IPR2020-01712
`Patent 8,243,593 B2
`
`proceeding with respect to the Parties.
`
`Petitioners Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Juniper Networks,Inc.,
`
`VMware,Inc., and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Patent Owner
`
`also requested that the Settlement Agreementbe treated as business
`
`confidential information and be kept separate from thefile ofPatent
`
`8,243,593. Joint Request 1. Although Petitioner Dell Technologies does not
`
`join the request, Petitioners Palo Alto Networks,Inc., Juniper Networks,
`
`Inc., VMware,Inc., and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Companyand Patent
`
`Ownerrepresent that Dell Technologies does not oppose the request. Jd.
`
`After reviewing the Settlement Agreement, we find that the Settlement
`Agreementcontains confidential business information regarding the terms of
`settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement
`
`Agreement betweenthe Parties as business confidential information
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. §42.74(c).
`
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuantto
`
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`IH. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above,it is:
`
`ORDEREDthatthe Joint Motion to Terminate is granted, and
`
`IPR2020-01712 is terminated with respectto Petitioner and Patent Owner;
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe Joint Request to File Settlement
`
`Agreement as Business Confidential Information is granted, and the
`
`Settlement Agreementshall be kept separate from the file of Patent
`8,243,593, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on
`
`written request, or to any person on a showingofgood cause, pursuant to
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 275
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 275
`
`
`Patent 8,243,593 B2
`
`proceeding with respect to the Parties.
`
`Petitioners Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Juniper Networks,Inc.,
`
`VMware,Inc., and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Patent Owner
`
`also requested that the Settlement Agreementbe treated as business
`
`confidential information and be kept separate from thefile ofPatent
`
`8,243,593. Joint Request 1. Although Petitioner Dell Technologies does not
`
`join the request, Petitioners Palo Alto Networks,Inc., Juniper Networks,
`
`Inc., VMware,Inc., and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Companyand Patent
`
`Ownerrepresent that Dell Technologies does not oppose the request. Jd.
`
`After reviewing the Settlement Agreement, we find that the Settlement
`Agreementcontains confidential business information regarding the terms of
`settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement
`
`Agreement betweenthe Parties as business confidential information
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. §42.74(c).
`
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuantto
`
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`IH. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above,it is:
`
`ORDEREDthatthe Joint Motion to Terminate is granted, and
`
`IPR2020-01712 is terminated with respectto Petitioner and Patent Owner;
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe Joint Request to File Settlement
`
`Agreement as Business Confidential Information is granted, and the
`
`Settlement Agreementshall be kept separate from the file of Patent
`8,243,593, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on
`
`written request, or to any person on a showingofgood cause, pursuant to
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 275
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 275
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01712
`Patent 8,243,593 B2
`
`35 U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jonathan Tuminaro
`Michael D. Specht
`Daniel Block
`Todd Thurheimer
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX, P.L.L.C.,
`jtuminar-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`mspecht-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`dblock-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`tthurheimer-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`
`Christopher TL Douglas
`Ben Pleune
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`ben.pleune@alston.com
`
`James L. Day
`Daniel Callaway
`Winston Liaw
`FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
`jday@fbm.com
`dcallaway@fbm.com
`wliaw@fbm.com
`
`Tiffany C. Miller
`James M.Heintz
`DLAPIPER LLP (US)
`tiffany.miller@us.dlapiper.com
`jim. heintz@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 276
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 276
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01712
`Patent 8,243,593 B2
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax
`Patrick Maloney
`Jason C. Linger
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`maloney@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`linger@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 277
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 277
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00608-ADA Documentb& Filed O9/O1/20 Page Loft
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDINGA PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`(Patents.
`( [7 thepatent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:20-cv-808
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`9/1/2020
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
`
`Nokia Corporation, Nokia of America Corporation, and
`Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`L] Cross Bill
`
`L] OtherPleading
`
`
`
`DECISION/JIUDGEMENT CLERK
`
`LC] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Csee
`aes
`Be
`
`LC] Answer
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling documentadding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 278
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 278
`
`
`
`Case &:20-cv-OOL96-RWS ODocument4 Filed 12/10/20 Page Loli Pageib a: 154
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDINGA PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`(Patents.
`( [7 thepatent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKETNO. 5:20-cv-196
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`12/10/2020
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
`
`Fortinet, Inc. and Masergy Communications, Inc.
`
`sd
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`L] Cross Bill
`
`L] OtherPleading
`
`
`
`DECISION/JIUDGEMENT CLERK
`
`LC] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Csee
`aes
`Be
`
`LC] Answer
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling documentadding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 279
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 279
`
`
`
`gee UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`OBS
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www, uspto, gov
`
`S)
`
` APPLICATION NUMBER|FILING OR 371(C) DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATTY.DOCKET NO./TITLE
`
`REQUESTID
`
`11/022,599
`
`12/22/2004
`
`Vishnu Natchu
`
`SABLE-01008
`
`135229
`
`Acknowledgement of Loss of Entitlement to Entity Status Discount
`
`Theentity status change request below filed through Private PAIR on 03/26/2021 has been accepted.
`
`CERTIFICATIONS:
`
`applicable.
`
`Change of Entity Status:
`X Applicant changing to regular undiscountedfee status.
`NOTE: Checking this box will be taken to be notification of loss of entitlement to small or micro entity status, as
`
`This portion must be completed by the signatory or signatories making the entity status change in accordance
`with 37 CFR 1.4(d)(4).
`
`43258
`
`Stuart J. West/
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 280
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 280
`
`
`
`Case &:2i-cv-O00175-ADA Document& Filed 02/28/21 Page Loft
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDINGA PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`(Patents.
`( [7 thepatent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:21-cv-175
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`2/25/2021
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
`
`Riverbed Technology, Inc.
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`L] Cross Bill
`
`L] OtherPleading
`
`
`
`DECISION/JIUDGEMENT CLERK
`
`LC] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Csee
`aes
`Be
`
`LC] Answer
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling documentadding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 281
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 281
`
`
`
`Case Lidi-cy-00207-LPS Document] Filed 02/12/21 Page i of i Pagel: 138i
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDINGA PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the District of Delaware
`on the following
`CJ Trademarks or
`(VW Patents.
`( [] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
`
`DEFENDANT
`Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and Check Point
`Software Technologies, Inc.
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`CJ Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`CJ Answer
`
`LI Cross Bill
`
`LI OtherPleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 9,774,501
`
`5/14/2012
`
`Sable Networks, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director©Copy 3—Upontermination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 282
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 282
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-00196-RWS Documentlé Filed 02/10/21 Page lofi PagelD # 176
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDINGA PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`(Patents.
`( [7 thepatent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKETNO. 5:20-cv-196
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`12/10/2020
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
`
`Fortinet, Inc. and Masergy Communications, Inc.
`
`sd
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`L] Cross Bill
`
`L] OtherPleading
`
`
`
`
`
`LC] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Csee
`aes
`Be
`
`LC] Answer
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISION/IUDGEMENT
`
`Tt is hercby ORDEREDthat the above-captioned causc of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All rclicf not previously granted is
`hereby DENIED-AS-MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the above-captioned cause of action.
`
`CLERK
`David A. O'Toole
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Lynn Siebel
`
`DATE
`01/26/21
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling documentadding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 283
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 283
`
`
`
`Case &:20-cv-OQ0120-RWS Document4 Filed 06/30/20 Page lofi Pageibé: 149
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDINGA PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`(Patents.
`( [7 thepatent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`5:20-cv-120
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`6/30/2020
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Aruba
`Networks, Inc.
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`L] Cross Bill
`
`L] OtherPleading
`
`
`
`DECISION/JIUDGEMENT CLERK
`
`LC] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Csee
`aes
`Be
`
`LC] Answer
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling documentadding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 284
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 284
`
`
`
`Case b2i-cy-00203-LPS Document Filed O8/06/23 Pace i of 3 PageliD &
`
`
`
` REPORT ON THE
`
`Rail Stap &
`IS. Patent aad Trademark (ifiee
`FILING OR DETERSUNATIONOF AN
`
`
`
`2.0, Box 1450
`
`
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`Alexandria, VA 22393-1480
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`
`%
`y ek
`serebyon are h
`
` in Compliance sit
`court action hay been
`
`
`~ 2 Toxiamark
`
`
`an fhe following
`
`
`
`L
`
`
`ek F
`at Sehware Technolagies Lid
`hnologies, ire.
`
`
`
`$8,088,775
`
`
`
`¢ $243,598
`
`gaat
`
`| Sable Networks, inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`AOT2008
`
`Satle Networks, inc.
`phepeeeeOe
`
`de the abovescontithed os
`
`LUDED BY
`
`P7650 SoeSPEERPETES
`
`-,
`
`Copy l-Lipes inition ef action, mal thin copy te IMrectar Copy }—U pun termuianiien of action, mall this copy te [Neecter
`Cayy i—-Tpon Hing doeument adding patertia}, mail dhs copyta irectar Copy 4Clase file capy
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 285
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 285
`
`
`
`Case i2i-cy-00203-LPS Document Filed O8/O6/21 Page 2 of 3 PagelD a: 190
`
`TN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`i
`
`C.A. Ne, 21-20 1-LPS
`mae
`
`SABLE NETWORKS, INC. AND
`SABLE IP, LLC,
`Plaieifs,
`
`¥e
`
`Cusce Pont Sorrware TECHNOLOGIES
`LTD. AMD CHECKPOINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNCLOCHES, INC,
`
`Defendants,
`
`STIPULATION OF DISSESSAL OF DEFENDANTS CHECK POINT SOPTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES LTD. AND CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs Sable Networks, fac. and Sable IP, LLC (collectively, “Sabie"} and Defendants
`
`Check Point Sofhware Technologies Lid. and Check Point Software Technologies,
`
`Inc.
`
`(collectively, “Defendants”} file this Stimulation of Diamissal under Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`4a iA, Sable and Defendants stipulate that:
`
`L
`
`Sable consents te dismissal WITH prejudice of all of its claims against Defendants
`
`int this suit.
`
`a
`
`Sable and Defendants shall each bear their own atiorney fees and costs incurred in
`
`connection with this action.
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 286
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 286
`
`
`
`Case i2i-cy-00203-LPS Document Filed O&8/06/21 Pace 3 ofS PageliD a: Lai
`
`Dated: April 23, 2621
`
`BAYARD, PA.
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNMELL
`LLLP
`ffRonald P GoldenUi
`Stephen B. Branerman ($4952)
`isf foc’ Bo Showenfeld
`Ronald P Golden TU 6254}
`Jack B. Blumenfeld GIGI
`S00 N, Kinw Street, Guile 400
`i201 North Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`BO, Box 1347
`(302) 655-3600
`Wilmington, DE 1¢89¢
`shrauerman@bayardlaw.com
`(3023 658-9296
`rgoliengihayardiaw.com
`Jolumenfeld@morrisnichois.com
`
`Aiterneyfor Defendants Check Point Software
`Technologies Lid. and Check Point Software
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`OF COHINSEL:
`
`BERGER & FIPSRIND LLP
`Daniel © Hinskind
`Dorian S. Berger
`3338 Brighton Way, Ste, 320
`Beverly Hills, CA S216
`(323) B#6-3438
`dpnd@bergerbipskindcorm
`dab@hhergerhipskindcam
`
`Altornaysfar Plaintiffs Sable Nenvorks,
`Tae. and Sable [P, LEC
`
`Koa
`
`TT ES ORDERED this
`
`pf”
`
`ea
`
`,
`
`?
`
`Ge Aa al
`
`day of
`
`in
`
`, 2021,
`
`ence” i
`O
`/ i
`
`;
`po,x
`& Leonard P. Stark
`The #
`Uniled States Chief District Judge
`
`be
`
`Splunk Inc.
`
`Exhibit1002
`
`Page 287
`
`Splunk Inc. Exhibit 1002 Page 287
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
