throbber

`US005815582A5582
`5,815,582
`[11] Patent Number:
`United States Patent
`Claybaughetal.
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Sep. 29, 1998
`
`
`515
`
`
`
`[54] ACTIVE PLUS SELECTIVE HEADSET
`[75]
`Inventors: David Claybaugh, Germantown;
`Jeffrey N. Denenberg, Trumbull;
`Ralph Busch, Takoma Park; John
`Hohman, Towson, all of Md.
`
`
`
`
`
`73| Assignee: Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.,
`Linthicum, Md.
`
`21]
`591
`
`63]
`
`Appl. No.: 899,090
`Filed:
`Jul. 23, 1997
`
`_o,
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation of Ser. No. 347,417, Dec. 2, 1994,
`
`Int. Che eeeceeeeee AGLF 11/06; HO3B 29/00
`ST]
`52] US. Ch. cisssiutenismsinnennes GOLL66; 381/72
`58]
`Field of Search ..........csseeee 381/72, 74, 103,
`381/94.9, 155, 71.1, 71.6, 71.11, 71.12;
`181/206; 379/406, 407, 410, 412, 387,
`388, 390, 395
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4/1976 Kyle etal. .
`3,952,158
`12/1977 Freifield et al. .
`4,061,875
`12/1977 Williams .
`4,064,362
`3/1987 Chaplin 2... cceesceeeteneee SB1/72
`4,054,871
`6/1987 McCutchen.
`4,677,678
`.
`8/1990 Twineyet al.
`4,953,217
`9/1991 Warnakaetal. .
`5,046,103
`2/1992 Tretler .
`5,091,953
`.
`4/1992. Ziegler, Jn.
`5.105.377
`1/1993 Bourk seeccscssssseecscsssseeesessssneeeees 381/74
`5,182,774
`Primary Examiner—Minsun Oh Harvey
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`es
`-
`y
`:
`An active plus selective headset system for provision of
`active attenuation of broadband noise as well as speech
`filtering comprising a headset with reference microphones,
`residual microphonesandspeakers on each ofapair of open
`backed muffs and a controller means.
`
`s
`
`20 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`REFERENCE
`MICROPHONE
`
`
`
`OPEN
`BACK
`HEADSET
`
`53
`
`53
`
`SPEECH
`+
`NOISE
`
`REFERENCE
`INPUT
`
`
`
`RESIDUAL
`
`
`
`
`ANTI-NOISE
`NOISE
`OUTPUT
`
`~~ 50
`
`seb oo we Ba
`
`60
`
`APPLE 1140
`APPLE 1140
`
`FEEDBACK
`COMPENSATION
`CANCELLATION
`FILTER “A"
`
` 1
`
`||
`
`I
`
`v
`
`;
`l
`
`|!tt||1
`
`1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 29, 1998
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`5,815,582
`
`SPEAKER
`
`
`
`SPEECH
`WARNING
`a=
`
`
`
`
`RESIDUAL
`ANTI-NOISE
`NOISE
`
`
`OUTPUT
`INPUT
`
`
`REFERENCE
`INPUT
`
`eepelincaras wercpecrecrmmmies a2 cams imenomasmnvescsatpaeasines| scene
`
`N/C
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`I | | | | | |
`
`| |
`
`|
`I
`
`) | L
`
`
`
`FILTER
`
`
`
`
`ADAPTER
`
`24
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`e. eee eR SS RES Se
`
`SB SS Se eS Se SS Sere
`
`FIG.I
`
`2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 29, 1998
`
`Sheet 2 of4
`
`5,815,582
`
`REFERENCE
`MICROPHONE
`
`53
`
`SPEECH
`+
`NOISE
`
`REFERENCE
`INPUT
`
`53
`
`
`
`RESIDUAL
`
`
`ANTI-NOISE
`OUTPUT
`
`
`
`NOISE
`
`
`FEEDBACK
`COMPENSATION
`
`CANCELLATION
`FILTER “A*
`
`
`
`Sr—
`
`3
`
`

`

`RESIDUAL
`SENSOR
`
`AMPLIFIER &
`GAIN CONTROL
`
`ANTI-ALIASING
`FILTERS
`
`SAMPLE &
`HOLD
`
`A/D
`
`REFERENCE
`SENSOR
`
`AMPLIFIER &
`GAIN CONTROL
`
`ANTI-ALIASING
`FILTERS
`
`SAMPLE &
`HOLD
`
`A/D
`
`~
`
`<
`
`
`
`PROCESSOR
`
`ACTUATOR
`
`AMPLIFIER
`
`RECONSTRUCTION
`FILTER
`
`
`
`D/A
`
`MIXER
`
`FIG.3
`
`OUTPUT y OF SPEECH
`FILTER
`
`quayed*S'0
`8661“67“dag
`pJO€Ways
`
`78S‘°ST8'S
`
`4
`
`

`

`REFERENCE
`SENSOR
`
`
`
` AMPLIFIER &
`
`GAIN CONTROL
`
` ANTI-ALIASING
`
`FILTERS
`
`WEIGHT
`ADAPTION
`
` ACTUATOR
`
`AMPLIFIER
`
`
`
`RECONSTRUCTION
`FILTER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`yuazed*S'0
`8661“67“dag
`fbJ0p19Y8
`
`78S‘°ST8'S
`
`SPEECH
`FILTER "S"
`
`F1G.4
`
`5
`
`

`

`5,815,582
`
`1
`ACTIVE PLUS SELECTIVE HEADSET
`
`This application is a continuation, of application Ser. No.
`08/347,417, filed Dec. 2, 1994, now abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to a headset for actively canceling
`unwantednoise while selectively allowing necessary speech
`to reach the user’s ear.
`
`In the past, attempts to combine the twoprotections, i.c.,
`high and low frequency attenuation, has resulted in not only
`the noise being attenuated, but also the speech that
`the
`wearer needs to hear. Some systems met only limited
`success with fixed or “near-stationary” noise but not with the
`other noise ofeither (a) varying spectral characteristics or
`(b) brief duration noises with “spikes”. Examples of such a
`systemis found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,025,721, to Graupe et al
`and U.S. Pat. No. 4,185,168 to Graupe et al. Other systems
`like that found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,455,675 to Bose actively
`attenuate all sounds at low frequencies and passively altenu-
`ate all high frequency sounds. These sounds include speech
`and warning signals that want
`to be heard by the person
`wearing the headset.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The instant invention solves oftotal attenuation of the
`noise and speech, by providing a solution of an active
`headset that can employ any ofseveral selective algorithms
`such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,654,871 to
`Chaplin, hereby incorporated by reference herein,
`Alternatively, this invention can employ the algorithm dis-
`closed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,105,377 to Ziegler which is also
`incorporated herein by reference. In addition this invention
`can employ other algorithms such as that disclosed in the
`application of Ziegler in U.S. patent application Ser. No,
`07/421 759; which is hereby incorporated by reference.
`In applications for noise canceling headsets, particularly
`in industrial environments, attenuation of low frequency
`noise as well as noise that covers the speech band (300 to
`3300 Hz) passive hearing protection works extremely well at
`higher frequencies (typically above L000 Hz) whereas active
`noise cancellation has been shown to achieve similar levels
`of protection at lower frequencies (50 to 1000 Hz). Passive,
`however, also attenuates speech and warning signals andthe
`protectors are uncomfortable to wear. This invention pro-
`vides a solution that simultaneously provides the protection
`offered by a passive headset
`in a lightweight open back
`headset while using active adaptive feed forward control
`algorithms that attenuate all sounds in the 20 to 3300 Hz
`frequency band. Additionally, adaptive speech filtering or
`in-wire control technology separates speech from noise and
`passes the speech to the user.
`Accordingly it is an objectof this invention to provide an
`active noise canceling headset with selectivity.
`Another object of this invention is the provision of an
`open back muff headset with selective filtering.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`These and other objects of this invention where reference
`is had to the accompanying drawings in which
`FIG.
`1 shows a typical active/passive headset system
`incorporating the instant invention.
`FIG. 2 showsan active plus selective headset system with
`an open back muff that
`incorporates active control and
`adaptive speech filtering to allow speech to pass with the
`“anti-noise” signal.
`
`a)
`
`10
`
`ta an
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`A an
`
`60
`
`2
`FIG. 3 shows a more detailed description of the active
`control system of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 4 shows a more detailed description ofthe adaptive
`speech filtering technique to be usedin this headset design.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`there is shown an active/passive closed back
`1
`In FIG.
`headset system 10. It consists ofa typical passive headset 11,
`loudspeakers 12 that drive the anti-noise and residual micro-
`phones 13 to sense any remaining noise near the ear and
`reference microphones 14 to send advancedinformation for
`feed forward approaches and a system controller 20 which
`synthesizes the anti-noise signal.
`The headset shown has closed backs 21, 22 for passive
`attenuation without the speakers, microphones and system
`controller, this headset would be a typical passive hearing
`protector.
`The systemis designedto use various algorithms such as
`that of Ziegler in U.S. Pat. No. 5,105,377 or an adaptive feed
`forward approach. Both these algorithms use a reference
`signal as inputs. The digital virtual earth (DVE) algorithm
`develops a reference signal by subtracting an equalized
`version of its own anti-noise signal fromthe residual signal.
`The adaptive feed forwarduses the reference microphone as
`its input and is very effective on complicated noise envi-
`ronments that are broadband and random in character. The
`
`Least Means Square (LMS) adapter 24 shown in FIG. 1 are
`Filtered-X versions which have inherent compensation for
`the effects of the feedback delays aroundthe loop. Box “C”
`at 25 is the impulse response of active cancellation system.
`Feedback compensator 26 and cancellation filter 27 com-
`plete the component portions of the controller.
`DVE is highly effective to use in simple noise environ-
`ments having only a few harmonics even where the noise
`varies tremendously.
`It has also been demonstrated to be
`very effective doing broadband cancellation at low frequen-
`cies (50-700 Hz).
`Speakers 12 ofthe headset are large enoughto be capable
`of producing antinoise at the same level as the noise to be
`canceled. They have little or no distortion and have a
`minimum of input-to-output delay as any delay in the
`feedback loop slows down the system adaptationrate.
`Residual microphones 13 are typically small electret
`microphones mounted on the speaker frame near the ear.
`They must faithfully reproduce the sound that remainsat the
`ear after cancellation so that the controller can make further
`adjustments to the anti-noise signal.
`Reference microphones 14 are small electret microphones
`attachedto the outside of the headset at a distance from the
`ear canal. These referenced microphonesare used to provide
`advanced information about the noise. The higher the fre-
`quency of the noise the more advanced information is
`neededto effectively cancel the noise.
`FIG. 2 showsan active plus selective headset system 50
`with headset 51 having open backed muff positions 52,
`reference microphones 53, speakers 54 and residual micro-
`phones 55. An earplug (not shown) may be substituted for
`the open backed muff.
`The active /passive system 10 previously described can be
`configuredto actively attenuate all sounds in the frequency
`bandfrom 20to 3300 Hz without the needfor a passive mulf
`or earplug. The approach uses an adaptive feed forward
`control algorithmto actively attenuate the damaging noise in
`this band.
`In order to accomplish this it
`is necessary to
`
`6
`
`

`

`5,815,582
`
`3
`minimize the delays ofthe digital signal processing system,
`which include delays introduced by the anti-aliasing and
`reconstructionfilters shown in FIG. 3 and the acoustic delay
`of the speaker and residual microphone physical system, in
`order to effectively attenuate noise at the higher frequencies.
`The controller 60 has adapters 61, 62, feedback compen-
`sation 63, cancellation filter 64 and adaptive speech filter 65.
`Controller 60 uses a parallel adaptive speech filtering tech-
`nique to pass speech to the user. Adaptive speech filtering
`techniques can be employed to work with the particular
`noisy environment. The active controller attenuates noise in
`the band ofinterest and allows speech and warning signals
`to pass via the adaptive speech filtering path which incor-
`porates a warning signal filter as shown in FIG. 2.
`It
`is
`similar to the active/passive system except
`for the open
`backed headset design andthe addition ofa parallel adaptive
`speech filtering path and warning signal filter path as inte-
`gral parts ofthe controller. The input to the speech filter and
`controller are the upstream reference microphones 53.
`This reference microphone contains noise and speech.
`The speech is filtered from the noise and passed with the
`“anti-noise” generated from the adaptive feed forward con-
`troller and sent to the headset loud speaker. Both speech and
`warning signals, which are typically above the speech band
`and of known frequencies, will be heard by the user of the
`lightweight and open back headset.
`With reference to FIG. 2,
`the “anti-noise” and speech
`output signals are mixed and input to the speakers. This
`combined signal output sample, u,, is given by
`Xg=rye-ze
`
`MRA
`
`Ug=Wety,
`
`u, is the output speech and anti-noise value
`where r, is a vector of the most recent examples ofthe
`residual signal
`z, is a vector of the output of the speech filter after it
`passed through the impulse response C,
`A, is a vector of cancellation filter coefficients
`y, is the output anti-noise value
`w, is the output speech value.
`s, is the vector of compensated inputs.
`Inputs to the controller and speech filter are the reference
`signal, v,, and residual signal r, that are picked up via the
`reference sensor andresidual sensor respectively. The adap-
`tive feedforward controller generates an “anti-noise”, y;,,
`and the adaptive speech filter generates a clean speech
`signal, w,, that are mixedto form the output signal u, which
`is sent
`to the speakers. Each ear piece operates indepen-
`dently with separate reference and residual sensors and
`actuator.
`
`It is essential that the output of the speech filter, w,, be
`filtered through the system in pulse response, C,, and
`subtracted from the residual input, r,, so as not to interfere
`with the operation of the adaptive feedforward controller.
`Otherwise, the controller will attempt to adapt to and cancel
`the speechsignal that is output to the speaker.
`Several techniques can be used to minimize the delays of
`the system. First, passive material can effectively act as a
`low passfilter for the input reference and residual sensors.
`This would eliminate the need for anti-aliasing filters and
`thus the delays introduced by these filters would be elimi-
`nated. This technique has been shown to be quite effective
`
`a)
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`A an
`
`60
`
`4
`in the active control of noise in ducts using the adaptive
`feedforward controller.
`Another technique removesneither the anti-aliasing filters
`nor the reconstruction filters but essentially by-passes the
`delays introduced by these filters by inserting an analog
`zeroth order tap. This is achieved by placing an amplifier
`between the output of the incoming gain control and the
`output of the reconstruction filters shown in FIG, 3.
`A final technique, which will be even more effective as the
`speed of microprocessor technology increases, is to sample
`at a rate of 40 kHz or greater, this eliminates the need for
`anti-aliasing and reconstruction filters because the cut off
`frequency of 20 kHz is at
`the limit of the loudspeaker
`response.
`We claim:
`1. An active plus selective headset system which provides
`active broadbandattenuation of noise as well as adaptive
`speech filtering, said system comprising:
`a headset means adapted to be worn by a user;
`reference sensing means onsaid headset means adapted to
`sense speech and noise signals;
`speaker means on said headset means adapted to convey
`speech signals to a user’s ear; and
`controller means adapted to control the speaker means
`based on input from the reference sensing means to
`provide active broadband attenuation of all random
`inbandnoise as well as adaptive speech filtering sothat
`only the speech reaches the ear, wherein said active
`broadband attenuation is accomplished without syn-
`chronization pulses.
`2. Asystem as in claim 1 wherein said headset means
`includes residual microphone means located on said headset
`means and including a feedback means connected to said
`speaker means.
`3. Asystem as in claim 2 wherein said feedback means
`includes an adaptive speechfilter means and a cancellation
`filler means.
`4. Asystem as in claim 2 wherein said controller means
`is run by an adaptive feedforward algorithm.
`§. A-ssystem as in claim 2 wherein said headset means
`includes an open backed mulf.
`6. Asystem as in claim 2 wherein said reference sensing
`means is an electret microphone.
`7. Asystem as in claim 6 wherein said headset system
`comprises a pair of open backed muffs with the reference
`sensing means located on the outside of said muffs.
`8. An active plus selective headset system which provides
`active broadband attenuation of noise as well as speech
`filtering, said system comprising:
`a headset means adapted to be worn by a user, wherein
`said headset means includes residual microphone
`means located on said headset means andincluding a
`feedback means connected to said speaker meansthat
`includes an adaptive speech filler means adapted to
`filter speech from noise anda cancellation filter means;
`reference sensing meanson said headset means adaptedto
`sense speech, noise and warning signals;
`speaker means on said headset means adapted to convey
`speech and warning signals to a user’s ear; and
`controller means adapted to control the speaker means
`based on input from the reference sensing means to
`provide active broadband attenuation of noise as well
`as speechfiltering so that only the warning signals and
`speech reach the ear.
`9. An active plus selective headset system whichprovides
`active broadband attenuation of noise as well as speech
`filtering, said system comprising:
`
`7
`
`

`

`5,815,582
`
`>
`a headset means adapted to be worn by a user, wherein
`said headset means includes residual microphone
`means located on said headset means and including a
`feedback means connected to said speaker meansthat
`includes an adaptive speech filter means anda cancel-
`lation filter means;
`reference sensing meanson said headset means adaptedto
`sense speech, noise and warning signals:
`speaker means on said headset means adapted to convey
`speech and warning signals to a user’s ear; and
`controller means adapted to control the speaker means
`based on input from the reference sensing means to
`provide active broadband attenuation of noise as well
`as speech filtering so that only the warning signals and
`speech reach the ear;
`wherein an output
`from said adaptive speech filtering
`means is mixed with an output from said controller
`means and a resulting signal passed to said speaker
`means.
`
`10. An active plus selective headset system which pro-
`vides active broadband attenuation of noise as well as
`speech filtering, said system comprising;
`a headset means adapted to be worn by a user, wherein
`said headset means includes residual microphone
`means located on said headset means and including a
`feedback means connected to said speaker means that
`includes an adaptive speech filter means anda cancel-
`lation filter means;
`reference sensing means onsaid headset means adaptedto
`sense speech, noise and warning signals;
`speaker means on said headset means adapted to convey
`speech and warning signals to a user’s ear; and
`controller means adapted to control the speaker means
`based on input from the reference sensing means to
`provide active broadbandattenuation of noise as well
`as speech filtering so that only the warning signals and
`speech reachthe ear,
`wherein an output
`from said adaptive speech filtering
`means is filtered by an impulse response of the can-
`cellation means and subtracted from a signal from the
`residual microphone so as not to interfere with opera-
`tion of said controller means.
`Il. Asystem as in claim | wherein said reference sensing
`means is external of said speaker means on said headset
`means and said controller means is adapted to employ a
`feedforward methodof noise cancellation.
`12. Asystem as in claim 2 wherein said residual micro-
`phone means is
`internal of said speaker means on said
`headset means and said controller means is adapted to
`employ a feedback methodof noise cancellation.
`13. A headset system for providing active broadband
`attenuation of unwanted random inband noise, as well as
`adaptive speech filtering, comprising:
`a pair of muffs, each of said mulls comprising:
`a reference microphone attachedto an outside portion
`ofsaid muff for sensing speech signals and unwanted
`random inband noise signals;
`
`10
`
`_ wn
`
`ta an
`
`30
`
`aoon
`
`40
`
`50
`
`A an
`
`6
`a speaker located on an inside portion ofsaid muff; and
`a controller attachedto said reference microphone such
`that said signals sensed by said reference micro-
`phone act as an input
`to said controller; said con-
`troller producing an anti-noise output at said speaker
`to eliminate said unwanted random inband noise
`
`signals at a user’s ear and removing noise from said
`speech signal by adaptive speechfiltering so that the
`speech signals output
`to the user’s ear is clearer,
`wherein said elimination of said unwanted random
`inband noise signals is accomplished without syn-
`chronization pulses.
`14. A headset system as in claim 13, further comprising a
`residual microphone attachedto said speaker for sensing any
`unwanted random inband noise near the user’s ear and
`
`providing an output to said controller so that the anti-noise
`output can be adjusted to compensate for said unwanted
`random inband noise.
`
`15. A headset system as in claim 13 wherein said con-
`troller includes a feedback compensator connected to said
`speaker.
`16. A headset system for providing active broadband
`attenuation of unwanted noise, as well as speech filtering,
`comprising:
`a pair of muffs, each of said muffs comprising:
`a reference microphone attached to an outside portion
`of said muff for sensing speech signals, warning
`signals, and unwanted noise signals;
`a speaker located on an inside portion of said muff; and
`a controller including a feedback compensator con-
`nected to said speaker andattached to said reference
`microphone such that said signals sensed by said
`reference microphone act as an input
`to said con-
`troller; said controller producing an anti-noise output
`at said speaker to eliminate said unwanted noise
`signal at a user’s ear and removing noise from said
`speech signal so that the speech signals output to the
`user’s ear is clearer.
`
`wherein said feedback compensator includes an adaptive
`speech filter and a cancellation filter.
`17. A headset system as in claim 13 wherein said con-
`troller is operated based on an adaptive feedforward algo-
`rithm.
`
`18. A headset system as in claim 13 wherein said refer-
`ence sensing microphone ts an electret microphone.
`19. Asystem as in claim 1 wherein the reference sensing
`meansis adaptedto additionally sense warning signals, the
`speaker means is adapted to convey speech and warning
`signals to the user, and the controller means is adapted to
`provide active broadband attenuation of noise as well as
`speech filtering so that only the warning signals and speech
`reach the ear.
`
`20. Aheadset system as in claim 13, wherein the reference
`microphone additional senses warning signals.
`*
`Ef
`eo
`*
`a
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket