throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INGENIOSHARE, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 10,142,810
`U.S. PATENT NO. 10,708,727
`U.S. PATENT NO. 10,492,038
`
`Case IPR2022-00202
`Case IPR2022-00291
`Case IPR2022-00294
`Case IPR2022-00295
`
`DECLARATION OF LINDSEY Y. SHI IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF
`PETITIONER EPIC GAMES, INC.
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1044
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00294 p. 1
`
`

`

`I, Lindsey Y. Shi, do hereby declare:
`
`IPR2022-00202
`IPR2022-00291
`IPR2022-00294
`IPR2022-00295
`
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner in the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP (“Kirkland”).
`
`Lead counsel in these inter partes review proceedings is W. Todd Baker, who is also
`
`a Kirkland partner, is registered to practice before the PTO, and holds Registration
`
`No. 45,265. With respect to these proceedings, I work closely with Mr. Baker.
`
`2.
`
`I hold a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the
`
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology. I hold a Juris Doctor degree from the
`
`University of California, Los Angeles School of Law.
`
`3.
`
`I have more than seven years of experience as a litigation attorney
`
`specializing in patent litigation. I represent clients in patent litigation matters in
`
`various United States District Courts. My experience includes, in relevant part, many
`
`matters related to computer systems, computer architectures, computer-based
`
`communications, and networked computer technologies. I am, therefore, an
`
`experienced patent litigation attorney with particular experience relevant to the
`
`technological and legal matters at issue in these proceedings. Petitioner Epic Games,
`
`Inc. desires and has a need to be represented in these these proceedings by an
`
`experienced patent litigation attorney who has particular expertise relevant to the
`
`issues in these proceedings.
`
`4.
`
`I am very familiar with U.S. Patent Nos. 10,142,810, 10,708,727, and
`2
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1044
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00294 p. 2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00202
`IPR2022-00291
`IPR2022-00294
`IPR2022-00295
`
`10,492,038 and with the legal subject matter, technical subject matter, and prior art
`
`discussed in Petitioner’s requests for inter partes review of these patents, which form
`
`the basis for these proceedings. I was counsel for Petitioner in the previous district
`
`court action related to these patents (IngenioShare, LLC v. Epic Games, Inc., Civil
`
`Action No. 21-cv-00663-ADA (W.D. Tex.), filed June 25, 2021) and was involved
`
`with factual and technical developments in that matter.
`
`5.
`
`In the present proceedings, I took the deposition of Patent Owner’s
`
`expert witness, Dr. George Rouskas, on October 27–28, 2022. Unintentionally, I
`
`had not yet moved to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Petitioner at the time of the
`
`deposition. However, lead counsel for Petitioner, W. Todd Baker (Reg. No. 45,265)
`
`served as second chair at the deposition of Dr. Rouskas and was present throughout
`
`the entire deposition. Counsel for Patent Owner made no objection to my
`
`participation in the deposition and does not oppose my motion to appear pro hac
`
`vice.
`
`6.
`
`After discovering my omission, I promptly prepared my declaration and
`
`concurrent motion to appear pro hac vice.
`
`7.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California. I
`
`am admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Northern
`
`District of California and United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
`3
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1044
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00294 p. 3
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00202
`IPR2022-00291
`IPR2022-00294
`IPR2022-00295
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`8.
`
`or administrative body.
`
`9.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application for
`
`admission to practice.
`
`10.
`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`11.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board's Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`12.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`13.
`
`I have participated in preparing multiple inter partes review petitions.
`
`In the past three years, I was admitted pro hac vice as counsel before the PTAB in
`
`Intel Corp. v. PACT XPP SCHWEIZ AG, IPR2020-00518.
`
`14.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful, false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`4
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1044
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00294 p. 4
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00202
`IPR2022-00291
`IPR2022-00294
`IPR2022-00295
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 9, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Lindsey Y. Shi
`Lindsey Y. Shi
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1044
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00294 p. 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket