`
`117TH CONGRESS
`
`1ST SESSION S. 2891
`
`To amend title 35, United States Code, to address matters relating to the
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trade-
`mark Office, and for other purposes.
`
`IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
`
`SEPTEMBER 29, 2021
`Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which
`was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
`
`A BILL
`To amend title 35, United States Code, to address matters
`relating to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office, and for
`other purposes.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
`
`tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
`
`SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
`
`This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring the America
`
`Invents Act’’.
`
`SEC. 2. PATENTS.
`
`Title 35, United States Code, is amended—
`
`(1) in section 6—
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`1
`
`EXHIBIT 1024
`
`
`
`2
`(A) in subsection (c)—
`
`(i) in the second sentence, by striking
`
`‘‘Only the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and
`
`(ii) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing: ‘‘After the constitution of a panel
`
`of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`under this subsection has been made pub-
`
`lic, any changes to the constitution of that
`
`panel shall be noted in the record.’’;
`
`(B) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
`
`section (e);
`
`(C) by inserting after subsection (c) the
`
`following:
`
`‘‘(d) REVIEW BY DIRECTOR.—
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to a final de-
`
`cision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board—
`
`‘‘(A) the Director may, on the initiative of
`
`the Director, review, and modify or set aside,
`
`the decision; and
`
`‘‘(B) if the decision is issued under section
`
`318 or 328, a party to the applicable inter
`
`partes or post-grant review may request that
`
`the Director review, and modify or set aside,
`
`the decision.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`2
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`3
`‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—Any review by the Direc-
`
`tor under paragraph (1) shall be issued in a sepa-
`
`rate written opinion that—
`
`‘‘(A) is made part of the public record; and
`
`‘‘(B) sets forth the reasons for the review,
`
`modification, or setting aside of the final deci-
`
`sion of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`‘‘(3) TIMELINE AND BASES FOR REVIEW.—Not
`
`later than 18 months after the date of enactment of
`
`the Restoring the America Invents Act, the Director
`
`shall promulgate rules addressing the following
`
`issues:
`
`‘‘(A) With respect to review of a decision
`
`on the initiative of the Director under para-
`
`graph (1)(A)—
`
`‘‘(i) the timeline under which the Di-
`
`rector may review the decision, which shall
`
`be consistent with the requirements under
`
`section 318(e) or 328(e), if applicable; and
`
`‘‘(ii) the bases on which the Director
`
`may review the decision.
`
`‘‘(B) With respect to a request by a party
`
`under paragraph (1)(B)—
`
`‘‘(i) the timeline for submitting such a
`
`request;
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`3
`
`
`
`4
`‘‘(ii) the content that the party is re-
`
`quired to include in such a request;
`
`‘‘(iii) the bases on which the party
`
`may submit such a request; and
`
`‘‘(iv) the timeline for any response or
`
`reply to such a request such that the re-
`
`quest can be decided within the deadline
`
`imposed under section 318(e) or 328(e), as
`
`applicable.
`
`‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—For the pur-
`
`poses of an appeal permitted under section 141, any
`
`decision on review issued by the Director under this
`
`subsection shall be deemed a final decision of the
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board.’’; and
`
`(D) in subsection (e), as so redesignated—
`
`(i) in the first sentence—
`
`(I) by striking
`
`‘‘of this sub-
`
`section’’ and inserting ‘‘of the Restor-
`
`ing the America Invents Act’’;
`
`(II) by inserting ‘‘or the Sec-
`
`retary’’ after ‘‘appointment by the Di-
`
`rector’’; and
`
`(III) by inserting ‘‘or the Sec-
`
`retary, as applicable,’’ after ‘‘on which
`
`the Director’’; and
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`5
`(ii) in the second sentence—
`
`(I) by inserting ‘‘, or, before the
`
`date of enactment of the Restoring
`
`the America Invents Act, having per-
`
`formed duties no longer performed by
`
`administrative patent judges,’’ after
`
`‘‘by the Director’’; and
`
`(II) by striking ‘‘that the admin-
`
`istrative patent judge so appointed’’
`
`and inserting ‘‘that the applicable ad-
`
`ministrative patent judge’’;
`
`(2) in section 302, in the first sentence, by in-
`
`serting ‘‘, including a governmental entity,’’ after ‘‘A
`
`person’’;
`
`(3) in chapter 31—
`
`(A) in section 311—
`
`(i) in subsection (a), in the first sen-
`
`tence, by inserting ‘‘, including a govern-
`
`mental entity,’’ after ‘‘a person’’; and
`
`(ii)
`
`in subsection (b), by striking
`
`‘‘under section 102’’ and all that follows
`
`through the period at the end and insert-
`
`ing the following: ‘‘under—
`
`‘‘(1) section 102 or 103 and only on the basis
`
`of—
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`5
`
`
`
`6
`‘‘(A) prior art consisting of patents or
`
`printed publications; or
`
`‘‘(B) admissions in the patent specifica-
`
`tion, drawings, or claims; or
`
`‘‘(2) statutory or obviousness-type double pat-
`
`enting on the basis of—
`
`‘‘(A) patents or printed publications; or
`
`‘‘(B) admissions in the patent specifica-
`
`tion, drawings, or claims.’’;
`
`(B) in section 314—
`
`(i) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The
`
`Director may not authorize an inter partes
`
`review to be instituted unless’’ and insert-
`
`ing the following: ‘‘Subject only to the dis-
`
`cretion of the Director under section
`
`325(d)(4), a petition that meets the re-
`
`quirements of this chapter shall be insti-
`
`tuted if’’; and
`
`(ii) in subsection (d)—
`
`(I) by inserting ‘‘or maintain’’
`
`after ‘‘to institute’’; and
`
`(II) by striking ‘‘section’’ and in-
`
`serting ‘‘chapter’’;
`
`(C) in section 315—
`
`(i) in subsection (a)(1)—
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`6
`
`
`
`7
`(I) by striking ‘‘An inter partes’’
`
`and inserting the following:
`
`‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An inter partes’’; and
`
`(II) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Subpara-
`
`graph (A) may not be construed to prevent an
`
`inter partes review from being instituted if a
`
`complaint in a civil action described in that
`
`subparagraph has been dismissed without prej-
`
`udice.’’;
`
`(ii) by striking subsection (b) and in-
`
`serting the following:
`
`‘‘(b) PATENT OWNER’S ACTION.—
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An inter partes review may
`
`not be instituted if the petition requesting the pro-
`
`ceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on
`
`which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy
`
`of the petitioner is served with a complaint alleging
`
`infringement of the patent. The time limitation set
`
`forth in the preceding sentence shall be subject to
`
`the following limitations:
`
`‘‘(A) The time limitation shall not apply—
`
`‘‘(i) to a request for joinder under
`
`subsection (c); or
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`7
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`8
`‘‘(ii) if the complaint is dismissed
`
`without prejudice.
`
`‘‘(B) If new or amended claims issue from
`
`reexamination after the petitioner, real party in
`
`interest, or privy of the petitioner is served with
`
`the complaint, an inter partes review of those
`
`claims may be instituted if the petition request-
`
`ing the review is filed not later than 1 year
`
`after the date on which the challenged claims
`
`are asserted in the action.
`
`‘‘(2) REQUEST FOR STAY.—
`
`‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If a party seeks a stay
`
`of a civil action brought under section 281 al-
`
`leging infringement of a patent that is also sub-
`
`ject to an inter partes review, the court shall
`
`decide whether to stay the civil action based on
`
`whether—
`
`‘‘(i) the outcome of the inter partes
`
`review will likely simplify the issues in
`
`question in the civil action and streamline
`
`the proceedings in the civil action;
`
`‘‘(ii) as of the date on which the stay
`
`is requested, discovery in the civil action is
`
`complete;
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`8
`
`
`
`9
`‘‘(iii) a stay, or the denial thereof,
`
`would—
`
`‘‘(I) unduly prejudice the non-
`
`moving party; or
`
`‘‘(II) present a clear tactical ad-
`
`vantage for the moving party; and
`
`‘‘(iv) a stay, or the denial thereof, will
`
`reduce the burden of litigation on the par-
`
`ties to the civil action and the court.
`
`‘‘(B) REVIEW.—A party may take an im-
`
`mediate interlocutory appeal from the decision
`
`of a district court of the United States under
`
`subparagraph (A). The United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall review the
`
`district court’s decision to ensure consistent ap-
`
`plication of established precedent, and such re-
`
`view shall be de novo.’’;
`
`(iii) in subsection (c)—
`
`(I) by striking ‘‘If the Director’’
`
`and inserting the following:
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Director’’; and
`
`(II) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(2) ESTOPPEL.—Any person joined as a party
`
`to an inter partes review, and any real party in in-
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`10
`terest or privy of such person, shall be estopped
`
`under subsection (e) to the same extent as if that
`
`person, real party in interest, or privy had been the
`
`first petitioner in that inter partes review.’’;
`
`(iv) by striking subsection (d) and in-
`
`serting the following:
`
`‘‘(d) MULTIPLE PROCEEDINGS.—
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections
`
`135(a), 251, and 252, and chapter 30, during the
`
`pendency of an inter partes review, if another pro-
`
`ceeding or matter involving the patent is before the
`
`Office, or if there is a pending application claiming
`
`the benefit of a common filing date to the patent
`
`under section 120 or 121—
`
`‘‘(A) the parties shall notify the Director;
`
`and
`
`‘‘(B) the Director shall issue a decision de-
`
`termining the manner in which the other pro-
`
`ceeding or matter may proceed, including pro-
`
`viding for stay, transfer, consolidation, or ter-
`
`mination of any such proceeding or matter.
`
`‘‘(2) NO EXTENSION.—A decision of the Direc-
`
`tor under paragraph (1)(B) may not—
`
`‘‘(A) extend any statutory deadline under
`
`this chapter; or
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`10
`
`
`
`11
`‘‘(B) terminate an inter partes proceeding
`
`in favor of an ex parte proceeding.
`
`‘‘(3) PRESUMPTION.—For the purposes of this
`
`subsection, if the multiple proceedings described in
`
`paragraph (1) are of like type and are filed reason-
`
`ably close in time, there shall be a rebuttable pre-
`
`sumption that the Director shall consolidate the pro-
`
`ceedings under that paragraph.’’; and
`
`(v) in subsection (e)—
`
`(I) in paragraph (1)—
`
`(aa) by striking ‘‘The peti-
`
`tioner in’’ and inserting the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(A) ESTOPPEL AGAINST PETITIONER.—
`
`The petitioner in’’;
`
`(bb) in subparagraph (A), as
`
`so designated, by
`
`inserting
`
`‘‘,
`
`after the time for appeal of the
`
`decision has expired or any such
`
`appeal has terminated,’’ after
`
`‘‘may not’’; and
`
`(cc) by adding at the end
`
`the following:
`
`‘‘(B) ESTOPPEL
`
`AGAINST
`
`PATENT
`
`OWNER.—The Office may not issue to a patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`12
`owner any claim that is not patentably distinct
`
`from a claim that was issued and was subse-
`
`quently—
`
`‘‘(i) found to be unpatentable; or
`
`‘‘(ii) canceled in any proceeding before
`
`the Office, including under section 135,
`
`251, 253, 301, 311, or 321.’’; and
`
`(II) in paragraph (2)—
`
`(aa) by inserting ‘‘that the
`
`claim is not unpatentable’’ after
`
`‘‘section 318(a)’’;
`
`(bb) by inserting ‘‘, after the
`
`time for appeal of the decision
`
`has expired or any such appeal
`
`has
`
`terminated,’’ after
`
`‘‘may
`
`not’’; and
`
`(cc) by inserting ‘‘or 1498’’
`
`after ‘‘section 1338’’;
`
`(D) in section 316—
`
`(i) in subsection (a)(11), by inserting
`
`‘‘or consolidation under section 315(d)’’
`
`after ‘‘under section 315(c)’’;
`
`(ii) in subsection (c)—
`
`(I) by striking ‘‘The Patent’’ and
`
`inserting the following:
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`12
`
`
`
`13
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Patent’’; and
`
`(II) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(2) EX PARTE COMMUNICATION.—An officer
`
`who has review authority, supervisory authority, or
`
`disciplinary authority with respect to an administra-
`
`tive patent judge of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board (or a delegate of such an officer), and who is
`
`not a member of a panel described in section 6(c),
`
`shall refrain from ex parte communication with such
`
`a judge who is a member of that panel concerning
`
`any pending matter before that panel, except as al-
`
`lowed under the Code of Conduct for United States
`
`Judges.’’; and
`
`(iii) in subsection (e)—
`
`(I) by striking ‘‘In an’’ and in-
`
`serting the following:
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In an’’;
`
`(II) in paragraph (1), as so des-
`
`ignated, by inserting ‘‘of challenged
`
`patent
`
`claims’’
`
`after
`
`‘‘unpatentability’’; and
`
`(III) by adding at the end the
`
`following:
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`13
`
`
`
`14
`‘‘(2) CLAIM AMENDMENT.—For any substitute
`
`claim proposed under subsection (d)—
`
`‘‘(A) the patent owner shall have the bur-
`
`den of proving patentability, including under
`
`sections 101, 102, 103, and 112, by a prepon-
`
`derance of the evidence;
`
`‘‘(B) the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`shall—
`
`‘‘(i) examine the substitute claim; or
`
`‘‘(ii)
`
`notwithstanding
`
`subsection
`
`(c)(2), refer the substitute claim to the Di-
`
`rector, who shall cause an examination of
`
`the substitute claim to be made within the
`
`time limits for the applicable inter partes
`
`review; and
`
`‘‘(C) the Director may establish, by regula-
`
`tion, fees for examination of the substitute
`
`claim in such amounts as the Director deter-
`
`mines to be reasonable, taking into consider-
`
`ation the aggregate costs of examination.’’;
`
`(E) in section 318—
`
`(i) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘,
`
`not later than 60 days after the date on
`
`which the parties to the inter partes review
`
`have informed the Director that the time
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`14
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`15
`for appeal has expired or any appeal has
`
`terminated,’’ after ‘‘the Director shall’’;
`
`and
`
`(ii) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(e) REHEARING.—Not later than 120 days after the
`
`date on which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issues
`
`a final written decision under subsection (a), the Board
`
`or the Director shall finally decide any request for recon-
`
`sideration, rehearing, or review that is submitted with re-
`
`spect to the decision, except that the Director may, for
`
`good cause shown, extend that 120-day period by not more
`
`than 60 days.’’; and
`
`(F) in section 319—
`
`(i) in the first sentence, by striking
`
`‘‘A party’’ and inserting the following:
`
`‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A party’’; and
`
`(ii) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(b) STANDING.—
`
`‘‘(1) INJURY IN FACT.—For the purposes of an
`
`appeal described in subsection (a), injury in fact
`
`shall be presumed if the party appealing the deci-
`
`sion—
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`15
`
`
`
`16
`‘‘(A) reasonably expects that another per-
`
`son will assert estoppel against the party under
`
`section 315(e) as a result of the final written
`
`decision that is the subject of the appeal; or
`
`‘‘(B) suffers any other concrete and par-
`
`ticularized injury that—
`
`‘‘(i) is fairly traceable to the final
`
`written decision that is the subject of the
`
`appeal; and
`
`‘‘(ii) could be redressed through ap-
`
`pellate review.
`
`‘‘(2) ESTOPPEL.—If a court finds that a party
`
`lacks standing to bring an appeal described in sub-
`
`section (a) under article III of the Constitution of
`
`the United States, that party shall not be estopped
`
`under section 315(e) with respect to the underlying
`
`inter partes review.’’; and
`
`(4) in chapter 32—
`
`(A) in section 321(a), by inserting ‘‘, in-
`
`cluding a governmental entity,’’ after ‘‘a per-
`
`son’’;
`
`(B) in section 324—
`
`(i) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The
`
`Director may not authorize a post-grant
`
`review to be instituted unless’’ and insert-
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`16
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`17
`ing the following: ‘‘Subject only to the dis-
`
`cretion of the Director under section
`
`325(d)(4), a petition filed under section
`
`321 that meets the requirements of this
`
`chapter shall be instituted if’’; and
`
`(ii) in subsection (e)—
`
`(I) by inserting ‘‘or maintain’’
`
`after ‘‘to institute’’; and
`
`(II) by striking ‘‘section’’ and in-
`
`serting ‘‘chapter’’;
`
`(C) in section 325—
`
`(i) in subsection (a)—
`
`(I) in the subsection heading, by
`
`striking
`
`‘‘INFRINGER’S CIVIL AC-
`
`TION’’ and inserting ‘‘CIVIL ACTION’’;
`
`and
`
`(II) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(4) REQUEST FOR STAY.—
`
`‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If a party seeks a stay
`
`of a civil action brought under section 281 al-
`
`leging infringement of a patent that is also sub-
`
`ject to a post-grant review, the court shall de-
`
`cide whether to stay the civil action based on
`
`whether—
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`17
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`18
`‘‘(i) the outcome of the post-grant re-
`
`view will likely simplify the issues in ques-
`
`tion in the civil action and streamline the
`
`proceedings in the civil action;
`
`‘‘(ii) as of the date on which the stay
`
`is requested, discovery in the civil action is
`
`complete;
`
`‘‘(iii) a stay, or the denial thereof,
`
`would—
`
`‘‘(I) unduly prejudice the non-
`
`moving party; or
`
`‘‘(II) present a clear tactical ad-
`
`vantage for the moving party; and
`
`‘‘(iv) a stay, or the denial thereof, will
`
`reduce the burden of litigation on the par-
`
`ties to the civil action and the court.
`
`‘‘(B) REVIEW.—A party may take an im-
`
`mediate interlocutory appeal from the decision
`
`of a district court of the United States under
`
`subparagraph (A). The United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall review the
`
`district court’s decision to ensure consistent ap-
`
`plication of established precedent, and such re-
`
`view shall be de novo.’’;
`
`(ii) in subsection (c)—
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`18
`
`
`
`19
`(I) by striking ‘‘If more’’ and in-
`
`serting the following:
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If more’’; and
`
`(II) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(2) ESTOPPEL.—Any person joined as a party
`
`to a post-grant review, and any real party in interest
`
`or privy of such person, shall be estopped under sub-
`
`section (e) to the same extent as if that person, real
`
`party in interest, or privy had been the first peti-
`
`tioner in that post-grant review.’’;
`
`(iii) by striking subsection (d) and in-
`
`serting the following:
`
`‘‘(d) MULTIPLE PROCEEDINGS.—
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections
`
`135(a), 251, and 252, and chapter 30, during the
`
`pendency of any post-grant review under this chap-
`
`ter, if another proceeding or matter involving the
`
`patent is before the Office, or if there is a pending
`
`application claiming the benefit of a common filing
`
`date to the patent under section 120 or 121—
`
`‘‘(A) the parties shall notify the Director;
`
`and
`
`‘‘(B) the Director shall issue a decision de-
`
`termining the manner in which the other pro-
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`19
`
`
`
`20
`ceeding or matter may proceed, including pro-
`
`viding for stay, transfer, consolidation, or ter-
`
`mination of any such proceeding or matter.
`
`‘‘(2) NO EXTENSION.—A decision of the Direc-
`
`tor under paragraph (1)(B) may not—
`
`‘‘(A) extend any statutory deadline under
`
`this chapter; or
`
`‘‘(B) terminate an inter partes proceeding
`
`in favor of an ex parte proceeding.
`
`‘‘(3) PRESUMPTION.—For the purposes of this
`
`subsection, if the multiple proceedings described in
`
`paragraph (1) are of like type and are filed reason-
`
`ably close in time, there shall be a rebuttable pre-
`
`sumption that the Director shall consolidate the pro-
`
`ceedings under that paragraph.
`
`‘‘(4) CONSIDERATIONS.—In determining wheth-
`
`er to institute or order a proceeding under this chap-
`
`ter, chapter 30, or chapter 31, the Director may
`
`take into account whether, and reject the petition or
`
`request because, the same or substantially the same
`
`prior art or arguments previously were presented to
`
`the Office.’’; and
`
`(iv) in subsection (e)—
`
`(I) in paragraph (1)—
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`20
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`21
`
`(aa) by striking ‘‘The peti-
`
`tioner in’’ and inserting the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(A) ESTOPPEL AGAINST PETITIONER.—
`
`The petitioner in’’;
`
`(bb) in subparagraph (A), as
`
`so designated, by
`
`inserting
`
`‘‘,
`
`after the time for appeal of the
`
`decision has expired or any such
`
`appeal has terminated,’’ after
`
`‘‘may not’’; and
`
`(cc) by adding at the end
`
`the following:
`
`‘‘(B) ESTOPPEL
`
`AGAINST
`
`PATENT
`
`OWNER.—The Office may not issue to a patent
`
`owner any claim that is not patentably distinct
`
`from a claim that was issued and was subse-
`
`quently—
`
`‘‘(i) found to be unpatentable; or
`
`‘‘(ii) canceled in any proceeding before
`
`the Office, including under section 135,
`
`251, 253, 301, 311, or 321.’’; and
`
`(II) in paragraph (2)—
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`21
`
`
`
`22
`
`(aa) by inserting ‘‘that the
`
`claim is not unpatentable’’ after
`
`‘‘section 328(a)’’;
`
`(bb) by inserting ‘‘, after the
`
`time for appeal of the decision
`
`has expired or any such appeal
`
`has
`
`terminated,’’ after
`
`‘‘may
`
`not’’; and
`
`(cc) by inserting ‘‘or 1498’’
`
`after ‘‘section 1338’’;
`
`(D) in section 326—
`
`(i) in subsection (a)(11), by inserting
`
`‘‘or consolidation under section 325(d)’’
`
`after ‘‘under section 325(c)’’;
`
`(ii) in subsection (c)—
`
`(I) by striking ‘‘The Patent’’ and
`
`inserting the following:
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Patent’’; and
`
`(II) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(2) EX PARTE COMMUNICATION.—An officer
`
`who has review authority, supervisory authority, or
`
`disciplinary authority with respect to an administra-
`
`tive patent judge of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board (or a delegate of such an officer), and who is
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`22
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`23
`not a member of a panel described in section 6(c),
`
`shall refrain from ex parte communication with such
`
`a judge who is a member of that panel concerning
`
`any pending matter before that panel, except as al-
`
`lowed under the Code of Conduct for United States
`
`Judges.’’; and
`
`(iii) in subsection (e)—
`
`(I) by striking ‘‘In a’’ and insert-
`
`ing the following:
`
`‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In a’’;
`
`(II) in paragraph (1), as so des-
`
`ignated, by inserting ‘‘of challenged
`
`patent
`
`claims’’
`
`after
`
`‘‘unpatentability’’; and
`
`(III) by adding at the end the
`
`following:
`
`‘‘(2) CLAIM AMENDMENT.—For any substitute
`
`claim proposed under subsection (d)—
`
`‘‘(A) the patent owner shall have the bur-
`
`den of proving patentability, including under
`
`sections 101, 102, 103, and 112, by a prepon-
`
`derance of the evidence;
`
`‘‘(B) the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`shall—
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`‘‘(i) examine the substitute claim; or
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`23
`
`
`
`24
`notwithstanding
`
`‘‘(ii)
`
`subsection
`
`(c)(2), refer the substitute claim to the Di-
`
`rector, who shall cause an examination of
`
`the substitute claim to be made within the
`
`time limits for the applicable inter partes
`
`review; and
`
`‘‘(C) the Director may establish, by regula-
`
`tion, fees for examination of the substitute
`
`claim in such amounts as the Director deter-
`
`mines to be reasonable, taking into consider-
`
`ation the aggregate costs of examination.’’;
`
`(E) in section 328—
`
`(i) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘not
`
`later than 60 days after the date on which
`
`the parties to the post-grant review have
`
`informed the Director that the time for ap-
`
`peal has expired or any appeal has termi-
`
`nated,’’ after ‘‘the Director shall’’; and
`
`(ii) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(e) REHEARING.—Not later than 120 days after the
`
`date on which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issues
`
`a final written decision under subsection (a), the Board
`
`or the Director shall finally decide any request for recon-
`
`sideration, rehearing, or review that is submitted with re-
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`24
`
`
`
`25
`spect to the decision, except that the Director may, for
`
`good cause shown, extend that 120-day period by not more
`
`than 60 days.’’; and
`
`(F) in section 329—
`
`(i) in the first sentence, by striking
`
`‘‘A party’’ and inserting the following:
`
`‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A party’’; and
`
`(ii) by adding at the end the fol-
`
`lowing:
`
`‘‘(b) STANDING.—
`
`‘‘(1) INJURY IN FACT.—For the purposes of an
`
`appeal described in subsection (a), injury in fact
`
`shall be presumed if the party appealing the deci-
`
`sion—
`
`‘‘(A) reasonably expects that another per-
`
`son will assert estoppel against the party under
`
`section 325(e) as a result of the final written
`
`decision that is the subject of the appeal; or
`
`‘‘(B) suffers any other concrete and par-
`
`ticularized injury that—
`
`‘‘(i) is fairly traceable to the final
`
`written decision that is the subject of the
`
`appeal; and
`
`‘‘(ii) could be redressed through ap-
`
`pellate review.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`25
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`26
`‘‘(2) ESTOPPEL.—If a court finds that a party
`
`lacks standing to bring an appeal described in sub-
`
`section (a) under article III of the Constitution of
`
`the United States, that party shall not be estopped
`
`under section 325(e) with respect to the underlying
`
`post-grant review.’’.
`
`Æ
`
`VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\S2891.IS S2891
`
`•S 2891 IS
`
`kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
`
`26
`
`