throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00616-ADA Document 28 Filed 11/15/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00616-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court ORDERS that the
`
`following schedule will govern deadlines up to and including the trial of this matter:
`
`Deadline
`September 7, 2021
`
`Item
`Plaintiff serves preliminary1 infringement contentions in
`the form of a chart setting forth where in the accused
`product(s) each element of the asserted claim(s) are
`found. Plaintiff shall also identify the earliest priority
`date (i.e. the earliest date of invention) for each asserted
`claim and produce: (1) all documents evidencing
`conception and reduction to practice for each claimed
`invention, and (2) a copy of the file history for each patent
`in suit.
`
`1 The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity
`contentions without leave of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts
`to prepare its preliminary contentions and the amendment is based on material identified after those
`preliminary contentions were served, and should do so seasonably upon identifying any such
`material. Any amendment to add patent claims requires leave of court so that the Court can address
`any scheduling issues.
`
`1
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2013 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00616-ADA Document 28 Filed 11/15/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`Deadline
`September 27, 2021
`
`November 12, 2021
`
`November 24, 2021
`December 8, 2021
`December 15, 2021
`
`December 21, 2021
`
`January 7, 2022
`
`January 28, 2022
`February 11, 2022
`
`Item
`The Parties shall submit an agreed Scheduling Order. If
`the parties cannot agree, the parties shall submit a
`separate Joint Motion for entry of each Order briefly
`setting forth their respective positions on items where
`they cannot agree.
`Absent agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff shall be
`responsible for the timely submission of this and other
`Joint filings.
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in
`the form of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art
`references each element of the asserted claim(s) are
`found, (2) an identification of any limitations the
`Defendant contends are indefinite or lack written
`description under section 112, and (3) an identification of
`any claims the Defendant contends are directed to
`ineligible subject matter under section 101. Defendant
`shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced in the
`invalidity contentions and (2) technical documents,
`including software where applicable, sufficient to show
`the operation of the accused product(s).
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall
`disclose any extrinsic evidence, including the identity of
`any expert witness they may rely upon with respect to
`claim construction or indefiniteness. With respect to any
`expert identified, the parties shall identify the scope of
`the topics for the witness’s expected testimony.2 With
`respect to items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall
`identify each such item by production number or produce
`a copy of any such item if not previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute
`and exchange revised list of terms/constructions.
`Defendant files Opening claim construction brief,
`including any arguments that any claim terms are
`indefinite.
`Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.
`Defendant files Reply claim construction brief.
`
`2 Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied
`upon by the other party.
`
`2
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2013 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00616-ADA Document 28 Filed 11/15/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`Deadline
`February 25, 2022
`February 28, 2022
`February 28, 2022
`
`March 8, 2022
`March 9, 2022
`
`April 5, 2022
`April 19, 2022
`
`June 14, 2022
`
`August 19, 2022
`
`September 13, 2022
`September 23, 2022
`October 28, 2022
`November 18, 2022
`November 22, 2022
`
`Initial
`
`to serve
`
`Item
`Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief.
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court
`and technical advisor (if appointed).
`Markman Hearing, 9:00 a.m.
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline
`Disclosures per Rule 26(a).
`Deadline to add parties.
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity
`Contentions. After this date, leave of Court is required for
`any
`amendment
`to
`Infringement or
`Invalidity
`contentions. This deadline does not relieve the Parties of
`their obligation to seasonably amend if new information
`is identified after initial contentions.
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required
`unless the amendment adds patents or patent claims.
`(Note: This includes amendments in response to a 12(c)
`motion.)
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims asserted
`and the prior art references at issues. Unless the parties
`agree to the narrowing, they are ordered to contact the
`Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a teleconference with the
`Court to resolve the disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`Opening Expert Reports.
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confers to
`discuss narrowing the number of claims asserted and
`prior art references at issue to triable limits. To the
`extent it helps the parties determine these limits, the
`parties are encouraged to contact the Court’s Law Clerk
`for an estimate of the amount of trial time anticipated
`per side. The parties shall file a Joint Report within 5
`business days regarding the results of the meet and
`confer.
`
`3
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2013 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00616-ADA Document 28 Filed 11/15/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`Deadline
`December 6, 2022
`
`December 20, 2022
`
`January 10, 2023
`
`January 24, 2023
`
`February 7, 2023
`
`February 10, 2023
`
`3 business days before Final Pretrial
`Conference.
`
`February 20, 2023
`
`February 27, 2023
`
`to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal
`
`Item
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion
`deadline.
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits
`lists, witness
`lists,
`discovery
`and
`deposition
`designations).
`Serve objections
`disclosures.
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and file Motions
`in limine.
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and
`deposition designations); file oppositions to motions in
`limine
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real
`Time Reporting. If a daily transcript or real time
`reporting of court proceedings is requested for trial, the
`party or parties making said request shall file a notice
`with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Kristie
`Davis at kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining
`objections and disputes on motions in limine.
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to
`pretrial disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set the
`Final Pretrial Conference within 2-4 weeks of the trial
`date. The Court expects to set this date at the conclusion
`of the Markman Hearing.
`Jury Selection/Trial.
`
`SIGNED this 15th day of November, 2021.
`
`________________________________
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.
`Ex. 2013 - Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket