`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INGENIOSHARE, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 10,708,727
`
`Case IPR2022-00291
`
`DECLARATION OF YIMENG DOU PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. 42.64(b)(2)
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`A.
`B.
`C.
`D.
`E.
`F.
`G.
`H.
`I.
`J.
`K.
`L.
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`Exhibit 1016 (Kurose and Ross) ...................................................................... 2
`Exhibit 1017 (Kuehn) ...................................................................................... 3
`Exhibit 1018 (Telecomputing in Japan) .......................................................... 4
`Exhibit 1019 (Hernandez) ............................................................................... 6
`Exhibit 1020 (Cruz) ......................................................................................... 7
`Exhibit 1021 (Benimoff) ................................................................................. 8
`Exhibit 1022 (Falconer) ................................................................................... 9
`Exhibit 1023 (Hine) ....................................................................................... 10
`Exhibit 1024 (Bazaios) .................................................................................. 11
`Exhibit 1025 (Stein) ....................................................................................... 12
`Exhibit 1029 (Grinter) ................................................................................... 13
`Exhibit 1034 (Patil)........................................................................................ 13
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`Description
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,708,727
`
`File History of U.S. Patent No. 10,708,727
`
`Declaration of Dr. Kevin Almeroth in Support of Inter Partes Review
`of U.S. Patent No. 10,708,727
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Kevin Almeroth
`
`U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/527,565
`
`U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/689,686
`
`U.S. Patent Application 2002/0116461 (“Diacakis”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,287,056 (“Loveland”)
`
`U.S. Patent Application 2002/0183114 (“Takahashi”)
`
`U.S. Patent Application 2004/0001480 (“Tanigawa”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,428,580 (“Hullfish”)
`
`IngenioShare’s Infringement Contentions in Texas Litigation
`
`Texas Litigation Proposed Scheduling Order
`
`Fourteenth Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operations Under
`the Exigent Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic
`Judge Albright’s Standing Order re Inter-District Transfer
`
`Kurose, J. and Ross, K., Computer Networking: A Top-Down
`Approach Feature the Internet (2000)
`Kuehn, S., A Play Theory Analysis of Computer-Mediated
`Telecommunication (Apr. 20, 1990)
`Telecomputing in Japan
`
`Hernandez, R., ECPA and Online Computer Privacy (1988)
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`Description
`
`Miller, A., Applications of Computer Conferencing to Teacher
`Education and Human Resource Development (1991)
`Benimoff, N. and Burns, M., Multimedia User Interfaces for
`Telecommunications Products and Services (1993)
`Falconer, W. and Hooke, J., Telecommunications Services in the
`Next Decade (1986)
`Hine, N.A., et al., An Adaptable User Interface to a Multimedia
`Telecommunications Conversation Service for People with
`Disabilities (1995)
`Bazaios, A., et al., Multimedia Architecture Offering Open Distance
`Learning Services over Internet
`Stein, J., et al., Chat and Instant Messaging Systems (2002)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,241,612 (“Heredia”)
`
`U.S. Patent Application 2003/0216178 (“Danieli”)
`
`International Patent Application WO 01/45343 (“Davies”)
`
`Grinter, R. and Palen, L., Instant Messaging in Teen Life (2002)
`
`File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,744,407
`
`File History of U.S. Patent No. 9,736,664
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,708,727 Claim Listing
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,828,924 (“Gustavsson”)
`
`Patil, S. and Kobsa, A., The Challenges in Preserving Privacy in
`Awareness Systems (2003)
`Unused
`
`Unused
`
`Declaration of Yimeng Dou Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.64(b)(2)
`
`Declaration of Jennifer A. Babbitt Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.64(b)(2)
`
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1039
`
`Description
`
`Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Kevin Almeroth Pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. 42.64(b)(2)
`
`
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 5
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Yimeng Dou, hereby declare as follows:
`
`
`
`I am a partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, counsel for Petitioner in the
`
`above-captioned Petition for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 10,708,727 (“the ’727 Patent”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated
`
`in this Declaration, and I can testify competently to them if called upon to do so.
`
`
`
`The P.T.A.B. has acknowledged that “[t]he burden of proof for
`
`authentication is ‘slight,’” and “Rule 901(a) merely prescribes that a proponent
`
`produce sufficient evidence of authenticity to support a prima facie case that the item
`
`is genuine.” See Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, IPR2014-01149, Paper
`
`68 (FWD) at 12. Nevertheless, Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1005–
`
`1029 and 1033–1034 because, according to Patent Owner, “Petitioner failed to
`
`authenticate the exhibits in accordance with FRE 901(a).” See Paper 12, ¶ 3. On
`
`the basis that these exhibits are not authenticated, Patent Owner argues that they are
`
`irrelevant and inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 402. See id.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to portions of the Petition and the Declaration of Dr.
`
`Kevin Almeroth (Ex. 1003) that rely on these exhibits. See id.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s objections are conclusory and do not articulate any
`
`basis for challenging the authenticity of these exhibits. Nor does Patent Owner
`
`“identify the grounds for the objection with sufficient particularity to allow
`
`correction in the form of supplemental evidence.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1). Thus,
`
`1
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner has not satisfied its burden—the exhibits do not require correction,
`
`and they should be admitted.
`
`
`
`Despite Patent Owner’s failure to satisfy its burden, I nevertheless
`
`submit this declaration as supplemental evidence under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2) to
`
`show that the exhibits are self-authenticating or otherwise authenticated, thereby
`
`obviating any concerns Patent Owner intended to raise.
`
`A. Exhibit 1016 (Kurose and Ross)
`
`Exhibit 1016 is an excerpt from a textbook titled Computer
`
`Networking: A Top-Down Approach Featuring the Internet, authored by James F.
`
`Kurose and Keith W. Ross. See Ex. 1016 at 1.
`
`
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8) provides that a document may be
`
`authenticated as an ancient document if it “is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity”; “was in a place where, if authentic, it would likely be”; and
`
`“is at least 20 years old when offered.” F.R.E. 901(b)(8); see, e.g., Microsoft Corp.
`
`v. FG SRC LLC, IPR2018-01601, Paper 72 (FWD) at 15 (finding a book published
`
`in 1996 to be authenticated as an ancient document). Exhibit 1016 satisfies these
`
`requirements. First, it is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its
`
`authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit 1016 that
`
`creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1016. Second, it was in a place
`
`where it would likely be. The first page of Exhibit 1016 indicates a copy of the
`
`2
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 7
`
`
`
`
`
`textbook is owned by Kirkland & Ellis LLP. See id. at 1. This copy is normally
`
`located at Kirkland’s library—a place where textbooks would likely be. Moreover,
`
`the book is available from online bookstores—another place where textbooks would
`
`likely be. Third, Exhibit 1016 indicates that it was published by Addison Wesley
`
`Longman, Inc. in 2001, more than twenty years ago. See Ex. 1016 at 2. Thus, it
`
`satisfies the rules for authentication.
`
`B.
`
`
`Exhibit 1017 (Kuehn)
`Exhibit 1017 is a paper titled “A Play Theory Analysis of Computer-
`
`Mediated Telecommunication” and authored by Scott A. Kuehn. See Ex. 1017 at 1.
`
`It indicates that it was “presented at the annual convention of the Eastern
`
`Communication Association, April 20, 1990, Philadelphia, PA.” See id.
`
`
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1) provides that a document may be
`
`authenticated with “[t]estimony that an item is what it is claimed to be.” F.R.E.
`
`901(b)(1). Exhibit 1017 is authenticated under this rule by the Declaration of
`
`Jennifer A. Babbitt. In her Declaration, Ms. Babbitt explains that Exhibit 1017 is
`
`what it is claimed to be. See Ex. 1038, § III.A. Thus, it satisfies the rules for
`
`authentication.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). The P.T.A.B. routinely finds papers like
`
`Exhibit 1017 to be authenticated as ancient documents. See, e.g., QSC Audio
`
`3
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Products, LLC v. Crest Audio, Inc., IPR2014-00129, Paper 41 (FWD) at 6–12
`
`(finding a paper presented at an October 1971 conference to be authenticated and to
`
`fall under a hearsay exception as an ancient document); Ericsson, IPR2014-01149,
`
`Paper 68 (FWD) at 10–16 (agreeing with Petitioner that two technical documents
`
`created in 1995 and available online were authenticated as ancient documents).
`
` Here, Exhibit 1017 is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its
`
`authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit 1017 that
`
`creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1017. It is available online at the
`
`Education Resources Information Center (“ERIC”)—a website maintained by the
`
`U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Services—a place where
`
`scholarly papers would likely be. Exhibit 1017 indicates it was published in 1990,
`
`more than twenty years ago. See id. at 1. Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication
`
`for this additional reason.
`
`C. Exhibit 1018 (Telecomputing in Japan)
` Exhibit 1018 is an article titled “Telecomputing in Japan” and authored
`
`by the Database Promotion Center, Japan. See Ex. 1018 at 1. It indicates that it was
`
`published in May/June of 1987 as part of volume 17, issue number 6 of the journal
`
`LASIE (i.e., the Library Automated Systems Information Exchange). See id. It also
`
`indicates that it spanned pages 122–129 of that issue. See id. at 1–8.
`
`4
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 9
`
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit 1018 is self-authenticating as “[p]rinted material purporting to
`
`be a newspaper or periodical.” F.R.E. 902(6). The P.T.A.B. routinely finds such
`
`journal articles to be self-authenticating. Thus, it satisfies the rules for
`
`authentication. See, e.g., Microsoft Corp. v. FG SRC LLC, IPR2018-01601, Paper
`
`72 (FWD) at 14–15 (finding an article published in a journal to be self-authenticating
`
`under F.R.E. 902(6)); Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR2015-01979,
`
`Paper 62 (FWD) at 67–68 (finding “periodical and inscription information” to be
`
`sufficient evidence that journal articles are self-authenticating).
`
` Exhibit 1018 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1018 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1018. It is available online
`
`through Informit, an online research database operated by the Royal Melbourne
`
`Institute of Technology (RMIT), at
`
`
`
`https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/ielapa.863028422703688—a
`
`place
`
`where scholarly papers would likely be. Exhibit 1018 indicates it was published in
`
`1987, more than twenty years ago. See id. at 1. As explained above in Section I.B,
`
`the P.T.A.B. routinely finds articles like Exhibit 1018 to be authenticated as ancient
`
`documents. Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication for this additional reason.
`
`5
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 10
`
`
`
`
`
`D. Exhibit 1019 (Hernandez)
` Exhibit 1019 is an article titled “ECPA and Online Computer Privacy”
`
`and authored by Ruel Torres Hernandez. See Ex. 1019 at 2. It indicates that it was
`
`published in 1988 in volume 41, issue number 1 of the Federal Communications
`
`Law Journal. See id at 1–3. It also indicates that it spanned pages 17–41 of that
`
`issue. See id. at 2–26.
`
` Exhibit 1019 is self-authenticating as “[p]rinted material purporting to
`
`be a newspaper or periodical.” F.R.E. 902(6). As explained above in Section I.C,
`
`the P.T.A.B. routinely finds such journal articles to be self-authenticating. Thus, it
`
`satisfies the rules for authentication.
`
` Exhibit 1019 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1019 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1019. It is available online
`
`from HeinOnline at
`
`
`
`https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/fedcom41&div=8&g_sent=
`
`1&casa_token=&collection=journals—a place where scholarly papers would likely
`
`be. Exhibit 1019 indicates it was published in 1988, more than twenty years ago.
`
`See id. at 1. As explained above in Section I.B, the P.T.A.B. routinely finds articles
`
`6
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 11
`
`
`
`
`
`like Exhibit 1019 to be authenticated as ancient documents. Thus, it satisfies the
`
`rules for authentication for this additional reason.
`
`E.
`
`Exhibit 1020 (Cruz)
` Exhibit 1020 is a paper titled “An Introduction to Computer
`
`Conferencing: A Look at Software Available in the Academic World” and authored
`
`by Alex Cruz. See Ex. 1020 at 18–21. It indicates that it was presented at an
`
`“International Symposium on Computer Conferencing at The Ohio State University”
`
`in Columbus, Ohio on June 13–15, 1991. It also indicates that it spanned pages 11–
`
`14 of the symposium’s published proceedings, which were titled “Applications of
`
`Computer Conferencing to Teacher Education and Human Resource Development”
`
`and edited by Aaron J. Miller. See id. at 1–3, 18–21.
`
` Exhibit 1020 is authenticated under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1)
`
`by the Declaration of Jennifer A. Babbitt. In her Declaration, Ms. Babbitt explains
`
`that Exhibit 1020 is what it is claimed to be. Ex. 1038, § III.B. Thus, it satisfies the
`
`rules for authentication.
`
` Exhibit 1020 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1020 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1020. It is available online
`
`from ERIC at http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED337705.pdf—a place where
`
`7
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 12
`
`
`
`
`
`scholarly papers would likely be. Exhibit 1020 indicates it was published in 1991,
`
`more than twenty years ago. See id. at 1. As explained above in Section I.B, the
`
`P.T.A.B. routinely finds papers like Exhibit 1020 to be authenticated as ancient
`
`documents. Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication for this additional reason.
`
`F.
`
`Exhibit 1021 (Benimoff)
` Exhibit 1021 is an article titled “Multimedia User Interfaces for
`
`Telecommunications Products and Services” and authored by Nicholas I. Benimoff
`
`and Michael J. Burns. See Ex. 1021 at 1. It indicates that it was published in the
`
`May/June 1993 issue of the AT&T Technical Journal. See id. It also indicates that
`
`it spanned pages 42–49 of this issue. See id.
`
` Exhibit 1021 is self-authenticating as “[p]rinted material purporting to
`
`be a newspaper or periodical.” F.R.E. 902(6). As explained above in Section I.C,
`
`the P.T.A.B. routinely finds such journal articles to be self-authenticating. Thus, it
`
`satisfies the rules for authentication.
`
` Exhibit 1021 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1021 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1021. It is available online
`
`from IEEE Explore at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6768681—a place
`
`where scholarly papers would likely be. Exhibit 1021 indicates it was published in
`
`8
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 13
`
`
`
`
`
`1993, more than twenty years ago. See id. at 1. As explained above in Section I.B,
`
`the P.T.A.B. routinely finds articles like Exhibit 1021 to be authenticated as ancient
`
`documents. Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication for this additional reason.
`
`G. Exhibit 1022 (Falconer)
` Exhibit 1022 is an article titled “Telecommunications Services in the
`
`Next Decade” and authored by Warren E. Falconer and John A. Hooke. See Ex.
`
`1022 at 1. It indicates that it was published in September 1986 in volume 72, issue
`
`number 9 of the Proceedings of the IEEE. See id. It also indicates that it spanned
`
`pages 1246–1261 of this issue. See id. at 1–16.
`
` Exhibit 1022 is at least self-authenticating as “[p]rinted material
`
`purporting to be a newspaper or periodical.” F.R.E. 902(6). As explained above in
`
`Section I.C, the P.T.A.B. routinely finds such journal articles to be self-
`
`authenticating. Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication.
`
` Exhibit 1022 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1022 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1022. It is available online
`
`from IEEE Explore at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1457882—a
`
`place where scholarly papers would likely be. Exhibit 1022 indicates it was
`
`published in 1986, more than twenty years ago. See id. at 1. As explained above in
`
`9
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 14
`
`
`
`
`
`Section I.B, the P.T.A.B. routinely finds articles like Exhibit 1022 to be
`
`authenticated as ancient documents. Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication for
`
`this additional reason.
`
`H. Exhibit 1023 (Hine)
` Exhibit 1023 is a book chapter titled “An Adaptable User Interface to a
`
`Multimedia Telecommunications Conversation Service
`
`for People with
`
`Disabilities,” which was authored by N.A. Hine et al. See Ex. 1023 at 1. It indicates
`
`that it was published in 1995 by the International Federation for Information
`
`Processing as the 68th chapter of the book Human-Computer Interaction, edited by
`
`K. Nordby, et al. See id. It indicates it spanned pages 394–397 of the book. See id.
`
`at 1–4.
`
` Exhibit 1023 is authenticated as an ancient document under Federal
`
`Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its
`
`authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit 1023 that
`
`creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1023. It is available online from
`
`the publisher Springer at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-5041-
`
`2896-4_68—a place where book chapters would likely be. Moreover, the book
`
`Human-Computer Interaction is available from online bookstores—where book
`
`chapters would likely be. Exhibit 1023 indicates it was published in 1995, more than
`
`twenty years ago. See id. at 1. As explained above in Section I.A, the P.T.A.B.
`
`10
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 15
`
`
`
`
`
`routinely finds books like Exhibit 1023 to be authenticated as ancient documents.
`
`Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication.
`
`I.
`
`Exhibit 1024 (Bazaios)
` Exhibit 1024 is a paper titled “Multimedia Architecture Offering Open
`
`Distance Learning Services Over Internet” and authored by A. Bazaios, C. Bouras,
`
`P. Lampsas, P. Spirakis, P. Zarafidis, and A. Zoura. See Ex. 1024 at 1.
