throbber

`

`-
`
`TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1
`
`The Protocols
`
`W. Richard Stevens
`
`A
`TT
`
`ADDISON-WESLEY PUBLISHING COMPANY
`Reading, Massachusetts Menlo Park, California New York
`Don Mills, Ontario Wokingham, England Amsterdam
`Bonn Sydney Singapore Tokyo Madrid . San Juan
`Seoul Milan Mexico City Taipei
`
`Petitioner
`Ex. 1007 - Page 2
`
`

`

`

`

`Section 1.6
`
`Encapsulation
`
`9
`
`.
`.
`In Section 3.4 we'll extend our d
`after describing IP routing. Figure 3 9 :~:iption of IP_ addresses to include subnetting,
`network IDs of all zero bits or all on~ bits. ws the special case IP addresses: host IDs and
`
`1.5
`
`The Domain Name System
`
`h
`Although the network interfaces O
`addresses humans wo k b
`t
`. n a ost, and therefore the host itself, are known by IP
`;.s ~~mg the name of a host. In the TCP /IP world the Domain
`Name System (DNS) • r
`is a 1stn uted database that provides the mapping between IP
`dd
`d h
`ostnames. Chapter 14 looks into the DNS in detail.
`a
`resses an
`1·

`For now we must be aware th t
`a any app 1cation can call a standard library function
`to lo~k u~ the I~ address ( or addresses) corresponding to a given hostname. Similarly a
`function 1s provided to do the re
`I k

`.
`verse oo up-given an IP address, look up the corre-
`spondmg hostname.
`Most applications that take a hostname as an argument also take an IP address.
`When we use the Telnet client in Chapter 4, for example, one time we specify a host(cid:173)
`name and another time we specify an IP address.
`
`1.6 Encapsulation
`
`When an application sends data using TCP, the data is sent down the protocol stack,
`through each layer, until it is sent as a stream of bits across the network. Each layer
`adds information to the data by prepending headers (and sometimes adding trailer
`information) to the data that it receives. Figure 1.7 shows this pro_cess. The unit of data
`that TCP sends to IP is called a TCP segment. The unit of data that IP sends to the net(cid:173)
`work interface is called an IP datagram. The stream of bits that flows across the Ethernet
`is called a frame.
`The numbers at the bottom of the headers and trailer of the Ethernet frame in Fig(cid:173)
`ure 1.7 are the typical sizes of the headers in bytes. We'll have more to say about each of
`these headers in later sections.
`A physical property of an Ethernet frame is that the size of its data must be between
`46 and 1500 bytes. We'll encounter this minimum in Section 4.5 and we cover the maxi-
`mum in Section 2.8.
`
`All the Internet standards and most books on TCP /IP use the term octet instead of byte. The
`use of this cute, but baroque term is historical, since much_ of the ea~ly work on TCP /IP was
`done on systems such as the DEC-10, which did not use ~-bit ~ytes. Smee almost every current
`computer system uses 8-bit bytes, we'll use the term byte m this text.
`
`To be completely accurate in Figure 1.7 we should say th~t the unit of data passed between IP
`and the network interface is a packet. This p_acket c_~ be ei~er an IP datagram or a fragment of
`an IP datagram. We discuss fragmentation m detail m Section 11.5.
`We could draw a nearly identical picture for UDP data. The only changes ar~ that
`the unit of information that UDP passes to IP is called a UDP datagram, and the size of
`the UDP header is 8 bytes.
`
`Petitioner
`Ex. 1007 - Page 4
`
`

`

`~ IP: Internet Protocol
`~:__~~~~~~~----------------------ChapterJ
`.___
`
`3.2
`
`IP Header
`
`Figure 3.1 shows the format of an
`bytes unless options are present.
`'
`
`0
`
`IP d t gram The normal size of the IP header is 20
`a a
`.
`31
`
`15 16
`
`4-bit
`version
`
`14-bit heade1 8-bit type of service
`(TOS)
`length
`
`16-bit total length (in bytes)
`
`16-bit identification
`
`3-bit
`flags
`
`13-bit fragment offset
`
`8-bit time to live
`(TTL)
`
`8-bit protocol
`
`16-bit header checksum
`
`20 bytes
`
`32-bit source IP address
`
`32-bit destination IP address
`
`options (if any)
`
`data
`
`?
`
`,
`7
`
`'7
`'
`
`7
`'
`
`Figure 3.1 IP datagram, showing the fields in the IP header.
`
`We will show the pictures of protocol headers in TCP /IP as in Figure 3.1. The ~oSt sig(cid:173)
`nificant bit is numbered O at the left, and the least significant bit of a 32-bit value IS mun-
`bered 31 on the right.
`b't
`The 4 bytes in the 32-bit value are transmitted in the order: bits 0-7 first, the~chI_s
`8-15, then 16-23, and bits 24-31 last. This is called big endian byte ordering, whi
`IS
`the byte ordering required for all binary integers in the TCP /IP headers as they traver~e
`a network. This is called the network byte order. Machines that store binary int~gers:
`other formats, such as the little endian format, must convert the header values into e
`network byte order before trai:15mitting the data.
`.
`dis-
`The current protocol version is 4, so IP is sometimes called IPv4. Section 3.lO .
`cusses some proposals for a new version of IP.
`.
`The header length is the number of 32-bit words in the header, including any opti:·
`Since this is a 4-bit field, it limits the header to 60 bytes. In Chapter 8 we'll see thatd ys
`limi
`1 s to a ·

`ak
`tation m es some of the options, such as the record route option, use es
`hich is
`The normal value of_ thi~ field (whe~ no options are present) is 5.
`.
`. The type-of-service field (TOS) Is composed of a 3-bit precedence field (w inutl(cid:173)
`i~ored today), ~ T?S bits, and an unused bit that must be O. The 4 TOS bits are: cost.
`nuze delay, maxuruze throughput, maximize reliability, and minimize monetary
`
`Petitioner
`Ex. 1007 - Page 5
`
`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket