throbber
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10773229
`
`Lipid evaluation in HIV-1-positive patients treated with protease inhibitors
`
`READS
`82
`
`Andre Dejam
`Harvard Medical School
`
`55 PUBLICATIONS   7,491 CITATIONS   
`
`SEE PROFILE
`
`Article  in  Antiviral Therapy · February 1999
`
`Source: PubMed
`
`CITATIONS
`45
`
`8 authors, including:
`
`Georg Behrens
`Hannover Medical School
`
`222 PUBLICATIONS   11,841 CITATIONS   
`
`SEE PROFILE
`
`Michael P Manns
`Hannover Medical School
`
`2,966 PUBLICATIONS   108,289 CITATIONS   
`
`SEE PROFILE
`
`Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
`
`Clinical View project
`
`Human adult liver stem cells generated from patient samples View project
`
`All content following this page was uploaded by Andre Dejam on 23 May 2014.
`
`The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 1 of 9
`
`

`

`Antiviral Therapy 4: 163–170
`
`Lipid evaluation in HIV-1-positive patients treated
`with protease inhibitors
`Hartmut H-J Schmidt1, Georg Behrens2*, Janine Genschel1, Matthias Stoll2, André Dejam2,
`Regina Haas1, Michael P Manns1 and Reinhold E Schmidt2
`
`1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and 2Department of Clinical Immunology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover,
`D-30623 Hannover, Germany
`
`*Corresponding author: Tel: +49 511 532 6656; Fax: +49 511 532 5648; E-mail: Behrens.Georg@MH-Hannover.de
`
`that human
`is accumulating evidence
`There
`immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease
`inhibitors (PIs) can induce hyperlipidaemia. To evaluate
`the frequency and type of hyperlipidaemia in PI-treated
`patients, 98 outpatients were prospectively analysed for
`their lipoprotein characteristics at the Medizinische
`Hochschule in Hannover, Germany. Fifty-seven percent
`of the patients studied presented with hyperlipidaemia.
`Both hypertrigylceridaemia (type IV and V hyperlipopro-
`teinaemia, 33%) and hypercholesterolaemia (type IIa
`hyperlipoproteinaemia, 6%) were detectable. The
`remaining 18% had a type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia.
`Increased lipid levels were highly statistically signifi-
`cant compared to a control group of PI-naive
`HIV-1-infected patients [low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
`146 mg/dl (range, 53–274 mg/dl) versus 105 mg/dl
`(range, 22–188 mg/dl; P=0.0006); very-low-density
`lipoprotein (VLDL) 35.5 mg/dl (5–253 mg/dl) versus 18
`
`mg/dl (range, 3–94 mg/dl; P=0.0002)]. All PIs used
`(saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir and ritonavir) were
`associated with this variable form of hyperlipidaemia
`according to the Fredrickson classification. There was
`no significant correlation of any determined lipid value
`with the duration of treatment. A higher frequency of
`the apolipoprotein E2 allele and E4 allele was observed
`in the hyperlipidaemic subjects. Patients with excessive
`hypertriglyceridaemia showed a reduced lipoprotein
`lipase activity. Lipodystrophy was observed especially in
`hyperlipidaemic patients and to a lesser extent in
`normolipidaemic subjects. The frequency of hyperlipi-
`daemic risk factors was surprisingly high in the group
`studied, which in turn may explain the proposed
`increased risk of atherogenesis in HIV-1 PI-treated
`patients. Therefore, PI-treated subjects should also be
`evaluated for their lipoprotein pattern, which may
`require antihyperlipidaemic interventions.
`
`Introduction
`
`The early introduction of powerful protease inhibitors
`(PIs) in the treatment of human immunodeficiency
`virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients has resulted in
`unexpected side effects over time [1–10]. The HIV-1
`protease consists of two 99 amino acid subunits that
`form a homodimer with a typical retroviral aspartyl
`protease activity [11]. PIs bind with high affinity to the
`catalytic site of HIV-1 protease and prevent cleavage of
`HIV precursor proteins in infected cells. In the presence
`of PIs, the virion is unable to mature and the amount
`of infectious virus rapidly decreases. The four common
`PIs used (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir)
`are structurally related substances that inhibit the
`cleavage of HIV precursor proteins competitively [11].
`There is accumulating evidence that PIs can induce
`hyperlipidaemia in a subgroup of treated patients
`[5,12]. Patients reported to date have presented with
`hypertriglyceridaemia. In addition, there are also rare
`
`events of coronary artery and peripheral vascular
`disease published so far [13–15]. The accelerated
`atherogenesis described in these subjects may result
`from the observed dyslipidaemia. To further evaluate
`the lipid pattern and its potency as an atherogenic risk
`factor we analysed PI-treated subjects in detail.
`
`Patients and Methods
`
`Patients
`HIV-1-infected patients who were admitted to our HIV
`outpatient clinic from March to July 1998 were
`enrolled in the study and analysed for lipid abnormal-
`ities. Specimen collection followed a 12 h overnight
`fasting period. Lipid parameters of patients receiving
`PI therapy were compared with a control group of PI-
`naive patients [13 patients treated with two nucleoside
`reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and/or non-
`
`©1999 International Medical Press 1359-6535/99/$17.00
`
`163
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 2 of 9
`
`

`

`HH-J Schmidt et al.
`
`Table 1. The clinical characteristics of the various hyperlipoproteinaemic phenotypes using the Fredrickson classification are
`depicted
`
`Phenotype
`Type IV/V
`Type IIa
`Type IIb
`Normal
`
`n, number of patients.
`BMI, body mass index.
`
`n
`32
`6
`18
`42
`
`Age (years)
`44.2±10.6
`54.2±6.6
`53.4±11.4
`45.9±12.7
`
`BMI
`24.3±4.1
`24.6±2.4
`24.7±3.0
`24.0±3.5
`
`CD4 cells (cells/mm3)
`294.8±186.7
`281.5±169.0
`287.2±159.2
`314.2±189.8
`
`Viral load (copies/ml)
`52.1×103±88.3×103
`2.3×103±3.7×103
`56×103±14×103
`35.8×103±12.3×103
`
`Lipodystrophy (%)
`28
`33
`28
`7
`
`nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and
`10 therapy-naive patients]. None of the patients
`received parenteral nutrition, nutrition via percuta-
`neous gastrostomy, growth hormones or anabolic
`steroids. Body fat changes in patients with HIV infec-
`tion were defined as signs of abnormal
`fat
`accumulation (dorsocervical fat pad, benign symmetric
`lipomatosis, increased abdominal girth/visceral obesity,
`breast hypertrophy) and/or loss of the subcutaneous fat
`in the face, limbs, gluteal regions or buttocks. The
`symptoms were defined clinically by physical examina-
`tion and patient’s reports. The different forms of
`hyperlipoproteinaemia were defined as total choles-
`terol >200 mg/dl, triglycerides >200 mg/dl, low-density
`lipoprotein (LDL) >155 mg/dl, and very-low-density
`lipoprotein (VLDL) >35 mg/dl. Reference values for
`other lipid parameters were high-density lipoprotein
`(HDL) >35 mg/dl and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] >30 mg/dl.
`
`Determination of triglycerides and total cholesterol
`Serum concentrations of triglycerides and total
`cholesterol were determined using semi-automatic
`enzymatic methods. For the triglyceride assay the
`Peridochrom Triglyceride GPO-PAP Test kit was used
`(Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). The reaction
`buffer
`contained 0.5 mM ATP, 0.35 mM
`4-aminophenazone, 3 U/ml lipase, 2.5 U/ml glycerol
`phosphatoxidase, 0.2 U/ml glycerol kinase, 0.15 U/ml
`peroxidase and 3.5 mM 4-chlorophenol. For the total
`cholesterol assay the CHOD-PAP Test kit (Boehringer
`Mannheim, Germany) was used. The reaction buffer
`contained 50 mM MgCl2, 1 mM 4-aminophenazone,
`10 mM sodium cholate, 6 mM phenol, 4 mM 3,4-
`dichlorophenol, 0.3% polyglycol ether, 0.4 U/ml
`
`cholesterol esterase, 0.25 U/ml cholesterol oxidase, 0.2
`U/ml peroxidase. Extinction was measured at 546 nm.
`The assays were performed according to manufac-
`turer’s instructions.
`
`Lipid electrophoresis of VLDL, LDL and HDL
`The concentrations of VLDL-, LDL- and HDL-choles-
`terol were determined using an electrophoretic and
`densitometric method (REP Lipoprotein-Kit, Helena
`Diagnostics, Germany). The plasma lipoproteins were
`separated on an agarose gel according to the manufac-
`turer’s instructions. The gel was stained and scanned in
`a specific densitometer. The lipoprotein concentrations
`were automatically calculated according to their
`densitometric value. Hyperlipoproteinaemia was
`classified according to the Fredrickson classification.
`
`Nephelometric quantification of apolipoproteins
`[apoA-I, apoA-II, apoB, apoE and Lp(a)]
`This method is based on particle agglutination tech-
`nology. The assays were semi-automatically performed
`on the BN II (Behring Nephelometer, Behringwerke
`AG, Marburg, Germany) using rabbit polyclonal anti-
`sera against human apolipoproteins. For Lp(a), the
`antibody is conjugated to latex-particles to enhance the
`turbidity of the antigen–antibody complexes [16]. The
`turbidity of the formed complexes was proportional to
`the concentration of the used antigen. The reactions
`were measured at time 0 and 6 minutes at 840 nm. The
`differences of the measured values were calculated
`automatically. This approach excludes non-specific
`turbidity. From each of the serum samples, 30 µl was
`diluted by 1:100. A lyophilized serum control and stan-
`dard serum were used for the quantification. The
`
`Table 2. The lipoprotein parameters of the various hyperlipoproteinaemic phenotypes are illustrated
`
`Phenotype
`Type IV/V
`Type IIa
`Type IIb
`Normal
`
`Serum cholesterol
`249.7±74.9
`268.7±30.5
`298.2±42.5
`184.9±39.3
`
`Serum triglycerides
`654.3±542.4
`169±40.8
`425.6±201.9
`145±67.6
`
`VLDL
`84.6±56.4
`25±7.8
`65.6±34.1
`20.2±8.6
`
`LDL
`139.4±36.6
`203.5±22.1
`188.9±37.4
`122.6±30.9
`
`HDL
`27±9.2
`40.2±9.7
`33.4±8.2
`42.2±14.6
`
`Lipoprotein (a)
`(mg/dl)
`19.9±30.9
`26.8±27.3
`21.2±42.9
`10.8±14.5
`
`VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein.
`LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
`HDL, high-density lipoprotein.
`
`164
`
`©1999 International Medical Press
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 3 of 9
`
`

`

`Lipid evaluation in HIV-1-positive individuals
`
`Table 3. Lipid parameters, CD4 cell count and viral load of PI-treated and PI-naive HIV-infected patients
`
`Cholesterol (mg/dl)
`Triglycerides (mg/dl)
`LDL (mg/dl)
`VLDL (mg/dl)
`HDL (mg/dl)
`ApoA-I (mg/dl)
`ApoA-II (mg/dl)
`ApoB (mg/dl)
`ApoE (mg/dl)
`CD4 cell count (cells/mm3)
`HIV RNA copies/ml (log10)
`
`PI-treated patients
`227 (100–450)
`252.5 (58–2192)
`146 (53–274)
`35.5 (5–253)
`31.5 (15–91)
`135 (93–189)
`30 (18–43)
`125 (2–33)
`5 (2–33)
`275 (5–814)
`3.20 (1.69–5.88)
`
`PI-naive patients
`159.5 (75–307)
`125.5 (22–538)
`105 (22–188)
`18 (3–94)
`36 (20–50)
`140 (95–238)
`29 (22–54)
`84 (53–180)
`4 (2–10)
`336 (123–652)
`3.097 (1.69–4.72)
`
`P value
`<0.00001
`0.0003
`0.0006
`0.0002
`0.3
`0.8
`0.2
`0.0004
`0.001
`0.02
`0.4
`
`Data are expressed as median (range) and P values are indicated for between-group comparison. VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density
`lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
`
`reaction buffer consisted of polyethylene glycol,
`sodium chloride (11.6 g/l) in 0.05 M phosphate buffer
`pH 7.0 and sodium azide (<1 g/l). N-Diluens is a phos-
`phate-buffered saline, pH 7.5, containing sodium azide
`(<1 g/l). Samples were measured in duplicate.
`
`Lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activity
`Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity and hepatic lipase
`(HL) activity were measured according to the methods
`described in [17].
`
`ApoE genotype
`DNA was extracted from patients blood using a
`DNA purification kit
`(Invitek, Germany).
`Purification was performed according to the manu-
`facturer’s instructions. The relevant region within the
`apoE gene was amplified by PCR. PCR products
`were digested with the restriction enzyme HhaI for 4
`h at 37°C. After digestion, samples were analysed on
`a 3% Nusieve, 1% Seakem agarose gel (FMC
`Bioproducts, USA) was used to detect the different
`apoE alleles.
`
`CD4 cell count and viral load
`CD4 lymphocyte cell count was determined by flow
`cytometry and HIV RNA copies by quantitative PCR
`(Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test Kit, Roche Molecular
`Systems).
`
`Statistical analysis
`The analysis included the calculation of the mean and
`standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance for
`lipid profiles between PI-treated patients and control
`group was determined by analysis with non-para-
`metric Mann–Whitney U test or Student’s t-test where
`appropriate. Differences between the PI regimens and
`types of hyperlipoproteinaemia were determined by
`analysis of variance (ANOVA). P values of <0.05
`were considered to indicate statistical significance.
`
`Results
`
`Ninety-eight HIV-1-positive patients treated with PIs
`(78 male, 20 female) were analysed for lipid abnor-
`malities. None of the studied subjects had overt
`diabetes mellitus. The analysis of the lipid pattern
`revealed that 56 (57%) had detectable hyperlipidaemia
`showing that the prevalence of hyperlipidaemia in
`HIV-1 PI-treated subjects was very high. In addition,
`10 patients (19%) presented with an elevated Lp(a)
`serum concentration (range, 33–158 mg/dl, mean
`81±41 mg/dl), which represents an additional cardio-
`vascular risk factor. Interestingly, seven out of these 10
`patients with increased Lp(a) levels were treated with
`indinavir. In contrast, increased levels for Lp(a) were
`observed in 7% of the 42 normolipidaemic subjects
`(range, 44–71 mg/dl, mean 54±15 mg/dl) and in two
`patients (9%) of the control group (range, 44–100
`mg/dl, mean 77 mg/dl).
`We also determined the type of hyperlipopro-
`teinaemia using the Fredrickson classification [18]. A
`hypertriglyceridaemic lipid pattern was detectable in
`32 subjects, three of them presented with type V hyper-
`lipidaemia (3%) and 29 of them with type IV
`hyperlipidaemia (30%). Eighteen subjects had an
`increase of both VLDL- and LDL-cholesterol, the so-
`called type IIb hyperlipidaemia (18%). In addition, six
`subjects had an isolated hypercholesterolaemia, type
`IIa hyperlipidaemia (6%). Thus, besides hypertriglyc-
`eridaemia, PI-treated HIV-1-positive patients can also
`develop isolated hypercholesterolaemia. The clinical
`characteristics of the various hyperlipoproteinaemic
`phenotypes are depicted in Table 1, whereas Table 2
`reflects their lipoprotein parameters. Since type V
`hyperlipidaemia is commonly an exacerbation of an
`existing type IV hyperlipidaemia, we grouped these
`affected subjects for the subsequent statistical analysis.
`The average body mass index (BMI) was calculated in
`all studied groups within the non-obese range (<25
`
`Antiviral Therapy 4:3
`
`165
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 4 of 9
`
`

`

`type.
`To determine the impact of the apoE gene on lipid
`patterns in the studied subjects, we evaluated the geno-
`type, illustrated in Figure 1. Since apoE 3/3 is the
`normal and most common genotype in individuals, the
`analysis revealed a relatively higher association of the
`apoE 2 and statistically significant higher rate of apoE
`4 allele with patients presenting with hyperlipopro-
`teinaemia. Moreover, carriers of the apoE 4 allele had
`higher total triglyceride values than patients without
`the apoE 4 allele (mean 534.0±606.3 mg/dl versus
`321.9±278.0 mg/dl, P=0.02). No significant differ-
`ences were observed for the other lipid parameters. The
`percentages of each apoE genotype compared to the
`frequency of apoE genotype of three different German
`population studies [19–21] revealed higher frequencies
`of apoE 2/3 (19.8% versus 10.7–12.0%), apoE 2/4
`(7.3% versus 1.5-3.0%), and apoE 4/4 (8.3% versus
`1.3–2.8%) in our study group.
`The duration of treatment with PIs was compa-
`rable
`between
`the
`normolipidaemic
`and
`hyperlipidaemic groups: median 19 months (range,
`2–30) in the normolipidaemic group, whereas median
`21.5 months (range, 17–29 months), median 18.5
`months (range, 5–29 months), median 20 months
`(range, 2–28 months), and median 16 months (range,
`2–26 months) in type IIa, type IIb and type IV/V
`hyperlipidaemic subjects, respectively. Since the onset
`of hyperlipidaemia might already be within several
`months after initiation of PI treatment, the duration
`of therapy seems not to be critical for triggering
`hyperlipidaemia. The patients in the major groups of
`PI therapy were on drugs for an equivalent time
`[saquinavir: median 14 month (range, 7–30), indi-
`navir: median 17 month (range, 1–29), nelfinavir:
`21.5 month (range, 3–30), ritonavir plus saquinavir:
`21 month (range, 2–26)]. There was no significant
`correlation of any determined lipid value with the
`duration of PI treatment. Other individual factors
`have to be responsible for the development of hyper-
`lipidaemia. The individually applied PIs were also not
`significantly correlated with both hypertriglyceri-
`daemia
`(VLDL-cholesterol)
`and
`hypercholesterolaemia (LDL-cholesterol) (Figures
`2–4). More importantly, the combination of two PIs
`(especially ritonavir plus saquinavir) seems to have an
`synergistic effect on lipid metabolism as the preva-
`lence of hyperlipidaemia is particulary high in these
`groups (Figure 2). These data reflect that all PIs used
`are associated with hyperlipidaemia, which in turn
`can occur in variable phenotypes. Figure 5 illustrates
`as an example, the lipoprotein profile in patients
`under the treatment with indinavir, reflecting the vari-
`able lipoprotein phenotype once hyperlipidaemia is
`detectable.
`
`HH-J Schmidt et al.
`
`Figure 1. The apoE allele (ApoE2, E3 and E4) and
`corresponding hyperlipoproteinaemia
`
`Hyperlipidaemic patients
`
`Normolipidaemic patients
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`Number of patients
`
`5
`
`0
`
`E2
`
`E3
`ApoE alleIe
`
`E4
`
`96 of 98 patients were evaluated.
`
`kg/m2). The CD4 cell count and the viral load in all
`groups were within the same range. Interestingly,
`lipodystrophy was physically detectable in both hyper-
`lipidaemic and normolipidaemic subjects. However,
`lipodystrophy was more commonly observed among
`the hyperlipidaemic patients.
`The statistical evaluation of patients receiving PI
`compared to the PI-naive group (20 male, three female)
`revealed highly statistically significant differences
`(Table 3). PI treatment was associated with elevated
`levels for fasting cholesterol (median, 227 mg/dl;
`range, 100–450 mg/dl; P<0.00001), triglycerides
`(median, 252.5 mg/dl; range, 58–2192 mg/dl;
`P=0.0003), LDL (median, 146 mg/dl; range, 53–274
`mg/dl; P=0.0006), VLDL (median, 35.5 mg/dl; range,
`5–253 mg/dl; P=0.0002). However, HDL values were
`within the same range in PI-treated (median, 31.5
`mg/dl; range, 15–91 mg/dl) and PI-naive patients
`(median, 36 mg/dl; range, 20–50 mg/dl; P=0.3).
`The additional quantification of apolipoprotein A-I
`(apoA-I), apolipoprotein B (apoB), apolipoprotein A-II
`(apoA-II), and apolipoprotein E (apoE) did reveal
`significant higher levels of apoB (P=0.0004) and apoE
`(P=0.001) in the PI-treated group (Table 3), which is
`characteristic for patients with increased levels of
`VLDL- and/or LDL-cholesterol. The determination of
`the LPL and HL activity in eight patients with
`increased serum trigylcerides above 800 mg/dl revealed
`that in seven out of eight patients the mean LPL
`decreased by 30% (range 20–70%) in comparison to
`control subjects, whereas the hepatic lipase activity
`was normal in the eight subjects studied. LPL from PI-
`treated patients was compared to normolipidaemic
`HIV-negative control subjects with an apoE 3/3 geno-
`
`166
`
`©1999 International Medical Press
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 5 of 9
`
`

`

`Figure 2. The presence of hyperlipidaemia or
`normolipidaemia of patients treated with the different
`HIV-1 PIs
`
`Figure 3. The VLDL-cholesterol serum concentrations of
`patients treated with different HIV-1 PIs
`
`Lipid evaluation in HIV-1-positive individuals
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`Very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dl)
`
`Hyperlipidaemic
`patients
`
`Normolipidaemic
`patients
`
`Ritonavir + nelfinavir
`
`Ritonavir + indinavir
`
`Ritonavir + saquinavir
`
`Saquinavir + nelfinavir
`
`Ritonavir
`
`Nelfinavir
`
`Indinavir
`
`Saquinavir
`
`No protease inhibitor
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`Number of patients
`
`10
`
`20
`
`Saquinavir
`
`Indinavir
`
`Nelfinavir
`
`Ritonavir
`
`Saquinavir + nelfinavir
`
`Ritonavir + saquinavir
`
`Ritonavir + indinavir
`
`Ritonavir + nelfinavir
`
`Discussion
`
`There is accumulating evidence that PIs induce hyperlip-
`idaemia in a subgroup of patients, which has been
`recently reported [5,12,22]. SoRelle summarized these
`initial findings, which were discussed at the 12th World
`AIDS Conference in Geneva, highlighting the benefit of
`this drug regimen and its potential adverse effects [12].
`Both atherosclerosis and pancreatitis have been observed
`in association with hyperlipidaemia in PI-treated patients
`[23]. We analysed 98 HIV-1-infected subjects for their
`lipid parameters confirming the increased frequency of
`hyperlipidaemia in PI-treated patients. The observed
`hyperlipidaemia is primarily an increase of the serum
`concentration of the triglyceride-rich VLDL fraction
`causing a type IV hyperlipoproteinaemia [18]. However,
`patients may also develop isolated hypercholesterolaemia
`(type IIa hyperlipoproteinaemia), combined hypercholes-
`terolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia
`(type
`IIb
`hyperlipoproteinaemia), and excessive hypertriglyceri-
`daemia (type V hypertriglyceridaemia), respectively.
`Metabolic alterations, e.g. hypertriglyceridaemia, have
`been described already in HIV-infected individuals espe-
`cially in the late phase of the disease and to a lesser extent
`as we found in the PI-treated group. The major causes of
`hypertriglyceridaemia were shown to be elevated rates of
`de novo lipogenesis and delayed clearance of triglycerides
`in the postprandial period [24]. Interestingly, in our study
`both PI-treated as well as PI-naive patients had low
`plasma contents of HDL, already known to occur early
`in HIV disease [24]. Thus HDL seems not to be affected
`by PI treatment. The onset of the variable lipid patterns
`
`described and associated with PI-containing drug regi-
`mens has
`similarity with
`familial
`combined
`hyperlipidaemia, a lipid disorder, which is inherited with
`variable penetrance and variable type of hyperlipopro-
`teinaemia [25]. The primary origin of both PI-induced
`hyperlipidaemia and familial combined hyperlipidaemia
`has not been elucidated so far. The presence of variable
`phenotypes of hyperlipidaemia in PI-treated patients may
`reflect the impact of multiple genetic and metabolic
`factors.
`The use of PIs may result in hypertriglyceridaemia,
`but also in lipodystrophy [5,7,8]. The latter represents
`partial lipodystrophy, which is known to be frequently
`associated with hypertriglyceridaemia [26]. Metabolic
`in vivo analysis of VLDL particles revealed that the
`origin of hypertriglyceridaemia in patients with partial
`lipodystrophy is due to their delayed catabolism [27]
`and increased production [28,29]. Thus these studies
`will have also to be performed on PI-treated patients in
`the future to determine the aetiology of hyperlipid-
`aemia. The cause of delayed catabolism of the triglyc-
`eride-rich VLDL particles can be caused by a reduced
`activity of the LPL activity and HL activity, respec-
`tively. In addition, postprandial hyperinsulinaemia,
`which is associated with PI treatment [22], is able to
`induce increased hepatic lipogenesis leading to the
`release of VLDL particles. We determined the lipase
`activities in selected studied patients presenting with
`excessive hypertriglyceridaemia. These data revealed
`that seven out of eight subjects had reduced LPL
`
`Antiviral Therapy 4:3
`
`167
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 6 of 9
`
`

`

`HH-J Schmidt et al.
`
`Figure 4. The LDL-cholesterol levels of patients treated with
`different HIV-1 PIs
`
`Figure 5. This figure reflects the occurence of different types
`of hyperlipidaemia under the treatment of indinavir
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`Number of patients
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dl)
`
`Normal
`
`HLP
`type IIa
`
`HLP
`type IIb
`
`HLP
`type IV
`
`HLP
`type V
`
`may reflect the polygenicity of this mechanism.
`Although the low-density lipoprotein receptor-
`related protein (LRP) and the cytoplasmatic retinoic
`acid binding protein type 1 (CRABP-1) have been
`suggested as potential targets for PIs, explaining the
`variable clinical features including hyperlipidaemia of
`treated patients, no proven data are available so far
`[33]. Proteases are in general very important in
`lipoprotein metabolism including lipoprotein assembly,
`secretion, catabolism and cell membrane receptor
`interactions. ApoB and apoA-I are the main structural
`proteins for LDL and HDL particles e.g. are proteolyt-
`ically modified intracellularly before the secretion of
`the lipoprotein particles [34–36]. After secretion, the
`proapoA-I is proteolytically cleaved to result into the
`mature apoA-I. We assume that within the blood,
`mature apoA-I is also degraded by proteases, which is
`essential for determining the HDL serum concentration
`[37]. ApoA-I has evolutionary similarities with e.g.
`apoE and apoA-II [38–40]. Therefore, proteolysis will
`presumably play also an essential role in the structural
`and enzymatic functions of apoE and apoA-II. In addi-
`tion, LCAT and CETP modulate as enzymes the
`lipoprotein metabolism, which in turn are activated by
`the cofactors apoA-I, apoA-IV, ApoC-I, and apoD,
`respectively [41,42]. Receptor-mediated cellular uptake
`of lipoproteins may also serve as a potential target,
`especially since PIs may also act intracellularly. Thus
`PIs have many potential targets in modulating the
`lipoprotein metabolism.
`The determination of the lipoprotein profile in PI-
`treated patients is mandatory. Depending on the
`severity of the hyperlipidaemia and the benefit of the PI
`used, its continuation or withdrawal has to be decided.
`
`Ritonavir + nelfinavir
`
`Ritonavir + indinavir
`
`Ritonavir + saquinavir
`
`Saquinavir + nelfinavir
`
`Ritonavir
`
`Nelfinavir
`
`Indinavir
`
`Saquinavir
`
`No protease inhibitor
`
`activity, but normal HP activity. LPL activity is affected
`by different functional defective mutations [17]. It is
`possible that patients with genetic variants leading to
`less catabolic activity of the enzyme are more suscep-
`tible for the development of PI-associated hypertri-
`glyceridaemia. The discontinuation of PIs seems to
`result in the normalization of lipoprotein parameters
`[30,31], reflecting a potential impact of these drugs on
`the LPL activity. In addition, the metabolism of VLDL
`and LDL is influenced by the apoE genotype.
`Interestingly, we found a relatively higher association
`of the apoE 2 and apoE 4 allele in the patients with
`hyperlipidaemia [32]. Therefore, the apoE genotype
`may play a role in the pathogenesis of hyperlipidaemia
`in these patients.
`We also determined the serum concentration of
`Lp(a), an atherogenic risk factor, which is primarily
`regulated by its hepatic synthetic rate. Nineteen per
`cent of our hyperlipidaemic patients had an additional
`pathological increased serum concentration of Lp(a)
`emphasizing the increased risk of atherogenic events.
`These patients were primarily treated with indinavir
`(7/10), yet the real implication of this observation
`remains unclear. More patients have to be studied to
`assess the relevance of these data.
`The long-term treatment with PIs does not seem to
`affect the severity of hyperlipidaemia. Thus this drug
`regimen may induce hyperlipidaemia depending on the
`genetic background such as the mentioned apoE geno-
`type. All PIs used are associated with hyperlipidaemia
`and the type of hyperlipidaemia can differ. This in turn
`
`168
`
`©1999 International Medical Press
`
`Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`
`IPR2022-00215
`
`Ex. 1012, p. 7 of 9
`
`

`

`To circumvent drug withdrawal, we have to gain addi-
`tional experience in potential treatment strategies for
`hyperlipidaemia to minimize the risk of atherogenesis
`and pancreatitis.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`We thank Ulrike Beisiegel for the determination of the
`LPL activity and HL activity in a subgroup of the
`studied patients. Hartmut H-J Schmidt and Georg
`Behrens both contributed equally to the study design,
`interpretion of data and drafting of the article.
`
`References
`
`2.
`
`4.
`
`7.
`
`1. Dube MP, Johnson DL, Currier JS & Leedom JM. Protease
`inhibitor-associated hyperglycaemia. Lancet 1997;
`350:713–714.
`Eastone JA & Decker CF. New-onset diabetes mellitus
`associated with use of protease inhibitor. Annals of
`Internal Medicine 1997; 127:948.
`3. Hengel RL, Watts NB & Lennox JL. Benign symmetric
`lipomatosis associated with protease inhibitors. Lancet
`1997; 350:1596.
`Lumpkin MM. Reports of diabetes and hyperglycaemia in
`patients receiving protease inhibitors for the treatment of
`human immunodeficiency virus. FDA, Public Health
`Advisor June 11, 1997.
`5. Carr A, Samaras K, Burton S, Law M, Freund J, Chisholm
`DJ & Cooper DA. A syndrome of peripheral lipodys-
`trophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients
`receiving HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS 1998;
`12:F51–F58.
`6. Dong BJ, Gruta C, Legg J, Balano K & Goldschmidt G.
`Diabetes and the use of protease inhibitors. 5th Conference
`on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Chicago,
`USA, 1–5 February 1998. Abstract 416.
`Lo JC, Mulligan K, Tai VW, Algren H & Schambelan M.
`“Buffalo hump” in men with HIV-1 infection. Lancet
`1998; 351:867–870.
`8. Miller KD, Jones E, Yanovski JA, Shankar R, Feuerstein I
`& Falloon J. Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associ-
`ated with use of indinavir. Lancet 1998; 351:871–875.
`9. Mulligan K, Tai VW, Algren H, Chernoff DN, Lo JC &
`Schambelan M. Evidence of unique metabolic effects of
`protease inhibitors. 5th Conference on Retroviruses and
`Opportunistic Infections, Chicago, USA, 1–5 February
`1998. Abstract 414.
`10. Viraben R & Aquilina C. Indinavir-associated lipodys-
`trophy. AIDS 1998; 12:F37–F39.
`11. Flexner C. HIV-protease inhibitors. New England Journal
`of Medicine 1998; 338:1281–1292.
`12. SoRelle R. Vascular and lipid syndromes in selected HIV-
`infected patients. Circulation 1998; 98:829–830.
`13. Behrens G, Schmidt H, Meyer D, Stoll M & Schmidt RE.
`Vascular complications associated with use of HIV
`protease inhibitors. Lancet 1998; 351:1958.
`14. Meyer D, Behrens G, Schmidt RE & Stoll M.
`Osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients receiving
`HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS 1999; 13:1147–1148.
`15. Henry K, Melroe H, Huebsch J, Hermundson J, Levine C,
`Swensen L & Daley J. Severe premature coronary artery
`disease with protease inhibitors. Lancet 1998; 351:1328.
`16. Schmidt HH, Genschel JC, Wagner S & Manns MP.
`Quantification of lipoprotein(a): comparison of an auto-
`mated latex-enhanced nephelometric assay with an
`
`Lipid evaluation in HIV-1-positive individuals
`
`immunoenzymometric method. European Journal of
`Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 1996;
`34:119–124.
`17. Brümmer D, Evans D, Berg D, Greten H, Beisiegel U &
`Mann WA. Expression of type III hyperlipoproteinemia in
`patients homozygous for apolipoprotein E-2 is modulated
`by lipoprotein lipase and postprandial hyperinsulinemia.
`Journal of Molecular Medicine 1998; 76:355–364.
`18. Fredrickson DS & Lees RS. A system for phenotyping
`hyperlipoproteinemia. Circulation 1965; 31:321–327.
`19. Utermann G, Steinmetz A & Weber W. Genetic control of
`human apolipoprotein E polymorphism: comparison of
`one- and two-dimensional techniques of isoprotein
`analysis. Human Genetics 1982; 60:344–351.
`20. Menzel HJ, Kladetzky RG & Assmann G. Apolipoprotein
`E polymorphism and coronary artery disease.
`Arteriosclerosis 1983; 3:310–315.
`21. Luley C & Wieland H. Epidemiologie der
`Dyslipoproteinämien. In Handbuch der
`Fettstoffwechselstörungen. Edited by P Schwandt and WO
`Richter. 1995; pp 84–103. Stuttgart, New York: Schattauer.
`22. Behrens G, Dejam A, Schmidt H, Balks H-J, Brabant G,
`Körner T, Stoll M & Schmidt RE. Impaired glucose toler-
`ance, beta cell function and lipid metabolism in
`HIV-patients under treatment with protease inhibitors.
`AIDS 1999; 13:F63–F70.
`23. McBride M, Chin MTM, Lee MS & Kelly B. Lipid
`lowering therapy in patients with HIV infection. Lancet
`1998; 352:1782–1783.
`24. Grunfeld C, Pang M, Doerrler W, Shigenaga JK, Jensen P
`& Feingold KR. Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance,
`and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection
`and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Journal of
`Endocrinology and Metabolism 1992; 74:1045–1052.
`25. de Graaf J & Stalenhoef AF. Defects of lipoprotein metabo-
`lism in familial comined hyperlipidemia. Current Opinon
`in Lipidology 1998; 9:189–196.
`26. Peters JM, Barnes R, Bennett L, Gitomer WM, Bowcock
`AM & Garg A. Localization of the gene for familial partial
`lipodystrophy (Dunnigan variety) to chromosome 1q21-22.
`Nature Genetics 1998; 18:292–295.
`27. Enzi G, Digito M, Baldo-Enzi G, Cominacini L, Dodi G,
`Carraro R & Zurlo F. Lipid metabolism in lipatrophic
`diabetes. Hormone and Metabolism Research 1988;
`20:587–591.
`28. Chait A, Janus E, Mason AS & Lewis B. Lipodystrophy
`with hyperlipidemaemia: the role of insulin in very low
`density lipoprotein over-synthesis. Clinical Endocrinology
`1979;10:173-178.
`29. Franklin B, Ginsberg H, Haque WU, Yeh HC, Horlick
`MN, Paterniti JR, Gibson J, Le AN & Ginsberg-Fellner F.
`Very

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket