throbber
Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Forms of Interleukin-1 in
`the Tear Fluid and Conjunctiva of Patients with
`Dry-Eye Disease
`
`Abraham Solomon,1 Dilek Dursun,1 Zuguo Liu,1,2 Yuhuan Xie,1,2 Angelo Macri,1 and
`Stephen C. Pflugfelder1
`
`PURPOSE. To compare the expression of the pro- and anti-
`inflammatory forms of interleukin (IL)-1 in the tear fluid and
`conjunctival epithelium of normal eyes and those with dry-eye
`disease.
`METHODS. The concentrations of IL-1␣, IL-1␤ (precursor and
`mature forms), and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) were mea-
`sured by ELISA in tear fluid samples obtained from normal
`individuals and patients with dry eye who had rosacea-associ-
`ated meibomian gland disease (MGD) or Sjo¨gren’s syndrome
`(SS) aqueous tear deficiency (ATD). These cytokines were also
`measured in normal tear fluid before and after nasal stimulation
`to induce reflex tearing. The relative expression of these cyto-
`kines was evaluated in conjunctival impression cytology spec-
`imens and conjunctival biopsy tissue obtained from normal
`subjects and SS ATD–affected patients using immunofluores-
`cent staining. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 concentration
`and activity in the tear fluid were evaluated with gelatin zy-
`mography and with an MMP-9 activity assay kit, respectively.
`RESULTS. Compared with normal subjects, the concentration of
`IL-1␣ and mature IL-1␤ in the tear fluid was increased, and the
`concentration of precursor IL-1␤ was decreased in patients
`with MGD (P ⬍ 0.05, P ⫽ 0.02, and P ⬍ 0.01, respectively) and
`SS ATD (P ⬍ 0.001, P ⫽ 0.02, and P ⬍ 0.001, respectively).
`There was no significant change in the concentration of IL-1␣,
`precursor IL-1␤, and IL-1Ra in reflex tear fluid, indicating that
`the lacrimal glands may secrete these cytokines. The activity of
`MMP-9, a physiological activator of IL-1␤, was significantly
`elevated in the tear fluid of both dry-eye groups compared with
`normal subjects. A strong positive correlation was observed
`between the intensity of corneal fluorescein staining and the
`tear fluid IL-1␣ concentration (r2 ⫽ 0.17, P ⬍ 0.02) and the
`mature-to-precursor IL-1␤ratio (r2 ⫽ 0.46, P ⬍ 0.001). Positive
`immunofluorescent staining for IL-1␣, mature IL-1␤, and IL-1Ra
`was observed in a significantly greater percentage of conjunc-
`tival cytology specimens from eyes with SS ATD than in those
`from normal eyes (P ⬍ 0.01 for IL-1␣, P ⬍ 0.009 for mature
`IL-1␤, and P ⬍ 0.05 for IL-1Ra).
`
`From the 1Ocular Surface and Tear Center, Bascom Palmer Eye
`Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami School of
`Medicine, Florida; and the 2Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-
`sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
`Supported in part by Fight-for-Sight Postdoctoral Fellowship
`PD98025; Grant EY11915, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland;
`an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness; and the Drs.
`David and Maureen Smith Ocular Surface and Tear Research Fund.
`Submitted for publication February 2, 2001; revised April 20,
`2001; accepted May 15, 2001.
`Commercial relationships policy: N.
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be marked “advertise-
`ment” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`Corresponding author: Stephen C. Pflugfelder, Cullen Eye Insti-
`tute, 6565 Fannin, NC 205, Houston, TX 77030. stevenp@bcm.tmc.edu
`
`Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
`
`CONCLUSIONS. Dry-eye disease is accompanied by an increase in
`the proinflammatory forms of IL-1 (IL-1␣and mature IL-1␤) and
`a decrease in the biologically inactive precursor IL-1␤ in tear
`fluid. Increased protease activity on the ocular surface may be
`one mechanism by which precursor IL-1␤ is cleaved to the
`mature, biologically active form. The conjunctival epithelium
`appears to be one source of the increased concentration of IL-1
`in the tear fluid of patients with dry-eye disease. These results
`suggest that IL-1 may play a key role in the pathogenesis of
`keratoconjunctivitis sicca. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;
`42:2283–2292)
`
`T here is increasing evidence that dry eye is accompanied by
`
`subclinical ocular surface inflammation. The evidence for
`this inflammation includes increased expression of immune
`activation markers, such as HLA-DR, intercellular adhesion mol-
`ecule (ICAM)-1, and CD-40, by the conjunctival epithelium and
`infiltration of the conjunctiva by inflammatory cells.1–7 The
`importance of inflammation in the pathogenesis of dry eye is
`underscored by reports that the signs and symptoms of dry eye
`markedly improve with anti-inflammatory therapies such as
`glucocorticosteroids and cyclosporin.8,9
`Our group has previously evaluated the levels of the inflam-
`matory cytokines that are capable of modulating the expres-
`sion of these inflammatory markers and of stimulating leuko-
`cyte chemotaxis onto the ocular surface of dry eyes. Our
`studies showed that the levels of RNAs encoding a number of
`different inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1,
`-6, and -8 and TNF-␣, were elevated in the conjunctival epithe-
`lium of patients with Sjo¨gren’s syndrome (SS) keratoconjunc-
`tivitis sicca (KCS) compared with normal subjects.10 The levels
`of IL-1 and -8 RNA are directly correlated with the intensity of
`corneal fluorescein staining and are inversely correlated with
`conjunctival goblet cell density. In a subsequent study, we
`found that
`the concentration of matrix metalloproteinase
`(MMP)-9, the principal MMP enzyme produced by the corneal
`epithelium and a key factor in the pathogenesis of sterile
`corneal ulceration, increases as tear clearance decreases.11 The
`mechanism by which these inflammatory and matrix-degrading
`factors are upregulated in dry-eye disease has not been estab-
`lished.
`The proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 is an important mediator
`of inflammation and immunity.12 IL-1 has been implicated in
`the pathogenesis of human inflammatory diseases, such as
`septic shock, rheumatoid arthritis, and periodontitis,13–15 as
`well as the corneal and ocular surface diseases rosacea, bullous
`keratopathy,
`keratoconus,
`and
`sterile
`corneal
`ulcer-
`ation.11,16 –17 Both proinflammatory forms of IL-1 (IL-1␣ and
`-1␤) are multifunctional cytokines that in general produce
`similar biological effects, although these may vary among dif-
`ferent cell types and organ systems.19,20 IL-1 is a potent inducer
`of other inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and -8, TNF-␣, and
`granulocyte-macrophage
`colony-stimulating
`factor
`(GM-
`CSF).21,22 It also stimulates production of MMP enzymes by
`epithelial and inflammatory cells.23 Both IL-1␣ and -1␤ are
`
`2283
`
`DDownloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 12/14/2022
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1089, Page 1 of 10
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`2284
`
`Solomon et al.
`
`IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`
`TABLE 1. Demographic Characteristics of Study Patients
`
`Group
`
`Normal 1
`Normal 2
`SS ATD
`MGD
`
`n
`
`10
`7
`9
`13
`
`Gender
`
`Age
`
`6 women, 4 men
`4 women, 3 men
`8 women, 3 men
`7 women, 6 men
`
`32 ⫾ 6.6*
`46 ⫾ 8.6†
`68 ⫾ 9.1
`55 ⫾ 16.3
`
`Age
`Range
`
`24–44
`35–57
`53–80
`25–73
`
`Age is expressed as mean years ⫾ SD.
`* Normal 1 vs SS ATD P ⬍ 0.001; Normal 1 vs MGD P ⫽ 0.0004.
`† Normal 2 vs SS ATD P ⫽ 0.001; Normal 2 vs MGD P ⫽ 0.36.
`
`synthesized as precursor proteins with a molecular mass of
`approximately 33 kDa.19 The precursor and the mature 17-kDa
`forms of IL-1␣ are both biologically active.19 In contrast, the
`precursor form of IL-1␤ possesses minimal biological activity
`and requires cleavage to the 17-kDa mature form to become
`active.19 This conversion occurs within cells by IL-1␤– convert-
`ing enzyme (also known as ICE or caspase 1) and in the
`extracellular environment by a number of proteases, including
`leukocyte elastase, granzyme A, and MMP-2 and -9.12,24,25
`Among a number of different MMPs evaluated, MMP-9 was
`found to be the most efficient activator of precursor IL-1␤.25
`IL-1Ra is a cytokine that inhibits the activities of the proin-
`flammatory forms of IL-1 by competitively binding to the type
`1 IL-1 receptor.26 Administration of IL-1Ra has been found to
`be clinically beneficial in the treatment of arthritis and preven-
`tion of corneal transplant rejection in experimental mod-
`els.14,27 Both proinflammatory forms (IL-1␣ and -1␤) and the
`anti-inflammatory form (IL-1Ra) of IL-1 have been detected in
`the human corneal epithelium.28 –31 IL-1Ra has also been de-
`tected in human conjunctival epithelial cells.32 IL-1␣ and -1␤
`have also been detected in human tear fluid.11,33
`We hypothesized that increased concentration and/or activ-
`ity of IL-1 could be an initiating factor for the observed ocular
`surface immunopathology of dry eye. This study was designed
`to test this hypothesis by comparing the concentrations of
`IL-1␣, inactive precursor and active mature IL-1␤ and IL-1Ra in
`tear fluid samples obtained from patients with dry-eye disease
`who had rosacea-associated meibomian gland disease (MGD)
`or Sjo¨gren’s syndrome (SS) aqueous tear deficiency (ATD) and
`normal asymptomatic subjects. The relative levels of expres-
`sion of the IL-1 family of cytokines in the conjunctival epithe-
`lium of normal subjects and patients with SS ATD, the dry-eye
`condition that has been reported to involve the most severe
`
`KCS,34 were compared using immunofluorescent staining. The
`activity of MMP-9, a protease that activates precursor IL-1␤ in
`the extracellular environment was also evaluated. Finally, the
`tear fluid concentrations of lactoferrin, a protein secreted by
`the lacrimal glands into human tears that inhibits the formation
`of reactive oxygen species that can damage cells and promote
`production and release of IL-1 was measured.35,36
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`Rabbit anti-human polyclonal antibodies specific for IL-1␣, the precur-
`sor and mature forms of IL-1␤, and recombinant precursor and mature
`human IL-1␤and ELISA kits for the precursor and mature forms of IL-1␤
`were purchased from Cistron (Pine Brook, NJ); ELISA kits for IL-1␣and
`IL-1Ra and recombinant human IL-1␣ and IL1-Ra and polyclonal anti-
`sera for IL-1Ra from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN); FITC-conjugated
`secondary antibodies from Caltag Laboratories (Burlingame, CA); and
`Texas red-conjugated secondary antibodies from Molecular Probes
`(Eugene, OR).
`
`Patient Selection
`This study was conducted according to a protocol approved by the
`University of Miami School of Medicine Institutional Review Board and
`in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed
`consent was obtained from participants after the nature and possible
`consequences of the study were explained.
`Tear fluid samples were obtained from 9 patients with primary SS
`ATD, 1 patient with non-SS ATD, 13 patients with rosacea-associated
`MGD, and 17 normal subjects. The demographic characteristics of
`these patients are presented in Table 1. One group of normal subjects
`consisted of six women and four men who had no history of eye
`disease or ocular surgery, did not use eye drops, and had no ocular
`irritation symptoms. All the subjects had a Schirmer 1 test score greater
`than 15 mm, normal meibomian glands, and no corneal fluorescein
`staining. This group was used for evaluating tear proteins in unstimu-
`lated tear fluid. A second group of asymptomatic normal subjects (four
`women and three men) who met the same criteria was used for
`evaluating the effects of reflex tearing on the concentration of the IL-1
`family of cytokines in tear fluid. All normal subjects were recruited
`from the employees of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute.
`The SS group consisted of eight women and one man. Diagnosis of
`primary SS was based on criteria proposed by Fox et al.37 and included
`the following: (1) a Schirmer 1 test score of 5 mm or less in at least one
`eye, (2) interpalpebral zone fluorescein dye staining of the conjunctiva
`
`TABLE 2. Concentrations of IL-1 Family Cytokines in Unstimulated Tear Fluid Obtained from Normal
`Subjects and Patients with MGD and SS ATD
`
`Cytokine
`
`Normal
`(n ⴝ 10)
`
`MGD
`(n ⴝ 13)
`
`SS
`(n ⴝ 9)
`
`IL-1␣
`
`Precursor IL-1␤
`
`Mature IL-1␤
`
`43.1 ⫾ 24
`
`253.7 ⫾ 90
`
`443.3 ⫾ 128.5
`
`379.2 ⫾ 73
`
`54.6 ⫾ 16
`
`29.8 ⫾ 10
`
`187.7 ⫾ 72
`
`21.2 ⫾ 10
`
`80.9 ⫾ 22
`
`Precursor-mature IL-1␤
`IL-1 Ra (⫻105)
`IL-1 Ra/IL-1␣ (⫻103)
`
`19.1 ⫾ 5
`2.95 ⫾ 1.27
`27.86 ⫾ 20.57
`
`1.17 ⫾ 0.7
`9.40 ⫾ 2.54
`6.95 ⫾ 6.6
`
`0.35 ⫾ 0.2
`23.96 ⫾ 12.35
`5.01 ⫾ 6.28
`
`IL-1 Ra/mature IL-1␤ (⫻103)
`
`40.5 ⫾ 18.39
`
`14.28 ⫾ 42.59
`
`70.29 ⫾ 44.15
`
`P
`
`*⬍0.05
`†⬍0.001
`*⬍0.01
`†⬍0.0001
`*0.02
`†0.02
`*†0.0001
`*†NS
`*0.012
`†0.007
`*0.0016
`†NS
`
`Data are expressed as mean picograms per milliliter.
`* Normal vs MGD.
`† Normal vs SS.
`
`DDownloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 12/14/2022
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1089, Page 2 of 10
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`
`IL-1 Cytokines in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
`
`2285
`
`(A) Correlation between
`FIGURE 1.
`IL-1␣ concentration in tears and cor-
`neal fluorescein staining scores. (B)
`Correlation between mature-precur-
`sor IL-1␤ ratio in tears and corneal
`fluorescein staining scores.
`
`and cornea, (3) xerostomia, (4) elevated serum autoantibody titers
`(antinuclear antibody and/or rheumatoid factor titer ⱖ1:160), and (5)
`symptoms of moderate to severe ocular irritation.37 The patient with
`non-SS ATD was a 67-year-old woman who had a Schirmer 1 test score
`of 4 mm in both eyes and interpalpebral corneal and conjunctival
`staining, but did not have xerostomia or serum autoantibodies.
`The MGD group consisted of seven women and six men with the
`chief symptoms of ocular irritation and/or redness that was diagnosed
`as ocular rosacea with MGD, according to previously reported crite-
`ria.38 Corneal fluorescein staining was graded using a previously re-
`ported method.39 The cornea was examined under blue-light illumina-
`tion 2 minutes after instillation of 5 ␮l 2% fluorescein into the tear film.
`The intensity of the corneal fluorescein staining was graded in each of
`four quadrants on the cornea (temporal, nasal, superior, inferior) using
`
`a standardized four-point scale (0, no staining; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and
`3, intense). The range of staining scores was 0 to 12. Patients with dry
`eye were excluded if they had any clinical signs of external ocular
`infection, including staphylococcal blepharitis or bacterial conjuncti-
`vitis.
`
`Tear Fluid Collection and Sample Extraction
`
`For experiments comparing the concentrations of proteins in unstimu-
`lated tear fluid, a tear fluid sample was collected from the inferior tear
`meniscus of both eyes, causing the least irritation possible, using a
`preweighed polyester wick (Transorb rods; American Filtrona, Rich-
`mond, VA) to obtain the sample, as previously described.11,40 The
`volume of collected tears was determined by reweighing the rods
`
`DDownloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 12/14/2022
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1089, Page 3 of 10
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`2286
`
`Solomon et al.
`
`IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`
`TABLE 3. Poststimulation Tear Fluid Concentrations of IL-1␣, Precursor IL-1␤, and IL-1Ra in Seven
`Normal Subjects
`
`Cytokine
`
`Prestimulation
`
`Poststimulation 1
`(1 minute)
`
`Poststimulation 2
`(5 minutes)
`
`IL-1␣
`Precursor IL-1␤
`IL-1 Ra (⫻104)
`
`53.6 ⫾ 26.8†
`712 ⫾ 395‡
`23.81 ⫾ 11.25§
`
`35.2 ⫾ 10.0
`92.1 ⫾ 68
`22.13 ⫾ 81.37
`
`108.7 ⫾ 48.6
`384.7 ⫾ 188
`113.67 ⫾ 73.65
`
`P *
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`Data are expressed as mean picograms per milliliter.
`* NS ⫽ no significant within group differences by ANOVA and no significant differences between the
`prestimulation concentration and either poststimulation concentration or between the 1- and 5-minute
`poststimulation concentrations, by the Wilcoxon test.
`† P ⫽ 0.01 compared with MGD; P ⫽ 0.006 compared with SS ATD (Table 2).
`‡ P ⫽ 0.03 compared with MGD; P ⫽ 0.05 compared with SS ATD (Table 2).
`§ P ⫽ 0.01 compared with MGD; P ⫽ 0.04 compared with SS ATD (Table 2).
`
`immediately after tear collection (model GA110 scale; Ohaus, Florham
`Park, NJ). Wicks were then placed into the end of a micropipette tip
`located within a 0.5-ml tube (Eppendorf, Fremont, CA) as described by
`Jones et al.40 For experiments evaluating the concentrations of IL-1
`cytokines in reflex tear fluid, an unstimulated tear fluid sample was
`collected, and reflex tearing was induced by placing a dry cotton-
`tipped applicator under the middle nasal turbinate, advancing it until
`the nasal membrane of the ethmoid sinus was reached, then rotating it
`for 1 minute as previously described.41 Tear fluid was then collected
`from the ipsilateral eye 1 and 5 minutes after stimulation.
`Tears were extracted from the saturated wicks by centrifuging
`them at 12,000 rpm for 5 minutes within the pipette tip after adding a
`volume of buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.005%
`Brij35, 0.02% sodium azide [pH 7.5]) 10 times greater than the original
`volume of the tear sample. The rods and pipette tips were carefully
`removed and the tear fluid aspirated. Tear fluid from both eyes was
`combined. This method resulted in a final tear dilution factor of 1:11
`for the ELISA, gelatin zymography, and the MMP-9 activity assay. Tear
`samples were placed in numbered 500-␮l tubes (Eppendorf) and
`stored at ⫺80°C for 3 to 7 days until they were used.
`Subjects with dry eye were not receiving any eye treatment other
`than nonpreserved artificial tears, and they were instructed not to
`instill any eye drops on the day the tear collection was performed. Tear
`collection was repeated on a separate day in all subjects, and both tear
`collections were performed in the morning. Tear fluid from one tear
`collection was used for cytokine ELISAs, and tear fluid from the second
`collection was used for the lactoferrin ELISA, gelatin zymography, and
`the MMP-9 activity assay.
`
`IL-1␣, -1␤, and -1Ra and Lactoferrin ELISAs
`The concentrations of IL-1 family cytokines were determined with
`commercial ELISA kits. For these assays, tear samples were diluted in
`
`ELISA buffer (supplied by the manufacturer) to a final volume of 100 to
`200 ␮l. These assays were performed as recommended by the manu-
`facturer. Tear lactoferrin concentration was measured with an immu-
`noassay (Touch Tear MicroAssay System; Touch Scientific, Raleigh,
`NC).
`
`Gelatin Zymography and MMP-9 Activity Assay
`
`Gelatinase level in the tear fluid was measured by gelatin zymography,
`as previously described.11 Diluted tear samples (all at a dilution of 1:11)
`were incubated with SDS-gel sample buffer for 30 minutes at room
`temperature and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 10% SDS-polyacryl-
`amide gel containing 1 mg/ml gelatin. After electrophoresis, the pro-
`teins were renatured by removing SDS from the gel using two washes
`of 0.25% Triton X-100 (30 minutes per wash). This was followed by an
`18-hour incubation at 37°C in the digestion buffer consisting of 50 mM
`Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 2 ␮M ZnSO4,
`1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.005% Brij35, and 0.02%
`sodium azide. After this incubation, the gel was briefly rinsed in
`distilled water and stained with 0.25% Coomassie brilliant blue R250
`prepared in 40% isopropanol solution for 1 hour. The gel was
`destained with 7% acetic acid. Gelatinase activity in the gel was visible
`as a clear area in the blue background, indicating an area where the
`gelatin had been digested. The minimum sensitivity of this technique
`for detecting gelatinase B is 0.05 ng/lane. The molecular weight of
`gelatinases in the tear fluid was determined from molecular weight
`standards (prestained broad range standards; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA)
`and 0.1 ng purified rabbit 92-kDa progelatinase B (Oncogene Research,
`Cambridge, MA) that were run in separate lanes on the gel. These gels
`were photographed with a camera (Polaroid, Cambridge, MA), and the
`photographs were scanned (Scan Jet 4C scanner; Hewlett-Packard,
`Palo Alto, CA) into a computer.
`
`DDownloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 12/14/2022
`
`FIGURE 2.
`concentra-
`Lactoferrin
`tion in tears from normal subjects,
`patients with MGD, and patients
`with SS ATD. *P ⬍ 0.01 compared
`with patients with SS.
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1089, Page 4 of 10
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`
`IL-1 Cytokines in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
`
`2287
`
`FIGURE 3. Gelatin zymogram of tear
`samples from a normal subject, two
`patients with MGD, a patient with
`non-SS ATD, and two patients with
`SS ATD. The 92-kDa pro-MMP-9 and
`72-kDa pro-MMP-2 bands are marked.
`Sample SS2 (right lane) was obtained
`from a 75-year-old patient with SS
`who had a 30-year history of bilateral
`recurrent sterile corneal ulceration
`with perforation.
`
`MMP-9 activity in tear fluid was measured with an MMP-9 activity
`assay system (Biotrak; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ),
`according to a previously published protocol.42 This colorimetric assay
`captures MMP-9 in the tear fluid and measures its activity in cleaving a
`modified prodetection enzyme and the subsequent cleavage of its
`chromogenic peptide substrate.43
`
`Immunofluorescent Staining of Conjunctival
`Impression Cytology and Conjunctival Biopsy
`Specimens
`Impression Cytology. The expression of four forms of IL-1
`(IL-1␣, precursor and mature IL-1␤, and IL-1Ra) was evaluated in
`conjunctival impression cytology specimens obtained from 6 ideal
`normal subjects and 16 patients with SS ATD.
`Impression cytology was performed by lightly pressing a mem-
`brane (Biopore; Millipore, Bedford, MA) against the nasal, inferior, and
`temporal bulbar conjunctiva, 1 mm behind the limbus after instillation
`of topical anesthesia (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride). The mem-
`branes were placed in a container and stored at ⫺80°C until they were
`processed. Before staining, these membranes were fixed with cold
`methanol for 10 minutes and were then blocked for 20 minutes with
`PBS containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to prevent nonspecific
`staining. The cytology specimens obtained from the nasal and temporal
`bulbar conjunctiva were bisected, and one of the four primary anti-
`bodies (IL-1␣, precursor and mature IL-1␤ and -1Ra) was applied to
`
`each membrane for 1 hour at room temperature in a moist chamber.
`Membranes were rinsed three times with PBS and incubated for 1 hour
`with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody. The cytology specimens
`obtained from the inferior bulbar conjunctiva was treated only with
`secondary antibody and served as a negative control. Membranes were
`washed three times with PBS, placed on a glass microscope slide, and
`covered with nonfade mounting medium (Fluoromount-G; Southern
`Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) and a glass coverslip. Spec-
`imens were examined and photographed with a microscope (Axiophot
`II; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using TMAX 400 film (Eastman Kodak, Roch-
`ester, NY). The fluorescein staining was visually graded negative if the
`staining was less than or equal to the secondary antibody control and
`positive if it was greater than the secondary antibody control by two
`independent observers.
`Conjunctival Biopsy. Samples were taken from the superior or
`superotemporal bulbar conjunctiva of three normal subjects with
`Schirmer 1 test scores of 15 mm or more, no corneal fluorescein
`staining, and no lid or conjunctival inflammation, and three patients
`with SS KCS during cataract surgery. Tissue specimens were placed in
`DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) for transport and then
`were embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound
`(Tissue Tek, Elkhart, IN), rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored
`at ⫺70°C. Within 72 hours, serial 4- to 5-␮m-thick sections were cut.
`Indirect immunofluorescence staining on tissue sections was per-
`formed by a previously reported technique,44 using polyclonal anti-
`
`FIGURE 4. MMP-9 activity in tear
`samples of normal subjects, patients
`with MGD, and patients with SS ATD,
`measured by an MMP-9 activity assay.
`*P ⬍ 0.001 compared with normal
`subjects.
`
`DDownloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 12/14/2022
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1089, Page 5 of 10
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`2288
`
`Solomon et al.
`
`IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`
`TABLE 4. Expression of IL-1 Cytokines in Conjunctival Impression
`Cytology Specimens from Normal Subjects and Patients with SS KCS
`
`Normal Eyes
`
`SS KCS
`
`Antibodies
`
`Eyes
`(n)
`
`IL-1␣
`Negative
`Positive
`Total
`Precursor
`IL-1␤
`Negative
`Positive
`Total
`Mature IL-
`1␤
`Negative
`Positive
`Total
`IL-1 Ra
`Negative
`Positive
`Total
`
`6
`0
`6
`
`2
`4
`6
`
`4
`2
`6
`
`6
`0
`6
`
`* Fisher exact test.
`
`%
`
`100
`0
`100
`
`33.33
`66.67
`100
`
`66.67
`33.33
`100
`
`100
`0
`100
`
`Eyes
`(n)
`
`%
`
`P *
`
`5
`11
`16
`
`0
`15
`15
`
`1
`15
`16
`
`8
`8
`16
`
`31.25
`68.75
`100
`
`0
`100
`100
`
`6.25
`93.75
`100
`
`50
`50
`100
`
`0.012
`
`0.071
`
`0.009
`
`0.051
`
`bodies for IL-1␣, -1␤, and -1Ra at a concentration of 50 ␮g/ml and
`FITC-labeled secondary antibodies. The specificity of these antibodies
`was evaluated by neutralization with their corresponding recombinant
`human cytokine proteins according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`Primary antibodies were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C (0.002 ␮g/ml
`anti-IL-1␣ or anti-IL-1␤ antibodies with 50 pg/ml of their respective
`recombinant proteins and 1 ␮g/ml anti-IL-1Ra antibody with 50 ng/ml
`of its recombinant protein), before applying the mixture to tissue
`sections. Some sections were treated with the secondary antibody
`alone as a negative control. Slides were photographed as for the assays
`described earlier.
`
`Statistics
`Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test were used when appropriate for
`comparing the ELISA results between groups. One-way ANOVA and
`Wilcoxon paired tests were used to compare pre- and poststimulation
`tear cytokine concentrations. The ELISA data are expressed as means ⫾
`SD, and the differences were considered statistically significant at P ⬍
`0.05. The t-distribution was used to determine whether correlation
`coefficients were different from zero.45
`
`RESULTS
`
`Profile of IL-1 Cytokines in Tear Fluid
`The concentrations of the IL-1 family of cytokines in basal tear
`fluid collected from normal subjects and patients with MGD
`and SS ATD are presented in Table 2. The concentration of
`IL-1␣ was significantly higher in the tear fluid of both dry-eye
`groups than in the normal group. The precursor form of IL-1␤
`was the predominant form of this cytokine in normal tear fluid
`with a mean precursor-to-mature ratio of 19.1 ⫾ 14.2. IL-1Ra
`was also detected in normal tear fluid with a ratio to IL-1␣ and
`precursor IL-1␤ of more than 27,000 and more than 40,000,
`respectively. Compared with normal eyes, there was a statisti-
`cally significant increase in the concentration of mature IL-1␤
`and a decrease in the concentration of precursor IL-1␤ in the
`tear fluid of patients with MGD and SS ATD. These changes
`resulted in significantly lower ratios of the precursor-to-mature
`forms of IL-1␤in both dry-eye groups. There was no significant
`difference in the concentration of IL-1Ra among the three
`
`groups; however, the ratio of IL-1Ra to IL-1␣ was significantly
`lower in the two dry-eye groups and the IL-1Ra-to-IL-1␤ ratio
`was significantly decreased in the MGD group compared with
`the control group. A strong correlation was observed between
`the clinical intensity of corneal fluorescein staining and the log
`of the tear IL-1␣ concentration (Fig. 1A) and between the
`corneal fluorescein staining score and the precursor-mature
`IL-1␤ ratio (Fig. 1B).
`
`Concentrations of IL-1 Cytokines in Reflex
`Tear Fluid
`One minute after stimulation of the nasal mucosa, a 1.5-fold
`decrease of the tear fluid IL-1␣ concentration, a 7.7-fold de-
`crease in precursor IL-1␤ concentration, and a minimal de-
`crease in IL-1Ra concentration was observed. However, 5 min-
`utes after stimulation, the concentrations of all three cytokines
`increased compared with the 1-minute levels: IL-1␣(threefold),
`IL-1␤ (fourfold), and IL-1Ra (fivefold). Within-group (ANOVA)
`and paired (Wilcoxon test) comparisons between the pre-
`stimulation concentration and either the poststimulation con-
`centration or between the 1 and 5 minute poststimulation
`concentrations were not statistically significant (Table 3). Be-
`cause the concentration of mature IL-1␤was near or below the
`level of detection of our immunoassay in unstimulated and
`stimulated tear fluid obtained from these normal subjects, no
`meaningful statistical comparison could be made.
`
`Lactoferrin Concentration in Tear Fluid
`The tear fluid concentration of lactoferrin was 1.35 ⫾ 0.07
`␮g/ml in normal subjects, 1.16 ⫾ 0.16 ␮g/ml in patients with
`MGD (no significant difference), and 0.08 ⫾ 0.04 ␮g/ml in
`patients with SS (P ⫽ 0.001 when compared with either nor-
`mal subjects or MGD; Fig. 2).
`
`MMP-9 Level and Activity in Tear Fluid
`Minimal or no 92-kDa pro-MMP-9 was observed by gelatin
`zymography of tear fluid samples taken from normal control
`subjects (representative sample shown in Fig. 3, left lane). In
`contrast, greater levels of pro-MMP-9 were found in tear fluid
`samples taken from patients with dry eye who had MGD,
`patients with non-SS ATD, and those with SS (Fig. 3). The
`strongest bands were observed in a 75-year-old patient with SS
`who had a 30-year history of bilateral recurrent sterile corneal
`ulceration with perforation (Fig. 3, right lane, SS2).
`To confirm the zymography results, a quantitative MMP-9
`activity assay detected an activity of 7.2 ⫾ 2.1 U/mg in normal
`control subjects, which was significantly increased to 473.1 ⫾
`173.5 U/mg in patients with MGD (66-fold, P ⬍ 0.0001) and to
`651.7 ⫾ 208.3 U/mg in patients with SS (90-fold, P ⬍ 0.0001;
`Fig. 4).
`
`Immunostaining of the IL-1 Cytokines in
`Conjunctival Impression Cytology Specimens
`Impression cytology was used to evaluate the relative levels of
`expression of IL-1␣, precursor IL-1␤, mature IL-1␤, and IL-1Ra
`in apical conjunctival epithelium specimens obtained from six
`ideal normal subjects and 16 patients with SS KCS by impres-
`sion de´bridement with a membrane (Biopore; Millipore). IL-1␣
`and -1Ra could not be immunodetected in the normal conjunc-
`tival epithelium, and the mature form of IL-1␤ was detected in
`only 33% of normal samples. Positive immunofluorescent stain-
`ing for IL-1␣, mature IL-1␤, and IL-1Ra was observed in a
`significantly greater percentage of conjunctival cytology spec-
`imens from eyes with SS ATD than in those from normal eyes
`(P ⬍ 0.01 for IL-1␣, P ⬍ 0.009 for mature IL-1␤, and P ⬍ 0.05
`for IL-1Ra; Table 4, Fig. 5).
`
`DDownloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 12/14/2022
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1089, Page 6 of 10
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10
`
`IL-1 Cytokines in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
`
`2289
`
`FIGURE 5. Expression of
`the IL-1
`family of cytokines in apical conjunc-
`tival epithelial
`impression cytology
`samples from normal subjects and
`patients with SS ATD. (A, B) Staining
`with IL-1␣–specific antibody in cytol-
`ogy membranes from normal (A) and
`SS ATD (B) eyes; (C, D) staining with
`precursor IL-1␤–specific antibody in
`cytology membranes from normal
`(C) and SS ATD (D) eyes; (E, F) stain-
`ing with mature IL-1␤–specific anti-
`body in cytology membranes from
`normal (E) and SS ATD (F) eyes; (G,
`H) staining with IL-1Ra–specific anti-
`body in cytology membranes from
`normal (G) and SS ATD (H) eyes.
`Original magnification, ⫻200.
`
`Immunostaining of the IL-1 Cytokines in
`Conjunctival Biopsy Specimens
`The antibodies for IL-1␣ and -1Ra stained the epithelial cells in
`conjunctival specimens obtained from patients with SS, with
`the strongest staining observed in the superficial cell layers
`(Figs. 6A, 6G). Isolated IL-1Ra–positive cells were scattered
`throughout the conjunctival epithelium (Fig. 6G). The identity
`of these cells could not be determined by phase microscopy;
`however, their staining pattern was similar to that of inflam-
`matory cells located in the conjunctival stroma just below the
`epithelial basement membrane. The antibody for IL-1␤ stained
`the superficial conjunctival epithelium, although to a lesser
`degree than IL-1␣and -1Ra (Fig. 6D). Immunofluorescent stain-
`ing for all three forms of IL-1 was markedly reduced after
`preincubation of these antibodies with their corresponding
`recombinant cytokine proteins (Figs. 6B, 6E, 6H), which indi-
`cates the specificity of the antibodies. Lower intensity staining
`for IL-1␣ and -1Ra was still observed in the superficial layers of
`the conjunctival epithelium after preincubation. This may be
`
`attributed to increased concentrations of these cytokines in the
`tightly compacted superficial metaplastic epithelial cells or to
`absorption of these cytokines from the tear film. Minimal or no
`staining was observed in conjunctival specimens stained with
`the secondary antibody alone (Figs. 6C, 6F, 6I).
`No staining above the background level was observed for
`these three antibodies in conjunctival sections obtained from
`normal subjects (Fig. 7).
`
`DISCUSSION
`In this study we found that IL-1␣, the precursor and mature
`forms of IL-1␤, and IL-1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket