2002
`5/27/1994
`3/24/2000
`
`US6105008
`US20060165060A1
`EP0949595A2
`
`4/30/1998
`1/21/2005
`3/26/1999
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`Assignee
`
`Inventor
`
`7/18/2013
`4/28/2015
`2/16/2016
`3/15/2016
`6/21/2016
`
`Square Inc.
`Block Inc.
`Block Inc.
`Block Inc.
`Block Inc.
`
`Block Inc.
`9/13/2016
`11/15/2016 Block Inc.
`12/21/2006
`n/a
`12/6/2011 Macronix
`2/19/2013
`PayPal Inc.
`8/16/2012
`Visa
`8/6/2013
`Block Inc.
`12/24/2013 Block Inc.
`5/13/2014 Digital Retail
`Apps
`Cake Corp
`7/14/2015
`Qualcomm
`3/22/2016
`Block Inc.
`3/13/2018
`N/A
`8/5/2004
`N/A
`9/24/2009
`N/A
`8/9/2001
`Amex
`7/3/2007
`AT&T Corp
`7/15/1997
`11/3/2004 Global
`Platform
`Visa
`8/15/2000
`Samsung
`4/15/2014
`10/13/1999 Citicorp
`
`8
`
`Kulasooriya
`Langley
`Dorsey
`Keena
`Tang
`Atsmon
`Berardi
`Carlisle
`Chan
`
`Davis
`Dua
`Pan
`
`Bates
`Suffix
`00000001
`00000426
`
`00000454
`00000489
`00000526
`00000594
`00000662
`
`00000687
`00000722
`00000796
`00000812
`00000849
`00000889
`00001010
`00001043
`00001095
`
`00001148
`00001201
`00001234
`00001300
`00001337
`00001382
`00001546
`00001573
`00001598
`
`00001659
`00001702
`00001751
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 008
`
`

`

`Assignee
`
`Filed Date Pub./Issue
`Date
`12/21/2006 N/A
`12/31/2003 Prepayment
`Cards
`Verifone
`7/1/2004
`7/23/2003
`10/24/2006 Mastercard
`12/18/2002
`12/23/2008 Mastercard
`9/1/2006
`2/24/2009 Mastercard
`5/24/2005
`3/24/2006
`n/a
`9/17/2004
`11/26/2003 6/4/2012
` SK Planet
`
`Pub. No.
`
`US20060287004A1
`GB2390211A
`
`6/17/2005
`6/29/2002
`
`US20040127256A1
`US7127236
`US7469151
`US7494055
`FR2875656A1
`KR 10-2003-
`0050757
`11/26/2003
`KR20050050757
`KR20050050757A 11/26/2003
`US20050009564
`3/16/2004
`US6233683
`3/24/1998
`
`US6402028
`
`US6981245
`
`4/6/1994
`
`9/14/2000
`
`US7296160B2
`
`9/9/2002
`
`US7392534
`US7628322
`US8781529
`WO2001078020A1
`CN101833817A
`
`12/31/2003
`9/28/2005
`10/16/2006
`4/11/2000
`3/11/2009
`
`EP1860840A2
`
`5/21/2007
`
`EP1860840A2
`
`5/21/2007
`
`US20080129450A1 12/4/2007
`
`US20080129450A1 12/4/2007
`
`12/30/2005
`US20090243810A1
`1/26/2010
`US20100207742A1
`US20110218911A1 3/2/2010
`
`SK Planet
`6/4/2012
`SK Planet
`6/4/2012
`Sony
`12/15/2009
`5/15/2001 Global
`Platform
`6/11/2002 Global
`Platform
`12/27/2005 Sun
`Microsystems
`11/13/2007 UBS
`Business
`Solutions
`Thales
`6/24/2008
`Nokia
`12/8/2009
`47-15-2014 NXP
`10/18/2001
`n/a
`8/13/2014
`Changshu IP
`Operations
`7/30/2014 Giesecke and
`Devrient
`7/30/2014 Giesecke and
`Devrient
`Verimatrix
`France
`Infineon
`Technologies
`Infineon
`Technologies
`Nokia
`n/a
`GoNow
`Technologies
`
`8/27/2013
`
`8/27/2013
`
`4/2/2013
`8/19/2010
`9/8/2015
`
`US10169754B2
`
`11/17/2011 1/1/2019
`
`Inventor
`
`Fuqua
`Stanford
`
`Goldthwaite
`Khan
`Khan
`Ferandes
`Vidal
`Kim
`
`Kim
`Kim
`Hayaashi
`Chan
`
`Graham
`
`Bates
`Suffix
`00001771
`00001787
`
`00001822
`00002118
`00002145
`00002166
`00003760
`00003765
`
`00003792
`00003808
`00003831
`00003872
`
`00003897
`
`Schwabe
`
`00003935
`
`Hiltgen
`
`00003991
`
`Lu
`Holtmanns
`Kerdraon
`Graham
`
`00004016
`00004032
`00004059
`00004079
`00004256
`
`Wolfgang
`
`00004268
`
`Wolfgang
`
`00004281
`
`Charrat
`
`00004394
`
`Riegebauer
`
`00004415
`
`Riegebauer
`
`00004423
`
`Pendlebury
`Buhot
`Spodak
`
`00004431
`00004444
`00004459
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`9
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 009
`
`

`

`Pub. No.
`
`Assignee
`
`Inventor
`
`US20110218911A1 3/2/2010
`
`Filed Date Pub./Issue
`Date
`9/8/2015
`
`Bates
`Suffix
`00004478
`
`00004497
`
`00004511
`
`00004524
`
`00004535
`00004574
`
`00004581
`00004591
`00004604
`00004629
`00004654
`00004681
`00004696
`
`00004716
`00004743
`00004770
`00004780
`00004859
`00004880
`00004907
`
`00004937
`
`00004971
`00004988
`
`00006154
`00006660
`00008445
`00009143
`00009499
`00009509
`
`00009529
`00009609
`
`Spodak
`
`Chen
`
`Zhuang
`
`Yun
`
`Rao
`Goncalves
`
`Malzahn
`Liu
`Slovsky
`Slovsky
`Behren
`Zhu
`Aiglstorfer
`
`Behren
`Behren
`Malzahn
`Wall
`Staib
`Holtmanns
`Wentker
`
`Chan
`
`Pesonen
`Lee
`
`Conner
`Dua
`Cassone
`Davis
`Brown
`Rene
`
`Hanseen
`Teppler
`
`GoNow
`Technologies
`Cellco
`Partnership
`China
`Unionpay Co.
`12/22/2015 Samsung
`Electronics
`Rao
`Idemia
`Identity and
`Security
`NXP
`6/13/2017
`11/14/2014
`12/15/2009 Mastercard
`12/16/2006
`11/15/2011 Google
`3/4/2009
`11/15/2011 Google
`3/4/2009
`6/5/2012
`Google
`9/26/2011
`8/21/2012
`T Mobile
`9/27/2007
`11/18/2009 12/24/2013 Fidelity
`Information
`Services
`Google
`2/4/2014
`9/26/2011
`Google
`8/19/2014
`9/26/2011
`11/18/2014 NXP
`10/28/2010
`4/14/2015
`Google
`12/9/2011
`10/6/2005
`Payzy Corp.
`9/14/2004
`12/8/2009
`Nokia
`9/28/2005
`10/26/1999 11/19/2002 Global
`Platform
`12/21/1999 Global
`Platform
`Nokia
`Visa
`International
`Blustor Pmc
`Samsung
`Kepler
`n/a
`Qsecure
`IPOC
`Technologies
`Hanseen
`TimeCertain
`
`US20120233357A1 5/16/2012
`
`9/10/2013
`
`US20120246476A1 8/27/2010
`
`5/14/2015
`
`US20130122806A1 11/2/2012
`
`3/10/2015
`8/14/2012
`US20140006277A1
`US20150020160A1 12/20/2012 8/1/2017
`
`US20150074400A1
`US7631810
`US8060012
`US8060012B2
`US8196131
`US8249654B1
`US8615466
`
`US8646059
`US8807440
`US8892880
`US9008616
`US20050222961A1
`US7628322
`US6481632
`
`US6005942
`
`US7699233
`US6367011
`
`US7350717
`US20060165060A1
`US6983882
`WO1998049658A1
`US20040177045A1
`EP1369842A1
`
`WO2002041236A2
`US6792536
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`3/24/1998
`
`4/20/2010
`11/2/2005
`10/13/1998 4/2/2002
`
`4/7/2006
`1/21/2005
`3/31/2003
`4/30/1998
`3/15/2004
`5/8/2002
`
`11/16/2001
`10/20/1999
`
`4/1/2008
`4/15/2014
`1/10/2006
`11/5/1998
`9/9/2004
`1/7/2009
`
`8/7/2003
`9/14/2004
`10
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 010
`
`

`

`Supercom IP
`DPD Patent
`Trust
`7/27/2010 DPD Patent
`Trust
`Kogen
`Citicorp
`7/30/2013
`Holtmanns
`Nokia
`12/8/2009
`Moshal
`10/16/2014 Merburn
`3/21/2012 Makoto Jogu Kou
`5/12/2015
`Qualcomm
`Dessert
`12/11/2014
`Safety Pay
`Ohlhausen
`7/7/2020
`Visa
`Aabye
`International
`10/2/2014 Harex
`Infotech
`Shank
`n/a
`3/17/2011
`Granucci
`Visa USA
`5/1/2012
`Narayanan
`Infosys
`6/27/2013
`3/21/2012 Makoto Jogu Kou
`7/14/2011 Green
`Gallagher
`Rewards
`Liberty Peak
`Ventures
`Thales
`Trade-Van
`Information
`Services
`Apple
`Mastercard
`
`Bates
`Suffix
`00009642
`00009659
`
`00009674
`
`00009710
`00009726
`00009752
`00009778
`00009899
`00009949
`00009966
`
`00009985
`
`00010007
`00010027
`00010043
`00010055
`00010117
`
`00010131
`
`00010156
`00010168
`
`00010179
`00010308
`
`00010343
`
`00010433
`
`00010452
`
`00010504
`00010545
`
`00010565
`
`Basson
`Finn
`
`Finn
`
`Park
`
`Brendell
`
`Boucher
`Chao
`
`Lin
`Killian
`
`Nonaka
`
`Lu
`
`Ueno
`
`Dessert
`Aabye
`
`Aabye
`
`Pub. No.
`
`US20060005050A1
`US7748636
`
`Filed Date Pub./Issue
`Date
`1/5/2006
`7/6/2010
`
`6/10/2004
`7/18/2007
`
`Assignee
`
`Inventor
`
`US20060208066A1 2/15/2006
`
`US8498898
`US20060196931A1
`US20140310117A1
`JPB-0004902053
`US 9027827
`US 2014-0365371
`US 2010-0211507
`
`3/16/2000
`9/28/2005
`11/12/2012
`6/13/2001
`2/3/2012
`12/7/2012
`9/21/2009
`
`US 2014-0297381
`
`7/11/2012
`
`US 2011-0066550
`US 8170527
`US 2013-0166448
`JPB-0004901053
`US 2011-0173060
`
`US 2013-0048717
`
`9/16/2009
`9/26/2007
`3/12/2012
`6/13/2001
`1/10/2011
`
`10/25/2011 5/6/2014
`
`US 9202330
`US 7890371
`
`11/30/2009
`5/28/2008
`
`12/1/2015
`2/15/2011
`
`US 10380573
`US 2009-
`0094123A1
`US 2010-
`0174650A1
`
`US 2012-
`0296819A1
`US 2010-
`0287095A1
`US 2013-0246258
`US 8601266
`
`8/13/2019
`9/30/2008
`12/26/2007 4/9/2009
`
`2/1/2008
`
`7/8/2010
`
`Universal
`Entertainmen
`t
`12/29/2020 Feitian
`Technologies
`12/25/2008 11/11/2010 Kyocera
`
`6/29/2011
`
`5/25/2012
`3/30/2011
`
`US 2010-0211504
`
`9/21/2009
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`Qualcomm
`7/28/2015
`12/3/2013 Visa
`International
`11/21/2017 Visa
`International
`
`11
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 011
`
`

