throbber
COVER STORY
`
`Intravitreal
`VEGF Trap for AMD:
`An Update
`
`The CLEAR-IT 2 Extension Study was presented at the annual meeting of the Association
`for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
`
`BY JEFFREY S. HEIER, MD
`
`T he CLEAR-IT 2 trial was a phase 2 study of the
`
`safety and efficacy of VEGF Trap-Eye
`(Regeneron Pharmaceuticals) in patients with
`neovascular age-related macular degeneration
`(AMD). The results of the phase 2 trial were presented
`at the 2008 Retina Society meeting.1 An extension of
`the CLEAR-IT 2 trial followed patients from the original
`trial; 6-month results of the extension stage of the study
`
`were presented at the Association for Research in Vision
`and Ophthalmology (ARVO) earlier this year.2 This arti-
`cle reviews results of the initial CLEAR-IT 2 as well as
`data from the extension stage.
`
`CLE AR-IT 2
`VEGF Trap-Eye is a purified formulation of VEGF Trap,
`a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor
`
`Image courtesy of Jeffrey S. Heier, MD
`
`Figure 1. VEGF Trap-Eye is a fusion protein designed to bind all forms of the proteins VEGF-A and PLGF, which both play a part
`in abnormal growth of new blood vessels.
`
`44 I RETINA TODAY I OCTOBER 2009
`
`CELLTRION - EXHIBIT 1020
`
`

`

`COVER STORY
`
`fusion protein that binds all forms of VEGF-A (Figure 1).
`VEGF Trap-Eye, formulated for intraocular use, is being
`developed for the treatment of neovascular AMD, dia-
`betic macular edema, and other ocular pathologies.
`CLEAR-IT 2 was a double-masked multicenter trial
`in which patients with neovascular AMD were ran-
`domly assigned to receive monthly intravitreal injec-
`tions of VEGF Trap-Eye 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg or quarterly
`injections of 0.5, 2.0 or 4.0 mg for an initial 3-month
`fixed-dose period, after which they received the same
`doses on an as needed basis at monthly visits out to 1
`year. Subgroups of patients were established based on
`age, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline,
`lesion size at baseline, and previous treatment for neo-
`vascular AMD.
`
`At 1 year, for all treated groups
`combined, there was a significant
`improvement in BCVA from baseline.
`
`At 1 year, for all treated groups combined (n=157),
`there was a significant improvement in BCVA from
`baseline (mean improvement 5.3 letters; P<.0001).
`Patients who received three monthly doses of 2.0 mg
`followed by as-needed dosing achieved mean improve-
`ments in BCVA of 9.0 letters from baseline (P<.0001 vs
`baseline). Those who received three monthly doses of
`0.5 mg followed by as-needed dosing achieved mean
`improvements of 5.4 letters from baseline (P<.085 vs
`baseline) at the end of 1 year. Patients who received ini-
`tial quarterly dosing followed by as-needed dosing also
`achieved gains in BCVA, but they were generally not as
`robust as those achieved with initial monthly dosing.
`Patients receiving initial monthly doses of VEGF Trap-
`Eye achieved mean decreases in retinal thickness vs
`baseline at 1 year. In addition, treatment with VEGF
`Trap-Eye was associated with a reduction in the size of
`the total active choroidal neovascular membrane
`(CNV).
`Subgroup analyses were presented at this year’s
`ARVO meeting. Patients 75 years old or less achieved
`greater BCVA gains than those older than 75 years.
`Other differences between subgroups did not achieve
`statistical significance.
`
`E XTENSION STUDY
`Six-month results for 117 patients who elected to
`enter the extension stage of the CLEAR-IT 2 study were
`also presented at this year’s ARVO. All patients received
`
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye on an as-needed basis.
`In the original study, the mean gain in BCVA from
`baseline for the 117 patients who entered the extension
`stage was 7.3 letters (P<.0001 vs baseline) at the
`3-month primary endpoint of the original study, 8.4 let-
`ters (P<.0001 vs baseline) at 1 year, and 7.1 letters
`(P<.0001 vs baseline) at month 6 of the extension study.
`Over the 15-month course of the PRN dosing phase,
`from month 3 of the original study to month 6 of the
`extension phase, patients received a mean 3.5 injections
`of VEGF Trap-Eye.
`The treatment was generally well tolerated through-
`out the study, and there were no drug-related serious
`adverse events. One case of culture-negative endoph-
`thalmitis/uveitis was reported in a study eye, and there
`were two arterial thrombotic events that were deemed
`not to be related to the drug. Three deaths were report-
`ed, two related to cancers and one in a patient with
`pre-existing pulmonary hypertension. The most com-
`mon adverse events were those typically associated
`with intravitreal injections, including conjunctival hem-
`orrhage at the injection site and transient increased
`intraocular pressure following injection.
`
`CONCLUSION
`The extension study demonstrates that patients with
`neovascular AMD achieved and maintained significant
`improvement in BCVA for 18 months with initial fixed
`dosing followed by 15 months of as-needed administra-
`tion. On average, only 3.5 injections were given during
`the PRN dosing phase. Patients continue to be seen and
`treated in the extension stage of the CLEAR-IT 2 study. ■
`
`Jeffrey S. Heier, MD, is a Clinical
`Ophthalmologist specializing in diseases of the
`retina and vitreous at Ophthalmic Consultants
`of Boston. He reports that is a consultant or
`Regeneron, Inc. Dr. Heier is a member of the
`Retina Today Editorial Board. He can be reached at
`jsheier@eyeboston.com.
`
`1. Brown D. One year results of a phase 2, randomized, controlled dose- and interval-
`ranging study of intravitreal VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with neovascular age-related
`macular degeneration. Paper presented at: Retina Society annual meeting; September
`25-28, 2008; Scottsdale, AZ.
`2. Heier JS, CLEAR-IT 2 Investigators. CLEAR-IT 2: Phase 2, randomized, controlled
`dose-and interval-ranging study of intravitreal VEGF Trap Eye in patients with neovascu-
`lar age-related macular degeneration: predictive factors for visual acuity outcome at one
`year. Paper presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology annual
`meeting; May 4, 2009; Fort Lauderdale, FL.
`
`CONTACT US
`
`Send us your thoughts via e-mail to
`letters@bmctoday.com.
`
`OCTOBER 2009 I RETINA TODAY I 45
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket