throbber
forms in the first six years of life; beyond this age exotropia
`predominates until the teenage years when the three forms
`have a similar but decreased incidence.
`THIS STUDY WAS SUPPORTED IN PART BY AN UNRE-
`stricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New
`York. The authors indicate no financial conflict of interest. Involved in
`design and conduct of study (B.G.M.); collection (B.G.M., A.E.G.);
`management (B.G.M.); analysis and interpretation of the data (B.G.M.,
`N.N.D.); preparation of the manuscript (B.G.M.); and review and
`approval of the manuscript (B.G.M., A.E.G., N.N.D.). Institutional
`Review Board approval was obtained for this study, and only patients who
`provided research authorization were included. Mayo Clinic institutional
`review board approval and HIPAA compliance were appropriately
`followed for this study.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Frandsen AD. Occurrence of squint: a clinical-statistical study
`on the prevalence of squint and associated signs in different
`groups and ages of the Danish population. Acta Ophthalmol
`Suppl 1960;62:9 –157.
`2. Nordlow W. Squint—the frequency of onset at different ages,
`and the incidence of some associated defects in a Swedish
`population. Acta Ophthalmol 1964;42:1015–1037.
`3. Graham PA. Epidemiology of strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol
`1974;58:224 –231.
`4. Friedman MC, Neumann E, Hyams SW, et al. Ophthalmic
`screening of 38,000 children, age 1 to 2 1/2 years, in child
`welfare clinics. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1980;17:
`261–267.
`5. Matsuo T, Matsuo C. The prevalence of strabismus and
`amblyopia in Japanese elementary school children. Ophthal-
`mic Epidemiol 2005;12:31–36.
`6. Yu CB, Fan DS, Wong VW, et al. Changing patterns of
`strabismus: a decade of experience in Hong Kong. Br J
`Ophthalmol 2002;86:854 – 856.
`
`Effect of Prophylactic Brimonidine
`Instillation on Bleeding During
`Strabismus Surgery in Adults
`Samin Hong, Chan Yun Kim, Gong Je Seong, and
`Sueng-Han Han
`
`PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of preoperative bri-
`monidine-purite 0.15% instillation on intraoperative
`bleeding and postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage
`during strabismus surgery in adult patients.
`DESIGN: Randomized comparative interventional case se-
`ries.
`METHODS: One hundred and eighteen eyes of 90 consec-
`utive adult patients were instilled with either a single
`
`Accepted for publication Apr 17, 2007.
`From the Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology,
`Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
`Inquiries to Sueng-Han Han, Institute of Vision Research, Department
`of Ophthalmology, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University
`College of Medicine, 146-92 Dogok-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-720
`Korea; e-mail: shhan222@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr
`
`drop of brimonidine-purite 0.15% (42 eyes), phenyleph-
`rine 1% (38 eyes), or sodium hyaluronate 0.1% (38
`eyes) 15 minutes prior to strabismus surgery. Intraoper-
`ative bleeding and postoperative subconjunctival hemor-
`rhage were graded on a scale of one to three. The scores
`were compared among the study groups.
`RESULTS: Scores of the intraoperative bleeding and the
`postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage of the treat-
`ment groups were significantly less than that of the
`control group (P < .001). The scores of the brimonidine
`group were similar to those of the phenylephrine group
`(intraoperative bleeding score, P ⴝ .405; subconjuncti-
`val hemorrhage score, P ⴝ .722).
`CONCLUSIONS: Topical brimonidine administration be-
`fore strabismus surgery may reduce intraoperative bleed-
`ing and postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage in
`adult patients.
`(Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:469–470.
`© 2007 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
`
`V ASOCONSTRICTING AGENTS SUCH AS PHENYLEPHRINE
`
`have been used prior to strabismus surgery to reduce
`hemorrhage during the procedure. Attack of acute angle-
`closure glaucoma and other systemic complications after
`topical phenylephrine are rare.1 However, these systemic
`adverse reactions include very serious cardiovascular prob-
`lems such as marked hypertension, syncope, myocardial
`infarction, arrhythmia,
`subarachnoid hemorrhage, and
`even death.2,3
`Brimonidine-purite 0.15% is a selective ␣ 2-adrenergic
`agonist that has been widely used to lower intraocular
`pressure in glaucoma patients.4 It is also considered to have
`a vasoconstrictive property. There are some reports that
`the preoperative use of topical brimonidine can help
`reduce bleeding-related problems during laser in situ kera-
`tomileusis (LASIK) and cataract surgery.5,6 We deter-
`mined whether the preoperative use of topical brimonidine
`reduces intraoperative bleeding and postoperative subcon-
`junctival hemorrhage during strabismus surgery in adult
`patients, and compared its effect with the well-known
`strong vasoconstrictor phenylephrine.
`After informed consent from the patients was obtained,
`a total of 118 eyes of 90 consecutive adult patients (49
`males and 41 females) who underwent strabismus surgery
`were included in the study. Mean age was 36.22 ⫾ 14.76
`years. Seventy-four eyes received the extraocular muscle
`recession surgery and 27 eyes received the resection surgery
`(including 11 eyes which received both the recession and
`Ëresection surgery). The patients who received prior ocular
`surgery were excluded.
`A drop of brimonidine-purite 0.15% (42 eyes), phenyl-
`ephrine 1% (38 eyes), or sodium hyaluronate 0.1% (38
`eyes) was applied randomly to the eye(s) of each patient 15
`minutes prior to strabismus surgery. All procedures were
`performed by the same surgeon (S.H.H.). During the
`surgery, the severity of bleeding was detected by the same
`observer (S.H.) in a double-blind manner and classified as
`
`VOL. 144, NO. 3
`
`BRIEF REPORTS
`
`469
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1104, Page 1 of 2
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`TABLE 1. Intraoperative Bleeding Scores in Eyes
`Receiving Strabismus Surgery, With and Without
`Prophylactic Brimonidine or Phenylephrine
`
`Treatment Group
`
`Brimonidine 0.15%
`(n ⫽ 42)
`
`Phenylephrine 1%
`(n ⫽ 38)
`
`Sodium Hyaluronate 0.1%
`(n ⫽ 38)
`
`Score
`1
`2
`3
`
`15 (35.71%)
`20 (47.62%)
`7 (16.67%)
`
`19 (50.00%)
`15 (39.47%)
`26 (68.42%)
`
`0 (0.00%)
`12 (31.58%)
`26 (68.42%)
`
`TABLE 2. Postoperative Subconjunctival Hemorrhage
`Scores in Eyes Receiving Strabismus Surgery, With and
`Without Prophylactic Brimonidine or Phenylephrine
`
`Treatment Group
`
`Brimonidine 0.15%
`(n ⫽ 42)
`
`Phenylephrine 1%
`(n ⫽ 38)
`
`Sodium Hyaluronate 0.1%
`(n ⫽ 38)
`
`Score
`1
`2
`3
`
`17 (40.48%)
`18 (42.86%)
`7 (16.67%)
`
`16 (42.11%)
`18 (47.37%)
`4 (10.53%)
`
`0 (0.00%)
`7 (18.42%)
`31 (81.58%)
`
`bleeding-related problems of strabismus procedures with-
`out the risk of serious adverse reactions in adult patients.
`THE AUTHORS INDICATE NO FINANCIAL SUPPORT OR CON-
`flict of interest. All of the authors were involved in the design and
`conduct of study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of
`the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. The
`proper informed consent was taken from the participants, and this study
`adherence to Declaration of Helsinki and all federal laws. The ISRCTN
`number is ISRCTN31792393.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Wolfs RC, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Risk of acute
`angle-closure glaucoma after diagnostic mydriasis in nonse-
`lected subjects: the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
`Sci 1997;38:2683–2687.
`2. Meyer SM, Fraunfelder FT. 3. Phenylephrine hydrochloride.
`Ophthalmology 1980;87:1177–1180.
`3. Fraunfelder FW, Fraunfelder FT, Jensvold B. Adverse systemic
`effects from pledgets of topical ocular phenylephrine 10%.
`Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:624 – 625.
`4. Katz LJ. Twelve-month evaluation of brimonidine-purite ver-
`sus brimonidine in patients with glaucoma or ocular hyper-
`tension. J Glaucoma 2002;11:119 –126.
`5. Norden RA. Effect of prophylactic brimonidine on bleeding
`complications and flap adherence after laser in situ keratom-
`ileusis. J Refract Surg 2002;18:468 – 471.
`6. Desco MC, Navea A, Ferrer E, Menezo JL. Effect of prophy-
`lactic brimonidine on bleeding complications after cataract
`surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:228 –232.
`7. Enyedi LB, Freedman SF. Safety and efficacy of brimonidine in
`children with glaucoma. J AAPOS 2001;5:281–284.
`
`FIGURE. Intraoperative bleeding score (Top) and postoper-
`ative subconjunctival hemorrhage score (Bottom) in eyes re-
`ceiving strabismus surgery, with and without prophylactic
`brimonidine or phenylephrine.
`
`follows: grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; and grade 3,
`severe. The size of the subconjunctival hemorrhage was
`classified by slit-lamp examination as follows: grade 1, ⬍ 3
`mm; grade 2, between 3 and 5 mm; and grade 3, ⬎5 mm
`after four hours. Statistical analysis was performed using
`the Chi-square test of Pearson and P ⬍.05 was considered
`statistically significant.
`The results are summarized in the Figure and in Tables 1
`and 2. The intraoperative bleeding scores of the treatment
`groups were significantly less than that of the control group
`(P ⬍ .001). However, there was no significant difference
`between the intraoperative bleeding scores of two treat-
`ment groups (P ⫽ .405). Concerning the subconjunctival
`hemorrhage, the scores of the treatment groups were
`significantly less than that of the control group (P ⬍ .001).
`However, no significant difference was noted between the
`postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage scores of two
`treatment groups (P ⫽ .722). No patient experienced
`angle-closure glaucoma or other systemic complications,
`including cardiovascular problems.
`In conclusion, topical brimonidine administration be-
`fore strabismus surgery reduced intraoperative bleeding and
`postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage in adult pa-
`tients, and is as effective and as powerful as the well-
`known vasoconstrictor phenylephrine.
`The use of brimonidine is not suitable in pediatric
`patients because it can pass through the blood-brain
`barrier.7 However, its preoperative use can reduce the
`
`470
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`SEPTEMBER 2007
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1104, Page 2 of 2
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket