  
`     
`      
`     
`    
`
`   
`    
`  
` 
`
`     
`
`      
`
` 
`
`
`
`
` 
` 
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REPLY TO PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`
`  Patent Board
`    
`    
`  
`  
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131— Petitioner’s Reply
`  
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`Page
`
`
`
`Il.
`
`
`INTRODUCTION.........ccccsssssssssssssseessessesscessesseessessesesesaesseesaeseeessesessneseeseneaes 1
` 
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION..........ccccsccsscssssssesscssessesseecseseeesaeseeeseeseeeneeseeseeeeeees 2
`  
`
`A.
`
`
`NO COMSHUCTION 1S NECESSATY ...........cccccecesseeesseessseceseeeeeeesneecseaeeseecsaeens2
`    
`
`1.
`1.
`
`2.
`2.
`
`“PLIVILCQO”... eecceceesceesseesssseesssecsseessesecsseeseeecssasecseecessecesaeesseeseeaeess 2
`
`
`“Destination Identity”..........ccccceccsccsssecssececsseceeesceeecseaessseeseaeeees 3
`  
`
`HABERMAN RENDERS OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS
`Il.
`      
`OF THE ’267 PATENT..........cccccccsssssscssesecescessesseesaessessesaesnesesessasseeseesenseeessees 6
`   
`
`A.|Haberman’s Preferences are “Privileges”...........cccccscccsseessseceseeeesseeseaes 7
`    
`
`
`1.
`1.
`
`2.
`2.
`
`Haberman’s Preferences are not Optional................ccccccecesseeees 8
`     
`
`Haberman’s Privileges Satisfy PO’s Construction................0 10
`     
`
`B.
`
`
`Haberman discloses “destination identity”...........cccccccssessseeeseeeseeeees 11
`    
`
`1.
`1.
`
`Haberman’s Destination Grants the Originator a Privilege......11
`      
`
`IV.
`
`
`THE COMBINATION OF HABERMAN AND BOGER RENDERS
`      
`OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMG...........:cccccssssssesseesecseeseseesseeenees 12
`   
`
`
`
`VANLUIJT RENDERS OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMB......... 13
`     
`
`A.
`
`
` Vanlusyjt’s Preferences are Equivalentto “Privileges”...........:::cccee 13
`      
`
`B.—Vanlusjt Teaches “Searching the Privilege Data” ..............cccsccesseeees 16
`      
`
`
`C.
`
`
`Vanluijt Teaches “Destination Identity” 00.0... eecccseceseessseeeseeeeees 17
`    
`
`VI.
`
`
`PATENT OWNER HASFAILED TO SHOW OBJECTIVE INDICIA
`       
`OF NON-OBVIOUSNESG. ........c:csccssssssessesseeseesessecssesseseesaecesseeeeesseeseeeneees 18
` 
`
`A.
`
`
`COPYING oa. eee ccececssccesssecsseeesseesseeecseceessecssesesseeesseeesseeceeeeeeeesaeeeeseeeesess 19
` 
`
`B.—-Commercial SucceSS...........ccccseseecsscesseeseeceeeseseeeseceeeeeeeeseeseeesseeseneeeeas 20
`
` 
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131— Petitioner’s Reply
`  
`
`C.
`
`
`LICENSES 20....e eee eeeeeeeeeseseceeecceceeccccecscssseesceceeecececeececsssesecesceeecessecaecusessesers 21
` 
`
`VII. CONCLUSION(A... ceeccccesssecesssessssssssssssssssssssssssssessssecececceceescecceeceeees 22
` 
`
`ill
`
`
`

`

`  
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`Page(s)
`
`Cases
`
`          
`  
`
`         
`          
`    
`
`         
`
`            
`
`            
`   
`
`          
`   
`
`         
` 
`
`         
`     
`
`
`
`

`

`  
`
`Exhibits
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`
`
`   
`
`
`
`     
`
`
`
`      
`
`
`
`        
`
`
`
`      
`
`
`
`        
`
`
`
`         
`  
`
`
`
`         
`
`
`
`            
`       
`
`
`
`
`         
`
`
`
`          
`
`
`
`      
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131 — Petitioner’s Reply
`   
`
`L
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Asexplained by the petition and preliminarily agreed to by the Board,
`           
`
`claims 1, 5, 13, 20, 21, 29, 30, 34, 42, and 49 (the “Challenged Claims’) are
`               
`
`obvious under three grounds: (1) Haberman; (2) Haberman in view of Boger; and
`            
`
`(3) Vanluijt. See Institution Decision, 18-19, 23. Nothing in the Patent Owner
`  See         
`
`Response (“POR") changes this determination. EX1012, P10.
`      
`
`Patent Owner (PO)fails to address the substantive analysis of the petition or
`            
`
`the institution decision in the Patent Owner Response (POR). Instead, for the first
`            
`
`time, PO proposes narrow constructions for “privilege” and “destination identity,”
`         
`
`which PO usesto justify their position of non-obviousness. Aslaid out below,
`            
`
`these constructions are both unnecessary and incorrect. Nevertheless, even
`        
`
`construing these terms in the mannerproposedby the PO, the Petitioner’s grounds
`            
`
`still render the Challenged Claims obviousas discussed below. EX1012, P11.
`          
`
`Finally, by failing to address the substantive analysis of the petition, PO
`           
`
`concedesthat the Petitioner’s arguments of obviousnessare correct should the
`          
`
`Board reject PO’s constructions. Accordingly, Petitioner maintainsthat the
`        
`
`Challenged Claims are obvious underthree distinct grounds. See Petition, 7-64;
`        See  
`
`EX1012, p12.
` 
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`II.
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`A.
`
`No construction is necessary
`
`          
`
`         
`
`            
`
`         
`
`Phillips          
`
`          
`
`1.
`
`“Privilege”
`
`           
`
`          
`
`           
`
`           
`
` 
`
`          
`
`               
`
`          
`
`            
`
`            
`
`              
`
`      Id     
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`             
`
`            
`
`             
`
`            
`
`    
`
`          
`
`          
`
`  
`
`       narrower   
`
`            
`
`             
`
`         
`
`         
`
`      
`
`         
`
`    
`
`2.
`
`“Destination Identity”
`
`          
`
`             
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`           
`
` 
`
`            
`
`                 
`
`             
`
`           
`
`            
`
`            
`
`         
`
`           
`
`            
`
`        a particular embodiment appearing in the
`
`written description may not be read into a claim when the claim language is
`
`broader than the embodiment      
`
`            
`
`        
`
`          
`
`         
`
`          
`
`           
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131 — Petitioner’s Reply
`   
`
`“destination” is referenced in only two contexts in the ’267 specification: as an MS
`             
`
`destination and as a destination identity field in a commandoperand. In the
`            
`
`context of an MSdestination, the ’267 specification mentions that the MS
`           
`
`destination is the MS for which the data was intended. In the context of a
`              
`
`commandoperand, the destination identity is only used in the context of a
`            
`
`parameterfield for a send command, a notify command, a compose command, a
`            
`
`connect command, a find command, an invoke command, a copy command, a
`           
`
`move command, a store command, and an administrate command. At no point
`           
`
`does the ’267 specification discuss destination or destination identity in the context
`           
`
`of a grantor/grantee relationship. EX1012, P22.
`     
`
`Further, there is evidence in the record that PO’s use of “originating
`           
`
`identity” and “destination identity” was a purposeful broadening of the claims.
`          
`
`During prosecution, PO purposely removed the grantor/grantee relationships from
`        
`
`the claims in favorof a broaderlimitation. EX1003, 87-96. In particular, PO
`            
`
`submitted the following amendment:
`   
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131 — Petitioner’s Reply
`   
`
`ls
`
`(Currently Amended) A method for automatic location based exchangeprocessing at a
`
`mobile data processing system, said method comprisingthe-steps-ef:
`
`
`
`
`
`with other mobile data processing systems, said privilege data ér describing howto distinctly
`
`process forthcoming whereabouts data received at said mobile data processing system
`at said mobile data
`
`sae
`
`receiving
`
`2
`
`processing systemsaid whereabouts data including an onginating identity,
`
`
`determinerelevance-ofsaid_permissientoscarching said privilege data at said mobile
`
`data processing system for a matching privilege permitting a user configured action determined
`
`
`for said whereabouts data, said matching privilegeconfigured forrelating said originating
`
`
`
`identity with a receiving identity of said mobile data processing systemand
`
`performing a# said action at said mobile data processing systemwhen finding said
`
`matching privilege upon receipt-sat
`
`processing whereabouts data.
`
`
`
`EX1003, 88; EX1012, P23.
`   
`
`Accordingly, it would be improper to import the grantor/grantee
`        
`
`39
`embodiment into the claims because the claim language — the “destination identity
`           
`
`— 1s broaderthan the grantor/grantee embodiment described in the specification.
`          
`
`Therefore, PO’s construction of “destination identity” cannot be adopted. EX1012,
`         
`
`PP 24-25.
` 
`
`HABERMAN RENDERS OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS
`III. HABERMAN RENDERS OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS
`OF THE ’267 PATENT
`OF THE ’267 PATENT
`
`PO’s rebuttal is predicated on the Board adopting their constructions of
`          
`
`“privilege” and “destination identity.”” POR, 19 and 24. While Petitioner submits
`          
`
`that these constructions are both unnecessary and incorrect, even under PO’s
`          
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`        
`
` 
`
`A.
`
`Haberman’s Preferences are “Privileges”
`
`        
`
`        
`
`        
`
`           
`
`          
`
`           
`
`          
`
`          
`
`    
`
`         
`
`        
`
`            
`
`            
`
`         
`
`            
`
`           
`
`     are not    
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`            
`
`         
`
`   
`
`         
`
`             
`
`          
`
`         
`
`          
`
` 
`
`1.
`
`Haberman’s Preferences are not Optional
`
`            
`
`           
`
`            
`
`          
`
`              
`
`          
`
`           
`
`        
`
`             
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131 — Petitioner’s Reply
`   
`
`content type A, the mobile device is not permitted to present content type B.
`             
`
`EX1012, P30.
` 
`
`Habermanalso providesthat the reverseis true, i.e., the preferences profile
`           
`
`can indicate which types of content the mobile device is not permitted to present.
`          not   
`
`For example, Habermanteachesthat “the preferences profile indicates types of
`          
`
`informational content with which the person using the mobile device does not
`           
`
`desire to be presented.”” EX1004, [0035]. Similarly, the negative preferences must
`          
`
`be followed and are not merely an indication that the user would prefer other types
`              
`
`of content. In fact, Haberman equates such negative preferences to a blocked
`           
`
`senderlist. EX2005, [0176]. Accordingly, continuing with the above example,if
`          
`
`the user defines a preference that indicates that they do not wish to be presented
`              
`
`with content type B, and only content type B, the mobile device cannotpresent
`             
`
`content type B because the mobile device is not permitted to do so. EX1012, P31.
`              
`
`Accordingly, Habermanclearly indicates that the preferences dictate
`       
`
`whether the mobile device is permitted to present the user with certain contentor,
`             
`
`taken another way, whether the sending device is permitted to have their content
`            
`
`presented on the mobile device. EX1012, P32.
`      
`
`Thus, for this reason alone, Haberman’s preferencesare privileges.
`        
`
`EX1012, p33.
` 
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`2.
`
`Haberman’s Privileges Satisfy PO’s Construction
`
`        
`
`           
`
`           
`
`           
`
`             
`
`            
`
`             
`
`            
`
`              
`
`       
`
`          
`
`              
`
`               
`
`            
`
`  
`
`        
`
`        
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`B.
`
`Haberman discloses “destination identity”
`
`         
`
`See              
`
`            
`
`           
`
`         
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Haberman’s Destination Grants the Originator a Privilege
`
`          
`
`           
`
`           
`
`          
`
`            
`
`       
`
`           
`
`             
`
`         
`
`         
`
`        
`
`          
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`        
`
`            
`
`Id  
`
`          
`
`           
`
`         
`
`            
`
`         
`
`       
`
`           
`
`      Id  
`
`        
`
`     
`
`IV. THE COMBINATION OF HABERMAN AND BOGER RENDERS
`OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS
`
`           
`
`          
`
`            
`
`         
`
`      See supra    
`
`
`
`

`

`   
`
`         
`
`   
`
`V.
`
`VANLUIJT RENDERS OBVIOUS THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS
`
`         
`
`         
`
`          
`
`         
`
`  
`
`A.
`
`Vanluijt’s Preferences are Equivalent to “Privileges”
`
`        
`
`        
`
`         
`
`            
`
`          
`
`           
`
`          
`
`         
`
`   
`
`          
`
`           
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00131 — Petitioner’s Reply
`   
`
`EX1006, Abstract, [0001], [0036], FIG. 1. The arrangement in Vanluyt allows for
`           
`
`organizations to provide users within a location to receive information relevant to
`           
`
`those organizations. For example, “[t]here are many application scenarios where
`         
`
`the typical information request will be highly dependent on the location andlikely
`            
`
`to be identical or similar for many requesters at that location. For example, a
`             
`
`restaurant may want to announceits daily menuto every passer-by.” EX1006,
`           
`
`[0004], [0036]. “The arrangement 100 maybe used to provide location-specific
`          
`
`information such as local maps, information on nearby shops and restaurants and
`           
`
`so on, with the beacon 120, 121, 122 downloading information to the mobile
`            
`
`device 130, preferably in the form of information keys.” Jd; EX1012, P46.
`         Id  
`
`The user of mobile device 130 can dictate the information processed or
`           
`
`received from beacons 120, 121, 122 by allowingthe userto set preferences. For
`             
`
`example, “[w]here the message is carrying data from one or other of the beacons
`             
`
`120, 121, 122 the mobile device 130 preferably hasthe ability to filter the
`             
`
`information received according to pre-stored user preferences.” EX1006, [0058];
`        