throbber
Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`Dr. Williams has 40 years of professional experience in wireless communications and telecom
`technology. Heis an entrepreneur whohasparticipated in the organization and
`operation of start up companiesthat brought wireless LAN, software VoIP PBX,
`and 2-way paging technology to the marketplace. Dr. Williams holds numerous
`patents in wireless and signal processing technology. He is an experienced
`litigation support consultant with experience in patent infringement matters. Dr.
`Williamsis also a registered Patent Agent.
`
`"Wireless LAN
`
`"Cellular and PCS Standards
`"Cellular Telephone Architecture
`"Digital Signal Processing
`
`=Telecommunications Technology
`#VoIP Technology
`"Computer Networking
`"Wireless Networks & Protocols
`
`Year
`
`1991
`
`University
`University of Texas at Austin
`
`Degree
`MBA
`
`1985
`
`University of Texas at Austin
`
`1982
`
`University of Texas at Austin
`
`Ph.D.,
`Dissertation:
`“Digital Signal Processing Techniques for Acoustic
`Log Data”
`
`MSEE,
`Thesis:
`“Cepstral Processing of Speech Signals”
`
`1976
`
`Michigan Technological
`University
`
`BSEE
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1004
`
`APPLE 1004
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`Professional Experience
`
`2008
`From:
`2010
`To:
`Organization: Expressume, Inc / Montage Inc. – Milwaukee, WI
`Title:
`Board Member
`Summary:
`This company sells software for human resource recruiting. This company was
`sold in June 2019.
`
`2008
`From:
`2014
`To:
`Organization: Faculte, Inc. – San Jose, CA
`Title:
`Board Member
`Summary:
`This company provided SaaS (Software as a Service) web video based
`communication products.
`
`2008
`From:
`2010
`To:
`Organization: BitRail Networks Inc. – Miami, FL
`Title:
`Founder, Board Member
`Summary:
`This company sold computer networking solutions.
`
`2008
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: Calumet Venture Management – Madison, WI
`Title:
`Member
`Summary:
`This company provides seed capital and management expertise to small
`companies.
`
`2006
`From:
`2015
`To:
`Organization: BEEcube Inc. – Fremont, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Board Member, Board Advisor
`Summary:
`This company built high speed processing solutions. This company was sold to
`National Instruments, Inc. in Feb 2015.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`2006
`From:
`2015
`To:
`Organization: Topaz Equity, LLC – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Board Member
`Summary:
`This is a private equity investment company. It owned AtomAMPD which
`develops, markets and sells software based network solutions.
`
`2004
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: DoceoTech Inc. – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Chairman
`Summary:
`This was a training company that provides training for engineers in Wireless,
`Networking, and Telephony technologies. It is currently owned
`by Beach Technologies, LLC.
`
`2004
`From:
`2006
`To:
`Organization: SiBEAM Inc. – Sunnyvale, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Chief Executive Officer
`Summary:
`This is a fabless semiconductor company that develops high-speed wireless
`networking ICs. This company was sold to Silicon Image, Inc. in
`Apr 2011.
`
`2001
`From:
`2004
`To:
`Organization: JetQue, Inc. – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Chief Executive Officer
`Summary:
`This company created messaging solutions for the mobile professional.
`
`1999
`From:
`2000
`To:
`Organization: Atheros Communications, Palo Alto, CA
`Title:
`Interim CEO, Advisory Board Member
`Summary:
`This company builds wireless LAN ICs. Atheros became a public company in
`May 2004. (ATHR) This company was sold to QCOM in Jan
`2011.
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`1998
`From:
`2000
`To:
`Organization: Picazo Communications – San Jose, CA
`Title:
`Chief Technology Officer, Advisory Board Member
`Summary:
`This company built and sold software PBXs Telephony equipment using VoIP
`and Circuit Switched Technologies. The company was purchased
`by Intel.
`
`1996
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: Beach Technologies, LLC – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Chief Executive Officer
`Summary:
`This is a consulting company that provides IP services. It owns DoceoTech LLC
`and Streaming Knowledge LLC, which perform the same
`services.
`
`1991
`From:
`1998
`To:
`Organization: Wireless Access, Inc. – Santa Clara, CA
`Title:
`Co-Founder, Chief Technical Officer, Vice President of Engineering, Vice
`President of Business Strategy
`This was a startup company focusing on the Narrow Band PCS equipment
`market. The company developed the over the air protocols, the
`subscriber equipment and the ICs to deploy 2-way paging
`services. The company was sold to Glenarye Electronics.
`
`Summary:
`
`2014
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: Through Technology, LLC. – Chicago, IL
`Title:
`Partner
`Summary:
`This is a private equity investment company. It owns Through Technology
`Group, PTE LTD, which is registered in Singapore.
`
`1979
`From:
`1991
`To:
`Organization: Motorola, Inc. – Austin, TX – Semiconductor Sector
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`Sr. Engineer, Member Technical Staff, Sr. MTS
`Business manager, project leader, and senior technical member of the teams
`which were responsible for product development of the following systems:
`§ ADPCM transcoder,
`§ ISDN U-reference point transceiver,
`§ CT-2 voice codec and channel modem,
`§ GSM voice codec and channel modem,
`§ TDMA voice codec and channel modem
`§ CDMA voice codec and channel modem, and
`§ Japanese Digital Cellular voice codec and channel modem.
`
`1976
`From:
`1979
`To:
`Organization: Motorola Inc. - Chicago, IL - Communications Sector - Digital Voice Privacy
`Group
`
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`Engineer
`This group built the first commercial digitally encrypted two-way FM land
`mobile radio system.
`
`Professional Certifications
`
`§Patent Agent – U.S. Patent and Trademark Office #50,790 (Jan 2002)
`
`Issued Patents
`
`Date Description
`Patent
`2017
`Data Enciphering or Deciphering using a Hierarchical Assignment System
`9,787,471
`2011
`7,904,117
`Wireless Communication Device using Adaptive Beamforming
`2004
`6,781,962
`Apparatus and Method for Stored Voice Message Control
`6,600,481 2003 Data entry apparatus and method
`6,088,457 2000 Method and apparatus for over the air programming a communication device
`5,854,595 1998 Communications apparatus and method with a computer interchangeable
`integrated circuit card
`5,557,642 1996 Direct conversion receiver for multiple protocols
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`5,428,638 1995 Method and apparatus for reducing power consumption in digital
`communications devices
`5,345,406 1994 Bandpass sigma delta converter suitable for multiple protocols
`5,101,344 1992 Data processor having split level control store
`5,001,661 1991 Data processor with combined adaptive LMS and general multiplication
`functions
`4,989,169 1991 Digital tone detector using a ratio of two demodulators of differing frequency
`4,972,356 1990 Systolic IIR decimation filter
`4,965,762 1990 Mixed size radix recoded multiplier
`4,947,363 1990 Pipelined processor for implementing the least-mean-squares algorithm
`4,876,542 1989 Multiple output oversampling A/D converter with each output containing
`data and noise
`4,862,169 1989 Oversampled A/D converter using filtered, cascaded noise shaping
`modulators
`4,843,585 1989 Pipelineable structure for efficient multiplication and accumulation
`operations
`4,843,390 1989 Oversampled A/D converter having digital error correction
`4,796,219 1989 Serial two's complement multiplier
`4,737,925 1988 Method and apparatus for minimizing a memory table for use with nonlinear
`monotonic arithmetic functions
`4,734,876 1988 Circuit for selecting one of a plurality of exponential values to a
`predetermined base to provide a maximum value
`4,727,508 1988 Circuit for adding and/or subtracting numbers in logarithmic representation
`4,722,067 1988 Method and apparatus for implementing modulo arithmetic calculations
`4,682,302 1987 Logarithmic arithmetic logic unit
`4,618,946 1986 Dual page memory system having storage elements which are selectively
`swapped between the pages
`4,406,010 1983 Receiver for CVSD modulation with integral filtering
`4,398,262 1983 Time multiplexed n-ordered digital filter
`
`Patent Applications and Continuation Applications
`
`Appl. Num. Pub. Date Description
`20070037528 2007
`Wireless Communication Device using Adaptive Beamforming
`20040252679 2004
`Stored Voice message Control Extensions
`15/711,590
`2017
` Data Enciphering or Deciphering using a Hierarchical Assignment
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`Published Papers
`
`6 Sept 2016 Putnam, Jonathan D. and Williams, Tim A., The Smallest Salable Patent-Practicing
`Unit (SSPPU): Theory and Evidence. Available at
`SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2835617
`
`Litigation Experience
`
`See attached.
`
`7
`
`

`

` 337-TA-598
`
`2006 ITC
`
`Complete
`
`Microsoft
`
`00417; 2:11-cv-00265
` 2:07-cv-341; 2:11-cv-
`
`2006E.D. TX
`
`Complete
`
`Cisco
`
` 2:06-cv-00241
`
`2006E.D. TX
`
`Complete
`
`AT&T
`
`RichardsonMicrosoft Inc. v. Alcatel Inc.
` Fish and
`
`Bartlett LLPCommil USA LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
`Thacher &
` Simpson
`
`C2 Comm. Tech Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
`
`Austin LLP
` Sidley
`
` 04-cv-02111
`
`2004 N.D. Ga.
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Systems
`Witness
`
`RichardsonSTS Networks v. Witness Systems
` Fish and
`
` 08-cv-04555
`
`2004 N.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`Intel
`
` 2:04-cv-00040
`
`2004E.D. TX
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
` 2:04-cv-00040
`
`2004E.D. TX
`
`Complete
`
`Networks
`Foundry
`
`Networks
`Foundry
`
`and Ellis LLPIntel Corp. v. Wi-LAN Inc.
` Kirkland
`
`Foundry Networks v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
`
` Howrey
`
`Foundry Networks v. Alcatel Inc.
`
` Howrey
`
` 337-TA-577
`
`2004 ITC
`
` 03-cv-02854
`
`2003 D.N.J.
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Ericsson
`
`Ericsson Inc v. Samsung Inc.
`
`Complete
`
`University
`Stanford
`Instruments;
`Texas
`
`GlobespanVirata v. Texas Instruments
`
` 03-cv-03138
`
`2003 E.D. PA
`
`Complete
`
`Broadcom
`
`Agere Systems v. Broadcom Inc.
`
`Smith
` McKool
`
`McAuliffe
`White &
`Ehrman
` Heller
`
`Manges
`Gotshal &
` Weil
`
` 03-cv-02177
`
`2002 N.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`3Com
`
`1:2001-cv-00755
` 1:2001-cv-00155;
`
`2001 D. Del.
`
`Complete
`
`3Com.
`
`Bartlett LLP3Com Inc. v. D-Link/ Realtek Inc.
`Thacher &
` Simpson
`
`Proxim v. 3Com
`
`Blair
`Miller and
` Morgan
`
`PBX services
`Infringement
` Patent
`ICs
`Networking
`Infringement
` Patent
`Systems
`Telephone
`Infringement
` Patent
`Recording
`VoIP
`Infringement
` Patent
`Wireless ICs
`Infringement
` Patent
`PBX services
`Infringement
` Patent
`PBX services
`Infringement
` Patent
`Phones
`Cellular
`Infringement
` Patent
`Loop (DSL)
`Subscriber
`Digital
`Infringement
` Patent
`LANs
`Wireless
`Infringement
` Patent
`ICs
`Networking
`Infringement
` Patent
`wireless LANs
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Case Name
`
`Firm
`
`Case Type
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`8
`
`

`

` 07-ml-01816
`
`2008C.D. CA
`
`Y
`
`CommunicationsComplete
`Citizens
`
`in re Katz Interactive Call Processing
`
`LLP
` Jones Day
`
` 5:08-cv-00020
`
`2008E.D. TX
`
` 08-cv-01637
`
`2008 N.D. TX
`
` 6:2007-cv-00490
`
`2007E.D. TX
`
` 2:2007-cv-00229
`
`2007 E.D. TX
`
`01366; 3:05-cv-02063
` 3:07-cv-00187; 3:07-cv-
`
`CA
`S.D. CA; S.D.
` W.D. WI;
`
`2007
`
`01829_
` 08-cv-01607; 08-cv-
`
`2007 S.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Cisco
`
`AT&T
`
`Palm
`Nintento; RIM;
`Samsung;
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Motion
`Research in
`Qualcomm
`
`Complete
`
`Qualcomm
`
` 1:2007-cv-00272
`
`2007 D. Del.
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Palm
`
` 07-ml-01816
`
`2007C.D. CA
`
`Y
`
`General ElectricComplete
`
` 07-ml-01816
`
`2007C.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`Experian
`
`Saxon Innovations LLC. v. Nokia Corp. et al.
`
` DLA PiperQualcomm Inc. v. Nokia Inc.
`
`Kronish LLPQualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.
`Godward
` Cooley
`
`Burling LLPIntermec Tech. V. Palm Inc.
`Covington &
`and
`Ehrman LLP
` Heller
`
`in re Katz Patents
`
` Howrey
`
`in re Katz Patents
`
`LLP
` Jones Day
`
`LLP
`Emanuel
` Quinn
`LLP
` Baker Botts
`DLA Piper
`Howrey;
`Cooley;
`& Burling;
` Covington
` Howrey LLPMinerva Inc. v Motorola Inc. et al.
`
`ESN v Cisco
`
`AT&T v Airbiquity
`
` 06-cv-0660
`
`2006 S.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Qualcomm Inc v. Broadcom Inc.
`
`McAuliffe
`White &
`Ehrman
` Heller
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Case Name
`
`Firm
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`Processing
`Call
`Telephone
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Phones
`Cellular
`Infringement
` Patent
`Phones
`Cellular
`Infringement
` Patent
`Networks
`Wireless
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Systems
`Telephone
`Infringement
` Patent
`Systems
`Telephone
`Infringement
` Patent
`Phones
`Cellular
`Secret
`and Trade
`Infringement
` Patent
`Case Type
`
`9
`
`

`

` 10-cv-03972-LHK
`
`2011 N.D. CA
`
`Y
`
` 3:09-cv-00447
`
`2010 E.D. VA
`
` 3:09-cv-00447
`
`2010 E.D. VA
`
` 337-TA-831
`
`2010 ITC
`
` 09-cv-00387
`
`2009 E.D. VA
`
` 09-cv-00531
`
`2009 E.D. NC
`
` 3:2009-cv-02535
`
`2009 S.D. CA
`
` 06-cv-00551
`
`2009E.D. TX
`
` 09-cv-01058
`
`2009 C.D. CA
`
` 2:06-cv-00462
`
`2008E.D. TX
`
` 3:08-cv-00284
`
`2008 N.D. TX
`
`00299; 3:09-cv-00572
` 3:08-cv-02146; 3:09-cv-
`
`2008 S.D. CA
`
` 4:08-cv-04015
`
`2008 W.D. AR
`
` 2:06-CV-504
`
`2008E.D. TX
`
` 1:08-cv-00157
`
`2008E.D. VA
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Fujitsu
`
`Sony
`
`Motorola
`
`HTC
`
`Sybase
`
`Inc.
`Technologies;
`Performance
`Nokia
`
`Complete
`
`Intel
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Emulex
`
`Paradox
`
`Complete
`
`Motorola
`
`Complete
`
`Kyocera.
`
`Complete
`
`eBay.
`
`Complete
`
`Cricket Comm.
`
`Complete
`
`Cox
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`Lardner LLPSPH America LLC v. Kyocera Wireless Corp. et al.
` Foley &
`
`Manella LLPeBay Inc. v. IDT Corp. et al.
` Irell &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Watkins LLPFreedom Wireless Inc. v. Cricket Communications Inc et al.
` Latham &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Verizon Corp. v. Cox Inc.
`
`Case Name
`
`LLP
`Stockton
` Kilpatrick
`Firm
`
`VoIP
`Infringement
` Patent
`Case Type
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Wireless ICs
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`Devices
`Wireless
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Fujitsu v Belkin et al.
`
`LLP
` Covington
`LLP
`Emanuel
`Quinn
` Howrey LLPWiAV v Motorola
`
`WiAV v Sony
`
`Kodak v HTC
`
`Telecommunications Systems Inc. v Sybase 365 Inc.
`
`LLP
`Van Nest
` Kecker &
`Emery LLP
`Will &
` McDermott
`
`Tekelec v Performance Technologies Inc.
`
`LLP
`Richardson
` Fish and
`Lardner LLPSPH v Nokia
` Foley and
`LLP
`Van Nest
` Keker &
`Dunn LLP
` Gibson
`Witcoff
` Banner &
`Grey LLP
` Ropes &
`
`Intel Corp. v. CSIRO Inc.
`
`Broadcom v Emulex
`
`Paradox Ltd. v. ADT Ltd.
`
`Motorola Inc. v. Research in Motion Inc.
`
`10
`
`

`

`6/24/09ArbitrationNone
`
`Complete
`
` 337-TA-543
`
`13-Jan-08 ITC
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
` 05-cv-00467
`
`10-Jan-07C.D. CA
`
`Unknown
`
`9/22/06Unknown
`
`2:2005-cv-00293
` 2:2005-cv-00291;
`
`6/27/05E.D. TX
`
` 05-cv-1392
`
`21-Jan-03 S.D. CA
`
` 6:11-cv-00018
`
`2013 E.D. TX
`
` 11-cv-01846
`
`2012 N.D. CA
`
` 10-cv-01823
`
`2012 W.D. WA.
`
` 1:10-cv-00258
`
`2012 D. Del.
`
` 337-TA-808
`
`2012 ITC
`
`1:2010-cv-00867
` 1:2010-cv-23580
`
`Del.
` S.D. FL; D.
`
`2011
`
` 337-TA-778
`
`2011 ITC
`
` 337-TA-721
`
`2011 ITC
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Apple
`
`Complete
`
`Wachovia.
`Wells Fargo and
`
`Complete
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Complete
`
`Avaya
`
`Complete
`
`Samsung
`
`Complete
`
`Motorola
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`MMI
`
`HTC
`
`Complete
`
`Motorola
`
`Complete
`
`MOSAID
`
`Complete
`
`HTC
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`Broadcom Inc. v Qualcomm Inc.
`
`Class v Apple
`
`Data Treasury Corp. v. Wells Fargo. et al.
`
`Kronish LLP Qualcomm v Panasonic
`Godward,
`Cooley,
`Kronish LLPBroadcom Inc. v Qualcomm Inc.
`Godward
` Cooley
`Moore
`Swaine &
` Cravath
`Foerster
`Morrison &
`LLP
`Stockton
`Kilpatrick
`LLP and
`McKenzie
` Baker &
`McAuliffe
`White &
`Ehrman
` Heller
`
`Broadcom Inc. v Qualcomm Inc.
`
`VirneTX v Avaya
`
`Samsung v Apple Inc.
`
`Motorola v Microsoft Inc.
`
`MMI v Apple Inc.
`
`HTC v Apple Inc.
`
`Motorola v Apple Inc.
`
`LLP
`Richardson
` Fish and
`LLP
`Emanuel
` Quinn
`Grey LLP
` Ropes and
`LLP
` Proskauer
`LLP
`Henderson
` Finnegan
`LLP
`Emanuel
`Quinn
`Lovells LLPMOSAID v Cisco Inc.
` Hogan
`LLP
`Van Nest
`LLP Keker &
`Henderson
` Finnegan
`Firm
`
`HTC v Apple Inc.
`
`Case Name
`
`Arbitration
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Phones
`Cellular
`Secret
`and Trade
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Case Type
`
`11
`
`

`

` 337-TA-827
`
`14-Feb-12 ITC.
`
`Complete
`
`Motorola
`
` 2:2011-cv-02686
`
`1/30/12 D. KS
`
` 11-cv-00179
`
`11/2/11MDFL
`
` 337-TA-800
`
`8/18/11 ITC
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Cable
`Time Warner
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Complete
`
`ZTE; Nokia
`Huawei; LG;
`
` 11-cv-02709
`
`6/14/11 N.D. CA
`
`Barnes & NobleComplete
`
` 1:2010-cv-00428
`
`5/20/11 D. Del.
`
`Complete
`
`Motorola
`
` 10-cv-00687
`
`9/10/10 D. Del.
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`MOSAID
`
`Patent Interference No.
`Patent No. 7,084,529,
`10/304,121 and U.S.
`Application Serial No
` 3:2009-cv-02535
`
`4/14/10 S.D. CA
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`3-Nov-09Arbitration
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Mobility.
`Motorola
`Solutions;
`Motorola
`Starcom;
`Packard; UT
`Hewlett
`Novatel; Nokia;
`Sierra Wireless;
`
`(_AT&TÓ);
`Wireless LLC)
`Cingular
`LLC (f/k/a
`AT&T Mobility
`Client
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`21-Jul-10USPTO
`
`EnOcean GMBH Complete
`
`No. 105,755(RES)
`Application Serial No 10/304,121 and U.S. Patent No. 7,084,529, Patent Interference
`
`LLP
`Townsend
` Kilpatrick
`Watkins LLPSprint Communications v Time Warner Cable et al.
` Latham &
`
`Digitude v Motorola
`
` Cravath LLPParkervision v Qualcomm
`
`Interdigital v Huawei et al.
`
`Bird LLP
`Alston &
`Lione LLP;
`Gilson &
`Hofer
`LLP; Brinks
`Richardson
`LLP;Fish and
` Covington
`
`Barnes & Noble v LSI
`
`Golden Bridge v Motorola.
`
`LLP
`Emanuel
`Quinn
`LLP
`Townsend
` Kilpatrick
`Brown LLPMOSAID v Cisco
` Mayer
`Lardner LLP
`Foley and
`
`SPH America v Acer Inc. et al
`
`AT&T v. Intrado
`
`Proctor
`Goodwin
`Strawn;
`Winston &
`Spotts Fain;
`Traurig;
`Greenberg
`Bird;
`Altson and
`K&L Gates;
`Peabody;
` Nixon
`
`Austin LLP
`Sidley
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Interference
`Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Arbitration
`
`Case Name
`
`Firm
`
`Case Type
`
`12
`
`

`

`No. 13-cv-OOO I I
`337-TA-868 and Case
`
`8-Apr-13ITC Del.
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`InterDigital Technology Corp.IPR Licensing Inc. and InterDigital Holdings Inc
`
`Gray LLP
`Ropes &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
` 2:11-cv-00416-JRG
`
`2-Apr-13E.D. TX
`
`2:09-cv-00395-JRG
`
`Marshall
`E.D. TX
`
`1-Apr-13
`
`5:13-cv-01774-PSG
`
`22-Mar-13N.D. CA
`
`6:12-cv-00016-MHS
`
` 2:11-cv-00416-JRG
`
`Tyler
`E.D. TX
`19-Mar-13E.D. TX
`
`22-Mar-13
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`337-TA-862
`
`10-Jan-13 ITC
`
`Complete
`
`1:12CV907
`
`17-Dec-12E.D. VA
`
` 337-TA-853
`
`11/7/12 ITC
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`Samsung
`
` 12-mc-00244
`
`8/1/12 W.D. PA
`
`Complete
`
`Comerica
`
`LLC
`ions America;
`Telecommunicat
`and Samsung
`America; Inc.;
`Electronics
`LTD.; Samsung
`Electronics Co.;
`Samsung
`Google Inc.
`
`Mobility
`Motorola
`Mobility
`Motorola
`LLC
`ions America
`Telecommunicat
`and Samsung
`America; Inc.;
`Electronics
`Ltd.; Samsung
`Electronics Co.;
`Samsung
`Samsung
`
`CommunicationsComplete
`Cassidian
`
`TeleCommunications Systems Inc.
`Cassidian Communications v. microData GIS Inc.; microData LLC; and
`
`SimpleAir Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. et al.
`
`Electronics America Inc.
`Patriot Scientific Corporation ("PTSC") v Samsung Electronics Co. ltd. And Samsung
`Technology Properties Limited LLC ("TPL");Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC ("PDS") and
`
`LLP
`Richardson
` Fish and
`Procter LLPWIAV Solutions v. ZTE Corporation. et at.
`Goodwin
`LLP
` DLA Piper
`
`Ericsson v Samsung
`
`Aldridge LLPComerica v Maxim Integrated Products
`Long &
` McKenna
`
`SimpleAir Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al.
`
`LLP
`& Stockton
`Townsend
`Kilpatrick
`LLP
`& Allison
`Mory Smith
`Bunsow De
`Strawn LLPAdaptix v Motorola Mobility LLC et al.
`Winston &
`Strawn LLPAdaptix v Motorola Mobility LLC et al.
`Winston &
`Ellis LLP
`Kirkland &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
` 1:2012-cv-00193
`
`7/5/12 D. Del.
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Client
`
`States Cellular Corporation; and Telephone and Data Systems Inc.
`Wayport Inc.; T-Mobile USA Inc.; Nextel Operations Inc.; Sprint Spectrum L.P.; United
`Mobility II LLC; New Cingular Wireless Services Inc.; SBC Internet Services Inc.;
`Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC; AT&T
`Case Name
`
` Dechert LLP
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Firm
`
`Case Type
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`13
`
`

`

`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`27-Sep-13CA
`
`Y
`
`HTC CorporationComplete
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`27-Sep-13CA
`
` 1:12-cv-01688-GMS)
`
`3-Sep-13D. Del.
`
`2: 13-cv-00740-AJS
`
`30-Aug-13W.D. PA
`
`Complete
`
`Exedea, Inc
`
`CSC Holdings LLCComplete
`
`Complete
`
`Ventures
`Intellectual
`
`6:12-cv-578-LED
`
`19-Jul-13E.D. TX
`
`Complete
`
`Del.)
`1:13-CV-00474-SLR (D.
`
`12-Jul-13Del.
`
`Complete
`
`Del.)
`1:13-CV-00473-SLR (D.
`
`12-Jul-13Del.
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`No. 13-010 (RGA)).
`337-TA-868 and Case
`
`No. 13-009 (RGA)).
`337-TA-868 and Case
`
`20-Jun-13ITC Del.
`
`12-Jun-13ITC Del.
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`LLC
`ions America;
`Telecommunicat
`Samsung
`Inc.; and
`Semiconductor
`Ltd.; Samsung
`Electronics Co.;
`Samsung
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Nokia Inc
`Corporation and
`Nokia
`Inc.
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`
`AIP Acquisition LLC v. Cablevision Systems Corporation, et al.
`
`Bank, Suntrust, and M&T
`Morgan Chase, Fifth Third Bank, Bank of America, BBVA Compass Bank, Commerce
`Intellectual Ventures v PNC Bank, Capital One, First National Bank of Omaha, JP
`
`InfringementCooley LLP Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al.,
` Patent
`InfringementCooley LLP Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al.,
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Dunn
`Gibson
`LLP
`Thompson
`&
`Day Alberti
`Feinberg
`LLP
`Thompson
`&
`Day Alberti
`Feinberg
`Myers LLP
`OMelveny &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`1:13-cv-740-AJT/TRJ
`
`30-Aug-13E.D. VA
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Ventures
`Intellectual
`
`Bank, Suntrust, and M&T
`Morgan Chase, Fifth Third Bank, Bank of America, BBVA Compass Bank, Commerce
`Intellectual Ventures v PNC Bank, Capital One, First National Bank of Omaha, JP
`
`Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. MediaTek Inc. et al.
`
`Americas Corporation and Ricoh Electronics Inc
`Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v Ricoh Company Ltd. Ricoh
`
`Inc. and Canon Solutions America Inc.
`Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v Canon Inc. Canon U.S.A.
`
`InterDigital Technology Corp.IPR Licensing Inc. and InterDigital Holdings Inc
`
`InterDigital Technology Corp.IPR Licensing Inc. and InterDigital Holdings Inc
`
`LLP
`Law Group
`Tensegrity
`
`LLP
`Law Group
`Tensegrity
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Bird LLP
`Alston &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Lione
`Gilson &
`Brinks Hofer
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`12-Jun-13Arbitration
`
`Complete
`
`Huawei
`
`Burling LLPInterDigital Technology Corp.IPR Licensing Inc. and InterDigital Holdings Inc
`Covington &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`No. 13-009 (RGA)).
`337-TA-868 and Case
`
`12-Jun-13ITC Del.
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Huawei
`
`Burling LLPInterDigital Technology Corp.IPR Licensing Inc. and InterDigital Holdings Inc
`Covington &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Case Name
`
`Firm
`
`Case Type
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`14
`
`

