throbber
ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006588
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 1 of 7
`
`

`

`International
`
`Journal for Vitamin
`and Nutrition
`Research
`
`Now in its sixtieth year of publica(cid:173)
`tion, this journal serves as a forum
`for the scientific discussion of vita(cid:173)
`min and nutrition research from
`around the world. The primary em(cid:173)
`phasis lies in the high scientific
`quality of the articles submitted for
`publication. Manuscripts dealing
`with experimental as well as epi(cid:173)
`demiological vitamin and nutrition
`research are welcome. Also papers
`related to deficiency syndromes, in(cid:173)
`teractions of food stuffs, pharmacology of nutrition, nutrition dependent health risks
`or dealing with clinical nutriton and dietetics are gladly accepted. New analytical
`methods in the general area of nutrition can also be considered. However, articles
`in the area of animal husbandry, poultry science as well as papers dealing with molecu(cid:173)
`lar mechanisms of biological reactions do not have first priority.
`Please pay strict attention to the Directions to Contributors (see second page) for
`preparations of the manuscripts.
`
`The International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research is published by Hogrefe
`& Huber Publishers, Toronto, Seattle, Bern, Gottingen. It appears in four issues yearly
`which make up a volume.
`Subscriptions are available on a volume basis only. Yearly subscription rates: Swiss
`Francs 169.-, or US $ 117.00.
`Advertisements: Please direct inquiries regarding the placing of advertisements in this
`journal to: Journals Advertising Coordinator, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Uinggass(cid:173)
`Strasse 76, CH-3000 Bern 9, Switzerland.
`
`© 1992 by Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Toronto, Seattle, Bern, Gottingen
`No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or
`by any means, electronic, mechanical,
`photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher and
`the author
`
`This journal is regularly listed in Current Contents and Index Medicus, indexed in AGRICOLA and CABS
`(Current Awareness in Biological Sciences)
`
`HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS
`
`European Address:
`
`American Address:
`
`Canadian Address:
`
`Langgass-Strasse 76
`CH-3000 Bern 9, Switzerland
`
`P. O, Box 2487
`Kirkland WA 98083-9968
`
`14 Bruce Park Avenue
`Toronto, Ontario M4P 2S3, Canada
`
`ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006589
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 2 of 7
`
`

`

`256
`
`lnternat. .T. Vit. Nutr. Res. 62
`(1992) 256-260
`Received for publication
`November 12, 1991
`
`S. NozAKI et al: Effects of Purified EPA on Plasma Lipoproteins 1
`
`I
`
`Eicosapentaenoic acid
`Hypercholesterolemia
`Cholesteryl ester transfer protein
`Low density lipoprotein
`High density lipoprotein
`
`Effects of Purified Eicosapentaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester on Plasma
`Lipoproteins in Primary Hypertholesterolemia
`
`Shuichi NozAKI, Yuji MATSUZAWA, Ken-ichi HIRANO, Naohiko SAKAI, Masaharu KuBo,
`Seiichiro TARUI
`
`The Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka University Medical School, Fukushima, Fuskushima-ku,
`Osaka 553, Japan
`
`Summary: We investigated the effects of puri(cid:173)
`fied eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester
`capsules (90% purity), which are free from
`cholesterol, saturated fatty acids and docosa(cid:173)
`hexaenoic acid (DHA), on plasma lipoproteins
`and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP)
`activity. We administered 2.7 g of EPA per day
`as capsules for 6 months to 14 primary hyper(cid:173)
`cholesterolemic subjects. Total cholesterol,
`triglyceride and low density lipoprotein (LDL)(cid:173)
`cholesterol levels in plasma were significantly
`reduced. The LDL cholesterol!apoB ratio and
`LDL particle size did not change. The ratio of
`high density lipoprotein (HDL)2/HDL3 chol(cid:173)
`esterol increased from 1.04 to 1.35 (p<0.05),
`while the HDL cholesterol level did not change.
`CETP activity was significantly reduced. The
`reduction of CETP activity may explain the in(cid:173)
`crease in the HDL2/HDL3 cholesterol ratio.
`These results suggest that purified EPA not
`only reduces LDL cholesterol levels but also
`acts on HDL metabolism in patients with
`hypercholesterolemia and therefore will be use(cid:173)
`! ul for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.
`
`Abbreviations used: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein,
`CETP; docosahexaenoic acid, DHA; eicosapentaenoic
`acid, EPA; low density lipoprotein, LDL; high density
`lipoprotein, HDL; hepatic triglyceride lipase, HTGL; very
`low density lipoprotein, VLDL.
`
`Introduction
`
`Since it has been suggested [1] that high content
`of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in diet is linked
`to low incidence of coronary heart disease in
`Greenland Eskimos, many studies reported that
`EPA has a variety of beneficial effects protect(cid:173)
`ing against atherosclerotic disease [2-8]. The
`effect of EPA on plasma lipoproteins has been
`studied [9] since lipoprotein abnormalities are
`an important factor in the development of
`atherosclerosis.
`In previous studies, fish oil has been used
`since purified EPA has not been available.
`These studies have confirmed the reduction of
`low density
`triglyceride and very
`serum
`lipoprotein (VLDL) concentrations by fish oil
`(9, 10]. There is still controversy concerning the
`effects of fish oil on low density lipoprotein
`(LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL)
`cholesterol levels [9]. Fish oil conventionally
`used contains at most 25% EPA in addition to
`various amount of other fatty acids including
`docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and cholesterol
`[2].
`The insufficient purity of fish oil may be one
`of the reasons for inconsistent data about the
`effects of fish oil on LDL and HDL cholesterol
`levels. Furthermore, it is suggested that EPA
`and DHA have different properties against
`lipoprotein metabolism [11]. In our previous
`study, we reported the effect of a capsule con(cid:173)
`taining 80% pure EPA on platelet and plasma
`
`ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006590
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 3 of 7
`
`

`

`s. NozAKI et al: Effects of Purified EPA on Plasma Lipoproteins
`
`257
`
`> lipids, showing a substantial reduction in total
`plasma cholesterol level [12]. However even this
`capsule still contained much DHA and we
`could not differentiate the effects of EPA and
`DHA.
`This report describes the effect of purified
`EPA ethylester, recently developed in Japan, on
`concentrations and composition of plasma
`Jipoproteins in primary hypercholesterolemia.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Subjects: Fourteen patients (11 females and 3 males) with
`primary hypercholesterolemia were studied as outpatients.
`The patients were selected from the Lipid Clinic of Osaka
`University Medical School. Familial hypercholesterolemia
`, was excluded. We further excluded patients with diabetes
`mellitus, renal disease, and liver disease. Their ages ranged
`from 36 to 65 years old (mean±SD, 55 ± 8.8 years). Their
`body mass indexes averaged 22.9 ± 2.2 kg/m2
`• Patients did
`not take any medicine affecting lipid metabolism for at least
`2 months before the start of this study. Eight of the patients
`had type Ila hyperlipidemia and 6 of them had type Ilb.
`Their mean total cholesterol levels and triglyceride levels
`were 277±30 and 165±25 mg/di respectively. The mean
`HDL cholesterol level was 52± 13 mg/di.
`
`Study protocol: The subjects were instructed to take 20%
`fat diet on the entry of this study. It was confirmed that
`their serum lipids levels were plateau at least for 2 months
`before the onset of treatment with EPA ethyl ester. They
`were also instructed to maintain this diet throughout the
`stndy. The subjects took 2.7 g of EPA ethyl ester daily for
`6 months. The encapsulated EPA ethyl ester was provided
`by Mochida Pharmaceutical Company. The EPA used in
`this study was purified from sardine oil. Each capsule con(cid:173)
`tained over 90% EPA ethyl ester. The content of DHA
`(C22:6) was less than 1 % and no cholesterol was present.
`This EPA capsule contains 0.2% vitamin E to inhibit
`, peruxidizatiun in capsule and in vivo. Venous blood sam(cid:173)
`ples were obtained before and during the study period. All
`' patients gave informed consent to participate in the investi(cid:173)
`gation.
`
`Lipoprotein analyses: Venous blood was drawn in a glass
`tube with EDTA 3.5 mM (final concentration) from patients
`after overnight fasting. Total cholesterol and triglycerides
`were measured by an enzymatic method (Kyowa Medex Co.,
`1 Tokyo, Japan). HDL cholesterol was measured by the hepa(cid:173)
`rin manganese precipitation method [13]. Total protein was
`measured in the LD L fraction [14]; it was assumed to consist
`entirely of apoBIOO. Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL,
`d < 1.006 g/ml), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL,
`1.006<d<1.019 g/ml), low density lipoprotein (LDL,
`1.019< d< 1.063 g/ml), high density lipoprotein 2 (HDL2,
`1.063,d < 1.125 g/ml) and high density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3,
`
`1.125 < d g/ml) were separated by sequential preparative
`ultracentrifugation according to the method of Havel [15]
`as we previously reported [16]. LDL size was estimated
`using 2-16% polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis
`according to the method of KRAUSS [17]. Size was deter(cid:173)
`mined by scanning each lane with a densitometer and com(cid:173)
`paring this value to a standardized curve of compounds of
`known size as we previously reported [18]. Cholesteryl ester
`transfer protein (CETP) activity was measured by ALBERS'
`method [19] as we previously reported [20]. Briefly, the
`activity in the patient's plasma is assayed by examining the
`lransfcr of carbon-14 cholesteryl ester from HDL3 to
`VLDL and LDL. The CETP activity was expressed as the
`percentage of donor cholesteryl ester transferred to LDL.
`
`Fatty acids analyses: Total plasma fatty acids were extracted
`with chloroform methanol solution (2/1,v/v). The fatty
`acids were analyzed as their methyl esters by gas chromato(cid:173)
`graphy using Yokogawa Hewlett Packard HP-5731 before
`and 6 months after EPA administration. Plasma fatty acids
`composition was calculated as percentage of total mass.
`
`Plasma peroxide analysis: Plasma peroxide levels were
`measured before and after 6 months of EPA treatment by
`using Determiner J ,PO kit (Kyowa Medex Co., Tokyo,
`Japan), which depends on the method of 0HISHI and YAGI
`et al [21].
`
`Statistical analysis: The significance of differences between
`mean values was determined by paired t-test.
`
`Results
`
`EPA concentrations of serum fatty acids are in(cid:173)
`creased in all subjects (data non shown) and the
`mean plasma EPA concentration of 14 subjects
`was significantly increased from 2.8% to 9.7%
`after EPA administration as shown in Table I.
`The change of plasma
`levels of total
`cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL cholesterol
`before and after EPA administration are shown
`in Table IL Total cholesterol levels were signifi(cid:173)
`cantly reduced by 10%. The triglyceride levels
`were also significantly decreased by 16%. The
`HDL cholesterol levels did not significantly
`change.
`Lipoprotein fractionation was done before
`and after EPA administration (Tab. III). Mean
`VLDL triglyceride levels decreased by 18%. The
`levels of IDL cholesterol and triglyceride were
`not changed. A significant reduction in LDL
`cholesterol was noted (p < 0.05). The LDL
`apolipoprotein (apo) BlOO levels were signifi(cid:173)
`cantly reduced (p < 0,05). The LDL cholesterol
`
`ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006591
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 4 of 7
`
`

`

`258
`
`S. NozAKI et al: Effects of Purified EPA on Plasma Li po proteins
`
`Table I: Changes of serum fatty acids compositions after
`EPA administration
`
`Before
`
`After EPA
`
`c 14:0
`c 16:0
`C 16:1 n-7
`c 18:0
`C 18:1 n-9
`C 18:2 n-6
`C 18:3 n-3
`c 20:0
`C 20:1 n-9
`C 20:2 n-6
`C 20:3 n-9
`C 20:4 n-6
`c 22:0
`C 20:5 n-3
`C 22:5 n-3
`C 22:6 n-3
`
`1.15 ± 0.39
`24.9 ±2.42
`4.17± 1.06
`5.35 ± 0.46
`20.3 ±2.05
`30.0 ±4.09
`0.88 ± 0.36
`0.11 ±0.06
`0.16±0.06
`0.18 ±0.04
`0.79±0.26
`4.68±1.10
`0.08±0.06
`2.88 ± 1.47
`0.50±0.14
`3.86±0.90
`
`I .OJ± 0.36
`23.7 ±2.74
`3.60± 1.35*
`5 .90 ± 0.64**
`18.2 ± 2.82**
`25 .3 ± 4.30**
`0.84±0.36
`0.13 ±0.04
`0.16± 0.05
`0.13 ± 0.02**
`0.51 ±0.16**
`4.96 ± 1.01
`0.12±0.07
`9.75 ± 3.13**
`1.36 ± 0.37**
`4.26± 1.06
`
`Each value shows percent of total fatty acids and presented
`as mean±SD.
`*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, Significantly different from before
`EPA administration
`
`Table II: Effects of EPA administration on plasma lipids
`
`Before
`
`After EPA administration
`
`Total cholesterol mg/di 277 ± 30 249 ± 28* (-10%)
`Triglyceride
`mg/di 165 ± 25 139 ± 27* (-16%)
`52 ± 13
`50 ± 12
`HDL-cholesterol mg/di
`
`Values are presented as mean±SD
`* Significantly different from before EPA administration
`at p < 0.05 (student's t-test; paired)
`
`Table !IL· Changes of lipid levels, ratio of high density
`lipoprotein subfractions and CETP activities before and
`after EPA administration
`
`Before
`
`After
`
`p value
`
`25.4 ± 18.1
`VLDL CH (mg/di) 29.8 ± 14.2
`ns
`87.0 ±45.0 <0.05
`TO (mg/di) 106.5 ±42.6
`11.8 ± 8.3
`IDL CH (mg/di) 10.8 ± 7.9
`ns
`TO (mg/di)
`9.8 ± 6.3
`9.3 ± 5.7
`ns
`LDL CH (mg/di) 185.4 ±49.5 156.2 ±43.2 <0.01
`TO (mg/di) 37.6 ± 10.5
`34.0 ± 13.0
`ns
`apoB (mg/di) 142.2 ±27.9 122.5 ±27.9 <0.05
`HDL2 CH (mg/di) 25.2 ±11.2
`28.8 ± 11.5
`ns
`HDL3 CH (mg/di) 26.1 ± 6.9
`21.9 ± 4.4
`ns
`HDL2-CH/
`HDL3-CH
`
`1.35± 0.53 <0.05
`
`1.04± 0.6
`
`CETP activity (%) 29.0 ± 6.3
`
`24.2 ± 5.5 <0.05
`
`Values are presented as mean±SD.
`Abbreviations: CH, cholesterol; TO, triglyceride; CETP,
`cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity; ns, not significant
`
`to apo B ratio did not change (1.2±0.11 vs.
`1.19±0.18, before and after treatment of EPA,
`respectively. There was no statistically signifi(cid:173)
`cant relationship between the increase of EPA
`the decrease of LDL
`concentration and
`cholesterol level.
`There was an increase in HDL2 cholesterol
`(from 25.2±11.2 mg/dl to 28.8±11.5) and de(cid:173)
`crease in HDL3 cholesterol (from 26.1±6.9 mg/
`dl to 21.9±4.4), although the changes did not
`reach statistical significance. There was a sig(cid:173)
`nificant
`increase
`in
`the HDL2/HDL3
`cholesterol ratio (from 1.04±0.6 to 1.35±0.53,
`p<0.05).
`LDL fractions were analyzed by 2-16% PAG
`gradient electrophoresis. EPA treatment did
`not cause any change in the electrophoretic
`mobility of LDL before (267 A± 8.1) and during
`EPA (268A±8.8), suggesting the size of LDL
`particles had not changed.
`CETP activities were significantly decreased
`from 29.0±6.3%
`to 24.2±5.5%, p<0.05,
`(Tab. III).
`The weight percent chemical compositions of
`LDL before and after EPA administration is
`shown in Figure 1. No statistically significant
`changes could be observed.
`There was no significant increase of plasma
`peroxide level before and after 6 months of EPA
`treatment (mean± SD: 1.2 ± 0.24 to 1.1±0.31
`nmol/ml, before and after).
`
`50
`
`40
`
`ti)
`
`~ 30
`E
`'+-
`0
`~ 20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`FC
`
`CE
`
`PL
`•:before
`
`~:EPA
`
`TG
`PR
`free cholesterol
`FC
`CE cholesterol ester
`PL phosphollpid
`triglyceride
`TG
`PR protein
`
`Figure 1: Chemical compositions of LDL before and after
`EPA administration.
`
`ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006592
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 5 of 7
`
`

`

`s. NozAKI et al: Effects of Purified EPA on Plasma Lipoproteins
`
`259
`
`> Discussion
`
`1
`
`We demonstrated that purified EPA reduced
`plasma LDL cholesterol levels in primary
`hypercholesterolemic patients.
`It has been confirmed that n-3 fatty acids
`' consistently reduce serum triglyceride levels [9,
`IO]. However, the results from the various
`studies regarding the effect of n-3 fatty acids
`on serum cholesterol levels have been inconsis(cid:173)
`tent [9]. The inconsistency of the results among
`· the reports concerning the effect of fish oil on
`LDL levels might be, in part, relative to the fact
`that the subjects with different LDL composi(cid:173)
`tion show different responses to fish oil [22].
`Fish oil had been used as a preparation contain(cid:173)
`ing much n-3 fatty acids since purified EPA had
`( not been available. While, fish oil contains
`, much cholesterol and fatty acids other than
`EPA. It also contains much DHA, another
`major n-3 fatty acid. Furthermore, the quality
`of fish oil is different in each study. This hetero(cid:173)
`geneity of fish oil used in those studies may be
`another cause of the inconsistency of the results
`., regarding the effect of fish oil on LDL levels.
`(, We previously reported the reduction of LDL
`cholesterol by administration of the capsules
`which contain 80% EPA, but as this capsule
`also contained much DHA, we could not
`ascribe this effect to EPA alone [12].
`In the present study, EPA itself reduced
`VLDL and LDL levels and the reduction in
`LDL cholesterol levels was associated with the
`reduction in apo BlOO levels. The cholesterol/
`apo BlOO ratio of LDL did not change. These
`results suggest that the number of LDL parti-
`i' cles is reduced by EPA treatment.
`'
`The present study also demonstrated that
`EPA treatment resulted in the increase of
`HDL2/HDL3 cholesterol ratio. We also meas(cid:173)
`ured CETP activity as an important factor in
`HDL and LDL metabolism and found a reduc-
`·1 tion in CETP activity. This finding is well in
`~ accordance with the recent observations made
`in a study where fish oil was used as a supple(cid:173)
`ment [23]. Patients with absent or markedly
`reduced CETP activities have increased HDL
`cholesterol, mainly associated with HDL2
`cholesterol [24]. Patients with heterozygous
`CETP deficiency have CETP levels between
`
`(
`
`those of normal persons and those with
`homozygous deficiency and also have an in(cid:173)
`creased HDL2/HDL3-cholesterol ratio [20],
`indicating that even a partial reduction in
`CETP activity is associated with changes in dis(cid:173)
`tribution of HDL subfractions. Lipoprotein
`lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase
`{HTOL) are well known to play an important
`role in HDL metabolism. We and other re(cid:173)
`searchers [25, 26] reported no change of LPL
`and HTOL activity in either hypertriglyceride(cid:173)
`mia or normolipidemia using fish oil, suggest(cid:173)
`ing LPL and HTOL might not be responsible
`for the increase in the HDL2/HDL3 cholesterol
`ratio. As these studies were done using fish oil,
`further study of the effect of pure EPA on LPL
`and HTOL will be needed. Increased catabol(cid:173)
`ism of VLDL particles due to a change in
`VLDL composition may also be related to the
`increase of the HDL2/HDL3 cholesterol ratio
`[27, 28]. In the patients studied, there was an
`increase in TO content and a decrease in the CE
`content of LDL although these changes did not
`reach statistical significance. The reduction of
`CETP activity may explain, in part, the change
`of LDL composition since LDL from CETP
`deficient patients is TO rich and CE poor as we
`reported [29]. There is, recently, much concern
`about feeding large amounts of highly unsatu(cid:173)
`rated fatty acids such as EPA because this may
`increase the risk of lipid peroxidation. In order
`to reduce the problem of excess peroxidation in
`vivo, the capsule used in this study contains
`0.2% vitamin E. This amount of vitamin E did
`not produce any increase of peroxide at least
`for 1 year in the capsule. Further, as studied in
`this study, the plasma peroxide levels were not
`increased. From these observations, we believe
`this EPA capsule is safe for use even for rela(cid:173)
`tively long period, 6 months.
`Regarding to the study design, although this
`study was not placebo-controlled study, their
`serum lipids levels were confirmed to be plateau
`before the entry (data not shown) and their
`good compliance to the EPA capsule adminis(cid:173)
`tration was ascertained by the increase of
`plasma EPA levels (Tab. III). These observa(cid:173)
`tions suggest that the results obtained in this
`study was due to the effect of EPA administra(cid:173)
`tion.
`
`ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006593
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 6 of 7
`
`

`

`260
`
`S. NozAKI et al: Effects of Purified EPA on Plasma Li po proteins
`
`In conclusion, the reduction in LDL chol(cid:173)
`esterol level and the change in HDL subfrac(cid:173)
`tions by EPA will provide clinical benefits and
`pure EPA capsules will be useful in the treat(cid:173)
`ment of primary non-familial hyperchol(cid:173)
`esterolemia.
`
`References
`
`1. DYERBERG, J., BANG, D. H. o. and HJORNE, N. (1975)
`Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 28, 958-966.
`2. CONNOR, w. E., CONNOR, s. L. (1990) Adv. Intern. Med.
`35, 139-172.
`3. KROMHOUT, D., BosSCHIETER, E. B. and DE LEZENNE
`CouLANDER, C. (1985) N. Engl. J. Med. 312, 1205-1209.
`4. DAVIS, H. R., BRIDENSTINE, R. T., VESSEL!NOVITCH, D.
`and WISSLER, R. W. (1987) Arteriosclerosis 7, 441-449.
`5. LICHTENSTEIN, A.H. and CHOBANIAN, A. v. (1990)
`Arteriosclerosis 10, 597-606.
`6. DYERBERG, J. and BANG, H. 0. (1979) Lancet 2,
`433-435.
`7. GOODNIGHT, s. H. Jr., HARRIS, w. s. and CONNOR,
`W. E. (1981) Blood 58, 880-885.
`8. LEE, T. K., HOOVER, R. L., WILLIAMS, J. D., SPERLING,
`R. I., RAVALESE III, J., SPUR, B. W., ROBINSON, D.R.,
`COREY, E. J., LEWIS, R. A. and AUSTEN, K. F. (1985) N.
`Engl. J. Med. 312, 1217-1224.
`9. HARRIS, W. S. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 785-807.
`10. PHILLIPSON, B. E., ROTHROCK, D. W., CONNOR, W. E.,
`HARRIS, w. s. and ILLINGWORTH, D.R. (1985) N. Engl.
`J. Med. 312, 1210-1216.
`11. KoBATAKE, Y., KuRoDA, K., J1NNOUCHI, H., N1sHmE,
`E. and INNAMI, S. (1984) J. Nutr. Set. Vitaminol. 30,
`357-372.
`12. KAMIDO, H., MATSUZAWA, Y. and TARur, s. (1988)
`Lipids 23, 917-923.
`
`13. WARNICK, G. R., CHEUNG, M. c. and ALBERS, J. J.
`(1979) Clin. Chem. 25, 596-604.
`14. LowRY, 0. H., RosEBROUGH, N. J., FARR, A. L. and
`RANDALL, R. F. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275.
`15. HAVEL, R. J., EDER, H. A. and BRAGDON, J. H. (1955)
`J. Clin. Invest. 34, 1345-1352.
`16. NOZAKI, s., KUBO, M., Suno, H., MATSUZAWA, Y. and
`TARur, S. (1986) Metabolism 35, 53-58.
`17. KRAUSS, R. M. and BURKE, D. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23,
`97-102.
`18. NozAKI, S., VEGA, G. L., HADDOX, R. J., DoLAN, E.T.
`and GRUNDY, S. M. (1990) Atherosclerosis 84, 101-110.
`19. ALBERS, J. J., TOLLEFSON, J. H., CHEN, C.-H. and STEIN(cid:173)
`METS, A. (1984) Arteriosclerosis 4, 49-58.
`20. YAMASHITA, S., Hur, D. Y., WETTERAU, J. R., SPRECHER,
`D.L., HARMONY, J.A.K., MATSUZAWA, Y. and TARUI,
`S. (1991) Metabolism 40, 756-763.
`21. Omsm, N., OHKAWA, H., MnKE, A., TATANo, T. and
`YAGI, K. (1985) Biochem. Int. 10, 205-211.
`22. SCHECTMAN, G., KAUL, S. and K1ssEBAH, A.H. (1989)
`Arterioclerosis 9, 348-354.
`23. ABBEY, M., CLIFTON, P., KESTIN, M., BELLING, B. and
`NESTEL, P. (1990) Arteriosclerosis 10, 85-94.
`24. YAMASHITA, S., SPRECHER, D. L., SAKAI, N., MAT(cid:173)
`SUZAWA, Y., TARur, s. and Hur, D. Y. (1990) J. Clin. In(cid:173)
`vest. 86, 688-695.
`25. NOZAKI, s., GARG, A., VEGA, G. L. and GRUNDY, s. M.
`(1991) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 638-642.
`26. HARRIS, w. s., CONNOR, w. E. and ILLINGWORTH, D.R.
`(1988) J. Lipid Res. 29, 1451-1457.
`27. HUFF, M. W. and ThLFORD, D. E. (1989) Arteriosclerosis
`9, 58-66.
`28. INAGAKI, M. and HARRIS, w. s. (1990) Artherosclerosis
`82, 237-246.
`29. SAKAI, N., MATSUZAWA, Y., HIRANO, K., YAMASHITA, S.,
`NozAKI, s., UEYAMA, Y., KUBO, M. and TARUI, s. (1991)
`Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis 11, 71-79.
`
`Dr. Shuichi Nozaki, The Second department of Internal Medicine, Osaka University Medical School, Fukushima,
`Fukushima-ku, Osaka 553, Japan
`
`ICOSAPENT DFNDTS00006594
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1015, p. 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket