`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper 55
`Entered: August 22, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`APPLE, INC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MEMORYWEB, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent 10,621,228 B2
`
`
`
`
`Before LYNNE H. BROWNE, NORMAN H. BEAMER, and
`KEVIN C. TROCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TROCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed
`Motion for Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2041
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb - IPR 2022-00222
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent 10,621,228 B2
`
`
`
`On August 18, 2023, Patent Owner, MemoryWeb, LLC, filed an
`
`Unopposed Motion for Entry of Protective Order. Paper 52 (“Motion”). In
`
`its Motion, Patent Owner indicates that it “has conferred with Petitioner via
`
`email,” and that “Petitioner does not oppose entry of the proposed Protective
`
`Order.” Id. at 1.
`
`Patent Owner submits a proposed Protective Order that differs from
`
`the Board’s Default Protective Order. Id. at App. A. Patent Owner indicates
`
`that “[t]he proposed Protective Order differs from the Board’s Default
`
`Protective Order . . . in that the proposed Protective Order includes a
`
`‘HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY’ designation,”
`
`and that “the proposed Protective Order identifies the persons to which
`
`access to confidential information is limited and clarifies the treatment of
`
`confidential materials unless the Board determines that information does not
`
`qualify for confidential treatment.” Id. at 2. Patent Owner indicates that
`
`“these changes are designed to limit access to certain materials by each
`
`party’s representatives and in-house counsel,” and that the changes “do not
`
`limit [the] Board’s authority in this proceeding.” Id.
`
`
`
`Upon reviewing the proposed Protective Order, we conclude that the
`
`differences from the Board’s Default Protective Order address the parties’
`
`obligations and do not limit the Board’s authority in this proceeding.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of
`
`Protective Order is granted, and the proposed Protective Order (Paper 52,
`
`App. A) is entered.
`
`
`
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2041
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb - IPR 2022-00222
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00031
`Patent 10,621,228 B2
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jkushan@sidley.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jennifer Hayes
`George Dandalides
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com
`gdandalides@nixonpeabody.com
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2041
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb - IPR 2022-00222
`
`