`

`2:14-CV-33-JRG-RSP
`
`27-Feb-14E.D. TX
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Networks Ltd.
`Metaswitch
`
`GENBAND US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd., et. al.
`
`MRP(MANx)
`CV SA 8:13-829-
`1:12-cv-3296
`
`11-Feb-14CDCA
`
`27-Oct-13CO
`
`1:13-cv-180 - RBJ
`
`27-Oct-13CO
`
`1:13-cv-179 - RBJ
`
`27-Oct-13CO
`
`1:13-cv-178 - RBJ
`
`27-Oct-13CO
`
`Complete
`
`Broadcom
`
`Complete
`
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`
`Complete
`
`Ltd., et al
`Electronics Co.,
`Samsung
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`et al
`Pantech Co. Ltd.,
`al.
`Nokia Corp., et
`
`1:13-cv-175 - RBJ
`
`27-Oct-13CO
`
`Complete
`
`Inc., et al
`LG Electronics,
`
`Broadcom Corp. v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`1:13-cv-173 - RBJ
`
`27-Oct-13CO
`
`HTC Corp., et alComplete
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`50-117-T-00924-12
`
`Resolution
`Dispute
`l Centre for
`Internationa
`Association
`Arbitration
`American
`
`30-Sep-13
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Spreadtrum
`
`Spreadtrum Communications USA Inc
`Sasken Communication Technologies Limited v. Spreadtrum Communications, Inc. and
`
`LLP
`Emanuel
`Quinn
`Gray LLP
`Ropes &
`Richter &
`Mullin
`Sheppard
`LLP
`G TRAURIG,
`GREENBER
`
`LLP
`McKENZIE
`BAKER &
`LLP
`SPALDING
`&
`D LLP, KING
`ROTHSCHIL
`FOX
`Gage, LLP
`Lathrop &
`Shapiro LLP,
`Dickstein
`
`HART LLP
`HOLLAND &
`N,LLP and
`HENDERSO
`FINNEGAN,
`Burling LLP
`Covington &
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Arbitration
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`27-Sep-13CA
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`27-Sep-13CA
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Electronics, Inc.Complete
`and Samsung
`America, Inc.
`Electronics
`Samsung
`Mobility LLC
`Motorola
`
`Complete
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al.,
`
`P.C.
`Richardson
`Fish &
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`& StocktonMonec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al.,
`Townsend
`Kilpatrick
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Infringement
` Patent
`
`Case Type
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`15
`
`

`

`U.S. Patents
`
`21-Aug-14USPTO
`
`portfolio
`Analysis of Qualcomm
`3:12-cv-02576
`
`6-Aug-14Consulting
`
`16-Jul-14ED TX
`
`3:13-cv-02326
`
`10-Jul-14ED TX
`
`7,218,923
`U.S.Patent No.
`
`2-Jul-14USPTO
`
`Complete
`
`Inc.
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`
`Complete
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Inc.
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`
`Inc.
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`
`Complete
`
`et al
`Pantech Co. Ltd.,
`
`Pittman
`Shaw
`Winthrop
`Pillsbury
`QualcommAnalysis of Qualcomm portfolio
`
`Regarding Vringo patents
`
`Novatel Wireless, Inc. v. ZTE Corp. et. al.
`
`SPH America LLC v. ZTE Corp et. al.
`
`Regarding the U.S.Patent No. 7,218,923
`
`6:13-cv-00507
`
`1-Jul-14E.D. TX
`
`HTC CorporationComplete
`
`Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. HTC Corporation et al
`
`No. 6-13-cv-00507
`consolidated with Case
`TXED-6-13-cv-00569;
`
`1-Jul-14E.D. TX
`
`Complete
`
`Amazon Inc.
`
`Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
`
`7,215,962
`U.S.Patent No.
`
`6,819,923
`U.S.Patent No.
`
`25-Jun-14USPTO
`
`25-Jun-14USPTO
`
`8581,991
`8,134,600, 8,477,197,
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`9-May-14USPTO
`
`8,400,926 B2
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`9-May-14USPTO
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`and ZTE (USA)
`ZTE Corporation
`
`Corp of AmericaComplete
`Ltd. and NEC
`Communications
`Mobile
`NEC Casio
`HTC CorporationComplete
`
`PLLC
`Upshaw,
`Everett
`Bockius_LLPRegarding the U.S.Patent No. 6,819,923
`Lewis &
`Morgan,
`
`Regarding the U.S.Patent No. 7,215,962
`
`Regarding the U.S. Patent No. 8,134,600, 8,477,197, 8581,991
`
`HTC CorporationComplete
`
`Regarding the U.S. Patent No. 8,400,926 B2
`
`Pittman
`Shaw
`Winthrop
`Pillsbury
`Pittman
`Shaw
`Winthrop
`Pillsbury
`PLC
`Associates,
`H.C. Park &
`Pittman
`Shaw
`Winthrop
`Pillsbury
`West LLP
`Fenwick &
`
`LLP
`Wharton,
`Kertscher &
`Hill,
`Wharton,
`Kertscher &
`Hill,
`& Myers LLP
`O'Melveny
`
`IPR
`
`Analysis
`Patent
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`IPR
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`IPR
`
`IPR
`
`IPR
`
`IPR
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`2: 13-CV-824-JRG-RSP
`
`22-Apr-14E.D. TX
`
`Complete
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`and Samsung
`America, Inc.
`Electronics
`Samsung
`Client
`
`et al,
`Concinnitas, LLC and George Hindman v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC,
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`Case Name
`
`Firm
`
`Case Type
`
`16
`
`

`

`7:14-cv-00014
`
`3-Apr-15NDTX
`
`6-Mar-15
`
`3:12-cv-03879
`
`22-Jan-15N.D. CA
`
`6:14-cv-00687
`
`15-Dec-14MDFL
`
`1:11-CV-1025-SLR
`
`11-Nov-14Del.
`
`8,565,346
`Patent No. 8,532,231,
`Regarding the U.S.
`
`14-Oct-14USPTO
`
`6:14-cv-759-JRG
`
`8-Jun-15E.D. TX
`
`7:14-cv-00014
`
`8-Apr-15NDTX
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Google/Motorol
`
`Ltd., Samsung
`Electronics Co.,
`Samsung
`
`a
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`HTC America
`HTC Corp and
`Qualcomm
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Ltd.
`Electronics Co.,
`Samsung
`Qualcomm
`
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Device USA,
`Inc. and Huawei
`Technologies,
`Futurewei
`Co., Ltd.,
`Technologies
`Huawei
`Kudelski Group
`SA of the
`and Nagravision,
`OpenTV, Inc.
`
`15-cv-00322
`
`24-Jul-15N.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`Global, Inc
`and Invetergy
`Inventergy, Inc.
`
`Sonus Networks, Inc. v Inventergy, Inc. and Inventergy Global, Inc
`
`00092
`2015-00089, 2015-
`
`10-Jun-15USPTO
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`IV
`
`Int'l Bus. Machines Corp. v IV
`
`Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.Ltd et al
`
`Summit 6 LLC v. Motorola
`
`Summit 6 LLC v. HTC Corp.
`
`Patent Investigation
`
`Technology Properties Ltd LLC et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
`
`Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures 11 LLC v. Nikon Corp., et al
`
`InfringementCooley LLP ParkerVision, Inc. v Qualcomm Incorporated, et al
`Patent
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`LLP
`Desmarais
`
`Lardner LLPRegarding the U.S. Patent No. 8,532,231, 8,565,346
`Foley and
`
`IPR
`
`Quigg LLP
`Bove +
`Connolly
`Druce
`Novak,
`Fox PLLC
`Goldstein&
`Kessler,
`Sterne,
`LLP
`Emanuel
`Quinn
`LLP
`& Stockton
`Townsend
`Kolpatrick
`Hastings
`Paul
`Moore LLP
`Swaine &
`Cravath,
`LLP
`DLA Piper
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`IPR
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`Analysis
`Patent
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`14-cv-01622-JST
`
`22-Sep-14N.D. CA
`
`Complete
`
`OpenTV Inc. et. al. v. Apple, Inc.
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Case Name
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`L.L.P.
`Dunner,
`rrett &
`Farabow,Ga
`Henderson,
`Finnegan,
`Firm
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Case Type
`
`17
`
`

`

`FLN
`16-cv-00094-WMW-
`IPR2016-01123
`
`7-Jun-16?
`
`6-May-16USPTO
`
`None
`
`4-May-16None
`
`2:15-CV-1503
`
`14-Mar-16EDTX
`
`22-Feb-16
`
`Complete
`
`Y
`
`OnHold
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Inc
`Technologies,
`Securus
`Systems, Inc.
`Communications
`Brocade
`America, Inc.
`Electronics
`Samsung
`Ltd. and
`Electronics Co.,
`Samsung
`Qualcomm
`
`337-TA-982
`
`1-Feb-16ITC
`
`Complete
`
`Qualcomm
`
`2015-01873
`
`26-Dec-15USPTO
`
`CBM2015-00184
`IPR2015-01992,
`
`18-Dec-15USPTO
`
`2015-01872
`
`18-Dec-15USPTO
`
`25-Sep-15ArbitrationNone
`
`14-cv612
`
`24-Jul-15E.D. TX
`
`15-cv-10207
`
`24-Jul-15MA
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Complete
`
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`and Intellectual
`Ventures I LLC
`Intellectual
`Inc.
`LG Electronics,
`Global, Inc
`and Invetergy
`Inventergy, Inc.
`
`Complete
`
`Global, Inc
`and Invetergy
`Inventergy, Inc.
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Trial TestimonyEnagement LetterSigned
`
`Venue
`
`Deposition
`
`Status
`
`Client
`
`Dr Tim A Williams Case History
`
`OnHold
`
`Facebook, Inc.
`
`Skky, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al.
`
`Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
`
`Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
`
`TiVo Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.,
`
`InfringementCooley LLP
`Patent
`IPR
`
`Conroy PC
`Bragalone
`
`n LLC
`RuyakCheria
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`P.C.
`Richardson
`Fish &
`
`Infringement
`Patent
`
`Patent Investigation
`
`US LLP
`Fulbright
`Rose
`Norton
`
`Analysis
`Patent
`
`InfringementCooley LLP ParkerVision, Inc. v Qualcomm Incorporated, et al
`Patent
`
`Sonus Networks, Inc. v Inventergy, Inc. and Inventergy Global, Inc
`
`Sonus Networks, Inc. v Inventergy, Inc. and Inventergy Global, Inc
`
`Case Name
`
`Fox PLLC
`Goldstein&
`Kessler,
`Sterne,
`Fox PLLC
`Goldstein&
`Kessler,
`Sterne,
`Fox PLLC
`Goldstein&
`Kessler,
`Sterne,
`Brown LLPNokia Technologies Ltd and LG Electronics, Inc.
`Mayer
`Quigg LLP
`Bove +
`Connolly
`Druce
`Novak,
`Quigg LLP
`Bove +
`Connolly
`Druce
`Novak,
`Firm
`
`LM Ericsson v IV
`
`Old Republic Group Inc. v IV
`
`LM E

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket