throbber
(12) United States Patent
`Horn
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`US008293742B2
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`(54) PREFERENTIAL VASOCONSTRICTION
`COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE
`Inventor: Gerald Horn, Deerfield, IL (US)
`(75)
`(73) Assignee: Alpha Synergy Development, Inc.,
`Dana Point, CA (US)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 385 days.
`(21) Appl. No.: 12/460,941
`Jul. 27, 2009
`(22) Filed:
`Prior Publication Data
`(65)
`US 2010/0029659 A1
`Feb. 4, 2010
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(60) Provisional application No. 61/137,714, filed on Aug.
`1, 2008, provisional application No. 61/192,777, filed
`on Sep. 22, 2008, provisional application No.
`61/203,120, filed on Dec. 18, 2008, provisional
`application No. 61/207,481, filed on Feb. 12, 2009.
`Int. Cl.
`A61K 31/498
`(2006.01)
`A61P 27/02
`(2006.01)
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`....................................................... 514/249
`(58) Field of Classification Search ................... 514/249
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(51)
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,663,340 A
`5/1987 Najer et al.
`5,021,416 A
`6/1991 Gluchowski
`5,300,504 A
`4/1994 Gluchowski
`5,424,078 A
`6/1995 Dziabo et al.
`5,561,132 A
`10/1996 Burke et al.
`5,677,321 A
`10/1997 Jeon et al.
`5,756,503 A
`5/1998 Burke et al.
`5,804,587 A
`9/1998 Cupps et al.
`5,914,342 A
`6/1999 Maurer et al.
`5,916,900 A
`6/1999 Cupps et al.
`5,948,804 A
`9/1999 Jeon et al.
`5,965,595 A
`10/1999 Maurer et al.
`6,040,451 A
`3/2000 Jeon et al.
`6,087,361 A
`7/2000 Munk et al.
`6,110,952 A
`8/2000 Henry et al.
`6,117,871 A
`9/2000 Maurer et al.
`6,159,998 A
`12/2000 Jeon et al.
`6,162,818 A
`12/2000 Henry et al.
`6,242,442 B1
`6/2001 Dean et al.
`6,534,048 B1
`3/2003 Borgman
`6,562,873 B2
`5/2003 Olejnik et al.
`6,627,210 B2
`9/2003 Olejnik et al.
`6,641,834 B2
`11/2003 Olejnik et al.
`6,673,337 B2
`1/2004 Olejnik et al.
`6,730,065 B1
`5/2004 Horn
`6,982,079 B2
`1/2006 Huth
`7,019,149 B2 *
`3/2006 Burk et al.
`2005/0020600 A1
`1/2005 Scherer
`
`.................... 549/228
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Lee, “Efficacy of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% ophthalmic solution in
`reducing halos after laser in situ keratomileusis”, J Cataract Refract
`Surg 2008, (34), pp. 963-967.*
`Mechanism of decongestant activity of x2-adrenoceptor agnosits,
`Corboz M.R. et al., Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 21
`(2008) 449-454.
`
`Alpha-adrenoceptor agonistic activity of oxymetazoline and
`xylometazoline, Haenisch B. et al., Fundam Clin Pharmacol. Dec. 17,
`2009.
`An Evaluation of Nasal Response Following Different Treatment
`Regimes of . . . , Morris S. et al.,American Journal Rhinology, vol. 11,
`No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1997, pp. 109-115(7).
`Pharmacological Characterization of Postjunctional a-Adrenocep-
`tors in . . . , Corboz M.R. et al., American Jour of Rhinology, vol. 19,
`No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 2005, pp. 495-502(8).
`Postjuntional a2-adrenoceptors in blood ve3ssels of human nasal
`mucosa, Ichimura K. et al., Arch Otorhinolaryngol (1988) 245:127-
`131.
`Long-term use of oxy- and xylometazoline nasal sprays induces
`rebound swelling, tolerance, and nasal hyperreactivity, Graf P.,
`Rhinology 1996, 34(1):9-13.
`Alpha 1-receptors at pre-capillary resistance vessels of the human
`nasal mucosa, Johannssen V et al., Rhinology 1997; 35(4):161-65.
`Correspondence A Propos De L’article: <<Traitement Des
`Glaucomes Par La Brimonidine>>, M. Detry-Morel Et C. Dutrieux<
`J Fr Ophtalmo1.2001; 24(7): 748-9.
`by
`Vacoconstriction
`Potent
`a2A-Adrenoceptor-Mediated
`Brimonidine in Porcine Ciliary Arteries, Anna Wikberg-Matsson, et
`al., IOVS, 2001, vol. 42, No. 9, 2049-55.
`Medical Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitus—Jean P. Fong,
`MD, Matthew Ryan, MD (May 2006).
`Preven Drugs from Going Missing in Action—Mark B. Abelson,
`MD, and Sarah A. Rosner MPH; Review of Ophthalmology; www.
`revophth.com/index.asp?page=1—357.htm.
`Interactions Between CA2+ and H+ and Functional Consequences in
`Vascular Smooth Muscle—C. Austin and S. Wray, Journ. of Amer.
`Heart Association (Circ Res. 2000;86:355-363).
`A Useful New Topical Treatment for Glaucoma and Ocular Hyper-
`tension—Drug Ther Perspect 13(1):1-4, 1999.
`Brimonidine in the Treatment of Glaucoma and Ocular Hyperten-
`sion—Louis B. Cantor, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
`2006:2(4) 337-346.
`Silent Bedpartners—Nancy A. Collop, Chest 2002; 122; 1111-1112.
`Traitement Des Glaucomes Par La Brimonidine (Alphagan® 0,2
`%)—M. Detry-Morel, C. Dutrieux, J FR. Ophtalmol., 2000; 23, 8,
`763-768.
`Vasopressin-Induced Vasoconstriction: Two Concentration-Depen-
`dent Signaling Pathways—Kyle K. Henderson and Kenneth L.
`Bryon, J Appl Physiol 102: 1402-1409, 2007.
`The Effect of Correction of Sleep-Disordered Breathing on Bp in
`Untreated Hypertension—K. Mae Hla, J. B. Skatrud, L. Finn, M.
`Palta and T. Young, Chest 2002;122; 1125-1135.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner — Sreeni Padmanabhan
`Assistant Examiner — Sahar Javanmard
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Wood, Phillips, Katz, Clark
`& Mortimer
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The invention generally relates to compositions and methods
`for preferential vasoconstriction of smaller blood vessels
`relative to larger blood vessels. The compositions comprise
`highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists, at low
`concentrations, such as below 0.05% weight by volume. The
`compositions preferably comprise brimonidine. The compo-
`sitions preferably have pH between about 5.5 and about 6.5.
`
`6 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`(5 of 7 Drawing Sheet(s) Filed in Color)
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 1 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`US 8,293,742 B2
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Myogenic Tone and Reactivity of the Rat Ophthalmic Artery—Y. P.
`R. Jarajapu, M. B. Grant, and H. J. Knot, Invest. Ophth. & Visual
`Science, Jan. 2004, vol. 45, No. 1.
`Correspondence A Propos De L’article: <<Traitement Des
`Claucomes Par La Brimonidine>>, M. Detry-Morel Et C. Dutrieux,
`J Fr Ophtalmol. 2000; 23(8): 763-8.
`Prospective Study of the Association Between Sleep-Disordered
`Breathing and Hypertension—P. Peppard, et. al., The New England J
`of Med., vol. 342, No. 19:1378-1384 (2000).
`Catecholamines
`and Sympathomimetic Drugs—Goodman &
`Gilman’s Pharmacology, Ch. 10; www.accessmedicine.com/popup.
`aspx?aID-936314&pring=yes—chapter.
`
`Rhinitis Medicamentosa—JT Ramey, E Bailen, RF Lockey, J
`Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006; vol. 16(3); 148-155.
`Characterization of three inhibitors of endothelial nitric oxide
`synthase in vitro and in vivo—D.D. Rees, et al., br. J. Pharmacol.
`(1990) 101, 746-752.
`Inhibition of α-adrenergic vasoconstriction in exercising human
`thigh muscles—D. Walter Wray, et al., J Physiol 555, 2 pp. 545-264
`(2003).
`Dexmedetomidine Enhances the Local Anesthetic Action of
`Lidocaine via . . . TatsushiYoshitomi DDS et al., Anesth Analg 2008;
`107:96-101.
`Adding Dexmedetomidine to Lidocaine for Intravenous Regional
`Anesthesia, Dilek Memis, MD et al., Anesth Analg 2004;98:835-40.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 2 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 1 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 3 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 2 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 4 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 5 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 6 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 5 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 7 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 8 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 2012
`
`Sheet 7 of 7
`
`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 9 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`1
`PREFERENTIAL VASOCONSTRICTION
`COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Dilation of small blood vessels, particularly arterioles, cap-
`illaries, and venules, causes many clinically undesirable
`events including surface hemorrhage and hyperemia follow-
`ing Lasik surgery, eye redness (conjunctival hyperemia), and
`nasal congestion (turbinate mucosal swelling secondary to
`vasodilation).
`Adrenergic receptors mediate physiological responses to
`the catecholamines, norephinephrine and epinephrine, and
`are members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled recep-
`tors having seven transmembrane domains. These receptors,
`which are divided pharmacologically into a-1, a-2 and β-adr-
`energic receptor types, are involved in diverse physiological
`functions including functions of the cardiovascular and cen-
`tral nervous systems. The a-adrenergic receptors mediate
`excitatory and inhibitory functions: a-1 adrenergic receptors
`are typically excitatory post-synaptic receptors which gener-
`ally mediate responses in an effector organ, while a-2 adren-
`ergic receptors are located postsynaptically as well as presyn-
`aptically, where they inhibit release of neurotransmitters.
`Agonists of a-2 adrenergic receptors currently are used clini-
`cally in the treatment of hypertension, glaucoma, spasticity,
`and attention-deficit disorder, in the suppression of opiate
`withdrawal, as adjuncts to general anesthesia and in the treat-
`ment of cancer pain. Vascular constriction is known to be
`mediated by a-adrenergic receptors.
`a-2 adrenergic receptors are presently classified into three
`subtypes based on their pharmacological and molecular char-
`acterization: a-2A/D (a-2A in human and a-2D in rat); a-2B;
`and a-2C (Bylund et al., Pharmacol. Rev. 46:121-136 (1994);
`and Hein and Kobilka, Neuropharmacol. 34:357-366 (1995)).
`The a-2A, a-2B, and a-2C subtypes appear to regulate arterial
`and/or venular contraction in some vascular beds, and the
`a-2A and a-2C subtypes mediate feedback inhibition of nore-
`pinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings. The a-2A
`subtype also mediates many of the central effects of a-2
`adrenergic agonists (Calzada and ArtiZano, Pharmacol. Res.
`44: 195-208 (2001); Hein et al., Ann. NY Acad. Science
`881:265-271 (1999); and Ruffolo (Ed.), a-Adrenoreceptors:
`Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology S.
`Karger Publisher’s Inc. Farmington, Conn. (1991)). The a-2A
`subtype also mediates potent constriction of the porcine, but
`not human, ciliary artery.
`Many compounds having selective a-2 agonist activity are
`known and include brimonidine (which has been used for
`lowering intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle
`glaucoma or ocular hypertension), guanfacine (which has
`been used to control high blood pressure), dexmetidomidine
`(which has been used as a sedative, analgesic, sympatholytic
`and anxiolytic), and methyl dopa (which has been used as a
`centrally-acting ad renergic anti hypertensive).
`The patent or application file contains at least one drawing
`executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application
`publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the
`Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
`The clinically available compounds belong to the general
`category of a adrenergic receptor agonists. It is a known
`property of all a adrenergic receptor agonists, including bri-
`monidine, to cause vasoconstriction. However, known formu-
`lations of brimonidine and other known a-2 adrenergic recep-
`tor agonists are associated with a high incidence of rebound
`hyperemia, or other side effects, in clinical use. For example,
`after as few as three doses of applying known formulations of
`
`2
`a adrenergic receptor agonists, patients may develop second-
`ary rebound hyperemia or secondary vasodilation. Brimoni-
`dine (5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolidinylideneamino)quinoxaline
`L-tartrate), a known selective alpha 2 agonist is associated
`with significant rebound hyperemia (primary or delayed
`onset vasodilation) in its current concentration range for treat-
`ing glaucoma of about 0.1% to 0.2%.
`Commercially available general alpha agonists for topical
`mucosal decongestant use (ophthalmic and nasal applica-
`tions) include tetrahydrozoline, naphazoline, oxymetazoline,
`xylometazoline, methoxamine and phenylephrine. These
`agonists have high alpha 1 receptor agonist activity and are
`known to cause rebound hyperemia and medicamentosa.
`Accordingly, their clinical use is usually restricted to several
`hours or a few days, at most. Many individuals with mucosal
`congestion or hyperemia from chronic conditions such as dry
`eye, contact lens wear, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic rhini-
`tis, nonallergic rhinitis, acute or chronic sinusitis, nasal poly-
`posis, rhinitis secondary to pregnancy, or rhinitis due to nasal
`septal deviation or obstruction and asthma, particularly, aller-
`gic asthma require longer term agonist use. To the best of the
`inventor’s knowledge, there are currently no means to induce
`effective vasoconstriction without concomitant
`ischemia
`caused by an excessive reduction in blood flow and a cascade
`of inflammatory mediators, resulting in undesirable clinical
`sequelae of rebound hyperemia, and or medicamentosa, a
`potentially prolonged inflammatory state that can last for
`several weeks or months of rebound mucosal congestion.
`Thus, there is a need for new methods and formulations that
`would provide safe and long term vasoconstriction with
`reduced or minimized side effects, such as rebound hyper-
`emia.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
`
`The present invention is generally related to compositions
`and methods. for inducing vasoconstriction. One of the key
`discoveries of the present invention lies in using low doses of
`highly selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonists to achieve
`vasoconstriction with significantly reduced hyperemia.
`There are a variety of applications and dosage forms that
`can be utilized to apply the findings of the invention. For
`example, some applications include methods and composi-
`tions for: treating nasal congestion; inducing vasoconstric-
`tion; inducing preferential vasoconstriction of smaller blood
`vessels relative to larger blood vessels; reducing capillary
`permeability in a pulmonary condition; reversing rebound
`hyperemia; reducing activation of a-1 adrenergic receptors;
`and treating and preventing an allergic response with reduced
`rebound hyperemia.
`The invention also encompasses using the compositions
`and methods of this invention for prophylactic reasons, for
`example, for prophylaxis of conditions including, but not
`limited to, asthma, upper respiratory disease, acute pharyn-
`gitis, acute sinusitis, acute tracheobronchitis, influenza, lower
`respiratory disease, acute bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and com-
`munity acquired pneumonia (CAP).
`The invention also relates to a metered dose dispenser
`comprising the aqueous compositions of the invention.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
`
`The patent or application file contains at least one drawing
`executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 10 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`3
`publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the
`Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
`FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the variation of
`vasoconstriction net clinical effectiveness of prior art com-
`positions comprising naphazoline, oxymetazoline and tet-
`rahydrozoline at various concentrations.
`FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the variation of
`vasoconstriction clinical effectiveness of compositions of the
`present invention comprising brimonidine at low concentra-
`tions.
`FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of clinical effectiveness
`of the compositions of the present invention versus prior art
`compositions.
`FIG. 4A is a baseline visual appearance of two eyes of a
`patient with an ocular condition.
`FIG. 4B depicts the eyes of the patient 180 minutes after
`being treated with a prior art composition comprising tetrahy-
`drozoline at 0.05% (right eye) and a composition of the
`present invention comprising brimonidine at 0.01% (left eye).
`FIG. 4C depicts the eyes of the patient 240 minutes after
`baseline (FIG. 4A) after being treated with a prior art com-
`position comprising oxymetazoline at 0.025% (right eye) and
`a composition of the present invention comprising brimoni-
`dine at 0.02% (left eye).
`FIG. 4D depicts the eyes of the patient 240 minutes after
`treatment described in FIG. 4C after being treated with a prior
`art composition comprising naphazoline at 0.033% (right
`eye) and a composition of the present invention comprising
`brimonidine at 0.02% (left eye).
`FIG. 4E depicts the left eye of the patient 240 minutes after
`treatment described in FIG. 4D after being treated with a
`composition of the present invention comprising brimonidine
`at 0.033%.
`FIG. 5A is a baseline visual appearance of two eyes of a
`patient with an ocular condition of moderate hyperemia.
`FIG. 5B depicts a visual appearance of the right eye of the
`patient after being treated with a prior art composition com-
`prising VISINE Original® (tetrahydrozoline 0.05%) and the
`induction of rebound hyperemia, and the visual appearance of
`the left eye of the patient after being treated simultaneously
`with a composition of the present invention comprising bri-
`monidine at 0.015%
`FIG. 5C depicts a visual appearance of the right eye of the
`patient after then being treated with the novel composition of
`the present invention comprising brimonidine at 0.015%,
`reversing the VISINE Original® induced rebound hyper-
`emia, and a visual appearance of the left eye of the patient
`after being treated simultaneously with an additional drop of
`the composition of the present invention comprising brimoni-
`dine at 0.015%.
`FIG. 6 is another graphical representation of clinical effec-
`tiveness of the compositions of the present invention versus
`prior art compositions.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`55
`
`Definitions
`For purposes of the present invention, the terms below are
`defined as follows.
`The term “low concentrations” refers to concentrations
`from between about 0.0001% to about 0.05%; more prefer-
`ably, from about 0.001% to about 0.025%; even more pref-
`erably, from about 0.01% to about 0.025%; and even more
`preferably, from about 0.01% to about 0.02% weight by vol-
`ume.
`The term “administered locally” refers to administering the
`compositions of the present invention approximately at the
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`site where they will come into contact with a-2 adrenergic
`receptors. This term specifically excludes oral administra-
`tion, intravenous injection, or transdermal patches which are
`not applied approximately at the spatial location of the area
`which is desired to be treated by the compositions of the
`present invention.
`The term “brimonidine” encompasses, without limitation,
`brimonidine salts and other derivatives, and specifically
`includes, but is not limited to, brimonidine tartrate, 5-bromo-
`6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)quinoxaline
`D-tartrate,
`Alphagan™, and UK14304.
`The term “treating” refers to reversing, alleviating, inhib-
`iting, or slowing the progress of the disease, disorder, or
`condition to which such term applies, or one or more symp-
`toms of such disease, disorder, or condition.
`The term “preventing” refers to prophylactic use to reduce
`the likelihood of a disease, disorder, or condition to which
`such term applies, or one or more symptoms of such disease,
`disorder, or condition. It is not necessary to achieve a 100%
`likelihood of prevention; it is sufficient to achieve at least a
`partial effect of reducing the risk of acquiring such disease,
`disorder, or condition.
`The term “swollen nasal turbinates condition” includes,
`but is not limited to, nasal decongestion.
`Vasoconstriction with Reduced Hyperemia
`One aspect of the present invention refers to a surprising
`and unexpected finding that using highly selective a-2 ago-
`nists at low concentrations allows reducing, minimizing, and/
`or eliminating rebound hyperemia while optimally providing
`clinically equal or more effective vasoconstriction. Rebound
`hyperemia refers to induced vasodilation (instead of intended
`vasoconstriction) occurring, often with a lag time, after an
`application or, more typically, repeated applications of vaso-
`constrictors and characterized by engorgement of blood ves-
`sels (such as those in the conjunctiva or nasal mucosa),
`increased capillary permeability and leakage, and, in some
`cases, inflammatory sequelae (medicamentosa), frequently
`due to the use of an alpha 1 constricting drug and particularly,
`chronic use of a vasoconstricting drug.
`Many, if not all, references in the prior art associated
`rebound hyperemia with all alpha agonists and considered the
`complication of rebound hyperemia to be intrinsic to vaso-
`constriction, wherein blood flow is reduced, causing atten-
`dant ischemia with some inflammatory cascade, precipitating
`rebound hyperemia in many cases and often leading to medi-
`camentosa.
`Contrary to these teachings, it was surprisingly and unex-
`pectedly found that selective alpha-2 (a-2) adrenergic recep-
`tor agonists (which are also interchangeably referred to as
`“a-2 agonists” throughout the application) with extremely
`high selectivity for a-2 adrenergic receptors at low concen-
`trations, well below those previously contemplated, can
`induce effective vasoconstriction with low incidence of
`rebound hyperemia as compared to the prior art, and low
`incidence of allergic reaction, including allergic blepharitis
`and follicular conjunctivitis. Further,
`the incidence of
`ischemia is significantly reduced through the use of compo-
`sitions and methods of the present invention.
`While not wishing to be bound to any particular theory, the
`inventor believes that rebound hyperemia is primarily asso-
`ciated with a-1 agonist activity. Thus, unless the binding
`affinity of a-2 agonists for a-2 over a-1 adrenergic receptors is
`sufficiently high, not sufficiently highly selective a-2 agonists
`will cause an undesirable a-1 receptor stimulation with atten-
`dant rebound hyperemia. Accordingly, it is desired to mini-
`mize a-1 agonist activity by using highly selective a-2 ago-
`nists.
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 11 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`5
`Accordingly, in one embodiment, the invention generally
`relates to a method of treating or preventing rebound hyper-
`emia comprising administering to a patient in need thereof a
`selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist having a binding
`affinity of 100 fold or greater for a-2 over a-1 adrenergic
`receptors, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof,
`wherein said selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist is
`present at a concentration below about 0.05% weight by
`volume.
`In another embodiment, the invention relates to a surpris-
`ing finding that an aqueous composition comprising a selec-
`tive a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist, or a pharmaceutically
`acceptable salt thereof, can be used for the prevention or
`treatment of a disease or a condition by administering said
`aqueous composition to a patient in need thereof, wherein the
`concentration of said agonist in said aqueous composition is
`substantially lower than the concentration of said agonist
`normally used in the treatment of glaucoma.
`In another embodiment, the invention generally relates to a
`composition for inducing vasoconstriction comprising a
`selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist having a binding
`affinity of 100 fold or greater for a-2 over a-1 adrenergic
`receptors, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and
`wherein said selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist is
`present at a concentration below about 0.05% weight by
`volume.
`In yet another embodiment, the invention generally relates
`to a composition for inducing vasoconstriction comprising a
`selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist having a binding
`affinity of 100 fold or greater for a-2b and/or a-2c receptors
`over a-1 adrenergic receptors, or a pharmaceutically accept-
`able salt thereof, and wherein said selective a-2 adrenergic
`receptor agonist is present at a concentration below about
`0.05% weight by volume.
`Further, it was surprisingly and unexpectedly found that
`selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonists used at a concen-
`tration below about 0.05% weight by volume can reverse
`general/alpha 1 agonist induced hyperemia (instead of caus-
`ing further ischemia from the induced vasoconstriction as
`would be expected for all agonists from prior art teachings),
`thereby providing a useful treatment for such patients and
`possibly alleviating medicamentosa from such drug applica-
`tions, and possibly demonstrating a different mechanism of
`action for vasoconstriction than for alpha 1 agonists (FIGS.
`5A-C).
`In a preferred embodiment, the binding affinity of the
`selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist is about 500 fold or
`greater for a-2 over a-1 adrenergic receptors.
`In a preferred embodiment, the selective a-2 adrenergic
`receptor agonist is present at a concentration between about
`0.001% and about 0.025% weight by volume.
`In a further preferred embodiment, the selective a-2 adren-
`ergic receptor agonist is selected from the group consisting of
`apraclonidine, mivazerol, clonidine, brimonidine, alpha
`methyl dopa, guanfacine, dexemeditomidine, (+)-(S)-4-[1-
`(2,3-dimethyl-phenyl)-ethyl]-1,3-dihydro-imidazole-2-
`thione, 1-[(imidazolidin-2-yl)imino]indazole, and mixtures
`of these compounds.
`In another preferred embodiment, the composition com-
`prises brimonidine at a concentration between about 0.001%
`and about 0.025% weight by volume.
`In a more preferred embodiment, a pH of the composition
`comprising the selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist is
`between about 5.5 and about 6.5.
`In one embodiment, the invention generally relates to a
`composition for inducing vasoconstriction consisting essen-
`tially of brimonidine, wherein said brimonidine concentra-
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`tion is from between about 0.01% to about 0.02% weight by
`volume, wherein pH of said composition is between about 5.5
`and about 6.5, and wherein said composition is formulated as
`an ocular drop.
`In another embodiment, the invention generally relates to a
`composition for inducing vasoconstriction consisting essen-
`tially of brimonidine and potassium, wherein said brimoni-
`dine concentration is from between about 0.01% to about
`0.02% weight by volume, wherein pH of said composition is
`between about 5.5 and about 6.5, and wherein said composi-
`tion is formulated as an ocular drop.
`In the most preferred embodiment, potassium is in the form
`of potassium chloride and its concentration is between about
`0.2% to about 0.9% weight by volume.
`Preferential Vasoconstriction
`In one embodiment, methods of the present invention allow
`to induce preferential vasoconstriction of smaller blood ves-
`sels, such as capillaries and venules, relative to larger blood
`vessels, such as arteries and arterioles. These methods reduce
`activation of a-1 adrenergic receptors relative to a-2 adrener-
`gic receptors.
`Accordingly, in one embodiment, the invention generally
`relates to a method of effectively inducing preferential vaso-
`constriction of capillaries relative to arteries, and/or terminal
`arterioles, microvessels including capillary beds and/or
`venules with lower oxygen saturation than larger, proximal
`higher oxygen saturated arteries and or arterioles, comprising
`administering to a patient having an ocular or pulmonary
`condition, a selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist having
`a binding affinity of 100 fold or greater for a-2 over a-1
`adrenergic receptors, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
`thereof, wherein said selective a-2 adrenergic receptor ago-
`nist is present at a concentration below about 0.05% weight
`by volume.
`By the term “effectively” it is understood that preferential
`vasoconstriction results in minimizing and/or eliminating
`ischemia.
`While not wishing to be bound to any particular theory, this
`method allows constricting the blood flow to visible surface
`area with maximal constriction of microvasculature, together
`with minimal additional vasoconstriction of larger arterioles
`to maximize per unit area vasoconstrictive benefit and mini-
`mize ischemic consequence. This can be roughly analogized
`to reducing water flow at a sprinkler head rather than at the
`connection of the hose leading from the water supply to the
`sprinkler. Accordingly, this method allows achieving visibly
`effective whitening while optimizing total blood flow by
`minimizing arteriolar constriction to produce the best cos-
`metic and physiologic benefits of decongestant activity. Thus,
`the compositions and methods of the present invention make
`it possible to induce maximal microvessel constriction with
`the least arteriolar constriction.
`The method can be used to treat various ocular and pulmo-
`nary conditions. In a preferred embodiment, a pulmonary
`condition may be associated with swollen nasal turbinates. In
`addition, preferential vasoconstriction of smaller blood ves-
`sels allows decreasing ischemia, inflammation, rhinitis medi-
`camentosa, and rebound hyperemia.
`The invention also relates to compositions formulated for
`inducing preferential vasoconstriction.
`In one embodiment, a composition for inducing preferen-
`tial vasoconstriction of smaller blood vessels relative to larger
`blood vessels comprises a selective a-2 adrenergic receptor
`agonist having a binding affinity of 100 fold or greater for a-2
`over a-1 adrenergic receptors, or a pharmaceutically accept-
`
`Eye Therapies Exhibit 2161, 12 of 20
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`

`

`US 8,293,742 B2
`
`7
`able salt thereof, wherein said selective a-2 adrenergic recep-
`tor agonist is present at a concentration below about 0.05%
`weight by volume.
`In another preferred embodiment, the method comprises
`administering to a patient having an ocular condition a com-
`position comprising brimonidine, wherein said brimonidine
`concentration is between about 0.001% and about 0.025%
`weight by volume.
`In a preferred embodiment, the invention generally relates
`to a method for inducing preferential vasoconstriction of
`smaller blood vessels relative to larger blood vessels com-
`prising topically administering to a patient having an ocular
`condition a composition consisting essentially of brimoni-
`dine into ocular tissue, wherein pH of said composition is
`between about 5.5 and about 6.5, wherein said brimonidine
`concentration is from between about 0.001% to about 0.025%
`weight by volume and wherein said composition is formu-
`lated as an ocular drop.
`Thus, in one embodiment, the invention generally relates to
`a composition for inducing preferential vasoconstriction con-
`sisting essentially of brimonidine into ocular tissue, wherein
`pH of said composition is between about 5.5 and about 6.5,
`wherein said brimonidine concentration is from between
`about 0.001% to about 0.025% weight by volume and
`wherein said composition is formulated as an ocular drop.
`In one embodiment, the invention generally relates to
`administering compositions of the present invention within
`about 24 hours after a Lasik surgery on the patient.
`In yet another embodiment, the invention generally relates
`to a method for inducing preferential vasoconstriction of
`smaller blood vessels relative to larger blood vessels com-
`prising administering to a patient having an ocular or pulmo-
`nary condition a selective a-2 agonist having a binding affin-
`ity of 100 fold or greater for a-2b and or a-2c receptors over
`a-1 adrenergic receptors, or a pharmaceutically acceptable
`salt thereof, wherein said selective a-2 adrenergic receptor
`agonist is present at a concentration below about 0.05%
`weight by volume.
`Reducing Capillary Permeability
`In another embodiment, the invention generally relates to a
`method of
`reducing capillary permeability comprising
`administering locally to a patient in need thereof a selective
`a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist having a binding affinity of
`100 fold or greater for a-2 over a-1 adrenergic receptors, or a
`pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, in the absence of a
`substantial amount of another therapeutic agent, wherein said
`selective a-2 adrenergic receptor agonist is present at a con-
`centration below about 0.05% weight by volume.
`In a preferred embodiment, the selective a-2 adrenergic
`receptor agonist is present at a concentration between about
`0.001% and about 0.05% weight by volume.
`The method can be used to treat various pulmonary condi-
`tions, including, but not limited to, bronchitis, including res-
`piratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchitis. In a preferred
`embodiment, a pulmonary

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket