throbber
Spector and Raizman
`
`DISCUSSION
`Our field study of the Der p I antigen in house
`dust indicates that a large amount of mite aller(cid:173)
`gen is present in the houses in the Taipei area.
`Remarkable seasonal variation of Der p I levels is
`demonstrated, with peaks occurring in November
`and December. The pattern of seasonal variation
`of the Der p I allergen observed in Taipei was
`different from that reported in the United States,
`with the highest levels in July. 3 Furthermore, the
`house dust samples from mattresses, bedroom
`floors, and living room floors contained higher
`concentrations of Der p I in June, November, and
`December than in August, February, and April. In
`addition, it is important to point out that the
`occurrence of peaked Der p I concentration in
`November corresponded to the highest hospital
`admission rate for bronchial asthma in November
`found in our previous study. 1
`Absolute humidity was shown as the best single
`guide for excess mite growth; however, no corre(cid:173)
`lation between absolute humidity and mite aller(cid:173)
`gen content was found in our study. Because the
`indoor absolute humidity in Taipei is always
`higher than 9 gm/kg, which has been suggested to
`be critical for mite growth,4 the humidity cannot
`be used as a determining factor for mite growth in
`subtropical climates.
`In summary, the mite allergen Der p I content
`varied with seasons but was not influenced by the
`change of indoor absolute humidity in the Taipei
`area. On average, the highest Der p I concentra(cid:173)
`tion was found in the mattresses, and the pattern
`of the seasonal variation was similar among mat-
`
`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`JULY 1994
`
`tresses, bedroom floors, and living room floors.
`Furthermore, more than 90% of the dust samples
`collected in November and December were found
`to contain Der p I with a concentration higher
`than 2 µ.,g/gm dust, the proposed critical level for
`an asthma attack. 5 Therefore procedures to re(cid:173)
`duce the mite allergen as much as possible might
`be a feasible way to prevent the continuing rise in
`the prevalence of asthma in this area. In addition,
`the marked seasonal variation of mite allergen
`content observed in this investigation indicates
`that monitoring mite allergen levels in individual
`houses will be of great benefit in studying the
`relationship between HDM exposure and the oc(cid:173)
`currence of asthmatic symptoms.
`
`We thank the occupants of the 12 houses who let us
`use their homes to conduct an extensive sampling
`throughout the year.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Chang YC, Hsieh KH. The study of house dust mites in
`Taiwan. Ann Allergy 1989;62:101-6.
`2. Luczynska CM, Li Y, Chapman MD, Tae PM. A two-site
`monoclonal antibody ELISA for the quantification of the
`major Dermatophagoides spp. allergens, Der p I and Der f I.
`J Immunol Methods 1989;118:227-35.
`3. Lintner TJ, Brane KA. The effects of season, climate, and
`air-conditioning on the prevalence of Dennatophagoides
`mite allergens in household dust. J ALLERGY CuN IMMUNoL
`1993;9] :862-7.
`4. Korsgaard J. Mite asthma and residency. Am Rev Respir
`Dis 1983;128:231-5.
`5. Platts-Mills TAE, Ward GW, Sporik R, Gelber LE, Chap(cid:173)
`man MD, Heymann PW. Epidemiology of the relationship
`between exposure to indoor allergens and asthma. Int Arch
`Aller~, Appl Immunol 1991;94:339-45.
`
`Conjunctivitis medicamentosa
`
`S. L. Spector, MD, and M. B. Raizman, MD
`Los Angeles, Calif, and Boston, Mass
`
`Rhinitis medicamentosa is a well recognized
`condition of chronic nasal congestion associated
`with the overuse of vasoconstricting nose drops. It
`is thought to be due to rebound nasal mucosa!
`
`From Allergy Medical Clinical, Los Angeles.
`Reprint requests: Sheldon Spector, MD, Allergy Medical
`Clinic, 11620 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA
`90025.
`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL 1994;94:134-6.
`Copyright© 1994 by Mosby-Year Book, Inc.
`0091-6749/94 $3.00 + 0 1/54/55254
`
`edema, which may occur after use of topical nasal
`vasoconstrictors even for a short period of time. 1
`An analogous clinical condition in the eye is
`associated with the overuse of vasoconstricting
`drops. This results in increased conjunctiva! injec(cid:173)
`tion and often a rebound hyperemia that persists
`despite discontinuation of eye drops. The Physi(cid:173)
`cian's Desk Reference product information cau(cid:173)
`tions about persistent redness or irritation and
`suggests discontinuation of the drops should the
`condition worsen or persist. 2 These warning signs
`
`134
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1095, Page 1 of 3
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`VOLUME 94, NUMBER ;
`
`Spector and Raizman 135
`
`FIG. 1. Hyperemia immediately after cessation of Alba(cid:173)
`Ion- A administration.
`
`can be interpreted as a persistence or worsening
`of the underlying condition. We describe five
`patients with a distinct clinical pattern, suggesting
`"conjunctivitis medicamentosa."
`
`CASE REPORTS
`Patient 1
`Patient l, the prototype patient, is a 19-year-old
`student who sustained an injury to one eye initially but
`had underlying allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis. He
`was very self-conscious about his red eyes and had
`sought help from many ophthalmologists. His program,
`when he was first seen, included naphazoline and
`antazoline (AJbalon-A), which he used repeatedly
`throughout the day. The drops appeared to be required
`at shorter and shorter intervals to obtain relief. Oph(cid:173)
`thalmologists had prescribed steroid eye drops, which
`successfully improved the condition; but because he
`was told to use them sparingly, when they were stopped,
`the condition reappeared. A thorough allergic evalua(cid:173)
`tion revealed strongly positive skin test results. Skin test
`responses to the drops themselves were negative. An
`eye smear was positive for eosinophils. Immunotherapy
`and administration of cromolyn eye drops were started.
`After a few weeks, all vasoconstricting drops could
`be discontinued, and with long-term follow-up the pa(cid:173)
`tient continued to be free of symptoms. Fig. 1 shows the
`hyperemia seen immediately after cessation of Alba(cid:173)
`lon-A administration .
`
`Patient 2
`Patient 2 is a 37-year-old man who went sailing each
`week without proper protection for his eyes. He had
`marked redness of his eyes caused by sun exposure and
`three
`tetrahydrozoline hydrochloride (Visine)
`used
`times a day for 5 days. When he stopped using the eye
`drops, his eyes became "redder than they had ever been
`before." The drops appeared to be required at shorter
`and shorter intervals to obtain relief. He was given
`
`FIG. 2. Jt Appearance of eye within hours after use of
`eye drops. B, Appearance after cessation of drops for
`sever a I clays.
`
`artificial tears without preservatives, and after a few
`days his problem resolved. Fig. 2, A shows the appear(cid:173)
`ance of his eye within hours after the use of the eye
`drops, and Fig. 2, B shows appearance after cessation of
`the drops for several days.
`
`Patient: 3
`Patient 3 is a 44-year-old man with chlamydia! con(cid:173)
`junctivitis, which caused 5 months of bilateral ocular
`redness. Naphazoline and pheniramine maleate solu(cid:173)
`tion (Naphcon-A) was prescribed 3 to 4 times per day
`for 1 month. On the advice of his physician, Naphcon-A
`was stopped, and doxycycline, 100 µ.g 2 times per day,
`was started. An office visit 3 days later revealed eyes
`that were redder than before. After the drops had been
`discontinued for a longer time, the hyperemia was
`minimal. He restarted the drops, and the process re(cid:173)
`curred.
`
`Patient 4
`Patient 4 is a 32-year-old woman with seasonal
`allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis. An eye smear was
`examined for eosinophilia, but the result was negative.
`Naphazoline and polyethylene glycol 2%, along with
`the cxcipicnts found in Allergy Drops by Bausch and
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1095, Page 2 of 3
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`136 Spector and Raizman
`
`Lomb, was her treatment. When the drops were
`stopped, increasing tearing and redness occurred. After
`the patient was warned of a possible association be(cid:173)
`tween the eye drops and redness, she was able to stop
`using them on her own.
`
`Patient 5
`Patient 5 is a 32-year-old woman who had excision of
`bilateral pterygia resulting in revasculization of the
`larger vessels at the site of surgery. Naphazoline helped
`redness to clear completely in 20 to 30 minutes; how(cid:173)
`ever, 12 to 24 hours after the eye drops were discon(cid:173)
`tinued, the redness returned and became more intense.
`Immediate and delayed skin test responses to the drops
`were negative. She required no other medications after
`she stopped using the eye drops.
`
`RESULTS
`Skin test responses to the drops themselves, for
`both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity re(cid:173)
`activity, were negative in the three patients tested.
`Skin tests for possible pollen, dust, or mold aller(cid:173)
`gies were done in those patients with allergic
`rhinitis and helped to confirm the diagnosis. An
`eye smear for eosinophils was done in patient 1,
`and the result was positive.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Certain characteristics of the patients described
`should be noted. All patients had an underlying
`ocular problem that prompted the use of vasocon(cid:173)
`strictor eye drops. The vasoconstrictor drops
`helped the redness, prompting continuation of
`their use. In some patients the vasoconstrictor
`ocular drops appeared to be required at shorter
`and shorter intervals to obtain relief. Attempts to
`discontinue the drops after days, weeks, or
`months without additional treatment caused hy(cid:173)
`peremia, thought to be due to a rebound phenom(cid:173)
`enon. Artificial tears, corticosteroid drops, or
`long-term therapy with ocular cromolyn and/or
`immunotherapy may help terminate dependence
`on the vasoconstrictor drops, depending on the
`underlying condition. The most common agent
`used by the patients described was naphazoline,
`but other agents such as tetrahydrozoline hydro(cid:173)
`chloride can be responsible for the phenomenon
`described.
`The cause of these problems is unclear. Preex(cid:173)
`isting conjunctiva! disease may be a prerequisite
`condition for the development of medicamentosa.
`
`J ALLERGY CUN IMMUNOL
`JULY 1994
`
`Abelson et al.,3 using a histamine model to pro(cid:173)
`duce ocular redness, did not observe rebound
`vasodilation after administration of naphazoline
`or tetrahydrozoline in 11 normal volunteers after
`single use or 10 days of exaggerated use. Perhaps
`an underlying medical problem is necessary, as
`was the c:ase in our patients, for its development.
`Skin testing done with the components of the
`drops in three of the patients did not indicate
`immediate hypersensitivity or delayed hypersensi(cid:173)
`tivity reactivity. Additionally, patient 1 did not
`show reactivity by skin testing to the preservative
`benzalkonium, tested by itself.
`The use of vasoconstrictor eye drops has re(cid:173)
`cently increased in the United States because of
`the nonavailability of cromolyn sodium. This
`could help explain why more patients have been
`using the ocular formulation of vasoconstrictor
`drops. The analogy between rhinitis medicamen(cid:173)
`tosa and conjunctivitis medicamentosa is obvious.
`We think that physicians should be made more
`aware of the two entities. In a British study 26%
`of practitioners prescribed topical nasal deconges(cid:173)
`tants as a first-line therapy in allergic rhinitis. 4 We
`suspect that the ocular equivalent is more com(cid:173)
`mon than physicians realize and that most pa(cid:173)
`tients just stop using the drops because they think
`that they are not helping or because the situation
`is getting slightly worse. Often, patients do not
`bring their ocular problem to the attention of the
`physician because many over-the-counter prepa(cid:173)
`rations are available. They might conclude that
`the eye drops are not working rather than that
`there is an actual worsening of the condition. If
`the diagnosis of conjunctivitis medicamentosa is
`considered, the vasoconstrictor eye drops should
`be discontinued in favor of more appropriate
`treatment of the underlying condition.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Fennenbaum JI. Allergic rhinitis. In; Paterson R, ed. Al(cid:173)
`lergic diseases: diagnosis and management. 2nd ed.
`Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1980:87.
`2. Physicians desk reference for ophthalmology. 20th ed.
`Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co., 1992.
`3. Abelson MB, Butrus SI, Weston J, Rosner B. Tolerance
`and absence of rebound vasodilation following topical oc(cid:173)
`ular decongestant usage. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1364-7.
`4. Jones HS. Allergic rhinitis: a study on the prescribing pref(cid:173)
`erences in general practice. Br J Clin Pract 1989;43:30-2.
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1095, Page 3 of 3
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket