throbber

`
`www.archive.org
`
`415.561.6767
`
`415.840-0391 e-fax
`
`
`
`Internet Archive
`
`300 Funston Avenue
`
`San Francisco, CA 94118
`
`_____________________
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF DUNCAN HALL
`
`
`
`1. I am a Records Request Processor at the Internet Archive, located in San Francisco,
`California. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge.
`
`
`2. The Internet Archive is a website that provides access to a digital library of Internet
`sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form. Like a paper library, we provide
`free access to researchers, historians, scholars, and the general public. The Internet
`Archive has partnered with and receives support from various institutions,
`including the Library of Congress.
`
`
`3. The Internet Archive has created a service known as the Wayback Machine. The
`Wayback Machine makes it possible to browse more than 450 billion pages stored
`in the Internet Archive's web archive. Visitors to the Wayback Machine can search
`archives by URL (i.e., a website address). If archived records for a URL are
`available, the visitor will be presented with a display of available dates. The visitor
`may select one of those dates, and begin browsing an archived version of the Web.
`Links on archived files in the Wayback Machine point to other archived files
`(whether HTML pages or other file types), if any are found for the URL indicated
`by a given link. For instance, the Wayback Machine is designed such that when a
`visitor clicks on a hyperlink on an archived page that points to another URL, the
`visitor will be served the archived file found for the hyperlink’s URL with the
`closest available date to the initial file containing the hyperlink.
`
`
`4. The archived data made viewable and browseable by the Wayback Machine is
`obtained by use of web archiving software that automatically stores copies of files
`available via the Internet, each file preserved as it existed at a particular point in
`time.
`
`
`5. The Internet Archive assigns a URL on its site to the archived files in the format
`http://web.archive.org/web/[Year in yyyy][Month in mm][Day in dd][Time code in
`hh:mm:ss]/[Archived URL] aka an “extended URL”. Thus, the extended URL
`http://web.archive.org/web/19970126045828/http://www.archive.org/ would be the
`URL for the record of the Internet Archive home page HTML file
`(http://www.archive.org/) archived on January 26, 1997 at 4:58 a.m. and 28
`seconds (1997/01/26 at 04:58:28). A web browser may be set such that a printout
`from it will display the URL of a web page in the printout’s footer. The date
`indicated by an extended URL applies to a preserved instance of a file for a given
`URL, but not necessarily to any other files linked therein. Thus, in the case of a
`page constituted by a primary HTML file and other separate files (e.g., files with
`images, audio, multimedia, design elements, or other embedded content) linked
`within that primary HTML file, the primary HTML file and the other files will each
`have their own respective extended URLs and may not have been archived on the
`same dates.
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 1
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`
`
`6. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and accurate copies of printouts of
`screenshots of the Internet Archive's records of the archived files for the URLs and
`the dates specified in the attached coversheet of each printout.
`
`
`7. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE: ________________________
`
`
`________________________
`Duncan Hall
`
`01/27/2021
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 2
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 3
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`https://web.archive.org/web/20090813064936/https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT006373
`77
`
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 4
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`https: //clinicaltrials.gov/ct2 /show/NCT00637377
`
`
`
`
`23 cancures
`18 Jan 2009 - 23 Jan 2017
`
`AU Y Aboutthis capture
`
`INTERNET ARCHIVE
`WAQUSEKMACNNE
`Skip to Main Content
`Home Study Topics Glossary Search
`
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov
`
`Aservice of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
`
`
`\[ Search |
`
`
`( Tabular View | [ No Study Results Posted
`
`Full Text View
`
`Related Studies
`
`|
`
`Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (VIEW 2)
`
`This study is currently recruiting participants.
`Verified by Bayer, July 2009
`
`First Received: March 12, 2008 Last Updated: July 3, 2009 History of Changes
`
`ClinicalTrials.goy Identifier:|NCT00637377
`
`Information provided by:
`
`a Purpose
`
`This study is a phascIII, double-masked,randomized,study of the cfficacy and safety of VEGF Trap-Eycin patients with ncovascular age-related macular degencration.
`Approximately 1200 patients will be randomized in Europe, Asia, Japan, Australia and South America.
`
`
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`
`Phase III
`
`Macular Degeneration
`
`Study Type:
`Study Design:
`
`Interventional
`‘Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
`
`Official Title:|A Randomized, Double Masked, Active Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Dosesof Intravitreal VEGF Trap in Subjects
`With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).
`
`Resourcelinks provided by NLM:
`
`Genetics Home Referencerelated topics: X-linked juvenile retinoschisis
`
`MedlinePlusrelated topics: Macular Degeneration
`
`Drug Informationavailable for: Ranibizumab Aflibercept
`U.S. FDA Resources
`
`Further study details as provided by Bayer:
`
`Primary Outcome Measures:
`e The proportion of subjects who maintain vision at Week 52, where a subjectis classified as maintaining vision if the subject has lost fewer than 15 letters on the ETDRSchart
`comparedto baseline (ie, prevention of moderate vision loss) [ Time Frame: week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes]
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures:
`* Mean change from baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRSletter score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`© The proportion of subjects who gainatleast 15 letters of vision at Week 52 [ Time Frame: week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`* Mean change from baseline in total NEI VFQ-25 score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`e Mcan changefrom baseline in CNV arca at Weck 52 [ Time Frame: weck 52 ] [ Designated as safcty issuc: Yes ]
`
`Estimated Enrollment:
`Study Start Date:
`Estimated Study Completion Date:
`Estimated Primary Completion Date:
`
`1200
`April 2008
`September 2011
`July 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
`
`Assigned Interventions
`
`less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`Arm 3:
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGFTrap-Eye administered every 8 weeks (including one additional 2,0 mg dose at Week 4)during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be
`administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but noless frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`Arm 1:
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGFTrap-Eye
`0.5 mg VEGFTrap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during thefirst year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but no
`
`Arm 2:
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks duringthefirst year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but no
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 5
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 5
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`Jess MeYyUCuUy Wall CVeLy 14 WeeKS.
`
`Arm 4: Active
`Comparator
`
`every 12 weeks.
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`0.5 mg administered every 4 weeks duringthe first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks,but no less frequently than
`
`& Eligibility
`
`Ages Eligible for Study:
`GendersEligible for Study:
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
`Criteria
`
`Inclusion Criteria:
`
`50 Years and older
`Both
`No
`
`e Signed informed consent.
`¢ Men and women >/=50 years of age.
`¢ Active primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to AMD,including juxtafoveallesionsthat affect the fovea as evidenced by FAin the studyeye.
`e ETDRSbest-corrected visual acuity of: 20/40 to 20/320 (letter score of 73 to 25) in the studyeye at 4 meters.
`e Willing, committed, and able to return for ALL clinic visits and complete all study-rclated procedures.
`Able toread,(or, if unable to read due to visual impairment, be read to verbatim bythe person administering the informed consentor a family member) understand and
`willing to sign the informed consent form.
`Exclusion Criteria:
`
`e Anyprior ocular (in the study eye) or systemic treatmentor surgery for neovascular AMD, except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`e Anyprior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agentto treat neovascular AMDin the study eye.
`Anyprior treatment with anti-VEGFagentsin the study eye.
`Total lesion size >12 disc areas (30.5 mm�, including blood, scars and neovascularization) as assessed by FAin the study eye.
`Subretinal hemorrhagesthat is cither 50% or morcof the total lesion area, or if the blood is underthe fovea and is 1 or moredisc arcas in size in the studycye (if the bloodis
`underthe fovea, then the fovea must be surrounded by 270 degrees by visible CNV).
`Scar or fibrosis making up >50% of thetotal lesion in the study cyc.
`Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye.
`Presenceofretinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the maculain the study eye.
`¢ History of any vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeksprior to Visit | in the study eye.
`Presenceof other causes of CNVin the study eye.
`¢ Prior vitrectomyin the study eye.
`¢ Historyof retinal detachmentor treatmentor surgery for retinal detachmentin the study eye.
`e Any history of macular hole of stage 2 and abovein the study eye.
`e Any intraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months of Day 1 onthe study eye, except lid surgery, which may not have taken place within 1 month of Day 1, as long asitis
`unlikely to interfere with the injection.
`¢ Historyor clinical evidence ofdiabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edemaoranyretinal vascular disease other than AMDineither eye.
`
`® Contacts and Locations
`
`Pleasereferto this study byits ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00637377
`
`Contacts
`
`Contact: Bayer Clinical Trials Contact
`
`clinical-trials-contact@bayerhealthcare.com
`
`“4H Show 212 Study Locations
`
`Sponsors and Collaborators
`Bayer
`
`Investigators
`Study Director: Bayer Study Director Bayer
`
`® More Information
`
`Additional Information:
`
`Click here and search for drug information provided by the FDA Et)
`
`Click here and search for information on any recalls, market or product safetyalerts by the FDA which might have occurred with this product il
`
`Click hereto find results for studies related to marketed products Ei)
`
`Nopublications provided
`
`Bayer Schering Pharma AG ( Therapeutic Area Head )
`Responsible Party:
`91689, EurdaCT No.: 2007-000583-25
`Study ID Numbers:
`March 12, 2008
`Study First Received:
`July 3, 2009
`Last Updated:
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00637377 History of Changes
`Health Authority:
`Switzerland: Ethikkommission
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 6
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 6
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`Keywordsprovided byBayer:
`Eye diseases
`Vision Impairment and Blindness
`Eyes and Vision
`
`Study placed in the following topic categories:
`Eye Diseases
`Mitogens
`Retinal Degeneration
`Macular Degeneration
`Additional relevant MeSH terms:
`Growth Substances
`Eye Diseases
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`Retinal Degeneration
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on August 12, 2009
`
`Back to top of Main Content
`
`Seniors
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
`Retinal Disease
`
`Blindness
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Retinal Discases
`Vision, Low
`
`Macular Degeneration
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Pharmacologic Actions
`Retinal Diseases
`
`Contact Help Desk
`Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine,
`US. NationalInstitutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services,
`USA.gov, Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility, Freedom of Information Act
`mn
`
`
`
`serraG
`
`
`Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 7
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 7
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`https://web.archive.org/web/20090911163626/https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT005097
`95
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 8
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`INTERNET ARCHIVE
`wayoselmachine
`
`
`
`
`https: //clinicaltrials.gov/ct2 /show/NCT00509795
`
`
`21 captures
`1 Dec 2008 - 23 Sep 2020
`
`‘Y_Aboutthis capture
`
`
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov PSSareasSiteTopics SiesestyBois
`
`
`
`
`Aservice of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
`| Search
`No Study Results Posted
`
`Full Text View
`
`Tabular View
`
`Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor(VEGF)Trap-Eye:Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration(AMD)(VIEW 1)
`
`This studyis currently recruiting participants.
`Verified by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, April 2009
`First Received: July 31, 2007 Last Updated: April 28, 2009 History of Changes
`
`Sponsorsand Collaborators: oo Pharmaceuticals
`
`Purpose
`This study is a phaseIII, double-masked, randomized,studyof the efficacy and safety of VEGF Trap-Eyein patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Approximately
`1200 patients will be randomized in the US and Canada.
`
`
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`
`PhaseIII
`
`Macular Degeneration
`
`Interventional
`Study Type:
`Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
`Official Title:|A Randomized, Double Masked,Active Controlled PhaseIII Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated DosesofIntravitreal VEGF Trap in Subjects With
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
`
`Resourcelinks provided by NLM:
`
`Genetics Home Referencerelated topics: X-linked juvenile retinoschisis
`
`MedlinePlusrelated topics: Macular Degeneration
`Drug Information available for: Ranibizumab Aflibercept
`U.S. FDA Resources
`
`Further study details as provided by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals:
`Primary Outcome Measures:
`* The proportion of subjects who maintain vision at Week 52, where a subjectis classified as maintaining vision if the subject has lost fewer than 15 letters on the ETDRS
`chart comparedto baseline(i.e. prevention of moderate vision loss) [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures:
`+ Mean changefrom baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRSletter score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] [ Designatedassafety issue: Yes]
`¢ The proportion of subjects whogain atleast15 letters of vision at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] [ Designated assafety issue: No]
`« Mean changefrom baselinein total NEI VFQ-25 score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`« Mean change from baseline in CNV area at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes]
`
`1200
`Estimated Enrollment:
`August 2007
`Study Start Date:
`December 2011
`Estimated Study Completion Date:
`Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
`
`jams|AssignedInterventions
`1:
`Drug: VEGFTrap-Eye
`Experimental
`0.5 mg VEGFTrap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during thefirst year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but
`no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`Drug: VEGFTrap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGFTrap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during thefirst year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but
`no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`Drug: VEGFTrap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGFTrap-Eye administered every 8 weeks (including one additional 2.0 mg dose at week4) during thefirst year. Thereafter a dose may be
`administered as frequently as every 4 weeks,but no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`2:
`Experimental
`
`than every 12 weeks.
`
`3:
`Experimental
`
`4: Active
`Comparator
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`0.5 mg administered every 4 weeksduringthefirst year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks,but noless frequently
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 9
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 9
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`Eligibility
`
`AgesEligible for Study:
`GendersEligible for Study:
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
`Criteria
`
`50 Years and older
`Both
`No
`
`KeyInclusion Criteria:
`1. Signed Informed Consent.
`2. Men and women 250yearsof age.
`3. Active primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to AMD,including juxtafoveallesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye.
`4. ETDRSbest-corrected visual acuity of: 20/40 to 20/320 (letter score of 73 to 25) in the study eye.
`5. Willing, committed, and ableto return for ALLclinic visits and complete all study-related procedures.
`6. Able to read,(or, if unable to read dueto visual impairment, be read to verbatim by the person administering the informed consentor a family member. See Appendix J.4)
`understand andwilling to sign the informed consent form.
`Key Exclusion Criteria:
`1. Anyprior ocular(in the study eye) or systemic treatment or surgery for neovascular AMD except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`. Any prior or concomitant therapy with anotherinvestigational agent to treat neovascular AMD in the study eye, except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`. Any prior treatment with anti-VEGF agentsin the study eye.
`. Total lesion size > 12 disc areas (30.5 mm2,including blood, scars and neovascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye.
`
`ahrwn. Subretinal hemorrhagethat is either 50%or more of thetotal lesion area,orif the blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more discareasin size in the study eye. (If the blood
`oN
`
`is under the fovea, then the fovea must be surrounded 270 degreesbyvisible CNV.)
`. Sear or fibrosis, making up > 50%of total lesion in the study eye.
`. Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the center of the fovea.
`. Presenceofretinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the maculain the study eye.
`9. History of any vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeksprior to Visit 1
`in the study eye.
`10. Presence of other causes of CNVin the study eye.
`11. History orclinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edemaor any other vascular disease affecting the retina,other than AMD, in either eye.
`12. Prior vitrectomyin the study eye.
`13. History of retinal detachmentor treatment or surgery for retinal detachmentin the study eye.
`14. Anyhistory of macular hole of stage 2 and abovein the study eye.
`15. Anyintraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months of Day 1 on the study eye, exceptlid surgery, which may not have takenplace within 1 month of day1, as longas its
`unlikely to interfere with the injection.
`
`Contacts and Locations
`
`Pleaserefer to this study byits ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00509795
`
`Contacts
`Contact: Regeneron
`
`866-549-8439 VIEW1study@rip.ppdi.com
`
`“}| Show 191 Study Locations
`Sponsors andCollaborators
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`Bayer
`Investigators
`Study Director: Avner Ingerman, MD Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`
`MoreInformation
`
`No publications provided
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals ( Dr. Avner Ingerman)
`Responsible Party:
`VGFT-OD-0605
`Study ID Numbers:
`July 31, 2007
`Study First Received:
`April 28, 2009
`Last Updated:
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00509795—_History of Changes
`Health Authority:
`United States: Food and Drug Administration; Canada: Health Canada
`
`Study placedin the following topic categories:
`Eye Diseases
`Mitogens
`Retinal Degeneration
`Additional relevant MeSH terms:
`Growth Substances
`Eye Diseases
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`Retinal Degeneration
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 11, 2009
`
`Macular Degeneration
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Retinal Diseases
`
`Macular Degeneration
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Pharmacologic Actions
`Retinal Diseases
`
`Contact Help Desk
`Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. NationalLibrary of Medicine,
`U.S. NationalInstitutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services,
`USA.gov, Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility, Freedom of Information Act
`
`|WS. National Institutes of Health lpWS. National Library of Medicine apWS. Departmentof Health & Human Services
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 10
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 10
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

` JURAT
`
`State/Commonwealth of _____________________
`
` City County of ______________________
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`On __________________, before me, _________________________________________ ,
`Date
`Notary Name
` the foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me by:
`
`________________________________________________________________________.
`Name of Affiant(s)
` Personally known to me -- OR --
`
` Proved to me on the basis of the oath of _____________________________ -- OR --
`Name of Credible Witness
` Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence: ________________________________
`Type of ID Presented
`
`WITNESS my hand and official seal.
`
`Notary Public Signature: _________________________
`
`Notary Name:__________________________________
`Notary Commission Number:______________________
`Notary Commission Expires:______________________
`Notarized online using audio-video communication
`
`DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
`
`Title or Type of Document: ____________________________________________________
`
`Document Date: ________________________________
`
`Number of Pages (including notarial certificate): _____________
`
`FLORIDA
`
`Broward
`
`01/27/2021
`
`Mikhail Clarke
`
`Duncan Hall
`
`driver_license
`
`Notarized online using audio-video communication
`
`Mikhail Clarke
`HH7610
`06/08/2024
`
`Affidavit of Authenticity
`
`01/27/2021
`
`11
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1087
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 11
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket