Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 18
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-619-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-620-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-622-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM
`SERVICES LLC, and EERO LLC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 1 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 18
`
`
`
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
`MERAKI LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-623-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-625-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-626-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 2 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 3 of 18
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND DELL
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`HP INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-646-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-694-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-695-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 3 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 4 of 18
`
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Orders in these cases (see, e.g., Dkt. No. 39 in Case No. 6:21-
`
`cv-619) and the Court’s Updated Order Governing Proceedings – Patent Case (“Updated OGP”),1
`
`Plaintiff XR Communications LLC dba Vivato Technologies (“Plaintiff” or “Vivato”) and
`
`Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, and eero LLC; Apple Inc.; ASUSTeK
`
`Computer Inc.; Cisco Systems, Inc. and Meraki LLC; Google LLC; Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
`
`and Samsung Electronics America Inc.; Dell Technologies Inc. and Dell Inc.; HP Inc.; and
`
`Microsoft Corporation (collectively “Defendants”) file this Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`
`I.
`
`AGREED CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`There are no agreed-upon constructions.
`
`II.
`
`DISPUTED TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION
`
`Exhibit A sets forth the parties’ respective proposed constructions for each of the disputed
`
`claim terms and phrases of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,289,939, 10,594,376, and 10,715,235.
`
`Dated: June 8, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Reza Mirzaie
`
`
`
`1 OGP Version 4.1, available at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/wp-
`content/uploads/Standing%20Orders/Waco/Albright/Standing%20Order%20Governing%20Proc
`eedings%20Patent%20Cases%20041422.pdf.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 4 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 5 of 18
`
`
`
`Reza Mirzaie
`Marc A. Fenster
`James N. Pickens
`Minna Chan
`Jason Wietholter
`Christian Conkle
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Tel: 310-826-7474
`Fax: 310-826-6991
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`XR Communications, LLC dba Vivato
`Technologies
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Robert T. Cruzen
`Deron R. Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553)
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Phone: (903) 705-1117
`Fax: (903) 581-2543
`
`Robert T. Cruzen (OR Bar No. 080167)
`(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`rob.cruzen@klarquist.com
`James E. Geringer (OR Bar No. 951783)
`(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`james.geringer@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
`Portland, OR 97204
`Phone: (503) 595-5300
`Fax: (503) 595-5301
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, and
`EERO LLC
`
`/s/ Michael T. Pieja
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 5 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 6 of 18
`
`
`
`Michael T. Pieja (Pro Hac Vice)
`mpieja@goldmanismail.com
`Douglas Winnard (Pro Hac Vice)
`dwinnard@goldmanismail.com
`Lesley Hamming (Pro Hac Vice)
`lhamming@goldmanismail.com
`Jennifer M. Hartjes (Pro Hac Vice)
`jhartjes@goldmanismail.com
`GOLDMAN ISMAIL TOMASELLI
`BRENNAN & BAUM LLP
`200 South Wacker Dr., 22nd Floor
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Phone: (312) 681-6000
`Fax: (312) 881-5191
`
`J. Stephen Ravel (TX Bar No. 16584975)
`steve.ravel@kellyhart.com
`Kelly Ransom (TX Bar No. 24109427)
`kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com
`KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP
`303 Colorado, Suite 2000
`Austin, TX 78701
`Phone: (512) 495-6429
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`APPLE INC.
`
`/s/ Jonathan K. Waldrop
`Jonathan K. Waldrop (CA Bar No. 297903)
`(Admitted in this District)
`jwaldrop@kasowitz.com
`Marcus A. Barber (CA Bar No. 307361)
`(Admitted in this District)
`mbarber@kasowitz.com
`John W. Downing (CA Bar No. 252850)
`(Admitted in this District)
`jdowning@kasowitz.com
`KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 453-5170
`Fax: (650) 453-5171
`
`Allen F. Gardner (TX Bar No. 24043679)
`allen@allengardnerlaw.com
`ALLEN GARDNER LAW, PLLC
`609 S. Fannin
`
`
`
`6
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 6 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 7 of 18
`
`
`
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Phone: (903) 944-7537
`Fax: (903) 944-7856
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ryan Hawkins
`Sarah E. Piepmeier
`spiepmeier@perkinscoie.com
`Elise Edlin
`eedlin@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`505 Howard Street, Suite 1000
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Phone: (415) 344-7191
`Fax: (415) 344-7391
`
`Ryan Hawkins
`rhawkins@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11452 El Camino Real, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 720-5709
`Fax: (858) 720-5809
`
`Dakota Kanetzky
`dkanetzky@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`405 Colorado Street, Suite 1700
`Austin, TX 78701
`Phone: (737) 256-6115
`Fax: (737) 256-6300
`
`Samuel A. Hamer
`shamer@carlsoncaspers.com
`Peter M. Kohlhepp
`pkohlhepp@carlsoncaspers.com
`Philip P. Caspers
`pcaspers@carlsoncaspers.com
`William F. Bullard
`wbullard@carlsoncaspers.com
`CARLSON CASPERS VANDENBURGH &
`LINDQUIST
`225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 7 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 8 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Phone: (612) 436-9600
`Fax: (612) 436-9605
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and MERAKI, LLC
`
`
`
`/s/ Nicholas H. Lee
`Nicholas H. Lee (pro hac vice)
`nicholas.lee@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`777 S. Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844
`Phone: (213) 243-4156
`Fax: (213) 243-4199
`
`Paul Margulies (DC Bar No. 1000297)
`paul.margulies@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Phone: (202) 942-5000
`Fax: (202) 942-5999
`
`Michael A. Berta (pro hac vice)
`michael.berta@arnoldporter.com
`Bonnie Phan (pro hac vice)
`bonnie.phan@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Phone: (415) 471-3100
`Fax: (415) 471-3400
`
`Michael D.K. Nguyen
`michael.nguyen@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`3000 El Camino Real, Building 5, Suite 500
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Phone: (650) 319-4500
`Fax: (650) 319-4700
`
`Paige Arnette Amstutz
`
`
`
`8
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 8 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 9 of 18
`
`
`
`pamstutz@scottdoug.com
`SCOTT, DOUGLASS & MCCONNICO, LLP
`303 Colorado Street
`Suite 2400
`Austin, TX 78701
`Phone: (512) 495-6300
`Fax: 512-495-6399
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`GOOGLE LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ryan M. Nishimoto
`Ryan M. Nishimoto (pro hac vice)
`(CA Bar No. 235208)
`ryan.nishimoto@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Phone: (213) 243-4000
`Fax: (213) 243-4199
`
`Jin-Suk Park (DC Bar No. 484378)
`jin.park@arnoldporter.com
`Paul Margulies (pro hac vice)
`paul.margulies@arnoldporter.com
`Atanas T. Baitchev (pro hac vice)
`atanas.baitchev@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`Phone: (202) 942-5648
`Fax: (202) 942-5999
`
`Melissa Richards Smith
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM AND SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Phone: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903)934-9257
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`SAMSUNG ELECS. CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECS. AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`
`9
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 9 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 10 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brady Cox
`Michael J. Newton (TX Bar No. 24003844)
`mike.newton@alston.com
`Brady Cox (TX Bar No. 24074084)
`brady.cox@alston.com
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Phone: (214) 922-3400
`Fax: (214) 922-3899
`
`Lauren N. Griffin (NC Bar No. 54766)
`lauren.griffin@alston.com
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`101 S. Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, North Carolina 28280
`Phone: (704) 444-1000
`Fax: (704) 444-1111
`
`Bradley W. Micsky
`bmicsky@carlsoncaspers.com
`Dennis C. Bremer
`dbremer@carlsoncaspers.com
`Peter M. Kohlhepp
`pkohlhepp@carlsoncaspers.com
`Philip P. Caspers
`pcaspers@carlsoncaspers.com
`William F. Bullard
`wbullard@carlsoncaspers.com
`CARLSON CASPERS VANDENBURGH &
`LINDQUIST P.A.
`225 S. Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 436-9600
`Fax: (612) 436-9605
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. and
`DELL INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Aamir A. Kazi
`W. Thomas Jacks (TX Bar No. 10452000)
`jacks@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`111 Congress Avenue, Suite 810
`Austin, TX 78701
`Phone: (512) 472-5070
`
`
`
`10
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 10 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 11 of 18
`
`
`
`Fax: (512) 320-8935
`
`Ahmed J. Davis (pro hac vice)
`davis@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1000 Maine Ave. SW, Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20024
`Phone: (202) 783-5070
`Fax: (202) 783-2331
`
`Aamir A. Kazi (pro hac vice)
`kazi@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street NE, 21st Floor
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Phone: (404) 892-5005
`Fax: (404) 892-5002
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`HP INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kelly C. Hunsaker
`Kelly C. Hunsaker (CA Bar No. 168307)
`khunsaker@winston.com
`Matthew R. McCullough (CA Bar No. 301330)
`mrmccullough@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 520
`Redwood City, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 858-6500
`Fax: (650) 858-6550
`
`Robert N. Kang (CA Bar No. 274389)
`rkang@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-5840
`Phone: (415) 591-1000
`Fax: (415) 591-1400
`
`William Logan (TX Bar No. 24106214)
`wlogan@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`800 Capitol St., Suite 2400,
`Houston, TX 77002-2925
`Phone: (713) 651-2600
`
`
`
`11
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 11 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 12 of 18
`
`
`
`Fax: (713) 651-2700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 12 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 13 of 18
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
`
`electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per
`
`Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on June 8, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Reza Mirzaie
`Reza Mirzaie
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 13 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 14 of 18
`
`# Patent Claim Term or Phrase
`for Construction2
`1 “signal transmission/reception
`coordination logic”
`
`(’939 Patent, all asserted claims3)
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary meaning; no
`construction necessary.
`
`Alternative proposed
`construction, should the term be
`treated as a means-plus-function
`limitation:
`Function: See below for cl. 15,
`cl. 30.
`Claim 15: ascertaining, by
`monitoring the plurality of access
`points for received signals, that: a
`first access point of the plurality
`of access points is receiving a
`first signal on a first channel, a
`second access point of the
`plurality of access points is
`receiving a second signal that is
`ongoing on a second channel,
`restrain[ing] at least a third access
`point of the plurality of access
`points from transmitting a third
`signal on a third channel
`responsive to the ascertaining that
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`Means-plus-function; indefinite
`for lack of corresponding
`structure.
`
`Function:
`
`Claim 15: ascertaining, by
`monitoring the plurality of access
`points for received signals, that: a
`first access point of the plurality
`of access points is receiving a
`first signal on a first channel, a
`second access point of the
`plurality of access points is
`receiving a second signal that is
`ongoing on a second channel,
`restrain[ing] at least a
`
`
`2 All terms proposed for construction are proposed by Defendants.
`3 During the claim construction meet and confers, XR agreed to drop claims 1-14 and 23-29 of the ’939 that were previously asserted.
`XR is now only asserting claims 15-22 and 30-35.
`
`
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 14 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 15 of 18
`
`# Patent Claim Term or Phrase
`for Construction2
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`the first access point is receiving
`the first signal and that the second
`access point is receiving the
`second signal that is ongoing-on
`the second channel, wherein the
`restraining at least the third
`access point prevents degradation
`to the first and second signals.
`
`Claim 30: ascertaining, by
`monitoring the plurality of access
`points for received signals, that a
`first access point of the plurality
`of access points is receiving a
`first signal on a first channel,
`restrain[ing] at least a second
`access point of the plurality of
`access points from transmitting a
`second signal on a second
`channel different from the first
`channel responsive to the
`ascertaining that the first access
`point is receiving the first signal
`
`Structure:
`Signal transmission/reception
`logic 404 and/or MAC
`coordinator logic 606 and/or 6:1-
`51 and/or 6:65-7:20 and/or 9:11-
`59 and/or 11:19-12:21 and/or
`14:28-15:22 and/or 15:23-65
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`third access point of the plurality
`of access points from transmitting
`a third signal on a third channel
`responsive to the ascertaining that
`the first access point is receiving
`the first signal and that the second
`access point is receiving the
`second signal that is ongoing-on
`the second channel, wherein the
`restraining at least the third
`access point prevents degradation
`to the first and second signals
`
`Claim 30: ascertaining, by
`monitoring the plurality of access
`points for received signals, that a
`first access point of the plurality
`of access points is receiving a
`first signal on a first channel,
`restrain[ing] at least a second
`access point of the plurality of
`access points from transmitting a
`second signal on a second
`channel different from the first
`channel responsive to the
`ascertaining that the first access
`point is receiving the first signal.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 15 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 16 of 18
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`and/or 16:53-67 and/or 18:12-55
`and equivalents thereof.
`
`The corresponding structure of
`“signal transmission/reception
`logic 404” includes the
`characteristics and configuration
`set forth for the signal
`transmission/reception
`coordination logic 404 (and the
`MAC coordinator logic 606,
`which is subsumed within the
`corresponding structure of the
`signal transmission/reception
`coordination logic 404) in the
`’939 Patent, including at 6:1-51
`and/or 6:65-7:20 and/or 9:11-59
`and/or 11:19-12:21 and/or 14:28-
`15:22 and/or 15:23-65 and/or
`16:53-67 and/or 18:12-55, and
`equivalents thereof
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`# Patent Claim Term or Phrase
`for Construction2
`
`2 “IEEE 802.11 standard”
`(’939 Patent claims 3, 19, 32)
`
`
`3 “802.11 Standard”
`
`(’376 patent, claims 10, 21)
`
`
`
`3
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`“One of the IEEE 802.11
`standards that existed at the time
`of the invention.”
`
`“One of the IEEE 802.11
`standards that existed at the time
`of the invention.”
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 16 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 17 of 18
`
`# Patent Claim Term or Phrase
`for Construction2
`4 “transmission nulls”
`
`(’376 Patent, claims 1, 12, 22, 30,
`32; ’235 Patent, claims 2, 4, 8,
`12, 16)
`
`5 “transmission peaks”
`
`(’376 Patent, claims 1, 12, 22, 30,
`32; ’235 Patent, claims 2, 4, 8,
`12, 16)
`
`6 “third signal comprising content
`based on the set of weighting
`values”
`
`(’235 Patent, claims 1, 8 and 15)
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`which is “portions of one or more
`spatially distributed patterns of
`electromagnetic signals where
`transmissions of no or
`insignificant energy are
`selectively directed.”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Alternatively, “portions of one or
`more spatially distributed patterns
`of electromagnetic signals where
`transmissions of significant
`energy are selectively directed /
`portions of one or more spatially
`distributed transmission patterns
`of electromagnetic signals where
`transmissions of significant
`energy are selectively directed.”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`“portions of one or more spatially
`distributed transmission patterns
`of electromagnetic signals where
`transmissions of no or
`insignificant energy are
`selectively directed.”
`
`“portions of one or more spatially
`distributed transmission patterns
`of electromagnetic signals where
`transmissions of maximum
`energy are selectively directed.”
`
`
`
`“third signal carrying content,
`wherein the content is based on
`the set of weighting values”
`
`Alternatively, “third signal
`comprising content that is based
`on the set of weighting values”
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 17 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00620-ADA Document 49 Filed 06/08/22 Page 18 of 18
`
`# Patent Claim Term or Phrase
`for Construction2
`7 “the set of weighting values is
`configured to be used by the
`remote station to construct one or
`more beam-formed transmission
`signals”
`
`(’235 Patent, claim 8)
`
`“the set of weighting values is
`configured to be used by the
`transceiver to construct one or
`more beam-formed transmission
`signals”
`
`(’235 Patent, claims 1, 15)
`
`
`8 “remote station”
`
`(’235 Patent, claims 1, 4, 8, 9, 12,
`15)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary meaning, not
`indefinite.
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`Indefinite.
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`which is “remote client device.”
`
`
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 2011
`IPR2022-00367
`Page 18 of 18
`
`