`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
` INGENIOSHARE, LLC,
` Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00295
`Patent No. 10,492,038
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`_____________________________________________________
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD, PTAB
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent Owner IngenioShare, LLC
`
`(“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests oral argument in the above-identified
`
`proceedings, currently scheduled for March 8, 2023.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), and without waiving the right to raise any
`
`additional issues not listed below, Patent Owner requests an oral hearing on the
`
`following issues:
`
`1. Any issues raised by Petitioner in this proceeding, including in the
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review and Reply, and including whether any
`
`challenged claim of U.S. Patent No. 10,492,038 is unpatentable.
`
`2. Any issues raised by Patent Owner in this proceeding, including in Patent
`
`Owner’s Response and Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply.
`
`3. Any issue raised by any of the Parties to this proceeding.
`
`4. Any motions to exclude evidence filed by a Party to this proceeding.
`
`5. Any other motions or filings pending before this Board.
`
`6. Any additional issues raised by Petitioners in any Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`7. Any additional issues raised by the Board or Petitioner at oral argument.
`
`In the interest of efficiency, and consistent with the Board’s order setting a
`
`single hearing date for both IPR2022-00294 and IPR2022-00295, Patent Owner
`
`requests that these related proceedings be consolidated and argued in one hearing.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Given the overlap in issues and evidence in IPR2022-00294 and IPR2022-00295,
`
`Patent Owner believes that one (1) hour per side is sufficient. Patent Owner also
`
`requests the opportunity to reserve a portion of its allocated time for sur-rebuttal.
`
`Pursuant to the USPTO’s notice regarding Patent Trial and Appeal Board oral
`
`hearings occurring on/after July 11, 2022, Patent Owner states that it would like to
`
`participate via remote video.
`
`Respectfully submitted this 25th day of January, 2023,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Stephen R. Risley/
`
`Stephen R. Risley
`Email: steverisley@kentrisley.com
`Telephone: (404) 585-2101
`Cortney S. Alexander
`Email: cortneyalexander@kentrisley.com
`Telephone: (404) 855-3867
`
`KENT & RISLEY LLC
`5755 North Point Parkway, Suite 57
`Alpharetta, GA 30022
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner,
`IngenioShare, LLC
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Request For Oral Argument was served on January 25, 2023, via email on the
`
`following counsel for Petitioners:
`
`W. Todd Baker (No. 45,265)
`todd.baker@kirkland.com
`Postal and Hand-Delivery Address:
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`Telephone: (202) 389-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 389-5200
`
`Yimeng Dou (No. 69,770)
`yimeng.dou@kirkland.com
`Postal and Hand-Delivery Address:
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`555 South Flower Street, Suite 3700
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 680-8400
`Facsimile: (213) 680-8500
`
`KENT & RISLEY LLC
`
`
`/Stephen R. Risley/
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
