Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00531-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Case No. 21-cv-411-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MemoryWeb, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Defendant,
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`MemoryWeb, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (a Korean
`Company) and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc.,
`
`Defendants
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s June 24, 2021 Order Governing Proceedings – Patent Case, the
`
`Court’s June 16, 2021 Amended Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases,
`
`and the parties’ Case Readiness Status Reports, Plaintiff MemoryWeb, LLC and Defendants
`
`Apple Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. hereby move
`
`that the Court enter the agreed Scheduling Order, attached as Exhibit A, in each of the above -
`
`captioned cases.
`
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`1 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Daniel J. Schwartz
`
`Arthur Gollwitzer III
` Texas Bar No. 24073336
`Jackson Walker LLP
`100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100
`Austin, TX 78701
`Telephone: 512.236.2268
`Facsimile: 512.236.2002
`agollwitzer@jw.com
`
`Daniel J. Schwartz (pro hac vice)
`Zachary Sorman (pro hac vice)
`Angelo J. Christopher (pro hac vice)
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`70 West Madison, Suite 3500
`Chicago, IL 60602-4224
`Tel: 312-977-4400
`djschwartz@nixonpeabody.com
`achristopher@nixonpeabody.com
`zsorman@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff MemoryWeb, LLC
`
`Dated: October 1, 2021
`
`/s/ Bita Rahebi___________________
`
`J. Stephen Ravel
`Texas State Bar No. 16584975
`Kelly Ransom
`Texas State Bar No. 24109427
`KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP
`303 Colorado, Suite 2000
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel: (512) 495-6429
`Email: steve.ravel@kellyhart.com
`Email: kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com
`
`Bita Rahebi, Pro Hac Vice
`Hector G. Gallegos, Pro Hac Vice
`Nicholas Rylan Fung, Pro Hac Vice
`Stephen Liu, Pro Hac Vice
`Karina Pundeff, Pro Hac Vice
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`707 Wilshire Boulevard
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-3543
`Telephone:
`213.892.5200
`213.892.5454
`Facsimile:
`
` Attorneys for Defendant Apple
`
`
`
`/s/ Allan A. Kassenoff____________
`Melissa R. Smith
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Richard A. Edlin
`Allan A. Kassenoff
`Jeffrey R. Colin
`Vimal M. Kapadia
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`MetLife Building, 200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22 Filed 10/01/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`Telephone: (212) 801-9200
`Facsimile: (212) 801-6400
`Email: edlinr@gtlaw.com
`Email: kassenoffa@gtlaw.com
`Email: colinj@gtlaw.com
`Email: kapadiav@gtlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`3 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22-1 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00531-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Case No. 21-cv-411-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MemoryWeb, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Defendant,
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`MemoryWeb, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (a Korean
`Company) and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc.,
`
`Defendants
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Case Readiness Status
`
`Report, the Court ORDERS that the following schedule will govern deadlines up to and includin g
`
`trial in the above-referenced cases. For post-Mark man dates, the parties will file an amende d
`
`proposed scheduling order once the Court sets a Mark man hearing date.
`
`
`
`De adline
`
`Completed
`
`Ite m
`
`Plaintiff to identify claims asserted.
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`4 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22-1 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`Completed
`
`October 1, 2021
`
`December 3, 2021
`
`December 17, 2021
`
`January 7, 2021
`
`January 14, 2022
`
`January 21, 2022
`
`Plaintiff serves preliminary infringement contentions in
`the form of a chart setting forth where in the accused
`product(s) each element of the asserted claim(s) are found.
`Plaintiff shall also identify the earliest priority date (i.e.
`the earliest date of invention) for each asserted claim and
`produce: (1) all documents evidencing conception and
`reduction to practice for each claimed invention, and (2) a
`copy of the file history for each patent in suit.
`
`The Parties shall submit an agreed Scheduling Order. If
`the parties cannot agree, the parties shall submit a separate
`Joint Motion for entry of each Order briefly setting forth
`their respective positions on items where they cannot
`agree. Absent agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff shall
`be responsible for the timely submission of this and other
`Joint filings.
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the
`form of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art
`references each element of the asserted claim(s) are found,
`(2) an identification of any limitations the Defendant
`contends are indefinite or lack written description under
`section 112, and (3) an identification of any claims the
`Defendant contends are directed to ineligible subject
`matter under section 101. Defendant shall also produce (1)
`all prior art referenced in the invalidity contentions, and
`(2) technical documents, including software where
`applicable, sufficient to show the operation of the accused
`product(s).
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall
`disclose any extrinsic evidence, including the identity of
`any expert witness they may rely upon with respect to
`claim construction or indefiniteness. With respect to any
`expert identified, the parties shall identify the scope of the
`topics for the witness’s expected testimony. With respect
`to items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall identify
`each such item by production number or produce a copy of
`any such item if not previously produced.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute
`and exchange revised list of terms/constructions.
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`5 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22-1 Filed 10/01/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`January 28, 2022
`
`February 18, 2022
`
`March 4, 2022
`
`March 18, 2022
`
`March 23, 2022
`
`March 25, 2022
`
`April 1, 2022 or as soon
`thereafter as practical
`
`
`April 4, 2022 (or 1 business day
`after Mark man hearing,
`whichever is later)
`May 13, 2022
`
`May 27, 2022
`
`July 22, 2022
`
`September 30, 2022
`
`
`Defendant files Opening claim construction brief,
`including any arguments that any claim terms are
`indefinite.
`
`Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.
`
`Defendant files Reply claim construction brief.
`
`Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding providing copies of
`the briefing to the Court and the technical adviser (if
`appointed).
`
`Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court and
`technical adviser (if appointed).
`Mark man Hearing at 9:00 a.m. This date is a placeholder
`and the Court may adjust this date as the Markman hearing
`approaches
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures
`per Rule 26(a).
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity
`Contentions. After this date, leave of Court is required for
`any amendment to Infringement or Invalidity contentions.
`This deadline does not relieve the Parties of their
`obligation to seasonably amend if new information is
`identified after initial contentions.
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required
`unless the amendment adds patents or patent claims.
`(Note: This includes amendments in response to a 12(c)
`motion.)
`
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims asserted and
`prior art references at issue. Unless the parties agree to the
`narrowing, they are ordered to contact the Court’s Law
`Clerk to arrange a teleconference with the Court to resolve
`the disputed issues.
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`6 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22-1 Filed 10/01/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`October 28, 2022
`
`November 4, 2022
`
`December 9, 2022
`
`January 11, 2023
`
`January 13, 2023
`
`January 27, 2023
`
`February 10, 2023
`
`February 24, 2023
`
`March 3, 2023
`
`March 10, 2023
`
`
`March 17, 2023
`
`
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confers to discuss
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art
`references at issue to triable limits. To the extent it helps
`the parties determine these limits, the parties are
`encouraged to contact the Court’s Law Clerk for an
`estimate of the amount of trial time anticipated per side.
`The parties shall file a Joint Report within 5 business days
`regarding the results of the meet and confer.
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`See General Issues Note #8 regarding providing copies of
`the briefing to the Court and the technical adviser (if
`appointed).
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists,
`witness lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal
`disclosures.
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions
`in limine.
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and
`deposition designations); file oppositions to motions in
`limine.
`
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting. If a daily transcript or real time reporting of
`court proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties
`making said request shall file a notice with the Court and
`e-mail the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at
`kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining
`objections and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`7 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00411-ADA Document 22-1 Filed 10/01/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`3 business days before Final
`Pretrial Conference.
`
`March 24, 2023 (or as soon as
`practicable thereafter)
`
`April 24, 2023 (or as soon as
`practicable thereafter)
`
`May 30, 20231
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to
`pretrial disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set this
`date at the conclusion of the Mark man Hearing.
`
`Samsung Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set
`these dates at the conclusion of the Mark man Hearing.
`
`Apple Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set these
`dates at the conclusion of the Mark man Hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SIGNED this __________ day of _________________________, 2021.
`
`________________________________
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1 Apple’s lead counsel, Bita Rahebi, is scheduled to start a 15-day trial on April 24, 2023 in D. Delaware.
`(Cirba IP, Inc. v. VMware, Inc., 19-cv-742 (D. Del.), D.I. 1003 at 20.) If this trial does not proceed or is
`rescheduled, Ms. Rahebi will inform MemoryWeb, and the parties will meet and confer to determine
`whether the Apple Jury Selection/Trial can more closely follow April 24, 2023.
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2015
`Samsung v. MemoryWeb – IPR2022-00222
`8 of 8
`
`