`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00351
`Patent 10,622,842
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JOHN PETRSORIC
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`I. RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00351
`Patent No. 10,622,842
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner Scramoge Technology Ltd.,
`
`respectfully requests that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board admit John Petrsoric
`
`pro hac vice in this proceeding. Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner, and
`
`Petitioner has stated that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`II. GOVERNING LAW, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) provides that “where lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered
`
`practitioner may be granted upon a showing that counsel is an experienced litigation
`
`attorney and has stablished familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding.”
`
`III. STATETENT OF FACTS
`
`This Motion for pro hac vice admission should be granted because good cause
`
`exists to recognize Mr. Petrsoric pro hac vice, as set forth herein and in the
`
`accompanying Declaration of John Petrsoric in Support of Motion for Admission
`
`Pro Hac Vice (Ex. 2016). Lead Counsel, Brett Cooper, is a registered practitioner.
`
`Counsel, John Petrsoric is an experienced patent litigator in good standing with the
`
`New York State Bar, admitted to practice before the United States District Courts
`
`for the Easter District of Texas, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District of New
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00351
`Patent No. 10,622,842
`
`York and Southern District of New York with no disciplinary actions or denials of
`
`admission.
`
`Mr. Petrsoric has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, and further understands that he
`
`will be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility.
`
`Mr. Petrsoric is counsel in the related district court litigation and has extensive
`
`experience representing Patent Owner in patent litigations. Mr. Petrsoric is
`
`intimately familiar with the substantive and technical issues involved in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit John Petrsoric pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Date: October 13, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Brett Cooper/
`Brett Cooper, Reg. No. 55,085
`Lead counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00351
`Patent No. 10,622,842
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F,R. § 42.6(e))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above document was served on
`
`October 13, 2022, by filing this document through the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Case Tracking System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the
`
`following attorneys of record for the Petitioner:
`
`Scott T. Jarratt (Reg No. 70,297)
`scott.jarratt.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Andrew S. Ehmke (Reg No. 50,271)
`andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Calmann J. Clements (Reg No. 66,910)
`calmann.clements.ipr@haynesboone.com
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`Phone: (972) 739-8663
`Fax: (214) 200-0853
`
`
`
`
`Date: October 13, 2022
`
` /Brett Cooper/
`
`
`
`
`
`Brett Cooper
`Reg. No. 55,085
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`BC Law Group
`200 Madison Ave., 24th Fl.
`New York, NY 90025
`(212) 951-0100
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
