throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`and ANKER INNOVATIONS LTD.,1
`
`Petitioner,
`v.
`MYPAQ HOLDINGS LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2022-00311
`Patent No. 8,477,514
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Anker Innovations Ltd. filed a motion for joinder and a petition in IPR2022-01134
`and has been joined as a petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests the
`
`opportunity to present oral argument. As specified in the Board’s May 23, 2022
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper No. 12), oral argument for this IPR and IPR2022-00307,
`
`IPR2022-00308 and IPR2022-00312 are scheduled for February 23 and 24, 2023.
`
`Given the overlap in issues between this IPR and IPR2022-00312, Petitioner
`
`believes it would be efficient for these two IPRs to be argued together in a single
`
`combined hearing.
`
`Petitioner therefore requests a single combined hearing for this IPR and
`
`IPR2022-00312 with 90 minutes of argument per side (180 minutes total),
`
`including any time reserved for rebuttal, with Petitioner arguing first as the party
`
`with the burden of showing unpatentability. Alternatively, if the Board will hold a
`
`separate hearing in each of this IPR and IPR2022-00312, Petitioner requests 60
`
`minutes of argument per side (120 minutes total).
`
`Petitioner requests that the oral argument be held remotely by
`
`videoconference, rather than in person, consistent with the Board’s notice that the
`
`Board “will only conduct an in-person hearing when requested by all parties.” See
`
`<https://www.uspto.gov/patents/ptab/hearings>. Petitioner requests the ability to
`
`present demonstratives and exhibits to the Board during the videoconference (e.g.,
`
`using a “screen share” function), and the ability to have additional counsel attend
`
`the videoconference from separate locations (e.g., from Korea and Austin, TX,
`
`

`

`where Petitioner’s in-house counsel are located).
`
`If the Board requires an in-person hearing, then Petitioner requests that its
`
`attorneys be allowed to use computers at the hearing to avoid the need for the
`
`parties to bring entire paper copies of the record into the hearing room and to
`
`facilitate efficient answering of panel questions. Petitioner would also request the
`
`following equipment: an ELMO by the lectern to display printed documents, and
`
`an HDMI cable at counsel’s table to permit the display of documents from
`
`counsel’s laptop computer (e.g., PowerPoint or PDF slides).
`
`Petitioner requests oral hearing on all instituted grounds of unpatentability,
`
`disputed claim constructions, any motions to exclude, any procedural or
`
`evidentiary issues raised by the parties, and any additional issues or questions
`
`raised by the Board or the parties before or during the oral argument. Petitioner
`
`also requests oral argument on any issues raised by Patent Owner in its Request for
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /
`
`
`
` Eliot D. Williams /
`Eliot D. Williams
`Reg. No. 50,822
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Building One, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`T: (650) 739-7511
`F: (650) 739-7611
`
`
`Oral Argument.
`
`Dated: January 9, 2023
`
`

`

`Neil P. Sirota
`Reg. No. 38,306
`Eric J. Faragi
`Reg. No. 51,259
`Frank Zhu
`Reg. No. 71,214
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`New York, NY 10112
`T: (212) 408-2500
`F: (212) 408-2501
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`/ Paula Heyman /
`Paula Heyman
`Reg. No. 48,363
`Brett Thompsen
`Reg. No 69,985
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
`303 Colorado Street, Suite 2200
`Austin, TX 78701
`T: (512) 726-2600
`F: (512) 684-7732
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Dell Technologies Inc.
`
`
` /
`
` Ping Wang /
`Ping Wang
`Reg. No. 48,328
`RIMON PC
`1990 K Street, N.W., Suite 420
`Washington, DC 20006
`T: 202-519-2151
`
`Eric Cohen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Registration No. 27,429
`RIMON PC
`P.O. Box B1113
`150 Fayetteville St, Suite 2800
`Raleigh, NC 27601-2960
`T: 919-825-4877
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Anker Innovations Ltd.
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that on this 9th day of January,
`
`2023, the foregoing was served by email on the following counsel:
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`James T. Carmichael, Reg. No. 45,306
`jim@carmichaelip.com
`Stephen McBride, Reg. No. 78,396
`stevemcbride@camichaelip.com
`Minghui Yang, Reg No. 71,989
`mitch@carmichaelip.com
`Carmichael IP, PLLC
`8000 Towers Crescent Dr., 13th Floor
`Tysons, VA 22182
`
`
`
`Dated: January 9, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/ Eliot D. Williams /
`Eliot D. Williams
`Reg. No. 50,822
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Building One, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`T: (650) 739-7511
`F: (650) 739-7611
`Counsel for Petitioner Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket