`____________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ____________
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`RFCYBER CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2022-00412
`U.S. Patent No. 9,189,787
` ____________
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Case No. IPR2022-00412
`U.S. Patent No. 9,189,787
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s July 21, 2022, Scheduling Order (Paper 12), Petitioner
`
`respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on April 21,
`
`2023. Petitioner requests oral argument for this IPR (IPR2022-00412) be combined
`
`with oral argument for IPR2022-00413 (for which a Request for Oral Argument is
`
`concurrently filed). Although the patents of the two IPRs are related, the grounds
`
`and arguments are varied amongst the two patents. Petition requests a total argument
`
`time of 90 minutes for each Party. Petitioner also requests a single set of
`
`demonstratives be used for both IPRs.
`
`Petitioner proposes holding the hearing virtually. However, if the Board holds
`
`an in-person hearing, Petitioner requests that the hearing take place in Alexandria,
`
`Virginia.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner specifies the following issues,
`
`without intent to waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this
`
`proceeding:
`
`1. Whether Claims 1-19 are unpatentable under § 103(a) over U.S. Patent
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0165060 to Dua, GlobalPlatform Card
`
`Specification Version 2.1.1 (March 2003), and SmartMX, P5CT072 Secure Dual
`
`Interface PKI Smart Card Controller, Short Form Specification (Rev. 1.3 – 4 October
`
`2004);
`
`2.
`
`Any claim constructions raised in any papers filed in the proceeding;
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Case No. IPR2022-00412
`U.S. Patent No. 9,189,787
`
`Any issues specified in the Patent Owner’s Objection to Motion for
`
`3.
`
`Joinder; Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Patent Owner Response, or Patent Owner
`
`Sur-Reply;
`
`4.
`
`Any issues specified in the Petitioner’s Response to Patent Owner’s
`
`Objection to Motion for Joinder and Petitioner Reply; and
`
`5.
`
`Any issues otherwise raised by the Board.
`
`
`Date: March 8, 2023
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`
`BY: /s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`Paul R. Hart, Reg. No. 59,646
`
`
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Case No. IPR2022-00412
`U.S. Patent No. 9,189,787
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.105(a)
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(b), the undersigned certifies that
`
`on March 8, 2023, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for Oral
`
`Argument was served via electronic filing with the Board and via Electronic Mail
`
`on the following practitioners of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (vrubino@fabricantllp.com)
`Peter Lambrianakos (plambrianokos@fabricantllp.com)
`Alfred R. Fabricant (ffabricant@fabricantllp.com)
`Richard Cowell (rcowell@fabricantllp.com)
`
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`
`BY: /s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`