`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. __
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`THE DATA COMPANY TECHNOLOGIES INC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00135
`Patent No. 10,257,319
`_____________
`
`NOTICE OF FILING REDACTED VERSION OF EXHIBIT 1081
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`Exhibit Description
`1001
`U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319
`1002
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319
`1003
`Declaration of Prof. Dave Levin (“Levin”)
`1004
`Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Dave Levin
`1005
`Patent Owner’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 126 (E.D.
`Tex. Sept. 29, 2020)
`Claim Construction Opinion and Order, Luminati Networks Ltd. v.
`Teso LT et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 191 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2020)
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, Luminati Networks
`Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 28 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 7,
`2020)
`Corrected Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Code200, UAB, et
`al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., IPR2020-01266, Paper 16 (PTAB Dec.
`9, 2020)
`Supplemental Claim Construction Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT
`et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 453 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2021)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0228938
`(“Plamondon”)
`Declaration of Sandy Ginoza for IETF
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 1, RFC 793: Transmission Control Protocol -
`DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification, Information
`Sciences Institute (September 1981) (“RFC 793”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 2, RFC 1001: Protocol Standard for a NetBIOS
`Service on a TCP/UDP Transport: Concepts and Methods, NetBIOS
`Working Group (March 1987) (“RFC 1001”)
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`1012
`
`1013
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`1022
`
`1023
`1024
`1025
`
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 3, RFC 1122: Requirements for Internet Hosts --
`Communication Layers, Internet Engineering Task Force (October
`1989) (“RFC 1122”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 4, RFC 1630: Universal Resource Identifiers in
`WWW - A Unifying Syntax for the Expression of Names and
`Addresses of Objects on the Network as used in the World-Wide
`Web, Network Working Group (June 1994) (“RFC 1630”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 5, RFC 1738: Uniform Resource Locators (URL),
`Network Working Group (December 1994) (“RFC 1738”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 6, RFC 2187: Application of Internet Cache
`Protocol (ICP), version 2, National Laboratory for Applied Network
`Research/UCSD (September 1997) (“RFC 2187”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 7, RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
`HTTP/1.1, The Internet Society (June 1999) (“RFC 2616”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 8, RFC 2960: Stream Control Transmission
`Protocol, The Internet Society (October 2000) (“RFC 2960”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 9, RFC 6520: Transport Layer Security (TLS) and
`Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Heartbeat Extension,
`Internet Engineering Task Force (February 2012) (“RFC 6520”)
`Declaration of Gordon MacPherson for IEEE
`MacPherson Decl. Exh. A, IEEE 802.11-2007 - IEEE Standard for
`Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information
`Exchange Between Systems – Local and Metropolitan Area Networks
`- Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access
`Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, June 12,
`2007 (“IEEE 802.11-2007”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0026304 (“Price”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0055471 (“Kozat”)
`U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`1026
`
`1027
`1028
`1029
`1030
`1031
`
`1032
`1033
`
`1034
`1035
`1036
`1037
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`1041
`
`1042
`1043
`
`Pages from W. R. Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The
`Protocols. Canada: Addison-Wesley, 1994, chs. 1 & 18, bibliography
`(“Stevens”)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,491,712
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0072178 (“Budzisch”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0178217 (“Nguyen”)
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0125412 (“Glover”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0177513
`(“Kuokkannen”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,761,500 (“Eckert”)
`Pages from L.L. Peterson, B.S. Davie, Computer Networks: A
`Systems Approach, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier, 2007, chs. 1-
`2 (“Peterson”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0187654 (“Raja”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0169818 (“Stewart”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,351,775 (“Yu-775”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0059371 (“Jamail”)
`P. Mell, T. Bergeron, and D. Henning, “Creating a Patch and
`Vulnerability Management Program,” NIST Special Publication 800-
`40 Version 2.0, 2005 (“SP 800-40 Ver. 2”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0153473
`(“Hutchinson”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0236083 (“Fristch”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0115613
`(“Ramaswami”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,041,784 (“Amidon”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,655,838 (“Wright”)
`
`iii
`
`
`
`
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1049
`1050
`
`1051
`1052
`1053
`1054
`
`A. Rowstron and P. Druschel, “Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object
`Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems.”
`IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems
`Platforms and Open Distributed Processing: Middleware 2001, pp.
`329-350 (2001) (“Rowstron”)
`S. Ratnasamy, M. Handley, R. Karp and S. Shenker, “Topologically-
`aware overlay construction and server selection.” Proceedings
`Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and
`Communications Societies, vol. 3, pp. 1190-1199 (2002)
`(“Ratnasamy”)
`V. N. Padmanabhan and L. Subramanian, “An Investigation of
`Geographic Mapping Techniques for Internet Hosts.” ACM
`SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 3, No. 4, pp.
`173–185 (2001) (“Padmanabhan”)
`M.J. Freedman, K. Lakshminarayanan, and D. Mazières, “OASIS:
`Anycast for Any Service.” Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on
`Networked Systems Design & Implementation, vol. 3, pp. 129-142
`(2006) (“Freedman-2006”)
`S. Agarwal and J.R. Lorch, “Matchmaking for Online Games and
`Other Latency-Sensitive P2P Systems.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer
`Communication Review, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 315-326 (2009)
`(“Agarwal”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,144,611 (“Agarwal-611”)
`H. Casanova, “Benefits and Drawbacks of Redundant Batch
`Requests.” Journal of Grid Computing, vol. 5, pp. 235–250 (2007)
`(“Casanova”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0298328 (“Sharma”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0204700 (“Sudhakar”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0212584 (“Yu”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,865,585 (“Samuels”)
`
`iv
`
`
`
`
`
`1055
`
`1056
`1057
`
`1058
`
`1059
`
`1060
`
`1061
`
`1062
`1063
`
`1064
`
`1065
`
`1066
`
`1067
`
`S. J. Murdoch, “New Tor distribution for testing: Tor Browser
`Bundle,” January 30, 2008 post to tor-talk mailing list, available at
`https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2008-
`January/007837.html
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0222515 (“Thompson”)
`Defendants’ Section 282 Disclosure, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et
`al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 450 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2021)
`Docket, Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-
`JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Notice of Filing Invalidity Contentions, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom
`S.A. d/b/a NordVPN, Case No. 2:19-cv-00414-JRG, D.I. 37 (E.D.
`Tex. Mar. 3, 2021)
`Docket, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. BI Science (2009) Ltd., Case No.
`2:19-cv-397-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Motion for Summary Judgement, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 282 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2021)
`RESERVED
`Amended Complaint, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. d/b/a
`NordVPN, Case No. 2:19-cv-00414-JRG, D.I. 22 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 12,
`2020)
`Docket, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-
`JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Docket, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. d/b/a NordVPN, Case No.
`2:19-cv-00414-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Order Denying Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Bright
`Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 157
`(E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2020)
`Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,257,319, Code200, UAB, et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd.,
`IPR2020-01266, Paper 18 (PTAB Dec. 23, 2020)
`
`v
`
`
`
`
`
`1068
`
`1069
`
`1070
`
`1071
`1072
`1073
`1074
`
`1075
`
`1076
`
`1077
`1078
`
`1079
`1080
`
`1081
`
`Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,484,510, Code200, UAB, et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd.,
`IPR2020-01358, Paper 11 (PTAB Dec. 23, 2020)
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319,
`Code200, UAB et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., IPR2020-01266,
`Paper 5 (PTAB Jul. 14, 2020)
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510,
`Code200, UAB et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., IPR2020-01358,
`Paper 5 (PTAB Jul. 28, 2020)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 8,560,604
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,069,936
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510
`Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-
`JRG, D.I. 493 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2021)
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Certain
`Invalidity Grounds, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. D/B/A
`NordVPN, Case No. 2:19-cv-00414-JRG, D.I. 97 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 27,
`2021)
`Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the ’319,
`’510, and ’511 Patents, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. D/B/A
`NordVPN, Civil Action No. 2:19-CV-00414-JRG D.I. 99 (E.D. Tex.
`Sep. 29, 2021)
`Declaration of Adam R. Wichman
`Revised Joint Pretrial Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case
`No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 490 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 17, 2021)
`RESERVED
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0009518
`(“Harrow”)
`Deposition Transcript of Dr. Tim A. Williams, dated November 3,
`2022 (PROVISIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY)
`
`vi
`
`
`
`
`
`1082
`
`1083
`
`1084
`
`1085
`
`1086
`
`1087
`
`1088
`
`1089
`
`1090
`
`1091
`
`1092
`
`1093
`
`Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG,
`D.I. 97 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2021)
`ORDER - Overruling Plaintiff’s Objections and Defendant’s
`Objections, and Adopting Magistrate Judge Payne’s Order and
`Supplemental Order, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 251 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2021)
`Order on Pretrial Motions and Motions in limine, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 476 (E.D. Tex.
`Sept. 9, 2021)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, The Data Company
`Technologies Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00138, Paper 6
`(PTAB Feb. 16, 2022)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, NetNut Ltd. v. Bright Data
`Ltd., IPR2021-01493, Paper 8 (PTAB Dec. 27, 2021)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, NetNut Ltd. v. Bright Data
`Ltd., IPR2021-01492, Paper 9 (PTAB Dec. 27, 2021)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00103, Paper 6 (PTAB Mar. 9, 2022)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00353, Paper 6 (PTAB Apr. 11, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, The Data
`Company Technologies Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00138,
`Paper 12 (PTAB May 11, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, NetNut Ltd.
`v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01493, Paper 11 (PTAB Mar. 11, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, NetNut Ltd.
`v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01492, Paper 12 (PTAB Mar. 21, 2022)
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00862, Paper 19 (PTAB Oct. 19, 2022)
`
`vii
`
`
`
`
`
`1094
`
`1095
`
`1096
`
`1097
`
`1098
`
`1099
`
`1100
`
`1101
`
`1102
`
`1103
`
`1104
`
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00861, Paper 19 (PTAB Oct. 19, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Major Data
`UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00916, Paper 18 (PTAB Sept. 15,
`2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Major Data
`UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00915, Paper 18 (PTAB Sept. 15,
`2022)
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00103, Paper 7 (PTAB June 1, 2022)
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00353, Paper 8 (PTAB July 1, 2022)
`Plaintiff’s P.R. 4-2 Disclosures, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 138-3 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2020)
`Ex. 2001 - 344 Patent Family Tree, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00353, IPR2022-00353 (PTAB Apr. 11, 2022)
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Luminati Networks Ltd.
`v. Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 86 (E.D.
`Tex. Dec. 18, 2020)
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Reply Brief, Luminati Networks Ltd. v.
`Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 89 (E.D.
`Tex. Jan. 8, 2021)
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-JRG, D.I. 106 (E.D. Tex. Feb
`23, 2022)
`Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-JRG, D.I. 118 (E.D. Tex Mar.
`16, 2022)
`
`viii
`
`
`
`
`
`1105
`
`1106
`
`1107
`
`1108
`
`1109
`
`1110
`
`1111
`
`1112
`
`1113
`
`1114
`
`1115
`
`1116
`
`Joint Motion for Entry of Post-Verdict Scheduling Order, Bright Data
`Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 613 (E.D.
`Tex. Oct. 5, 2022)
`Order Staying Case, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 283 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2022)
`Order Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, Bright Data
`Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-JRG, D.I. 153 (E.D. Tex.
`May 17, 2022)
`Declaration of Dr. Vernon Thomas Rhyne III in Support of Plaintiff
`Luminati Network Ltd.’s Claim Constructions, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 126-5 (E.D. Tex.
`Sept. 29, 2020)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Major Data UAB v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00916, Paper 12 (PTAB June 23, 2022)
`Non-Final Office Action mailed March 23, 2022, Reexamination No.
`90/014,876
`Final Office Action mailed June 21, 2022, Reexamination Nos.
`90/014,827 & 90/014,624
`Complaint, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. UAB Tesonet, Case No. 2:18-
`cv-00299, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 19, 2018)
`Complaint, Luminati Networks, Ltd. v. BiScience Ltd., Case No. 2:18-
`cv-00483, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2018)
`Complaint, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. IP Ninja, Case No. 2:19-cv-
`00196, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2019)
`Complaint, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-
`cv-00395, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2019)
`Excerpts from Trial Transcript, Day 2, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et
`al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG (E.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 2021)
`
`ix
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4)(ii), Petitioner herewith submits the
`
`following Exhibit:
`
`Description
`Deposition Transcript of Dr. Tim A. Williams, dated November
`3, 2022 (Redacted Public Version)
`
`Exhibit
`1081
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 18, 2022
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted
`The Data Company Technologies Inc.
`
`/ Adam R. Wichman /
`Michael N. Rader, Reg. No. 52,146
`Adam R. Wichman, Reg. No. 43.988
`Gregory S. Nieberg Reg. No. 57,063
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`(617) 646-8000 Phone
`(617) 646-8646 Fax
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6 (E)(4)
`I certify that on November 18, 2022, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document, including any exhibits filed therewith, to be served via electronic mail,
`
`as previously consented to by Patent Owner, upon the following:
`
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Elizabeth A. O’Brien
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tomd@cherianllp.com
`elizabetho@cherianllp.com
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay Rush
`Paralegal
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 18, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`