`Subject: Re: Future Link v. Apple - preliminary proposed constructions
`Date: October 18, 2021 at 5:18 PM
`To: opp.futurelink.apple@raklaw.com
`Cc: rak_futurelink@raklaw.com
`
`[This email originated outside of F&R.]
`
`Counsel for Apple,
`FLS’s preliminary proposed construction for “serial port” should have been the court’s construction from the Intel v. FLS case (i.e., “a
`port that transfers information sequentially”), but a different construction was provided due to an oversight. FLS intends to revise its
`construction accordingly. FLS is continuing to evaluate whether there are any other terms for which it will provide revised constructions
`by the October 22 deadline set forth in the Court’s scheduling order.
`Best regards,
`Jim
`James A. Milkey
`Russ, August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`(310) 826-7474
`jmilkey@raklaw.com
`On Oct 12, 2021, at 7:35 PM, Jim Milkey <jmilkey@raklaw.com> wrote:
`<21-10-12 - FLS v Apple preliminary proposed constructions.pdf>
`
`IPR2022-00208
`Apple EX1025 Page 1
`
`