`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________
`
` IPR2022-00284
`Patent No. 9,997,962
`___________________
`
`
`
`
` PETITIONER GOOGLE LLC AND PATENT OWNER’S JOINT MOTION
`TO TERMINATE PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Google LLC
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00284
`Patent No. 9,997,962
`
`
`
`(“Petitioner”) and Patent Owner Scramoge Technology Ltd. (“Patent Owner”)
`
`(collectively, “the Parties”) jointly request termination of this proceeding. The
`
`Parties have entered into a written confidential settlement agreement that settles all
`
`disputes between them, including those relating to this proceeding and the related
`
`district court actions, Scramoge Technology Ltd. v. Google LLC, No. 6:21-cv-
`
`00616 (W.D. Tex.) and Scramoge Technology Ltd. v. Google LLC, No. 6:21-cv-
`
`01138 (W.D. Tex.), which were dismissed with prejudice on August 24, 2022.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, a true copy of the Parties’ settlement agreement
`
`(including any other related agreement between the Parties) has been filed as
`
`Exhibit 1030. This Joint Motion was authorized by the Board pursuant to e-mail
`
`correspondence on August 31, 2022. Petitioner Samsung Electronics, Ltd. and
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed a motion to terminate with respect to the
`
`Samsung entities on August 15, 2022. The Board granted that motion on August
`
`29, 2022. (Paper 16.) Therefore, Google LLC is the only remaining Petitioner in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5 and 42.72, the Board may terminate a trial
`
`without rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including pursuant to
`
`a joint request under 35 U.S.C. §§ 317(a) or 327(a). See Winplus N. Am., Inc. v.
`
`Pilot, Inc., IPR2018-00488, Paper 12 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 24, 2018). “There are strong
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`public policy reasons to favor settlement between the parties to a proceeding. . . .
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00284
`Patent No. 9,997,962
`
`The Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement
`
`agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits of the proceeding.”
`
`PTAB Consolidated Trial Practice Guide at 86 (November 2019).
`
`Trial was recently instituted on June 22, 2022. The proceeding is therefore
`
`in a preliminary stage and the Board has not finally decided the merits.
`
`Accordingly, it is appropriate for the Board to exercise its authority pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.71 to terminate this proceeding in view of the settlement entered into
`
`between Petitioner and Patent Owner. By granting the present motion, the Board
`
`and the Parties can conserve resources. Additionally, maintaining the proceeding
`
`would discourage further settlements, as patent owners in similar situations would
`
`have a strong disincentive to settle if they perceived that an inter partes review
`
`would continue regardless of a settlement.
`
`As required by statute and as directed by the Board, the parties are filing
`
`concurrently herewith, as a separate submission, a Joint Request to Treat
`
`Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential and to Keep Separate, pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b), along with the true copy of the written settlement agreement,
`
`which includes all agreements between the Parties related to this proceeding (Ex.
`
`1030). The Parties request that the settlement agreement be treated as business
`
`confidential information and be kept separate from the files of the involved patent,
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`and be made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00284
`Patent No. 9,997,962
`
`to any person on showing of good cause under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.74(c). The Parties certify that there are no other collateral agreements or
`
`understandings, oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of this proceeding.
`
`Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that that the Board grant the
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Brett Cooper/
`Brett Cooper
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 55,085
`Russ, August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Tel.: 310-826-7474
`
`
`Parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 1, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Naveen Modi/
`Naveen Modi
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Reg. No. 46,224
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`2050 M Street NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`Phone: 202-551-1700
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00284
`Patent No. 9,997,962
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 1, 2022, a copy of the foregoing
`
`Petitioner Google LLC and Patent Owner’s Joint Motion to Terminate Pursuant To
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317 was served by electronic means upon the following:
`
`
`
`Brett Cooper (bcooper@raklaw.com)
`Reza Mirzaie (rmirzaie@raklaw.com)
`Russ, August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`
`rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: September 1, 2022
`
`By: /Naveen Modi/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224)
` Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`