throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
`----------------------------X
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`) U.S. Patent No.
`) 10,142,810
`Petitioner,
` Case IPR2022-00202
`IPR2022-00291
`IPR2022-00294
`IPR2022-00295
`
`)
` vs.
`)
`)
`INGENIOSHARE, LLC,
`)
`Patent Owner. )
`----------------------------X
`
`))
`
`VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`GEORGE N. ROUSKAS, Ph.D. (VOLUME I)
`Thursday, October 27, 2022
`(Taken by Petitioner)
`
`Reported by:
`Christine A. Taylor, RPR,
`Job No.: 5945
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 1
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` Videotaped deposition of GEORGE N.
`ROUSKAS, Ph.D., taken before CHRISTINE A.
`TAYLOR, Registered Professional Reporter, held
`on Thursday, October 27, 2022, at Residence Inn
`by Marriott, 616 South Salisbury Street,
`Raleigh, North Carolina, commencing at
`10:05 a.m.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 2
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` Representing the Petitioner:
` KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
` LINDSEY SHI, ESQ.
` W. TODD BAKER, ESQ. (Washington, D.C.)
` YIMENG DOU, ESQ. (via Zoom)
` SOPHIA LEE, ESQ. (via Zoom)
` 555 South Flower Street, Suite 3700
` Los Angeles, California 90071
` 213.680.8400
` lindsey.shi@kirkland.com
` w.baker@kirkland.com
` yimeng.dou@kirkland.com
` sophia.lee@kirkland.com
`
` Representing the Patent Owner:
` KENT & RISLEY, LLC
` STEPHEN R. RISLEY, ESQ.
` 5755 North Point Parkway, Suite 57
` Alpharetta, Georgia 30022
` 404.585.2101
` steverisley@kentrisley.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 3
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
`
` Dr. Kevin Almeroth, University of
` California at Santa Barbara
`
` Brent Troublefield, Videographer
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 4
`
`

`

` C O N T E N T S
` PAGE
`EXAMINATION BY MR. SHI 8
`
`Page 5
`
` * * *
`
` E X H I B I T S
` EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit 1 U.S. Patent Number 10,142,810 Claim 12
` Listing
`Exhibit 2 U.S. Patent Number 10,708,727 Claim 13
` Listing
`Exhibit 3 U.S. Patent Number 10,492,038 Claim 14
` Listing
`Exhibit 4 Declaration of Professor George N. 16
` Rouskas, Ph.D. regarding Patent
` 10,142,810
`Exhibit 5 Declaration of Professor Geroge N. 18
` Rouskas, Ph.D. regarding Patent
` 10,708,727
`Exhibit 6 Declaration of Professor George N. 19
` Rouskas, Ph.D. regarding Patent
` 10,492,038
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5 6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 5
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`22
`
`34
`
`42
`
`Exhibit 7 Declaration of Professor George N.
`Rouskas, Ph.D. regarding Patent
`10,492,038
`Exhibit 8 March 2022 Curriculum Vitae of
`George N. Rouskas
`Exhibit 9 8/22/2002 U.S. Patent Application
`Publication, Diacakis et al.,
`2002/0116461 A1
`62
`Exhibit 10 Techopedia web page
`71
`Exhibit 11 TechTarget web page
`Exhibit 12 11/27/2018 U.S. Patent 10,142,810 B2 86
`Exhibit 13 1/1/2004 Patent Application US
`215
`2004/0001480 A1 (Tanigawa)
`Exhibit 14 9/23/2008 Patent US 7,428,580 B2
`(Hullfish)
`
`216
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 6
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`P R O C E E D I N G S
`- - -
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: On record at
`10:05 a.m. Today's date is October 27,
`2022. This is the video deposition of
`Dr. George Rouskas taken in the matter of
`Epic Games, Incorporated, Petitioner,
`versus IngenioShare, LLC, Patent Owner for
`U.S. Patent Numbers 10,142,810, and cases
`IPR 2022-00202, also in 291, 294, and 295.
`Would counsel please introduce
`themselves and then our court reporter will
`swear in our witness.
`MR. SHI: Good morning. My name is
`Lindsay Shi, I'm an attorney at Kirkland &
`Ellis here on behalf of Petitioner, Epic
`Games. With me is Todd Baker and Sophia
`Lee appearing by Zoom. Also with me is
`Dr. Kevin Almeroth, a professor at the
`University of California at Santa Barbara.
`MR. RISLEY: Good morning. This is
`Steve Risley appearing on behalf of the
`Patent Owner, IngenioShare.
`- - -
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 7
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`GEORGE N. ROUSKAS,
`having first been duly sworn, was examined
`and testified as follows:
`- - -
`EXAMINATION
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Good morning, Dr. Rouskas.
`Q.
`Good morning.
`A.
`Could you please state your full
`Q.
` name and spell it for the record?
`A.
`Yes. My name is George Rouskas,
`G-E-O-R-G-E, R-O-U-S-K-A-S.
`Q.
`Thank you. What is your home
` address?
`My home address is 7117 Misty
`A.
` Springs Court, Cary, North Carolina 27519.
`Q.
`Dr. Rouskas, have you been deposed
` before?
`I have.
`A.
`How many times?
`Q.
`I don't know the exact number, but
`A.
` it's probably between seven and ten times.
`Q.
`Okay. So since you've been deposed
` before, I won't spend too much time going over
` the ground rules. But I just wanted to, you
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 8
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` know, set a few ground rules down.
` So now I'm going to ask you some
` questions over the course of the day and you
` need to give me verbal answers. Does that make
` sense?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So there's no "uh-huh" or "huh-uh,"
` but, you know, a yes or no, that sort of thing.
` A. I understand.
` Q. Okay. If you don't understand my
` question, you can ask me to clarify it. Is
` that okay?
` A. Yes.
` Q. If you answer my question, I'll
` assume that you understood the question. Is
` that fair?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. If you answer my question, I'll
` assume that you understood the question. Is
` that fair?
` MR. RISLEY: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Do you understand that you're under
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 9
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` oath today?
`A.
`I do.
`Q.
`And so you understand that you're
` under oath to give truthful, complete, and
` accurate testimony today?
`A.
`Yes, I do.
`Q.
`Is there any reason that you can't
` provide your best truthful testimony today?
`A.
`Not that I can think of.
`Q.
`Great. And you understand that this
` deposition is part of an inter partes review or
` IPR proceeding related to three IngenioShare
` patents; right?
`A.
`I understand that.
`Q.
`Okay. Over the course of the day
` your attorney may object from time to time.
` But unless he instructs you not to answer, do
` you understand that you should answer the
` questions?
`I understand.
`A.
`Okay. And we can take breaks
`Q.
` through the course of the day, but I would just
` like to ask that if there's a question pending
` that you answer the question before we go on a
` break. Is that okay?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 10
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Yes, that is okay.
`A.
`Great. Now, Dr. Rouskas, in this
`Q.
` case you submitted four different declarations
` related to these IPR petitions; correct?
`A.
`That is correct.
`Q.
`And these four declarations, one is
` related to the -- what we're calling the '810
` Patent; is that right?
`A.
`That is correct.
`Q.
`One is related to the '727 Patent?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And two of your declarations are
` related to what we're calling the '038 or the
` '038 Patent, right?
`A.
`'038, yes.
`Q.
`Okay. You understand that for each
` of these patents, my client, Epic Games, has
` challenged certain of these claims; right?
`A.
`I understand.
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Sorry, can you --
`Q.
`I understand.
`A.
`Great. The opinions in your
`Q.
` declarations focus on these particularly
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 11
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` challenged claims; right?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Yes, they do.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Okay. So let's take a look at these
`Q.
` claims and mark some exhibits. So I'm handing
` you what we'll mark as Exhibit 1.
`(Exhibit 1 marked for
` identification.)
`It's titled, "U.S. Patent Number
` 10,142,810 Claim Listing." Do you see that?
`A.
`I see that.
`Q.
`Do you recognize this exhibit?
`A.
`Not in this form.
`Q.
`You don't recognize this exhibit?
`A.
`It does say it's the claim listing.
` But, as I said, I've reviewed the claims of the
` '810 Patent, but as part of the patent itself.
`Q.
`Do you see at the bottom of
` Exhibit 1 there's a footnote that says Epic
` Games Exhibit 1033, page 1?
`A.
`I do.
`Q.
`So is it your understanding that
` this exhibit is Exhibit 1033 to the petition
` for the '810 Patent?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 12
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Okay. Now that you mention it, yes,
` I remember I have seen this.
` Q. Okay. So your testimony is that you
` do recognize this Exhibit 1; is that right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Just for the record, this is
` a list of the claims challenged in the '810
` petition; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Let's mark a second exhibit.
` I'm handing you what will be marked as
` Exhibit 2. I'm going to make a big stack here
` in a second.
` (Exhibit 2 marked for
` identification.)
` Dr. Rouskas, this is a document
` titled, "U.S. Patent Number 10,708,727 Claim
` Listing." Do you see that.
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. Do you recognize this exhibit?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. This is a list of the claims
` challenged in the '727 petition; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you've seen this before?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 13
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. I have seen this before, yes.
` Q. Great. And I have one more to mark
` at this point. I'm handing you what's to be
` marked as Exhibit 3.
` (Exhibit 3 marked for
` identification.)
` Dr. Rouskas, I've handed you what's
` to be marked as Exhibit 3, which is a document
` titled, "U.S. Patent Number 10,492,038 Claim
` Listing." Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. Do you recognize this exhibit?
` A. I do.
` Q. This is a list of the claims
` challenged in the '038 petition; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So you're familiar with all of the
` claims that are laid out in Exhibits 1, 2, and
` 3; right?
` A. Yes, that's correct.
` Q. Okay. Dr. Rouskas, you understand
` that the '810, '727, and the '038 patents are
` in the same patent family; right?
` A. I understand that, yes.
` Q. You understand that the
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 14
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` specifications for these three patents largely
` overlap; right?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And, in fact, these three patents
` have many of the same claim elements in common;
` right?
`To some degree there are common
`A.
` elements, yes.
`Q.
`Right. There are some common
` elements between the challenged claims of all
` three of these patents; right?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Is it fair to say that if two or
` three of these patents have the same limitation
` or similar -- a similar limitation, is it fair
` to say that your analysis of that limitation is
` the same across those patents?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Generally speaking,
`
`yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
`Okay. So, generally speaking, if
`Q.
` two or three of the patents that we're talking
` about, the '810, the '727, and '038 patents,
` have the same or similar limitations, it's fair
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 15
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` to say that in general your analysis of that
` limitation is the same across those patents?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. And I'm only asking for the sake of
` efficiency so I don't have to ask you the same
` question, you know, three or four times.
` So let me ask you this. If at some
` point today or tomorrow if we talk about a
` section of one of your declarations and that
` section appears similarly in your other
` declarations, is it fair to say that that
` discussion will apply to those other
` declarations?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Generally, yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Okay. Thank you. So with that out
` of the way, I want to hand you -- I'm handing
` you an exhibit to be marked as Exhibit 4.
` (Exhibit 4 marked for
` identification.)
` Dr. Rouskas, do you recognize this
` exhibit?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 16
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. I do.
` Q. Can you explain what this exhibit
` is?
` A. This exhibit is my declaration
` regarding the '810 Patent.
` Q. This is the declaration that you
` signed in this proceeding related to the '810
` petition?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Now, does this declaration,
` Exhibit 4, reflect a complete expression of
` your opinions in this proceeding?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: It does.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. So all of your opinions related to
` the '810 Patent you have in this case are
` contained in this declaration, Exhibit 4;
` correct?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Correct.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Since -- since the time that you
` issued this declaration, have you changed any
` of your opinions with respect to the '810
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 17
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Patent?
`No.
`A.
`Okay. Are there any corrections or
`Q.
` additions to this declaration, Exhibit 4, that
` you'd like to make today?
`A.
`There may be some typos here and
` there, but other than that, I don't think that
` there's any changes, at least not in terms of
` the opinions themselves.
`Q.
`I see. So other than -- other than
` typos here and there, you have no substantive
` changes to the opinions that are contained
` within Exhibit 4; right?
`A.
`That is correct.
`Q.
`Great. So I'm going to hand you an
` exhibit to be marked as Exhibit 5.
`(Exhibit 5 marked for
` identification.)
`Dr. Rouskas, do you recognize
`
` Exhibit 5?
`I do.
`A.
`Can you explain what it is?
`Q.
`Yes. This is the declaration of --
`A.
` that I signed for the '727 Patent.
`Q.
`So similar questions. Is this
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 18
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` declaration, Exhibit 5, a complete expression
` of your opinions in the '727 IPR proceeding?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: It is.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`So all of your opinions with respect
`Q.
` to the '727 Patent are contained in this
` declaration; right?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Yes.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Since you issued this declaration,
`Q.
` have you changed any of your opinions with
` respect to the '727 Patent?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`Other than typographical errors, are
` there any corrections or additions to this
` declaration, Exhibit 5, that you'd like to make
` today?
`No.
`A.
`All right. I'm going to hand you a
`Q.
` document to be marked as Exhibit 7, I
` believe -- 6.
`(Exhibit 6 marked for
` identification.)
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 19
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Dr. Rouskas, do you recognize this
`
`I do.
`Can you explain what this exhibit
`
` exhibit?
`A.
`Q.
`
` is?
`
`Yes. This is my declaration with
`A.
` respect to the '038 Patent in IPR 294.
`Q.
`And just to be clear for the
` record0 -- let me take a step back. To be
` clear for the record, you authored two
` declarations with respect to the '038 Patent in
` two different proceedings; right?
`A.
`That is correct. Yes.
`Q.
`This particular exhibit, Exhibit 6,
` is one of them; right?
`A.
`It is one of them.
`Q.
`And, in fact, Exhibit 6 is related,
` as you say, to case number ending in 294;
` right?
`That is correct.
`A.
`And that petition mainly deals with
`Q.
` a reference call Diacakis. Is that your
` understanding?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Yes, that is correct.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 20
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Q.
`So if I refer to this as your '038
` Diacakis declaration, will you understand what
` I mean?
`I will.
`A.
`Great. Now, is this exhibit,
`Q.
` Exhibit 6, a complete expression of the --
` sorry, let me start over.
`Is Exhibit 6 a complete expression
` of your opinions in the proceeding ending in
` 294 with respect to your opinions regarding the
` '038 patent and Diacakis?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Yes.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`So all of your opinions related to
`Q.
` the '038 Patent and Diacakis are contained in
` this declaration, Exhibit 6; correct?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Yes.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Since the issuance of this
`Q.
` declaration, have you changed any of your
` opinions or developed new opinions related to
` the '038 Patent and Diacakis?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 21
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`No.
`A.
`Are there any corrections or
`Q.
` additions to your declaration, Exhibit 6, that
` you'd like to make today other than
` typographical errors?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`Okay. Last one of these. I'm
` handing you an exhibit to be marked as
` Exhibit 7.
`
`(Exhibit 7 marked for
` identification.)
`Dr. Rouskas, do you recognize this
`
` exhibit?
`A.
`Q.
`
` is?
`
`I do.
`Can you explain what this exhibit
`
`Yes. This is my declaration with
`A.
` respect to the '038 patent and the case number
` that ends in 295.
`Q.
`Now, is it your understanding that
` the case you just mentioned, the IPR proceeding
` ending in 295, mainly deals with a reference
` called Tanigawa?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`So if I refer to Exhibit 7 as your
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 22
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` '038 Tanigawa declaration, will you understand
` what I mean?
` A. I will.
` Q. Okay. Is this declaration,
` Exhibit 7, a complete expression of your
` opinions in the proceeding ending in 295 with
` respect to the '038 Patent and Tanigawa?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. So all of your opinions related to
` the '038 Patent and Tanigawa are contained in
` this declaration, right?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Since the issuance of this
` declaration, Exhibit 7, have you changed any of
` your opinions or developed new opinions related
` to '038 Patent and Tanigawa?
` A. No.
` Q. So other than typographical errors,
` are there any corrections or additions to this
` declaration, Exhibit 7, that you would like to
` make today?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 23
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`No.
`A.
`Thank you. Dr. Rouskas, were you
`Q.
` compensated for authoring these declarations?
`A.
`I was.
`Q.
`Can I ask how much?
`A.
`My hourly rate is $450.
`Q.
`Does your hourly rate -- is that
` your standard hourly rate?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Does that change depending on if
` you're giving testimony or if you're authoring
` reports?
`No.
`A.
`All right. Not counting the time
`Q.
` spent today at your deposition so far,
` approximately how many hours have you billed
` towards these declarations and your work on
` this case?
`I can't tell you the exact number.
`A.
` But I would put it anywhere between 80 and
` 100 hours.
`So if it's about 100 hours and your
`Q.
` hourly rate is $450 an hour, that's
` approximately $45,000 at the higher end; is
` that about right?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 24
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. That's about right, yes.
` Q. Okay. Do you recall when you were
` retained to provide opinions in this case?
` A. I don't recall the exact dates, but
` that was probably sometime in the summer. It
` was either late June or early July.
` Q. You -- strike that.
` When you say late June or early
` July, you're talking about year 2022, right?
` A. 2022, yes.
` Q. So you were retained approximately
` four or five months ago?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. You understand in this case
` that IngenioShare filed preliminary responses
` prior to your declarations; right?
` A. Yes, I believe so.
` Q. And did you review those preliminary
` responses?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Not that I recall.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Okay. So you did not review, to the
` best of your knowledge, those preliminary
` responses that IngenioShare filed with respect
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 25
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` to these IPR petitions?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Okay.
`MR. SHI: Can we go off the record
`for a quick second?
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Off record at
`10:25 a.m.
` (Recess taken from 10:25 a.m. until 10:27 a.m.)
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: On record at
`10:27 a.m.
`MR. SHI: For the record, I'd just
`like to also remark that a colleague of
`mine, Yimeng Dou, is on the Zoom as well in
`the interest of disclosure.
`MR. RISLEY: Thanks.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`Dr. Rouskas, we were just talking
`Q.
` about your retention. Did the law firm Kent &
` Risley reach out to you or did IngenioShare
` reach out to you to hire you?
`A.
`It was the law firm.
`Q.
`Have you worked with the law firm
` Kent & Risley before?
`A.
`I have.
`Q.
`How many times?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 26
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Once.
` Q. Can you tell me about -- just in
` rough terms about that prior experience you had
` with that firm?
` A. So it was, again, an IPR case and
` the technology that related to mobile phones.
` Q. Did that technology relate to
` communication features in mobile phones?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What was the outcome of that
` proceeding?
` A. The -- it's not known. I think the
` board has not issued a decision yet.
` Q. I see. Were you representing the
` patent owner in that proceeding or the
` petitioner?
` A. I was representing the patent owner.
` Q. Have you ever worked with
` IngenioShare before?
` A. No.
` Q. Did you work with anyone else to
` prepare your declarations in these cases?
` A. So I did work with Steve Risley
` to -- you know, in putting the documents
` together.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 27
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. Okay. Did you work with anyone
` other than Mr. Risley in putting the documents
` together?
` A. No.
` Q. Okay. So the only two people who
` worked on these declarations were the two of
` you?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Okay. Dr. Rouskas, what did you do
` to prepare for this deposition?
` A. So to prepare for the deposition, I
` went back and I reviewed the three patents. I
` reviewed the prior art. I reviewed my
` declarations, and I had a short meeting with
` Mr. Risley yesterday.
` Q. When you say "a short meeting,"
` about how long was it in terms of hours or
` minutes?
` A. It was just short of two hours.
` Q. Was that the only meeting that you
` had with Mr. Risley or anyone else specifically
` to prepare for your deposition?
` A. That was the only one, yes.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 28
`
`

`

`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Approximately how much time did you
`Q.
` spend reviewing documents in preparation for
` your deposition?
`A.
`About 20 hours.
`Q.
`Was anyone other than Mr. Risley
` present at your preparation meeting for two
` hours yesterday?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`Outside of Mr. Risley or any other
` counsel he may work with, have you discussed
` the substance of your declaration with anyone?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`Have you ever communicated with
` anyone at IngenioShare?
`A.
`I have not.
`Q.
`Have you ever communicated with any
` of the named inventors on the '810, '727, or
` '038 Patents?
`A.
`I have not.
`Q.
`So you don't know Mr. Peter Tong?
`A.
`No, I don't.
`Q.
`You don't know Mr. Doug Thomas?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`You don't know Mr. Kwok Wai Cheung?
`A.
`I don't.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 29
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Okay. Are you familiar with any of
`Q.
` the named inventors of the prior art
` references?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`Okay. So if you open up Exhibit 4,
` which is the declaration that you authored with
` respect to the '810 petition, and if you turn
` to page 6, paragraph 18.
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`So this paragraph is titled, "Bases
` of Opinions." Do you see that?
`A.
`I do.
`Q.
`And in this paragraph you've listed
` 11 categories of documents that you -- you
` analyzed in coming to your opinions; right?
`A.
`Yes, that's correct.
`Q.
`And I may have misspoken. It's not
` that these are 11 categories, but, in fact,
` these are 11 discrete documents and attachments
` that you reviewed; right?
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: Yeah, that's what I
`understood as categories. So these are 11
`documents, yes.
` BY MR. SHI:
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 30
`
`

`

`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`You didn't rely on anything outside
`Q.
` of these 11 documents in forming your opinions;
` right?
`
`MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
`THE WITNESS: No.
`
` BY MR. SHI:
`In particular, I want to direct your
`Q.
` attention to number 11, Roman Numerals XI at
` the bottom. Do you see that?
`A.
`I do.
`Q.
`You indicate that you analyzed
` Exhibit 2007 and you've written Judge Chang,
` and you indicated that this is a dissenting
` opinion from Judge Chang that you reviewed;
` right?
`Yes.
`A.
`And so you understand this to be a
`Q.
` dissenting opinion in an institution decision
` related to the proceeding ending in 294; right?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Did you consider the majority
` opinion granting institution or did you just
` consider the dissenting opinion?
`A.
`So I -- I certainly looked at the
` document, the whole documents, but I mostly
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 31
`
`

`

`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` focused on the dissenting opinion.
`Q.
`Okay. But you did review the
` majority opinion?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`You just haven't listed that on
` here; is that right?
`A.
`You're right. I have not listed
` that on there, but I did look at that, yes. It
` was part -- yes, because it was a document that
` was part of -- I mean, the dissenting opinion I
` believe was part of that document.
`Q.
`Okay. I just wanted to verify that
` you reviewed the whole document and not just
` the dissent; is that fair?
`A.
`Yeah.
`Q.
`Okay. Are there any other documents
` that you reviewed in forming your opinions that
` happen to not be listed in this list?
`A.
`The -- I guess the only other two
` are the two web references that I include in
` terms of the definition of a portal, but those
` are listed in the declaration.
`Q.
`I see. So other than those two
` references regarding the definition of a portal
` and outside of the majority opinion that we
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1043
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 32
`
`

`

`Page 33
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` just talked about with respect to the 294
` proceeding, everything else that you considered
` in forming your opinions is listed in
` paragraph 18; right?
` MR. RISLEY: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, that's correct.
` BY MR. SHI:
` Q. Okay. Dr. Rouskas, you've indicated
` that you reviewed the declaration of
` Dr. Almeroth in this proceeding; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you're familiar with
` Dr. Almeroth?
` A. I am.
` Q. Were you aware of who Dr. Almeroth
` was prior to your involvement in this case?
` A. Yes, I was.
` Q. Can you explain what your
` relationship is with Dr. Almeroth?
` A. With -- Dr. Almeroth and I
` overlapped during our Ph.D. studies at Georgia
` Tech in the early '90s, and we have kept up as
` colleagues since then.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket