throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Applicant:
`Appl. No.:
`Filed:
`Title:
`Art Unit:
`Examiner:
`Docket No.:
`
`Manku et al.
`13/614,111
`September 13, 2012
`Stable Pharmaceutical Compositions and Methods of Using Same
`1629
`Sasan
`3717958-00248
`
`Mail Stop Amendment
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION DATED
`
`NOVEMBER 8, 2012
`
`Amendments to the Claims begin on page 2.
`
`Remarks/Arguments begin on page 4.
`
`A Conclusion is provided on page 6.
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1031, p. 1 of 6
`
`

`

`AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the
`
`application.
`
`1 - 30 (Cancelled)
`
`31.
`
`(Currently Amended) A method of treating mixed dyslipidemia in a subject on statin
`
`therapy-aoo comprising, administering to the subject an effective amount of 2500 mg to
`
`5000 mg of ethyl eicosapentaenoate daily, wherein upon 12 weeks of said administration
`
`the subject exhibits a reduction in for a period effective to reduce triglycerides of at least
`
`15% and a reduction in [[and]] LDL-C of at least 5% compared to placebo control-HJ:---the
`
`subject.
`
`32.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 31 comprising, administering to the subject
`
`an effective amount of ethyl eicosapentaenoate daily to reduce wherein upon 12 weeks of
`
`said administration the subject exhibits a reduction in fasting triglycerides [[by]] of at
`
`least [[ 10%]] 20% compared to placebo control in the subject.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`(Cancelled).
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 31 comprising, administering to the subject
`
`an effective amount of ethyl eicosapentaenoate daily to reduce wherein upon 12 weeks of
`
`said administration the subject exhibits a reduction in fasting apolipoprotein B compared
`
`to placebo control in the subject.
`
`35.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 31 comprising, administering to the subject
`
`an effective amount of ethyl eicosapentaenoate daily to reduce wherein upon 12 weeks of
`
`said administration the subject exhibits a reduction in fasting VLDL-C compared to
`
`placebo control in the subject.
`
`36.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 31 comprising, administering to the subject
`
`an effective amount of ethyl eicosapentaenoate daily to reduce wherein upon 12 weeks of
`
`said administration the subject exhibits a reduction in fasting VLDL-C [[by]] of at least
`
`10% compared to placebo control in the subject..
`
`2
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1031, p. 2 of 6
`
`

`

`37.
`
`(Currently amended) The method of claim 36 where the effective amount of ethyl
`
`eicosapentaenoate is administered to the subject in compositions capsules each
`
`comprising about 900 mg to about 1 g of ethyl eicosapentaenoate.
`
`38.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim [[37]] 36 where the effective amount of ethyl
`
`eicosapentaenoate is administered to the subject in compositions capsules each
`
`comprising about 1 g of ethyl eicosapentaenoate.
`
`3
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1031, p. 3 of 6
`
`

`

`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS
`
`Claims 31, 32 and 34 - 38 are amended. Claim 33 is cancelled. No new matter is added.
`
`Support for amended claim 31 can be found in the specification as filed at least at
`
`paragraphs 0018, 0109, 0112 and 0138.
`
`With respect to the range of 2500 mg to 5000 mg, Applicants respectfully direct the
`
`Examiner's attention to In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257 (CCPA 1976) which states:
`
`In the context of this invention, in light of the description of the invention as
`employing solids contents within the range of 25-60% along with specific
`embodiments of 36% and 50%, we are of the opinion that, as a factual matter,
`persons skilled in the art would consider processes employing a 35-60% solids
`content range to be part of appellants' invention ...
`
`Applicants' specification discloses, inter alia, a daily dose of ethyl-EPA of 50 mg to
`
`about 5000 mg per day as well as a specific amount of2500 mg per day at least at paragraph
`
`[0020]. In view of Wertheim, wherein disclosure of a range of25-60% and a specific value of
`
`36% properly supported a claim to the range of 35-60%, the presently claimed range of 2500 mg
`
`to 5000 mg is also properly supported by disclosure of a range of 50 mg - 5000 mg and
`
`disclosure of a specific embodiment of 2500 mg per day as discussed in paragraph [0018].
`
`Support for amended claim 32 can be found in the specification as filed at least at
`
`paragraphs O 107 and O 109.
`
`Support for amended claim 34 can be found in the specification as filed at least at
`
`paragraphs 0107 and 0113.
`
`Support for amended claims 35 and 36 can be found in the specification as filed at least at
`
`paragraphs 0107 and 0114.
`
`Support for amended claims 37 and 38 can be found in the specification as filed at least at
`
`paragraphs 0028 and 0018.
`
`Attached herewith is a copy of Ballantyne et al., American Journal of Cardiology Volume
`
`110, Issue 7, Pages 984-992, October 1, 2012 ("Ballantyne") setting forth details and results of
`
`the ANCHOR trial. ANCHOR was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double(cid:173)
`
`blind, 12-week clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Vascepa® (also referred to as
`
`AMRlOl and icosapent ethyl) in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). These
`
`4
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1031, p. 4 of 6
`
`

`

`I
`
`patients had residual high triglyceride (TG) levels in the range of 200 mg/dl to 499 mg/dl despite
`
`being on stable statin therapy for control oflow density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C in the
`
`range of 40-100 mg/dL ). Patients in the ANCHOR study are said to have mixed dyslipidemia
`
`( as presently claimed), where the primary goal is to control LDL-C. As set forth in Ballantyne,
`
`in the Anchor study 4 g per day ofVascepa® unexpectedly reduced LDL-C compared to placebo
`
`control. By contrast with mixed dyslipidemic subjects in ANCHOR, subjects with triglyceride
`
`levels ~ 500 mg/dL are characterized as having "very high triglycerides." For these patients the
`
`primary treatment goal is to lower the elevated triglyceride levels in order to prevent pancreatitis.
`
`Applicants respectfully note that it is settled law that unexpected results, no matter when
`
`generated ( even after a patent issues), can be relied on to support patentability of a claimed
`
`invention. In Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. et al., v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.,
`
`367 F.3d 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2004), the Federal Circuit held that it was error for the district court to
`
`refuse to consider unexpected results evidence because "the unexpected benefits or results were
`
`discovered after the '252 patent had been issued." The Federal Circuit stated that" [t]here is no
`
`requirement that an inventions's properties and advantages were fully known before the patent
`
`application was filed, or that the patent application contains all of the work done in studying the
`
`invention, in order for that work to be introduce into evidence in response to litigation attack." Id
`
`at 1385. See also Genetics Institute, LLC, v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. No. 2010-
`
`1264 (Fed. Cir. 2011) ("evidence of unexpected results may be used to rebut a case of prima
`
`facie obviousness even if that evidence was obtained after the patent's filing or issue date.").
`
`5
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1031, p. 5 of 6
`
`

`

`CONCLUSION
`
`The application is believed to be in condition for allowance. Early and favorable
`
`consideration is respectfully requested. The Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge
`
`deposit account 02-1818 for any fees which are due and owing.
`
`Respectfully s11bmitted,
`lf
`/ 7
`ff,,
`j
`l
`fl
`K&LGAT.lt
`I
`
`BY - - - - - - - - ,
`David B. Fotimier
`Reg. No. 51,696
`Customer No. 24573
`
`Dated: January 11, 2013
`
`Attachments
`
`Ballantyne et al., American Journal of Cardiology Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages 984-992, October
`1,2012
`
`6
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1031, p. 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket