`
`
`
`Paper No. __
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`THE DATA COMPANY TECHNOLOGIES INC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2022-00135
`Patent No. 10,257,319
`_____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FILING PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`Exhibit Description
`1001
`U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319
`1002
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319
`1003
`Declaration of Prof. Dave Levin (“Levin”)
`1004
`Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Dave Levin
`1005
`Patent Owner’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 126 (E.D.
`Tex. Sept. 29, 2020)
`Claim Construction Opinion and Order, Luminati Networks Ltd. v.
`Teso LT et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 191 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2020)
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, Luminati Networks
`Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 28 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 7,
`2020)
`Corrected Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Code200, UAB, et
`al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., IPR2020-01266, Paper 16 (PTAB Dec.
`9, 2020)
`Supplemental Claim Construction Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT
`et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 453 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2021)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0228938
`(“Plamondon”)
`Declaration of Sandy Ginoza for IETF
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 1, RFC 793: Transmission Control Protocol -
`DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification, Information
`Sciences Institute (September 1981) (“RFC 793”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 2, RFC 1001: Protocol Standard for a NetBIOS
`Service on a TCP/UDP Transport: Concepts and Methods, NetBIOS
`Working Group (March 1987) (“RFC 1001”)
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`1012
`
`1013
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`1022
`
`1023
`1024
`1025
`
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 3, RFC 1122: Requirements for Internet Hosts --
`Communication Layers, Internet Engineering Task Force (October
`1989) (“RFC 1122”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 4, RFC 1630: Universal Resource Identifiers in
`WWW - A Unifying Syntax for the Expression of Names and
`Addresses of Objects on the Network as used in the World-Wide
`Web, Network Working Group (June 1994) (“RFC 1630”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 5, RFC 1738: Uniform Resource Locators (URL),
`Network Working Group (December 1994) (“RFC 1738”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 6, RFC 2187: Application of Internet Cache
`Protocol (ICP), version 2, National Laboratory for Applied Network
`Research/UCSD (September 1997) (“RFC 2187”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 7, RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
`HTTP/1.1, The Internet Society (June 1999) (“RFC 2616”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 8, RFC 2960: Stream Control Transmission
`Protocol, The Internet Society (October 2000) (“RFC 2960”)
`Ginoza Decl. Exh. 9, RFC 6520: Transport Layer Security (TLS) and
`Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Heartbeat Extension,
`Internet Engineering Task Force (February 2012) (“RFC 6520”)
`Declaration of Gordon MacPherson for IEEE
`MacPherson Decl. Exh. A, IEEE 802.11-2007 - IEEE Standard for
`Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information
`Exchange Between Systems – Local and Metropolitan Area Networks
`- Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access
`Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, June 12,
`2007 (“IEEE 802.11-2007”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0026304 (“Price”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0055471 (“Kozat”)
`U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`1026
`
`1027
`1028
`1029
`1030
`1031
`
`1032
`1033
`
`1034
`1035
`1036
`1037
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`1041
`
`1042
`1043
`
`Pages from W. R. Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The
`Protocols. Canada: Addison-Wesley, 1994, chs. 1 & 18, bibliography
`(“Stevens”)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,491,712
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0072178 (“Budzisch”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0178217 (“Nguyen”)
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0125412 (“Glover”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0177513
`(“Kuokkannen”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,761,500 (“Eckert”)
`Pages from L.L. Peterson, B.S. Davie, Computer Networks: A
`Systems Approach, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier, 2007, chs. 1-
`2 (“Peterson”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0187654 (“Raja”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0169818 (“Stewart”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,351,775 (“Yu-775”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0059371 (“Jamail”)
`P. Mell, T. Bergeron, and D. Henning, “Creating a Patch and
`Vulnerability Management Program,” NIST Special Publication 800-
`40 Version 2.0, 2005 (“SP 800-40 Ver. 2”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0153473
`(“Hutchinson”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0236083 (“Fristch”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0115613
`(“Ramaswami”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,041,784 (“Amidon”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,655,838 (“Wright”)
`
`iii
`
`
`
`
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1049
`1050
`
`1051
`1052
`1053
`1054
`
`A. Rowstron and P. Druschel, “Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object
`Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems.”
`IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems
`Platforms and Open Distributed Processing: Middleware 2001, pp.
`329-350 (2001) (“Rowstron”)
`S. Ratnasamy, M. Handley, R. Karp and S. Shenker, “Topologically-
`aware overlay construction and server selection.” Proceedings
`Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and
`Communications Societies, vol. 3, pp. 1190-1199 (2002)
`(“Ratnasamy”)
`V. N. Padmanabhan and L. Subramanian, “An Investigation of
`Geographic Mapping Techniques for Internet Hosts.” ACM
`SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 3, No. 4, pp.
`173–185 (2001) (“Padmanabhan”)
`M.J. Freedman, K. Lakshminarayanan, and D. Mazières, “OASIS:
`Anycast for Any Service.” Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on
`Networked Systems Design & Implementation, vol. 3, pp. 129-142
`(2006) (“Freedman-2006”)
`S. Agarwal and J.R. Lorch, “Matchmaking for Online Games and
`Other Latency-Sensitive P2P Systems.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer
`Communication Review, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 315-326 (2009)
`(“Agarwal”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,144,611 (“Agarwal-611”)
`H. Casanova, “Benefits and Drawbacks of Redundant Batch
`Requests.” Journal of Grid Computing, vol. 5, pp. 235–250 (2007)
`(“Casanova”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0298328 (“Sharma”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0204700 (“Sudhakar”)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0212584 (“Yu”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,865,585 (“Samuels”)
`
`iv
`
`
`
`
`
`1055
`
`1056
`1057
`
`1058
`
`1059
`
`1060
`
`1061
`
`1062
`1063
`
`1064
`
`1065
`
`1066
`
`1067
`
`S. J. Murdoch, “New Tor distribution for testing: Tor Browser
`Bundle,” January 30, 2008 post to tor-talk mailing list, available at
`https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2008-
`January/007837.html
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0222515 (“Thompson”)
`Defendants’ Section 282 Disclosure, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et
`al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 450 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2021)
`Docket, Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-
`JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Notice of Filing Invalidity Contentions, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom
`S.A. d/b/a NordVPN, Case No. 2:19-cv-00414-JRG, D.I. 37 (E.D.
`Tex. Mar. 3, 2021)
`Docket, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. BI Science (2009) Ltd., Case No.
`2:19-cv-397-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Motion for Summary Judgement, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 282 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2021)
`RESERVED
`Amended Complaint, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. d/b/a
`NordVPN, Case No. 2:19-cv-00414-JRG, D.I. 22 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 12,
`2020)
`Docket, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-
`JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Docket, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. d/b/a NordVPN, Case No.
`2:19-cv-00414-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (as of Nov. 2, 2021)
`Order Denying Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Bright
`Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 157
`(E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2020)
`Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,257,319, Code200, UAB, et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd.,
`IPR2020-01266, Paper 18 (PTAB Dec. 23, 2020)
`
`v
`
`
`
`
`
`1068
`
`1069
`
`1070
`
`1071
`1072
`1073
`1074
`
`1075
`
`1076
`
`1077
`1078
`
`1079
`1080
`
`1081
`
`Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,484,510, Code200, UAB, et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd.,
`IPR2020-01358, Paper 11 (PTAB Dec. 23, 2020)
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319,
`Code200, UAB et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., IPR2020-01266,
`Paper 5 (PTAB Jul. 14, 2020)
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510,
`Code200, UAB et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., IPR2020-01358,
`Paper 5 (PTAB Jul. 28, 2020)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 8,560,604
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,069,936
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510
`Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-
`JRG, D.I. 493 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2021)
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Certain
`Invalidity Grounds, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. D/B/A
`NordVPN, Case No. 2:19-cv-00414-JRG, D.I. 97 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 27,
`2021)
`Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the ’319,
`’510, and ’511 Patents, Bright Data Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A. D/B/A
`NordVPN, Civil Action No. 2:19-CV-00414-JRG D.I. 99 (E.D. Tex.
`Sep. 29, 2021)
`Declaration of Adam R. Wichman
`Revised Joint Pretrial Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case
`No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 490 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 17, 2021)
`RESERVED
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0009518
`(“Harrow”)
`Deposition Transcript of Dr. Tim A. Williams, dated November 3,
`2022 (PROVISIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY)
`
`vi
`
`
`
`
`
`1082
`
`1083
`
`1084
`
`1085
`
`1086
`
`1087
`
`1088
`
`1089
`
`1090
`
`1091
`
`1092
`
`1093
`
`Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG,
`D.I. 97 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2021)
`ORDER - Overruling Plaintiff’s Objections and Defendant’s
`Objections, and Adopting Magistrate Judge Payne’s Order and
`Supplemental Order, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 251 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2021)
`Order on Pretrial Motions and Motions in limine, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 476 (E.D. Tex.
`Sept. 9, 2021)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, The Data Company
`Technologies Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00138, Paper 6
`(PTAB Feb. 16, 2022)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, NetNut Ltd. v. Bright Data
`Ltd., IPR2021-01493, Paper 8 (PTAB Dec. 27, 2021)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, NetNut Ltd. v. Bright Data
`Ltd., IPR2021-01492, Paper 9 (PTAB Dec. 27, 2021)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00103, Paper 6 (PTAB Mar. 9, 2022)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00353, Paper 6 (PTAB Apr. 11, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, The Data
`Company Technologies Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00138,
`Paper 12 (PTAB May 11, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, NetNut Ltd.
`v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01493, Paper 11 (PTAB Mar. 11, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, NetNut Ltd.
`v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01492, Paper 12 (PTAB Mar. 21, 2022)
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00862, Paper 19 (PTAB Oct. 19, 2022)
`
`vii
`
`
`
`
`
`1094
`
`1095
`
`1096
`
`1097
`
`1098
`
`1099
`
`1100
`
`1101
`
`1102
`
`1103
`
`1104
`
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00861, Paper 19 (PTAB Oct. 19, 2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Major Data
`UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00916, Paper 18 (PTAB Sept. 15,
`2022)
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Major Data
`UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00915, Paper 18 (PTAB Sept. 15,
`2022)
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00103, Paper 7 (PTAB June 1, 2022)
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution of
`Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00353, Paper 8 (PTAB July 1, 2022)
`Plaintiff’s P.R. 4-2 Disclosures, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 138-3 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2020)
`Ex. 2001 - 344 Patent Family Tree, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00353, IPR2022-00353 (PTAB Apr. 11, 2022)
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Luminati Networks Ltd.
`v. Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 86 (E.D.
`Tex. Dec. 18, 2020)
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Reply Brief, Luminati Networks Ltd. v.
`Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 89 (E.D.
`Tex. Jan. 8, 2021)
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-JRG, D.I. 106 (E.D. Tex. Feb
`23, 2022)
`Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-JRG, D.I. 118 (E.D. Tex Mar.
`16, 2022)
`
`viii
`
`
`
`
`
`1105
`
`1106
`
`1107
`
`1108
`
`1109
`
`1110
`
`1111
`
`1112
`
`1113
`
`1114
`
`1115
`
`1116
`
`1117
`
`Joint Motion for Entry of Post-Verdict Scheduling Order, Bright Data
`Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 613 (E.D.
`Tex. Oct. 5, 2022)
`Order Staying Case, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 283 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2022)
`Order Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, Bright Data
`Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., Case No. 2:21-cv-00225-JRG, D.I. 153 (E.D. Tex.
`May 17, 2022)
`Declaration of Dr. Vernon Thomas Rhyne III in Support of Plaintiff
`Luminati Network Ltd.’s Claim Constructions, Bright Data Ltd. v.
`Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 126-5 (E.D. Tex.
`Sept. 29, 2020)
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Major Data UAB v. Bright
`Data Ltd., IPR2022-00916, Paper 12 (PTAB June 23, 2022)
`Non-Final Office Action mailed March 23, 2022, Reexamination No.
`90/014,876
`Final Office Action mailed June 21, 2022, Reexamination Nos.
`90/014,827 & 90/014,624
`Complaint, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. UAB Tesonet, Case No. 2:18-
`cv-00299, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 19, 2018)
`Complaint, Luminati Networks, Ltd. v. BiScience Ltd., Case No. 2:18-
`cv-00483, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2018)
`Complaint, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. IP Ninja, Case No. 2:19-cv-
`00196, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2019)
`Complaint, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-
`cv-00395, D.I. 1 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2019)
`Excerpts from Trial Transcript, Day 2, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et
`al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG (E.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 2021)
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`ix
`
`
`
`
`
`1118
`
`1119
`
`November 29, 2022 Response to Office Action in Reexamination
`Serial Nos. 90/014,652 and 90/012,816
`January 26, 2023 Advisory Action in Reexamination Serial Nos.
`90/014,652 and 90/012,816
`
`x
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4)(ii), and the Board’s Hearing Order (Paper
`
`42), Petitioner herewith submits the following Exhibits:
`
`Description
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`Exhibit
`1117
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 24, 2023
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`The Data Company Technologies Inc.
`
`By: / Adam R. Wichman /
`Michael N. Rader, Reg. No. 52,146
`Adam R. Wichman, Reg. No. 43,988
`Gregory S. Nieberg Reg. No. 57,063
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`(617) 646-8000 Phone
`(617) 646-8646 Fax
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6 (E)(4)
`I certify that on February 24, 2023, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document, including any exhibits filed therewith, to be served via electronic mail,
`
`as previously consented to by Patent Owner, upon the following:
`
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Elizabeth A. O’Brien
`Robert M. Harkins
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tomd@cherianllp.com
`elizabetho@cherianllp.com
`bobh@cherianllp.com
`
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay Rush
`Paralegal
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 24, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