`
` Exhibit 1024 is authenticated under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1)
`
`by the Declaration of Jennifer A. Babbitt. In her Declaration, Ms. Babbitt explains
`
`that Exhibit 1024 is what it is claimed to be. Ex. 1038, § III.C. Thus, it satisfies the
`
`rules for authentication.
`
` Exhibit 1024 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1024 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1024. It is available online
`
`from Semantic Scholar at
`
`https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Multimedia-Architecture-Offering-Open-
`
`Distance-over-Bazaios-Bouras/e117d9e6392aa716879aa07c287648b6c5f80094—a
`
`place where scholarly papers would likely be. As explained in the Declaration of
`
`Jennifer A. Babbitt, Exhibit 1024 was published in 1998, more than twenty years
`
`ago. See Ex. 1038, § III.C. As explained above in Section I.B, the P.T.A.B.
`
`11
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 16
`
`
`
`
`
`routinely finds papers like Exhibit 1024 to be authenticated as ancient documents.
`
`Thus, it satisfies the rules for authentication for this additional reason.
`
`J.
`
`Exhibit 1025 (Stein)
` Exhibit 1025 is an article titled “Chat and Instant Messaging Systems”
`
`and authored by Jennifer Stein, Debbie Garber, and Jon Baggaley. See Ex. 1025 at
`
`1. It indicates that it was published in April 2002 in volume 3, issue number 1 of
`
`the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. See id.
`
` Exhibit 1025 is self-authenticating as “[p]rinted material purporting to
`
`be a newspaper or periodical.” F.R.E. 902(6). As explained above in Section I.C,
`
`the P.T.A.B. routinely finds such journal articles to be self-authenticating. Thus, it
`
`satisfies the rules for authentication.
`
` Exhibit 1025 is also authenticated as an ancient document under
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(8). It is in a condition that creates no suspicion
`
`about its authenticity, nor has Patent Owner identified anything regarding Exhibit
`
`1025 that creates suspicion about its authenticity. See Ex. 1025. It is available online
`
`from the database Érudit at https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/irrodl/2002-v3-n1-
`
`irrodl05617/1073007ar—a place where scholarly papers would likely be. Exhibit
`
`1025 indicates it was published in April 2002, more than twenty years ago. See id.
`
`at 1. As explained above in Section I.B, the P.T.A.B. routinely finds articles like
`
`12
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 17
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1025 to be authenticated as ancient documents. Thus, it satisfies the rules
`
`for authentication for this additional reason.
`
`K. Exhibit 1029 (Grinter)
` Exhibit 1029 is a paper titled “Instant Messaging in Teen Life” and
`
`authored by Rebecca E. Grinter and Leysia Palen. See Ex. 1029 at 1. It indicates
`
`that it was presented at “CSCW ’02, November 16–20, 2002, New Orleans,
`
`Louisiana, USA.” See id. It also bears the inscription “Copyright 2002 ACM 1-
`
`58113-560-2/02/0011.” See id.
`
` Exhibit 1029 is authenticated under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1)
`
`by the Declaration of Jennifer A. Babbitt. In her Declaration, Ms. Babbitt explains
`
`that Exhibit 1029 is what it is claimed to be. Ex. 1038, § III.D. Thus, it satisfies the
`
`rules for authentication.
`
`L.
`
`Exhibit 1034 (Patil)
` Exhibit 1034 is an article titled “The Challenges in Preserving Privacy
`
`in Awareness Systems” authored by Sameer Patil and Alfred Kobsa and published
`
`by the Institute for Software Research of the University of California, Irvine. See
`
`Ex. 1034 at 1–3. It indicates that it is “ISR Technical Report # UCI-ISR-03-3,”
`
`referring to the third report published by the Institute of Software Research in 2003.
`
`See id. It further indicates it was published in April 2003. See id. at 2.
`
`13
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 18
`
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit 1034 is self-authenticating as “[p]rinted material purporting to
`
`be a newspaper or periodical.” As explained above in Section I.C, the P.T.A.B.
`
`routinely finds such journal articles to be self-authenticating. Thus, it satisfies the
`
`rules for authentication.
`
`
`
`Date: June 22, 2022
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Yimeng Dou
`Yimeng Dou (No. 69,770)
`
`
`
`14
`
`Epic Games Ex. 1037
`Epic Games v. IngenioShare
`IPR2022-00291 p. 19
`
`