`IPR2022-00222
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al,
`Petitioner
`
`
`v.
`
`MEMORYWEB, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2022-00222
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`Description
`
`2002
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2001 WITHDRAWN
`Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2001-
`160058 and Certified English Translation (“Fujiwara”)
`2003 Withdrawn
`2004
`U.S. Patent No. 6,714,215 (“Flora”)
`Supplemental Declaration of Kevin Jakel, Unified Patents, LLC v.
`MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413 (Dec. 30, 2021) (redacted version)
`3 Questions for Unified Patents CEO Post-Oil States (Part II)
`Petition for Inter Partes Review, Apple Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC,
`IPR2022-00031, Paper 1 (PTAB Oct. 30, 2021)
`Brief of Amicus Curiae Unified Patents Inc. in Cuozzo Speed
`Technologies, LLC v. Michelle K. Lee et al.
`Unified Patents September 3, 2021 Press Release regarding
`MemoryWeb IPR
`Unified Patents September 9, 2021 email regarding MemoryWeb IPR
`Unified Patents’ website link (FAQs)
`(https://www.unifiedpatents.com/faq)
`Case Readiness Status Report, MemoryWeb, LLC v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case No.
`21-cv-411 (W.D. Tex.) (Sept. 3, 2021)
`Amended Complaint, MemoryWeb, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-411
`(W.D. Tex.) (Nov. 24, 2021)
`Excerpts from Defendant Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`2013
`
`2014
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`Description
`
`Electronics America, Inc.’s Initial Invalidity Contentions,
`MemoryWeb, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-411 (W.D. Tex.) (Jan. 31,
`2022)
`Joint Motion for Entry of Agreed Scheduling Order, MemoryWeb, LLC
`v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc., Case No. 21-cv-411 (W.D. Tex.) (Oct. 1, 2021)
`MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku Inc., 6:18-cv-00308, (W.D. Texas) D.I. 83
`IAM, “The last thing anyone should think about WDTX is that it is
`patent plaintiff friendly, says Albright” (Apr. 7, 2020)
`Pages from The Way Back Machine The Wayback Machine-
`https://web.archive.org/web/20000510141416/http://www.photo.net:80
`Cluster Map, Thumbnail, First Combination Comparison
`Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2007-
`323544 and Certified English Translation (“Takakura”)
`Patent Owner Response, Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC,
`IPR2021-01413, Paper 30 (Redacted Version)
`Transcript of the deposition of Dr. Philip Greenspun dated August 26,
`2022
`Declaration of Professor Glenn Reinman, Ph.D.
`Corrected Patent Owner’s Response
`Transcript of the deposition of Dr. Philip Greenspun dated, January 19,
`2023
`Views 1 – 6 Comparison
`Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413,
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2021
`
`2022
`
`2023
`2024
`
`2025
`
`2026
`2027
`2028
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`Description
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to Seal and For Entry of Protective Order (Paper
`10)
`Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413,
`Petitioner’s Updated Mandatory Notices (Paper 57)
`Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413, Final
`Written Decision (Public Version) (Paper 67)
`Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413, Decision
`Granting Director Review (Public Version) (Paper 76)
`Email Chain between Counsel for Patent Owner and Counsel for
`Petitioner (Mar. 13-15, 2023)
`Unified Patents Document Subpoena
`Unified Patents Testimony Subpoena
`Samsung Document Production Requests
`Email Chain between Counsel for Patent Owner and Counsel for
`Petitioner (June 5-9, 2023)
`Declaration of Jennifer Hayes
`Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413, Order
`Identifying Real Party in Interest (Public Version) (Paper 79)
`Unified Patents, LLC v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2021-01413, Order
`Entering Protective Order (Paper 26)
`Apple, Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2022-00031, Motion for Entry of
`Protective Order (Paper 52)
`Apple, Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC, IPR2022-00031, Motion Order
`Granting Motion for Protective Order (Paper 55)
`Declaration of Kevin Jakel
`Docket Reports
`
`2029
`
`2030
`
`2031
`
`2032
`
`2033
`2034
`2035
`
`2036
`
`2037
`
`2038
`
`2039
`
`2040
`
`2041
`
`2042
`2043
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`Description
`
`2044
`2045
`2046
`2047
`2048
`2049
`
`2050
`
`2051
`
`2052
`
`2053
`
`2054
`
`2055
`
`2056
`
`2057
`
`2058
`
`2059
`
`Blog Post regarding Petition Filing
`REDACTED Supplemental Declaration of Kevin Jakel
`Newsletter regarding Petition Filing
`Email list summary for Newsletter
`News Update regarding Petition Filing
`REDACTED Transcript of Kevin Jakel Deposition
`Transcript of October 15, 2019 Deposition of Kevin Jakel
`(IPR2019-00482)
`Non-confidential Brief of Barkan Wireless IP Holdings on
`Appeal from IPR2018-01186
`3 Questions for Unified Patents CEO Post-Oil States (Part II)
`Brief of Amicus Curiae Unified Patents Inc. in Cuozzo Speed
`Technologies, LLC v. Michelle K. Lee et al.
`Unified Patents September 3, 2021 Press Release regarding
`MemoryWeb IPR
`Unified Patents September 9, 2021 email regarding MemoryWeb
`IPR
`Unified Patent’s website link (Benefits for Large Company
`Members)
`Unified Patent’s website link (Unified Patents’ Collaborative
`Deterrence Approach)
`Unified Patent’s website link (Zones)
`(https://www.unifiedpatents.com/npe)
`Unified Patent’s website link (Success)
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`Description
`
`(https://www.unifiedpatents.com/success)
`Unified Patent’s website link (FAQs)
`(https://www.unifiedpatents.com/faq)
`Unified Patents Web Page at www.unifiedpatents.com/npe/
`CONFIDENTIAL - Transcript of May 26, 2022 Deposition of Kevin
`Jakel (IPR2021-01413)
`CONFIDENTIAL
`RESERVED
`RESERVED
`RESERVED
`CONFIDENTIAL
`CONFIDENTIAL
`CONFIDENTIAL - List of email addresses
`Unified Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 10,621,228
`CONFIDENTIAL - Supplemental Declaration of Kevin Jakel
`(IPR2021-01413)
`CONFIDENTIAL
`CONFIDENTIAL - List of email addresses
`CONFIDENTIAL - Order Identifying Real Party-in-Interest (IPR2021-
`01413)
`RESERVED
`Petitioner's Updated Mandatory Notices
`CONFIDENTIAL
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`
`2060
`
`2061
`
`2062
`
`2063
`2064
`2065
`2066
`2067
`2068
`2069
`2070
`
`2071
`
`2072
`2073
`
`2074
`
`2075
`2076
`2077
`
`2078
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`Description
`
`2079
`2080
`
`2081
`
`2082
`2083
`2084
`2085
`
`2086
`
`2087
`
`2088
`2089
`
`2090
`2091
`2092
`2093-
`2098
`2099
`2100-
`2109
`2110
`2111
`
`RESERVED
`RESERVED
`Unified Patent’s website link (Top 20 Petitioners)
`(https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/analytics/case-level/top-parties)
`RESERVED
`CONFIDENTIAL
`CONFIDENTIAL - Spreadsheet Unified US Challenges 2021
`CONFIDENTIAL - Transcript of September 7, 2023 Deposition of
`Kevin Jakel (IPR2022-00031)
`REDACTED - Order Identifying Real Party-in-Interest (IPR2021-
`01413) (Originally entered March 8, 2023)
`MemoryWeb Subscription plans website link at
`(www.memoryweb.me/pricing)
`Internet Archive Declaration of Nathaniel E Frank-White
`Unified Patents PTAB Filings Since March 1, 2021
`(Docketnavigator.com)
`CONFIDENTIAL – Request for Director Review
`REDACTED – Request for Director Review
`Unified RPI page (https://www.unifiedpatents.com/rpi)
`RESERVED
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - Samsung Declaration Dated September 17, 2023
`RESERVED
`
`Patworld Search Results
`Declaration of Eugene Lhymn
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`
`Description
`
`Sept. 24, 2021 Letter from B. Rahebi to D. Schwartz
`
`Declaration of Jennifer Hayes
`
`Invited Brief for the Director – U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as
`Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party, BTG Int’l Ltd. et al., v.
`Amneal Pharms. LLC et al., No. 2019-1147, Doc. 123 (Fed. Cir. Feb.
`1, 2019)
`DocketNavigator Statistics
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`2112
`
`2113
`
`2114
`
`2115
`
`2116
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: November 17, 2023
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/Jennifer Hayes/
`Jennifer Hayes
`Reg. No. 50,845
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`300 South Grand Avenue,
`Suite 4100,
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3151
`Tel. 213-629-6179
`Fax 866-781-9391
`
`7
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Updated
`
`Exhibit List was served on November 17, 2023, upon the following parties via
`
`electronic service:
`
`IPR39843-0117IP1@fr.com
`
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`
`jjm@fr.com
`
`in@fr.com
`
`cgreen@fr.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jennifer Hayes
`By:
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
