throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 1 of 14
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00454-ADA
`
`v.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`AGAINST SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States
`
`of America, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., in which Plaintiff Scramoge Technology Limited (“Plaintiff” or
`
`“Scramoge”) makes the following allegations against Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”):
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This complaint arises from Samsung’s unlawful infringement of the following
`
`United States patents owned by Plaintiff, which relate to improvements in wireless charging of
`
`mobile devices: United States Patent Nos. 9,553,476 (“the ’476 Patent”), 9,825,482 (“the ’482
`
`Patent”), 9,997,962 (“the ’962 Patent”), 9,843,215 (“the ’215 Patent”), 10,367,370 (“the ’370
`
`Patent”), and 10,424,941 (“the ’941 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Scramoge Technology Limited is a limited liability company organized
`
`and existing under the law of Ireland, with its principal place of business at The Hyde Building,
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 2 of 14
`
`Suite 23, The Park, Carrickmines, Dublin 18, Ireland. Scramoge is the sole owner by assignment
`
`of all right, title, and interest in the Asserted Patents, including the right to recover damages for
`
`past, present, and future infringement.
`
`3.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a
`
`corporation organized under the laws of South Korea, with its principal place of business at 129
`
`Samsung-Ro, Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 443-742, South Korea.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a wholly
`
`owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., is a corporation organized under the laws of
`
`the State of New York, with its principal place of business at 85 Challenger Rd., Ridgefield Park,
`
`New Jersey 07660.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United
`
`States Code. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`6.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Samsung in this action because Samsung
`
`has committed acts within this District giving rise to this action and has established minimum
`
`contacts with this forum such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Samsung would not offend
`
`traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Samsung, directly and through subsidiaries
`
`or intermediaries, has committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in this District by,
`
`among other things, importing, offering to sell, and selling products that infringe the Asserted
`
`Patents.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b). Defendant
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is registered to do business in Texas. Additionally, upon
`
`
`
`2
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 3 of 14
`
`information and belief, Defendants have transacted business in this District and have committed
`
`acts of direct and indirect infringement in this District by, among other things, making, using,
`
`offering to sell, selling, and importing products that infringe the Asserted Patents. Defendants
`
`have regular and established places of businesses in this District, including at 12100 Samsung
`
`Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78754; 7300 Ranch Road 2222, Austin, Texas 78730; and 1700 Scenic
`
`Loop, Round Rock, Texas 78681. See Exhibits 1-3. Additionally, venue is proper as to a foreign
`
`defendant in any district. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(3); In re HTC Corp., 889 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
`
`Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of
`
`Korea, with a principal place of business in Korea.
`
`COUNT I
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,553,476
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff owns by assignment all rights, title, and interest, including the right to
`
`recover damages for past, present, and future infringement, in U.S. Patent No. 9,553,476, entitled
`
`“Antenna assembly and method for manufacturing same.” The ’476 Patent was duly and legally
`
`issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 24, 2017. A true and correct
`
`copy of the ’476 Patent is attached as Exhibit 4.
`
`10.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or
`
`imports certain products, including without limitation the Samsung Galaxy sub-models S6 Edge,
`
`S7, S7 Edge, S8, Note 8, S9, Note 9, S9+, S10e, S10, S10+, S10 5G, Note 10, Note 10+, Note 10+
`
`5G, S20, S20 5G, S20+, S20+ 5G, S20 Ultra LTE/5G, Note 20, Note 20 5G, Note 20 Ultra 5G,
`
`S21, S21+, S21 Ultra, Fold, and Z Fold2 5G (“Accused Products”), that directly infringe, literally
`
`
`
`3
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 4 of 14
`
`and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’476 Patent. Identification of
`
`the accused products will be provided in Plaintiff’s infringement contentions pursuant to the
`
`Court’s scheduling order.
`
`11.
`
`The Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the ’476
`
`Patent. A claim chart comparing exemplary independent claim 1 of the ’476 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Products is attached as Exhibit 5.
`
`12.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`the Accused Products, Samsung has injured Plaintiff and is liable for infringement of the ’476
`
`Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`13.
`
`As a result of Samsung’s infringement of the ’476 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to
`
`monetary damages (past, present, and future) in an amount adequate to compensate for Samsung’s
`
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by
`
`Samsung, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`14.
`
`Samsung’s infringing activities have injured and will continue to injure Plaintiff,
`
`unless and until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ’476 Patent,
`
`and, specifically, enjoining further manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offers for sale that
`
`come within the scope of the patent claims.
`
`COUNT II
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,825,482
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff owns by assignment all rights, title, and interest, including the right to
`
`recover damages for past, present, and future infringement, in U.S. Patent No. 9,825,482, entitled
`
`
`
`4
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 5 of 14
`
`“Electromagnetic booster for wireless charging and method of manufacturing the same.” The ’482
`
`Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November
`
`21, 2017. A true and correct copy of the ’482 Patent is attached as Exhibit 6.
`
`17.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or
`
`imports certain products, including without limitation Samsung Galaxy sub-models S8, Note 8,
`
`S9, Note 9, S9+, S10e, S10, S10+, S10 5G, Note 10, Note 10+, Note 10+ 5G, S20, S20 5G, S20+,
`
`S20+ 5G, S20 Ultra LTE/5G, Note 20, Note 20 5G, Note 20 Ultra 5G, S21, S21+, S21 Ultra, Fold,
`
`and Z Fold2 5G (“Accused Products”), that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, one or more claims of the ’482 Patent. Identification of the accused products will be
`
`provided in Plaintiff’s infringement contentions pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order.
`
`18.
`
`The Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the ’482
`
`Patent. A claim chart comparing exemplary independent claim 16 of the ’482 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Products is attached as Exhibit 7.
`
`19.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`the Accused Products, Samsung has injured Plaintiff and is liable for infringement of the ’482
`
`Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`20.
`
`As a result of Samsung’s infringement of the ’482 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to
`
`monetary damages (past, present, and future) in an amount adequate to compensate for Samsung’s
`
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by
`
`Samsung, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`21.
`
`Samsung’s infringing activities have injured and will continue to injure Plaintiff,
`
`unless and until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ’482 Patent,
`
`
`
`5
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 6 of 14
`
`and, specifically, enjoining further manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offers for sale that
`
`come within the scope of the patent claims.
`
`COUNT III
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,997,962
`
`22.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`23.
`
`Plaintiff owns by assignment all rights, title, and interest, including the right to
`
`recover damages for past, present, and future infringement, in U.S. Patent No. 9,997,962, entitled
`
`“Receiving antenna and wireless power receiving device including the same.” The ’962 Patent
`
`was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on June 12, 2018.
`
`A true and correct copy of the ’962 Patent is attached as Exhibit 8.
`
`24.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or
`
`imports certain products, including without limitation the Samsung Galaxy sub-models S6 Edge,
`
`S7, S7 Edge, S8, Note 8, S9, Note 9, S9+, S10e, S10, S10+, S10 5G, Note 10, Note 10+, Note 10+
`
`5G, S20, S20 5G, S20+, S20+ 5G, S20 Ultra LTE/5G, Note 20, Note 20 5G, Note 20 Ultra 5G,
`
`S21, S21+, S21 Ultra, Fold, and Z Fold2 5G (“Accused Products”), that directly infringe, literally
`
`and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’962 Patent. Identification of
`
`the accused products will be provided in Plaintiff’s infringement contentions pursuant to the
`
`Court’s scheduling order.
`
`25.
`
`The Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the ’962
`
`Patent. A claim chart comparing exemplary independent claim 1 of the ’962 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Products is attached as Exhibit 9.
`
`
`
`6
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 7 of 14
`
`26.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`the Accused Products, Samsung has injured Plaintiff and is liable for infringement of the ’962
`
`Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`27.
`
`As a result of Samsung’s infringement of the ’962 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to
`
`monetary damages (past, present, and future) in an amount adequate to compensate for Samsung’s
`
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by
`
`Samsung, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`28.
`
`Samsung’s infringing activities have injured and will continue to injure Plaintiff,
`
`unless and until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ’962 Patent,
`
`and, specifically, enjoining further manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offers for sale that
`
`come within the scope of the patent claims.
`
`COUNT IV
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,843,215
`
`29.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`30.
`
`Plaintiff owns by assignment all rights, title, and interest, including the right to
`
`recover damages for past, present, and future infringement, in U.S. Patent No. 9,843,215, entitled
`
`“Wireless charging and communication board and wireless charging and communication device.”
`
`The ’215 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on
`
`December 12, 2017. A true and correct copy of the ’215 Patent is attached as Exhibit 10.
`
`31.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or
`
`imports certain products, including without limitation the Samsung Galaxy sub-models S6 Edge,
`
`S7, S7 Edge, S8, Note 8, S9, Note 9, S9+, S10e, S10, S10+, S10 5G, Note 10, Note 10+, Note 10+
`
`
`
`7
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 8 of 14
`
`5G, S20, S20 5G, S20+, S20+ 5G, S20 Ultra LTE/5G, Note 20, Note 20 5G, Note 20 Ultra 5G,
`
`S21, S21+, S21 Ultra, Fold, and Z Fold2 5G (“Accused Products”), that directly infringe, literally
`
`and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’215 Patent. Identification of
`
`the accused products will be provided in Plaintiff’s infringement contentions pursuant to the
`
`Court’s scheduling order.
`
`32.
`
`The Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the ’215
`
`Patent. A claim chart comparing exemplary independent claim 1 of the ’215 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Products is attached as Exhibit 11.
`
`33.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`the Accused Products, Samsung has injured Plaintiff and is liable for infringement of the ’215
`
`Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`34.
`
`As a result of Samsung’s infringement of the ’215 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to
`
`monetary damages (past, present, and future) in an amount adequate to compensate for Samsung’s
`
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by
`
`Samsung, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`35.
`
`Samsung’s infringing activities have injured and will continue to injure Plaintiff,
`
`unless and until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ’215 Patent,
`
`and, specifically, enjoining further manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offers for sale that
`
`come within the scope of the patent claims.
`
`COUNT V
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 10,367,370
`
`36.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`
`
`8
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 9 of 14
`
`37.
`
`Plaintiff owns by assignment all rights, title, and interest, including the right to
`
`recover damages for past, present, and future infringement, in U.S. Patent No. 10,367,370, entitled
`
`“Wireless charging and communication board and wireless charging and communication device.”
`
`The ’370 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on
`
`July 30, 2019. A true and correct copy of the ’370 Patent is attached as Exhibit 12.
`
`38.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or
`
`imports certain products, including without limitation the Samsung Galaxy sub-models S6 Edge,
`
`S7, S7 Edge, S8, Note 8, S9, Note 9, S9+, S10e, S10, S10+, S10 5G, Note 10, Note 10+, Note 10+
`
`5G, S20, S20 5G, S20+, S20+ 5G, S20 Ultra LTE/5G, Note 20, Note 20 5G, Note 20 Ultra 5G,
`
`S21, S21+, S21 Ultra, Fold, and Z Fold2 5G (“Accused Products”), that directly infringe, literally
`
`and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’370 Patent. Identification of
`
`the accused products will be provided in Plaintiff’s infringement contentions pursuant to the
`
`Court’s scheduling order.
`
`39.
`
`The Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the ’370
`
`Patent. A claim chart comparing exemplary independent claim 1 of the ’370 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Products is attached as Exhibit 13.
`
`40.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`the Accused Products, Samsung has injured Plaintiff and is liable for infringement of the ’370
`
`Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`41.
`
`As a result of Samsung’s infringement of the ’370 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to
`
`monetary damages (past, present, and future) in an amount adequate to compensate for Samsung’s
`
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by
`
`Samsung, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`
`
`9
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 9
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 10 of 14
`
`42.
`
`Samsung’s infringing activities have injured and will continue to injure Plaintiff,
`
`unless and until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ’370 Patent,
`
`and, specifically, enjoining further manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offers for sale that
`
`come within the scope of the patent claims.
`
`COUNT VI
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 10,424,941
`
`43.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`44.
`
`Plaintiff owns by assignment all rights, title, and interest, including the right to
`
`recover damages for past, present, and future infringement, in U.S. Patent No. 10,424,941, entitled
`
`“Wireless power transmitting apparatus and wireless power receiving apparatus.” The ’941 Patent
`
`was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 24,
`
`2019. A true and correct copy of the ’941 Patent is attached as Exhibit 14.
`
`45.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or
`
`imports certain products, including without limitation the Samsung Galaxy Watch, Watch Active,
`
`Watch Active 2, and Watch 3 (“Accused Products”), that directly infringe, literally and/or under
`
`the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’941 Patent. Identification of the accused
`
`products will be provided in Plaintiff’s infringement contentions pursuant to the Court’s
`
`scheduling order.
`
`46.
`
`The Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the ’941
`
`Patent. A claim chart comparing exemplary independent claims 1 and 4 of the ’941 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Products is attached as Exhibit 15.
`
`
`
`10
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 10
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 11 of 14
`
`47.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`the Accused Products, Samsung has injured Plaintiff and is liable for infringement of the ’941
`
`Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`48.
`
`As a result of Samsung’s infringement of the ’941 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to
`
`monetary damages (past, present, and future) in an amount adequate to compensate for Samsung’s
`
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by
`
`Samsung, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`49.
`
`Samsung’s infringing activities have injured and will continue to injure Plaintiff,
`
`unless and until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ’941 Patent,
`
`and, specifically, enjoining further manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offers for sale that
`
`come within the scope of the patent claims.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter:
`
`a.
`
`A judgment in favor of Plaintiff that Samsung has infringed, either literally and/or
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents, the ’476, ’482, ’962, ’215, ’370, and ’941 Patents;
`
`b.
`
`A permanent injunction prohibiting Samsung from further acts of infringement of
`
`the ’476, ’482, ’962, ’215, ’370, and ’941 Patents;
`
`c.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Samsung to pay Plaintiff its damages (past, present,
`
`and future), costs, expenses, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest for Samsung’s
`
`infringement of the ’476, ’482, ’962, ’215, ’370, and ’941 Patents;
`
`d.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Samsung to pay Plaintiff compulsory ongoing
`
`licensing fees, as determined by the Court in equity.
`
`e.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Samsung to provide an accounting and to pay
`
`
`
`11
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 11
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 12 of 14
`
`supplemental damages to Plaintiff, including without limitation, pre-judgment and post-judgment
`
`interest and compensation for infringing products released after the filing of this case that are not
`
`colorably different from the accused products;
`
`f.
`
`A judgment and order finding that this is an exceptional case within the meaning
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding to Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys’ fees against Samsung; and
`
`g.
`
`Any and all other relief as the Court may deem appropriate and just under the
`
`circumstances.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Plaintiff, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests a trial by jury of
`
`any issues so triable by right.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 22, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/Reza Mirzaie
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reza Mirzaie (CA SBN 246953)
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`Marc A. Fenster (CA SBN 181067)
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`Brian D. Ledahl (CA SBN 186579)
`bledahl@raklaw.com
`James A. Milkey (CA SBN 281213)
`jmilkey@raklaw.com
`Christian W. Conkle (CA SBN 306374)
`cconkle@raklaw.com
`Jonathan Ma (CA SBN 312773)
`jma@raklaw.com
`Brett E. Cooper (NY SBN 4011011)
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`Drew B. Hollander (NY SBN 5378096)
`dhollander@raklaw.com
`Seth Hasenour (TX SBN 24059910)
`shasenour@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`12
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 12
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 13 of 14
`
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-6991
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Scramoge Technology
`Limited
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 13
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 06/22/21 Page 14 of 14
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`was electronically filed with the CM/ECF system per LR 5, and that all interested parties are being
`
`served with a true and correct copy of these documents via the CM/ECF system.
`
`/s/ Reza Mirzaie
` Reza Mirzaie
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2022 - Page 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket