`From:
`Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 9:16 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`
`Cc: AXF-PTAB <AXF-PTAB@fr.com>; Reza Mirzaie <rmirzaie@raklaw.com>; holt2@fr.com; Usman Khan <khan@fr.com>; RAK Vivato team <rak_vivato@raklaw.com>
`
`‘Subject:
`Re: 1PR2022-00367 - Regarding Oral Hearing
`
`
`
`Dear Honorable Board:
`The parties have conferredas instructed bythe Board in the scheduling order and Ms, Goldschlager’s March 13th email and submit this joint response,
`In view ofthis recent development and because the scheduling orderindicates that the parties cannotstipulate
`Patent Owner(XR) and Petitioners (HP, Apple) would liketo notify the Board that the parties have made progresstowards a settlement agreement although no written settlementis currently in place.
`to extend the date ofthe oral hearing, Patent Owner requests the Boardto grant a three (3) week extensionforthe oral hearing. Petitioners do not opposethis request. Good cause exists for this request becausethe additional timemayallow a written settlementto be agreed upon and signed bythe parties,
`thereby obviatingthe need foran oral hearing and savingtheparties’ and the Board’s resources.
`If and whenanoral hearingis conducted, the parties have agreed to conductthe oral hearing through videoconference.
`HfYour Honors would like to discussthis request overa conference call, the parties are available at the following times:
`‘© Monday, March 20, 2023: 3-5 pm EST
`
`‘+
`Tuesday, March 21, 2023:
`2:30-5 pm EST
`
`The parties also request the Board to provide instructions whethertheparties should file a paperincludingthis request and the parties’ response to Ms. Goldschlager’s email.
`Respectfully submitted,
`Philip Wang onbehalf of Patent Owner, XR Communications
`Usman Khan on behalf of Petitioners, Apple and HP
`
`On Mar13, 2023,at 1:32 PM, Trials <Irials@USPTO.GOV> wrote:
`Counsel,
`From the Board—
`
`In the Scheduling Orderforthis proceeding, we stated that the parties should meet and conferto decide ifthe Oral Hearing wasto be conducte:
`person or by videoconference. Paper11, 6. Only Petitioner requested an in-person hearing. Paper 25, 2. The
`parties were alsoto meet and conferand decide iftheywantthe hearing at the USPTOoffices in Alexandria, Virginia or DallasTexas, and notify the Board. Paper11, 6. The parties have not doneso. So, the parties shall meet and conferto decide 1)ifthe Oral
`Hearingwill be conducted in-person or by videoconference, and 2)ifin-person, whetherthey wantthe hearing conducted at the USPTOoffices in Alexandria, Virginia or Dallas, Texas, The parties shall file a paperin this proceeding providingthis information no
`laterthan March 17, 2023.
`Regards,
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3001
`Exhibit 3001
`
`