`

`Pub. No.
`
`Assignee
`
`US 7597250
`
`5/27/2006
`
`6/3/1999
`11/11/1998
`AU9234698A
`1/10/2001
`11/10/1998
`EP0917120A2
`6/19/2007
`3/1/2001
`US20010034719A1
`1/10/2002
`11/12/1998
`US20020004783A1
`12/2/2009
`12/16/1999
`US20030159135A1
`US20030218066A1 11/27/2002 5/30/2006
`
`5/2/2003
`US20040159700A1
`3/3/2003
`US20040177005A1
`7/3/2002
`US20040249768A1
`5/24/2005
`US20060000900A1
`US20060131410A1 2/15/2006
`
`US20060175405A1
`US5590038
`US5859419
`US6647260
`US6832373
`
`US6874037
`US6917802B1
`
`2/2/2006
`6/20/1994
`9/28/1995
`4/9/1999
`4/1/2003
`
`6/19/2000
`5/17/2001
`
`Filed Date Pub./Issue
`Date
`10/6/2009 DPD Patent
`Trust
`Citicorp
`Citicorp
`InterDigital
`Citicorp
`Cisco
`International
`Technologies
`10/24/2006 Mastercard
`12/18/2002
`US20040029569A1
`US20040094624A1 12/19/2002 4/18/2006
`International
`Technologies
`VivoTech
`8/19/2004
`Stripe
`8/9/2011
`Nokia
`12/9/2004
`2/24/2009 Mastercard
`8/7/2007
`International
`Technologies
`VivoTech
`8/10/2006
`12/31/1996 Mastercard
`1/12/1999 Wynn
`11/11/2003
`PhoneCom
`12/14/2004 Hewlett
`Packard
`Sony
`3/29/2005
`7/12/2005 Dot 23
`Technologies
`International
`Technologies
`International
`Technologies
`12/12/2006 Double-Time
`Corp.
`10/11/2006 4/12/2011 Meta
`Platforms
`Inc.
`Pai
`8/12/2004
`1/10/2013 Visa
`International
`
`US7028897
`
`12/19/2002 4/18/2006
`
`US7051932
`
`US7149511
`
`US7924989
`
`11/27/2002 5/30/2006
`
`8/31/2000
`
`WO2004057890A3
`20130013499
`
`11/19/2003
`7/5/2012
`
`Inventor
`
`Finn
`
`Golvin
`Paltenghe
`Durand
`Paltenghe
`Hiller
`Fernandes
`
`Khan
`Fernandes
`
`Khan
`Poltorak
`Kontio
`Fernandes
`Fernandes
`
`Fernandes
`Pitroda
`Wynn
`Dusse
`O'Neill
`
`Abram
`Nilsson
`
`Bates
`Suffix
`00010616
`
`00014965
`00015010
`00016426
`00016446
`00016468
`00016485
`
`00016516
`00016545
`
`00016577
`00016619
`00016641
`00016717
`00016756
`
`00016787
`00016818
`00016849
`00016882
`00016899
`
`00016942
`00016956
`
`Fernandes
`
`00016982
`
`Fernandes
`
`00017013
`
`Bachner
`
`Cooper
`
`Pai
`Kalgi
`
`00017045
`
`00017062
`
`00017081
`
`Table 3: Exemplary Relevant Non-Patent Prior Art References
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`12
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 012
`
`

`

`Title or Pat. No. / Pub. No.
`2012-Year-In-Review-Dec31
`
`Nokia NFC Whitepaper
`NXP_Semiconductors-
`PN5310A3HN_C203,51-datasheet
`Philips and ViVOtech Advance NFC
`Payments • 09_17_2004
`PN 511 Data Sheet
`PN511 Data Sheet
`PN511
`PN51x Integration Notes
`Smart Card Alliance -
`Transit_Financial_Linkages_WP_102006
`White_Paper_Contact_3.0_2006
`White_Paper_Contact_3.13_final
`GlobalPlatform_Implementation_Overvie
`w_Feb 2006
`Card Personalization Specification
`Contactless Payments: Delivering
`Merchant and Consumer Benefits
`Contactless Payments: Delivering
`Merchant and Consumer Benefits
`Contactless Payment and the Retail Point
`of Sale: Applications, Technologies, and
`Transaction Modes
`The What, Who, and Why of Contactless
`Payments
`Global Platform Guide to Personalization
`Smart Cards and the Retail Payments
`Infrastructure: Status, Drivers, and
`Directions
`The Mobile Payments and NFC
`Landscape: A U.S. Perspective
`Payment Card Management White Paper
`Government Smart Card Handbook
`The International Smart Card Industry
`Guide
`Transit and Retail Payment_
`Opportunities for Collaboration and
`Convergence
`Transit and Retail Payment_
`Opportunities for Collaboration and
`Convergence
`
`Bates Suffix
`
`Author / Publisher
`
`00000122
`
`00001946
`00001954
`
`Market Platform
`Dynamics
`Nokia
`Philips Semiconductor
`
`00001973
`
`VivoTech
`
`00001976
`00001998
`00002020
`00002038
`00002077
`
`00002263
`00002296
`00002326
`
`00002384
`00002386
`
`NXP
`NXP
`NXP
`Philips Semiconductor
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`VivoTech
`VivoTech
`Global Platform
`
`EMVCo
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00002428
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00002470
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00002520
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00002657
`00002722
`
`Global Platform
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00002785
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00002838
`00002940
`00003202
`
`EMVCo
`GSA
`Smart Card News
`
`00003521
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`Publication,
`Date
`2012
`
`2007
`2004
`
`2004
`
`2007
`2007
`2004
`2006
`2006
`
`2006
`2005
`2006
`
`2003
`2004
`
`2004
`
`2003
`
`2006
`
`2003
`2002
`
`2011
`
`2017
`2004
`1998
`
`2003
`
`00003570
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`2003
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`13
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 013
`
`

`

`Title or Pat. No. / Pub. No.
`Mobile Near Field Communication
`(Mobile NFC) Stepping Stones
`Near Field Communication White Paper
`Contactless payments based on Near Field
`Communication Technology
`Introduction to NFC
`Management of Multiple Cards in NFC-
`Devices
`Near Field Communication (NFC) and
`Transit: Applications, Technology, and
`Implementation Considerations
`Accepting Contactless Payments: A
`Merchant Guide
`Smartcard & Identity News
`Smart Card Handbook
`Philips Semiconductor mifare MF1-IC-
`S70 Functional Specification
`P5CD036 Smart MX Secure Dual
`Interface PKI Smart Card Controller
`GlobalPlatform Card Specification v2.1.1
`GlobalPlatform Guide to Common
`Personalization v.1.0
`Near Field Communication (NFC) and
`Transit: Applications, Technology, and
`Implementation Considerations
`Global Platform Card Spec v2.1.1
`Smart Card Handbook
`CEPS tech spec v2.3
`Smart MX P5CD009
`Smart MX P5CD036
`Smart MZ P5CT072
`Mifare ProX P8RF6016
`The Electronic Purse
`RFID Handbook
`Mifare-S50
`1995-05-12_ISO_7816-4
`GSA Smart Card Handbook
`IEEE Spectrum Nov2005
`RFC 3261_ SIP_ Session Initiation
`Protocol
`Mifare in action
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`Bates Suffix
`
`Author / Publisher
`
`00004159
`
`TCA
`
`00004238
`00004258
`
`00004308
`00004338
`
`Rohde & Schwarz
`Lacmanovic
`
`Nokia
`Madlmayr et a.
`
`00004356
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00004815
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`00004828
`00005003
`00006129
`
`Smart Card News
`Rankl
`Philips Semiconductor
`
`Publication,
`Date
`2012
`
`2011
`2011
`
`2011
`2008
`
`2012
`
`2007
`
`2010
`2003
`2002
`
`00006167
`
`Philips Semiconductor
`
`2004
`
`00006187
`00006424
`
`Global Platform
`Global Platform
`
`00006489
`
`Smart Card Alliance
`
`Global Platform
`Rankl
`CEPS
`Philips Semiconductor
`Philips Semiconductor
`Philips Semiconductor
`Philips Semiconductor
`Wennninger
`Finkenzeller
`Philips Semiconductor
`ISO-IEC
`GSA
`IEEE
`The Internet Society
`
`Card Technology
`Today
`
`00006709
`00006946
`00008069
`00008361
`00008372
`00008383
`00008395
`00008439
`00008473
`00008796
`00008815
`00008878
`00009140
`00009230
`
`00010167
`
`14
`
`2003
`2003
`
`2012
`
`2003
`2003
`2001
`2004
`2004
`2004
`2003
`1995
`1999
`1999
`1995
`2004
`2005
`2002
`
`2003
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 014
`
`

`

`Title or Pat. No. / Pub. No.
`Applying the RFID technology for field
`force solution
`Shopping without cash
`A Personalized Offer Presentation
`GlobalPlatform. Card Specification.
`Version 2.2
`GlobalPlatform_Card_Specification,
`Version 2.1.1
`E-wallet Software Architecture w-
`Decentralized Credentials
`ISO-IEC 14443-4 1st Ed 2-1-2001
`ISO-IEC 14443-4.2000(E) 7-13-2000
`ISO-IEC 7816-4 - 1st Ed - 5-12-95
`ISO-IEC 7816-4 - 1st Ed - 9-1-95
`ISO-IEC 7816-4 - 2d Ed - 1-15-05
`Online E-Wallet System with
`Decentralized Credential Keepers
`Smart Card Handbook
`VivoTech RF-Based Contactless Payment
`White Paper
`VivoTech RF-Based Contactless Payment
`White Paper
`Global Platform - Financial
`Implementations
`Global Platform - Mobile Telecom
`Implementations
`Global Platform - Retail Implementations
`Global Platform - Transit
`Implementations
`Global KMA Guide to MULTOS
`Issuance
`AN108511 PN51x Quick Start Guide
`PN511 Transmission Module
`PN5331B3HN
`GSA Smart Card Handbook
`
`Bates Suffix
`
`Author / Publisher
`
`00010583
`
`Vuorinen
`
`00010586
`00014956
`00015042
`
`Clark
`Liu
`Global Platform
`
`00015417
`
`Global Platform
`
`00015654
`
`Hernandez
`
`00015666
`00015710
`00015753
`00015816
`00015867
`00015957
`
`00015970
`00020250
`
`ISO-IEC
`ISO-IEC
`ISO-IEC
`ISO-IEC
`ISO-IEC
`Mjolsnes
`
`Rankl
`VivoTech
`
`00020283
`
`VivoTech
`
`00020316
`
`Global Platform
`
`00020323
`
`Global Platform
`
`00020326
`00020327
`
`Global Platform
`Global Platform
`
`00020452
`
`MultOS
`
`00020525
`00020550
`00020569
`00020948
`
`Philips Semiconductor
`Philips Semiconductor
`NXP
`GSA
`
`Publication,
`Date
`2005
`
`2005
`2004
`2003
`
`2003
`
`2003
`
`2001
`2000
`1995
`1995
`2005
`2003
`
`2003
`2006
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2006
`
`2006
`2006
`
`2003
`
`2006
`2004
`2017
`2004
`
`Including and in addition to the charts discussed herein, Apple identifies systems that
`
`constitute prior art that invalidate one or more of the asserted claims of the Asserted Patents
`
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103, including at least:
`
`Table 4: Relevant Prior Art Systems
`
`15
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 015
`
`

`

`System Prior Art
`Atlanta NFC Trials
`System
`
`VivoTech systems
`Proton PRISMA
`Google Wallet
`Isis Wallet/Softcard
`
`Moneta
`Square Systems
`Starbucks Mobile
`Application
`PayPal Mobile
`Venmo
`Cake POS and
`payment systems
`Toast POS and
`payment systems
`
`Entity
`NXP, Visa,
`VivoTech,
`Cingular, Chase
`VivoTech
`Proton World
`Google
`AT&T, T-Mobile,
`Verizon, Discover
`SK Telecom
`Square
`Starbucks
`
`PayPal
`Venmo
`Cake Corp.
`
`Toast, Inc.
`
`Date
`At least as early as 2005
`
`At least as early as 2005
`At least as early as 2005
`At least as early as 2011
`At least as early as 2010
`
`At least as early as 2005
`At least as early as 2009
`At least as early as 2009
`
`At least as early as 2006
`At least as early as 2010
`At least as early as 2013
`
`At least as early as 2012
`
`Discovery is not yet complete, and Apple reserves the right to identify different and/or
`
`additional evidence in support of these prior art systems, and further to identify additional prior
`
`art systems, including, but not limited to, any prior art systems disclosed by Patentee or a third-
`
`party under §§ 102 and 103 and any prior art systems related to or embodying the teachings of
`
`the prior art references identified in the attached charts.
`
`The Atlanta NFC Trial System:
`
`The Atlanta Trial:
`
`The Atlanta Philips Arena NFC Trial (“Atlanta Trial”) was held from December 2005 to
`
`September 2006 in the Philips Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. The Atlanta Trial was conducted by
`
`“Nokia, along with Cingular Wireless, Philips, JPMorgan Chase, and ViVOtech.” See
`
`https://philadelphiafed.org/-/media/consumer-finance-institute/payment-cards-
`
`center/publications/discussion-papers/2006/D2006JuneMicropaymentsCover.pdf.
`
`WEST\297624008.1
`
`16
`
`RFCyber's Exhibit No. 2005, IPR2022-00413
`Page 016
`
`

`

`The trial included “contactless payments and content downloads.” See
`
`https://www.securetechalliance.org/consumers-give-two-thumbs-up-to-first-north-american-
`
`mobile-phone-payment-and-content-trial/. Specifically, “150 Atlanta Thrashers and Atlanta
`
`Hawks season ticket holders with both a Chase-issued Visa credit account and a Cingular
`
`Wireless account made payments at contactless readers supplied by ViVOtech at concession
`
`stands throughout the arena. Additionally, fans downloaded content to their Nokia 3220 mobile
`
`phones equipped with NXP’s NFC semiconductor chips, including ring tones, wallpapers,
`
`screensavers and video clips of favorite players.” Id.
`
`The trial was also detailed in a widely-published information technology news magazine
`
`and Web site, Information Week, see https://www.informationweek.com/atlanta-sports-fans-test-
`
`cell-phone-payment-service/d/d-id/1038865. Fans in the 20,000+ attendee Philips Arena in
`
`Atlanta could see the field trial in use at concession stands throughout the arena by 300 Hawks
`
`and Thrashers season ticket holders in January 2006 through the end of the basketball and
`
`hockey season. Customer