throbber
© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`original article
`
`Ranibizumab for Macular Edema Due to
`Retinal Vein Occlusions: Implication of VEGF
`as a Critical Stimulator
`Peter A Campochiaro1, Gulnar Hafiz1, Syed Mahmood Shah1, Quan Dong Nguyen1, Howard Ying1,
`Diana V Do1, Edward Quinlan1, Ingrid Zimmer-Galler1, Julia A Haller1, Sharon D Solomon1,
`Jennifer U Sung1, Yasmin Hadi1, Kashif A Janjua1, Nida Jawed1, David F Choy2 and Joseph R Arron2
`
`1Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Immunology, Tissue Growth,
`and Repair Diagnostics and Biomarkers Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
`
`Macular edema is a major cause of vision loss in patients
`with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch reti-
`nal vein occlusion (BRVO). It is not clear how much of
`the edema is due to hydrodynamic changes from the
`obstruction and how much is due to chemical media-
`tors. Patients with macular edema due to CRVO (n = 20)
`or BRVO (n = 20) were randomized to receive three
`monthly injections of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab. At
`the primary endpoint, month 3, the median improve-
`ment in letters read at 4 m was 17 in the 0.3-mg group
`and 14 in the 0.5-mg group for CRVO, and 10 and 18,
`respectively for the BRVO group. Optical coherence
`tomography (OCT) showed that compared to injections
`of 0.3 mg, injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab tended to
`cause more rapid reductions of central retinal thickening
`that lasted longer between injections, but in 3 months,
`excess central retinal thickening which is a quantita-
`tive assessment of the macular edema, was reduced by
`~90% in all four treatment groups. There was no correla-
`tion between the amount of improvement and duration
`of disease or patient age at baseline, but there was some
`correlation between the aqueous vascular endothelial
`growth factor (VEGF) level at baseline and amount of
`improvement. These data indicate that excess produc-
`tion of VEGF in the retinas of patients with CRVO or
`BRVO is a major contributor to macular edema and sug-
`gest that additional studies investigating the efficacy of
`intraocular injections of ranibizumab are needed.
`Received 28 September 2007; accepted 7 January 2008; published online
`5 February 2008. doi:10.1038/mt.2008.10
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The pathogenesis of central retinal vein occlusions (CRVOs) is
`poorly understood. In the early stages, there are scattered hemorr-
`hages throughout the entire retina, cotton wool patches, a sign of
`retinal ischemia, and massive edema of the retina. Fluorescein
`angiography often shows delayed filling of retinal veins suggesting
`
`reduced blood flow, staining of the walls of retinal veins, and leakage
`of dye into the retina. It has been concluded that this picture most
`likely occurs from thrombosis within the central retinal vein caus-
`ing partial obstruction of blood flow from the eye, increased intra-
`luminal pressure in the retinal veins, and increased transudation of
`blood and plasma into the retina. Histopathology has confirmed
`the presence of a thrombus in the central retinal vein in several
`cases.1 The marked increase in interstitial fluid and protein increases
`interstitial pressure and is likely to be an impediment to capillary
`perfusion resulting in ischemia. The subacute stage varies among
`patients depending primarily upon the amount of retinal ischemia,
`and patients are classified as ischemic or nonischemic, although it is
`not an all or none dichotomy. In some patients ischemia increases
`over time and they are viewed as undergoing a transition from nonis-
`chemic to ischemic. Severe retinal ischemia can be complicated by
`retinal neovascularization, iris neovascularization, neovascular glau-
`coma, and a very poor visual outcome. Thus the amount of retinal
`ischemia is one of the major determinants of outcome.
`Those patients classified as nonischemic still have retinal isch-
`emia, as demonstrated by cotton wool patches and areas of capil-
`lary nonperfusion seen in fluorescein angiograms. These patients
`often enter a chronic stage in which they have severe macular
`edema that may last for many months and often years. Eventually
`the edema may resolve, presumably because there is resolution of
`the venous obstruction due to recanalization and/or formation of
`collateral vessels, but generally the visual outcome is poor due to
`damage to macular photoreceptors from the chronic edema, poor
`perfusion of perifoveal capillaries, or both.2
`Hypertension is a major risk factor for branch retinal vein
`occlusions (BRVOs).3 Chronic hypertension leads to thickening
`of the walls of retinal arterioles and since retinal arterioles and
`veins share a common adventitia at crossings, this may cause
` constriction of retinal veins that can lead to occlusions.4,5 The
`complications of BRVOs are similar to those for CRVOs but more
`limited in scope, because only part of the retina is drained by the
`involved branch vein. There is increased luminal pressure distal
`to the obstruction resulting in increased transudation of blood
`and plasma, increased interstitial fluid pressure, and reduced
`
`Correspondence: Peter A. Campochiaro, Maumenee 719, The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
`600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-9277, USA. E-mail: pcampo@jhmi.edu
`
`Molecular Therapy vol. 16 no. 4, 791–799 april 2008
`
`791
`
`CELLTRION - EXHIBIT 1036
`
`

`

`Ranibizumab for Macular Edema in Vein Occlusions
`
`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`Table 1 Baseline characteristics
`
`CRVO
`
`BRVO
`
`0.3 mg
`
`0.5 mg
`
`0.3 mg
`
`0.5 mg
`
`63 ± 17
`69
`34–83
`
`9 ± 7
`7.4
`1–26
`
`68 ± 13
`70
`48–83
`
`16 ± 17
`13
`0.5–53
`
`69 ± 13
`68
`43–84
`
`65 ± 10
`65
`50–82
`
`5 ± 3
`5
`0.4–9
`
`3 ± 2
`3
`0.8–6
`
`capillary perfusion causing ischemia. Since the area of ischemic
`retina tends to be much less than that in patients with CRVO, iris
`neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma are rare, but retinal
`neovascularization adjacent to the ischemic retina can occur and
`can cause vitreous hemorrhages necessitating scatter photocoagu-
`lation to the ischemic retina. The most common cause of reduced
`vision is macular edema, but nonperfusion of perifoveal capillar-
`ies can also be another contributing factor. Grid laser photoco-
`agulation to the poorly perfused retina adjacent to the fovea can
`help to resolve macular edema and improve vision.6
`Thus, in both CRVO and BRVO, retinal ischemia occurs and
`serves as an exacerbating factor. The ischemic retina releases
`vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which underlies
`neovascular complications, but also causes excessive vascular
`permeability.7,8 Hence, the release of VEGF is likely to contrib-
`ute to macular edema. In this study, we investigated the potential
`contribution of VEGF to macular edema in patients with CRVO
`and BRVO by testing the effects of intraocular injections of ranibi-
`zumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), an Fab
`fragment that binds and neutralizes all isoforms of VEGF-A.9
`
`RESULTS
`Baseline characteristics of study patients
`The baseline characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. For
`CRVO patients, the 0.5-mg group was somewhat older than the
`0.3-mg group and had a longer duration of disease.
`
`Effect of ranibizumab on central retinal
`(foveal) thickening
`Figure 1 shows optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans at all
`time points up to the primary endpoint for five randomly selected
`patients with CRVO randomized to each dose. Although the
`response varied somewhat among patients in each group, most
`patients showed substantial reduction in central retinal thickness
`over time. Within 7 days of the first injection, 8 out of 10 patients
`in the 0.3-mg group and 9 out of 10 in the 0.5-mg group had a
`substantial improvement in edema as assessed by OCT (Figure 2a
`and b). Four patients in the 0.3-mg group showed a worsening of
`the thickening between the time points of 1 week and 1 month
`but improved after the next two injections, while the other six
`showed persistent improvement 1 month after the first injection
`that improved further with subsequent injections (Figure 2a). All
`the patients in the 0.5-mg dose group showed the latter pattern
`of response (Figure 2b). Figure 3 shows the OCT scans of the
`five randomly selected patients with BRVO randomized to each
`group. They tended to show rapid and sustained responses after
`the first injection of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab with further
`improvement after subsequent injections. Measurements of cen-
`tral retinal thickening confirmed that this was the case for most
`patients, but two in the 0.3-mg group and one in the 0.5-mg group
`showed slight worsening between the time points of 1 week and
`1 month (Figure 4).
`In patients with CRVO, the median excess foveal thickness
`was 340 μm at baseline in the 0.3-mg group and 7 days after the
`first injection it improved to 124 μm, thus eliminating 64% of the
`edema (Figure 5a). In the 0.5-mg group, the median excess foveal
`thickness improved from 309 μm at baseline to 53 μm 1 week after
`
`Age (years)
`Mean ± SD
` Median
` Range
`Duration of disease (months)
`Mean ± SD
` Median
` Range
`Systemic disease
` Diabetes
` Hypertension
` Hyperlipidema
` Elevated homocysteine
`Ocular disease
` Glaucoma
` Other
`Prior treatment
`0
` Bevacizumab
`1
` Steroids
`1
` Laser
`Visual acuity (ETDRS letters read at 4 m)
`Mean ± SD
`16 ± 13
` Median
`18
`Excess foveal thickness (in μm)
`297 ± 126 252 ± 104 288 ± 101
`Mean ± SD
`346 ± 88
`309
`270
`294
` Median
`340
`Abbreviations: BRVO, branch retinal vein occlusion; CRVO, central retinal vein
`occlusion; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study.
`
`3
`5
`4
`1
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`6
`7
`3
`
`3
`5
`
`0
`2
`3
`
`3
`9
`7
`3
`
`0
`5
`
`1
`2
`4
`
`3
`8
`3
`6
`
`1
`3
`
`2
`2
`3
`
`23 ± 15
`26
`
`26 ± 12
`29
`
`20 ± 14
`23
`
`the first injection, thus eliminating 83% of the edema (Figure 5b).
`At the primary endpoint of 3 months, excess foveal thickness was
`reduced to 25 μm (eliminating 93% of the edema) in the 0.3-mg
`group, and 35 μm (eliminating 89% of the edema), in the 0.5-mg
`group. Thus, in patients with CRVO, edema was reduced to a
`greater extent and the reduction was more sustained after a single
`injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab compared to 0.3 mg, but after
`three injections of either dose, most of the edema, i.e., ~90%, had
`been eliminated.
`In patients with macular edema due to BRVO, the median
`excess foveal thickness was 270 μm at baseline in the 0.3-mg group
`and 7 days after the first injection it improved to 48 μm, thus eli-
`minating 82% of the edema (Figure 5c). In the 0.5-mg group, the
`median excess foveal thickness was 294 μm at baseline and 7 days
`after the first injection it improved to 51 μm, eliminating 83% of
`the edema (Figure 5d). At the primary endpoint, excess foveal
`thickness was essentially eliminated in each group.
`The last injection was at the time point of month 2; by month
`4 in some patients and month 6 in most patients there was recur-
`rent edema in patients with CRVO and worsening of the edema
`
`792
`
`www.moleculartherapy.org vol. 16 no. 4 april 2008
`
`

`

`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`Ranibizumab for Macular Edema in Vein Occlusions
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:5)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:10)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:2)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:1)
`
`(cid:11)(cid:14)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:4)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:5)
`(cid:2)
`
`(cid:11)(cid:14)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:4)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:5)
`
`Figure 1 Cross sections through the fovea obtained by optical coherence tomography in patients with central retinal vein occlusion. The hori-
`zontal cross sections at baseline (BL), day 7 (D7), month 1 (M1), month 2 (M2), and month 3 (M3, primary endpoint) are shown for five randomly
`selected patients of the 10 patients treated with (a) 0.3 mg or (b) 0.5 mg of ranibizumab.
`
`tended to occur sooner after the last injection in the 0.3-mg
`group compared to the 0.5-mg group. In the 0.3-mg/CRVO group,
`seven, and then five patients were given another treatment (usually
`an off-label injection of bevacizumab) at the time points of months
`4 and 6, respectively. In the 0.5-mg/CRVO group, three, and then
`six patients received additional injections at the time points of
`months 4 and 6, respectively. In patients with BRVO, recurrent
`edema was somewhat less frequent than in patients with CRVO,
`but still occurred in several patients. In the 0.3-mg/BRVO group,
`one, and then two patients received additional injections at the time
`points of months 4 and 6, respectively, and in the 0.5-mg/BRVO
`group, four patients, and then one, received additional injections at
`time points of months 4 and 6, respectively.
`
`Effect of ranibizumab on visual acuity
`In the CRVO group at the primary endpoint, the change from base-
`line (in the median number of letters read on an Early Treatment
`Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart) at 4 m was 17 and 14 in patients
`treated with 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab, respectively (Figure 5a
`and b). All the patients in the 0.3-mg group and eight patients in
`the 0.5-mg group showed improvement in vision at the primary
`endpoint compared to baseline. One of the patients showed a
`reduction of 16 letters at the endpoint of 3 months, that was back
`to baseline at 4 months. The other patient showed a reduction of
`11 letters at the endpoint of 3 months that was judged to be due
`to progression of edema despite administration of ranibizumab;
`there was no evidence of ischemia or any other problem that
`could be attributed to the drug. The percentage of patients with
`
` clinically significant visual improvement defined as an improve-
`ment of ≥15 letters was 70% in the 0.3-mg group and 40% in the
`0.5-mg group.
`At the primary endpoint in patients with macular edema due
`to BRVO, the median change in visual acuity (VA) from baseline
`was 10 letters in the 0.3-mg group, and 18 in the 0.5-mg dose
`group (Figure 5c and d). One patient in the 0.5-mg dose group
`showed a reduction in VA of three letters at the primary endpoint,
`but all other patients showed improved vision. The percentage of
`patients with clinically significant visual improvement defined as
`an improvement of ≥15 letters was 40% in the 0.3-mg group and
`70% in the 0.5-mg group.
`
`Effect of duration of disease and patient’s age
`on visual outcome
`Figure 6 shows scatter plots of change from baseline in VA versus
`the patient’s age or duration of disease for patients with CRVO
`or BRVO treated with ranibizumab. There was no correlation
`between the amount of improvement in VA and duration of
`edema. There were four patients who had edema from CRVO for
`>2 years prior to starting injections of ranibizumab and three of
`them improved in VA by >15 letters. Three patients had edema
`from BRVO for >2 years at baseline and they showed improve-
`ments of 41, 21, and 14 letters in 3 months. Therefore, chronic
`edema from a vein occlusion does not preclude visual improve-
`ment as a result of intraocular injections of ranibizumab. There
`was no correlation between the patient’s age and visual improve-
`ment; improvement in VA of >15 letters occurred in two out of
`
`Molecular Therapy vol. 16 no. 4 april 2008
`
`793
`
`

`

`Ranibizumab for Macular Edema in Vein Occlusions
`
`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:33)(cid:28)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:14)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:11)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:6) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:16) (cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:1)
`
`(cid:19)(cid:38)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:1)(cid:35)(cid:27)(cid:37)(cid:30)(cid:34)(cid:25)(cid:32)(cid:1)(cid:37)(cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:26)(cid:31)(cid:34)(cid:27)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:30)(cid:34)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:33)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:6)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:24)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:16) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:15)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:37)(cid:30)(cid:27)(cid:34)(cid:37)
`
`(cid:14)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:2)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:33)(cid:28)
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23) (cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:23)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:11)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:6)
`
`(cid:19)(cid:38)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:1)(cid:35)(cid:27)(cid:37)(cid:30)(cid:34)(cid:25)(cid:32)(cid:1)(cid:37)(cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:26)(cid:31)(cid:34)(cid:27)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:30)(cid:34)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:33)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:12)
`(cid:21)(cid:10)
`(cid:21)(cid:9)
`(cid:21)(cid:8)
`(cid:21)(cid:7)
`(cid:18)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:37)(cid:30)(cid:27)(cid:34)(cid:37)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:10)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:11)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:13)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:14)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:15)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:10)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:11)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:13)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:14)
`
`Figure 2 Excess foveal thickness at each visit from baseline (BL) to month 6 (M6) in patients with central retinal vein occlusion. The bars
`represent excess foveal thickness (central 1 mm retinal thickness—212 μm), which is a measure of the amount of macular edema, at BL just prior to
`injection of ranibizumab, and at day 7 (D7) and months 1 (M1), 2 (M2), 3 (M3), 4 (M4), and 6 (M6) for patients that received three injections of
`(a) 0.3 mg or (b) 0.5 mg of ranibizumab. The arrows show when injections were done (R, ranibizumab; B, bevacizumab; T, triamcinolone). Fairly rapid
`improvement in excess foveal thickness occurred in essentially all patients in the 0.5-mg dose group and most patients in the 0.3-mg group, but a few
`patients in the latter group showed small and/or delayed responses. Most patients showed recurrent edema 1–3 months after the last injection.
`showed elevation of blood pressure, thromboembolic events, or
`three patients with CRVO and three out of four patients with
`any other systemic problems. One patient, an 83-year-old male
`BRVO who were >80 years at baseline.
`with a history of pre-existent heart disease, died from a myocar-
`dial infarction 6 months after the last injection of ranibizumab;
`this was judged to be unrelated to the ranibizumab. As noted
`above, 38 out of 40 subjects showed improvement in VA at the
`primary endpoint compared to baseline and in the other two
`patients the reduction in vision was not felt to be attributable to
`ranibizumab.
`
`VEGF levels in aqueous
`The mean aqueous VEGF level at baseline was 39 pg/ml in 17
`patients with BRVO and 380 pg/ml in the 18 patients with CRVO
`for which measurements could be performed, a difference that
`was statistically significant (P = 0.001). There was an inverse cor-
`relation between baseline aqueous VEGF level and visual outcome
`in CRVO patients considered alone (P = 0.038) and for CRVO and
`BRVO patients considered together (P = 0.038); although BRVO
`patients considered alone did not reach statistical significance
`(Figure 7). There was no correlation of VEGF levels with excess
`foveal thickness at baseline or change in excess foveal thickness
`after treatment with ranibizumab.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Although this is an uncontrolled, open-label trial involving a rela-
`tively small number of patients, the results were very consistent
`among patients and suggest that intraocular injections of ranibi-
`zumab have a substantial effect on macular edema due to CRVO
`or BRVO. In both patient populations, the results were good with
`either 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab and no clear differences could
`be discerned between the doses except that more patients seemed
`to have rapid improvements in center subfield thickness and more
`
`Safety
`Intraocular injections of ranibizumab were tolerated well
`with no inflammation or other problems. None of the patients
`
`794
`
`www.moleculartherapy.org vol. 16 no. 4 april 2008
`
`

`

`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`Ranibizumab for Macular Edema in Vein Occlusions
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:10)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:4)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:11)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:2)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:5)
`
`(cid:1)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:14)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:4)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:5)
`(cid:2)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:14)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:4)
`
`(cid:15)(cid:5)
`
`Figure 3 Cross sections through the fovea obtained by optical coherence tomography in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. The hori-
`zontal cross sections at baseline (BL), day 7 (D7), month 1 (M1), month 2 (M2), and month 3 (M3, primary endpoint) are shown for five randomly
`selected patients of the ten patients treated with (a) 0.3 mg or (b) 0.5 mg of ranibizumab.
` ranibizumab, because the patient’s age being advanced at baseline
`had improvements that lasted for a month after the initial injection
`did not negatively impact the outcome.
`in the 0.5-mg groups compared to the 0.3-mg groups. However, at
`No drug-related adverse effects such as elevation of blood
`the 3-month primary endpoint, 1 month after the third injection,
`pressure, thromboembolic events, or any other systemic problems
`~90% of excess foveal thickness was eliminated in both patient
`were observed. This provides some preliminary data, suggesting
`populations with either dose. In addition, improvements from
`that intraocular injections of ranibizumab are well-tolerated in
`baseline in VA were large in both dose groups for patients with
`patients with retinal vein occlusions just as they are in patients
`macular edema due to CRVO or BRVO. These results are very
`with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.11,12
`encouraging and strongly support the performance of larger, more
`definitive studies.
`Measurement of VEGF levels in aqueous demonstrated a
`The Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study was a large multi-
`higher mean level in patients with CRVO compared to patients
`center trial that investigated the effect of grid laser photocoagula-
`with BRVO. In patients with CRVO there was an inverse correla-
`tion in patients with macular edema due to CRVO.10 Although 69%
`tion with VEGF level at baseline and the visual outcome. Further
`work is needed to determine the predictive value of baseline aque-
`of patients in the treated group compared to 0% in the untreated
`ous levels of VEGF and to determine the range of VEGF levels that
`group showed reduction of fluorescein leakage in the macula at
`occur in other disease processes such as neovascular age-related
`the end of 1 year, there was no difference in the final VA (20/200
`in treated patients versus 20/160 in untreated patients). It has been
`macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema.
`felt that a possible explanation is that chronic edema due to CRVO
`In addition to grid laser therapy, several treatments have been
`leads to permanent visual loss. Our data demonstrate that visual
`tried in patients with macular edema due to CRVO including
`improvement is possible in some patients who have had edema
`the use of anticoagulants, fibrinolytics, steroids, acetozolamide,
`for >1 year and in some cases several years. In fact, there was no
`isovolemic hemodilution, surgically induced retinochoroidal
`inverse correlation between duration of edema at baseline and
`anastamoses or laser-induced retinochoroidal anastamoses, and
`improvement in VA after three injections of ranibizumab, sug-
`radial optic neurotomy. A recent meta-analysis of all published
`gesting that patients with chronic edema should not be excluded
`randomized clinical trials concluded that there is no convincing
`from treatment based solely upon the duration of edema. Our
` evidence that any of these treatments provide benefit.13 In con-
`data suggest that chronicity of edema and the relatively slow reso-
`trast, grid laser therapy provides modest benefit in patients with
`lution of edema after grid laser therapy are not likely to explain
`macular edema due to BRVO;6 after 3 years, patients treated with
`the poor visual results after grid laser therapy. Our data also sug-
`grid laser photocoagulation improved by 1.33 lines from base-
`gest that elderly patients with macular edema due to CRVO or
`line compared to an improvement of 0.23 lines in the control
`BRVO should not be excluded from treatment with intraocular
`group. There are several case series suggesting possible benefit
`
`Molecular Therapy vol. 16 no. 4 april 2008
`
`795
`
`

`

`Ranibizumab for Macular Edema in Vein Occlusions
`
`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:31)(cid:26)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:13)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:14)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:10)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:11)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:13)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:15)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:31)(cid:26)
`
`(cid:14)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:1)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:11)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:6)
`
`(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:34)(cid:34)(cid:1)(cid:33)(cid:25)(cid:35)(cid:28)(cid:32)(cid:23)(cid:30)(cid:1)(cid:35)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:29)(cid:32)(cid:25)(cid:34)(cid:34)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:28)(cid:32)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:31)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:35)(cid:28)(cid:25)(cid:32)(cid:35)
`(cid:14)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:2)
`
`(cid:13)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:12)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:19)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:22) (cid:22)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:12)
`(cid:20)(cid:10)
`(cid:20)(cid:9)
`(cid:20)(cid:8)
`(cid:20)(cid:7)
`(cid:17)(cid:13)
`(cid:16)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:11)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:6)
`
`(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:34)(cid:34)(cid:1)(cid:33)(cid:25)(cid:35)(cid:28)(cid:32)(cid:23)(cid:30)(cid:1)(cid:35)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:29)(cid:32)(cid:25)(cid:34)(cid:34)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:28)(cid:32)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:31)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:35)(cid:28)(cid:25)(cid:32)(cid:35)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:10)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:11)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:15)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:6)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:8)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:16)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:14)
`
`Figure 4 Excess foveal thickness at each visit from baseline (BL) to month 6 (M6) in patients with branch retinal vein occ

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket