`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper: 18
`Entered: November 16, 2022
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2022-00351
`Patent 10,622,842 B2
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, KARL D. EASTHOM, and
`MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`John Petrsoric
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00351
`Patent 10,622,842 B2
`
`
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd. (“Patent Owner”) filed a motion for pro
`hac vice admission of John Petrsoric in this proceeding (“Motion”).
`Paper 12. Patent Owner also filed a supporting declaration from
`Mr. Petrsoric. Ex. 2016. Patent Owner states that the Motion is unopposed.
`Paper 12, 2.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In its notice
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual
`seeking to appear in this proceeding. See Paper 3, 2 (citing Unified Patents,
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013)
`(Paper 7) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission”)).
`The Board has reviewed the submission and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met, and that there is good
`cause to admit Mr. Petrsoric pro hac vice.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of John
`Petrsoric is granted and Mr. Petrsoric is authorized to represent Patent
`Owner only as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner will continue to
`represent Patent Owner as lead counsel in the above-listed proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Petrsoric shall comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the Consolidated Office
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00351
`Patent 10,622,842 B2
`
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)) and the
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code
`of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Petrsoric is subject to the USPTO’s
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and to
`the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00351
`Patent 10,622,842 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Scott T. Jarratt
`Andrew S. Ehmke
`Calmann J. Clements
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`scott.jarratt.ipr@haynesboone.com
`andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`calmann.clements.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Brett Cooper
`Reza Mirzaie
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
