throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 20
` Entered: September 20, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2022-00241 (Patent 9,825,482 B2)
`IPR2022-00284 (Patent 9,997,962 B2)
` IPR2022-00385 (Patent 9,843,215 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, KARL D. EASTHOM, BRIAN J. McNAMARA,
`and AARON W. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.2
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issue for the above-identified proceedings.
`2 This is not an expanded panel. Judges Lee, Easthom, and Moore are the
`panel for IPR2022-00241 and IPR2022-00284. Judges Lee, Easthom, and
`McNamara are the panel for IPR2022-00385.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00241 (Patent 9.825,482 B2)
`IPR2022-00284 (Patent 9,997,962 B2)
`IPR2022-00385 (Patent 9,843,215 B2)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`On September 19, 2022, a conference call was held in the above-
`identified proceedings. In each of these proceedings, Petitioner entities
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`(collectively “Samsung”) were terminated on August 29, 2022, by reason of
`settlement. The participants to the conference call were lead and backup
`counsel for Petitioner, lead counsel for Patent Owner, and Mr. Steve Chiang
`representing RPX Corp. who is not a party, and Judges Jameson Lee, Karl
`Easthom, Aaron Moore, and Brian McNamara.
`The matter discussed was the parties having filed a redacted copy of
`their Escrow Agreement in these proceedings, i.e., Exhibit 1034 in IPR2022-
`00385, Exhibit 1019 in IPR2022-00241, and Exhibit 1029 in IPR2022-
`00284. The parties previously represented to the Board that RPX Corp. is
`the only entity who possesses an unredacted copy of the Escrow Agreement.
`IPR2022-00385, Paper 21, 2.
`II. DISCUSSION
`During the conference call, Mr. Chiang informed the judges that RPX
`Corp. has agreed to send an unredacted copy of the Escrow Agreement to
`counsel for Patent Owner, for counsel for Patent Owner to file the
`unredacted copy with the Board and designate its access status as “Board
`only.” Counsel for the parties confirmed and agreed with that proposal. We
`also approved that proposed course of action
`The parties had previously requested to have their Escrow Agreement
`treated as confidential business information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c). We regard the request as extending to the unredacted
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00241 (Patent 9.825,482 B2)
`IPR2022-00284 (Patent 9,997,962 B2)
`IPR2022-00385 (Patent 9,843,215 B2)
`
`version of the Escrow Agreement, and herein grant that request as applied to
`the unredacted version of the Escrow Agreement as well.
`The parties further represented that they will take the same course of
`action in IPR2022-00478, IPR2022-00636, IPR2022-00643, IPR2022-
`00653, IPR2022-00683, IPR2022-00939, IPR2022-01052, IPR2022-01053,
`IPR2022-01054, IPR2022-01055, IPR2022-01056, IPR2022-01057, and
`IPR2022-01058.
`
`III. ORDER
`For the reasons discussed above, it is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner shall, within five business days from
`September 19, 2022 (by Monday, September 26, 2022) file an unredacted
`version of the Escrow Agreement, in each of IPR2022-00385, IPR2022-
`00241, and IPR2022-00284, and designate the corresponding access as
`“Board only”;3
`FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted version of the Escrow
`Agreement, when filed, will be treated as confidential business information
`under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order will be entered in
`each of IPR2022-00478, IPR2022-00636, IPR2022-00643, IPR2022-00653,
`IPR2022-00683, IPR2022-00939, IPR2022-01052, IPR2022-01053,
`IPR2022-01054, IPR2022-01055, IPR2022-01056, IPR2022-01057, and
`IPR2022-01058 as a 3000 series exhibit.
`
`
`3 Counsel for Patent Owner represented that Patent Owner will make the
`same filing by September 26, 2022, in IPR2022-00478, IPR2022-00636,
`IPR2022-00643, IPR2022-00653, IPR2022-00683, IPR2022-00939,
`IPR2022-01052, IPR2022-01053, IPR2022-01054, IPR2022-01055,
`IPR2022-01056, IPR2022-01057, and IPR2022-01058.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00241 (Patent 9.825,482 B2)
`IPR2022-00284 (Patent 9,997,962 B2)
`IPR2022-00385 (Patent 9,843,215 B2)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`John Kappos
`Cameron Westin
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`jkappos@omm.com
`cwestin@omm.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph Palys
`Paul Anderson
`Phillip Citroen
`Quadeer Ahmed
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`paulanderson@paulhastings.com
`phillipcitroen@paulhastings.com
`quadeerahmed@paulhastings.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Brett Cooper
`Reza Mirzaie
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket