throbber
JOM
`DOI: 10.1007/s11837-012-0350-0
`Ó 2012 TMS
`
`Soft Magnetic Materials in High-Frequency, High-Power
`Conversion Applications
`
`ALEX M. LEARY,1,3 PAUL R. OHODNICKI,2 and MICHAEL E. MCHENRY1
`
`1.—Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes
`Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. 2.—Division of Chemistry and Surface Science, National
`Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.
`3.—e-mail: leary@cmu.edu
`
`Advanced soft magnetic materials are needed to match high-power density
`and switching frequencies made possible by advances in wide band-gap
`semiconductors. Magnetics capable of operating at higher operating frequen-
`cies have the potential to greatly reduce the size of megawatt level power
`electronics. In this article, we examine the role of soft magnetic materials in
`high-frequency power applications and we discuss current material’s limita-
`tions and highlight emerging trends in soft magnetic material design for
`high-frequency and power applications using the materials paradigm of
`synthesis fi structure fi property fi performance relationships.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Wilson1 defines power electronics as the technol-
`ogy associated with the efficient conversion, control,
`and conditioning of electric power by static means
`from its available input form into the desired elec-
`trical output form. Nearly all generated electricity
`requires some form of conversion. Power losses
`during conversion dissipate as heat during trans-
`mission and distribution to the end user and
`developments in soft magnetic materials resulted in
`significant reductions in these losses over this time.2,3
`Limited metering restricts precise measurement of
`transmission and distribution losses on a large
`scale.4 When generated commercial power does not
`exceed demand, the ratio of power sold to generated
`provides an estimate for these losses. Figure 1
`shows the total electrical power generated for the
`retail market compared with the percentage that
`was not sold between 1949 to 2010 in the United
`States.5 In addition to a direct economic impact
`totaling $25.8 billion in lost revenue for a nominal
`retail price of $0.0988/kWh, the generation of this
`wasted power also results in additional greenhouse
`gas emissions that negatively impact the environ-
`ment. These losses drive efficiency improvements
`and are a lower bound of the total transmission,
`distribution, and conversion losses since they do not
`include losses experienced by the consumer down-
`stream of the billing meter.
`
`The Department of Energy expects demand for
`electricity to rise by 30% and estimates a $1.5 tril-
`lion cost to modernize the existing United States
`electricity infrastructure over the next 20 years.6
`These upgrades and capacity expansions provide an
`opportunity to build and integrate new power elec-
`tronics to meet demand while reducing waste and
`inefficiencies. Movement toward grid-level integra-
`tion of renewable energy sources and distributed
`storage systems requires new topologies to handle
`transient sources and facilitate two-way power
`conversion.7 Flexible alternating current
`(AC)
`Transmission Systems (FACTS) and High Voltage
`DC (HVDC) technologies aim to improve the effi-
`ciency of power networks and benefit from high-
`frequency conversion.8
`Increases in DC power
`generation and loading also motivate research into
`new topologies containing high-frequency DC–DC
`power converters.9–13
`Independent of the power generation method, the
`laminated electrical steels traditionally used for
`power cores become inefficient at high switching
`frequencies. Additionally, soft magnetics used in
`power electronics can occupy significant space,
`require extensive cooling, and limit designs. New
`large-scale systems must be cost competitive with
`existing systems and further
`cost
`reductions
`require materials advancements. These advance-
`ments will dictate the most successful topologies to
`take advantage of material strengths and minimize
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 1 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`Leary, Ohodnicki, and McHenry
`
`components. Instead, an active switching circuit
`modifies the input signal using pulse width modu-
`lation by various techniques.20 Fourier analysis de-
`scribes this modulated signal as the superposition of
`a many frequencies, so optimally designed soft
`magnetic materials must have broadband capability.
`The semiconductors used in active switching cir-
`cuits have voltage and power limitations and high-
`voltage converters often divide the total output into
`manageable quantities with a multilevel circuit.21
`Multilevel circuits can have the added benefit of
`improving the harmonic quality of the drive current,
`but each additional level comes with a price as the
`semiconductors have associated switching and con-
`duction losses. New SiC and GaN semiconductors
`have wider band gaps than currently available Si
`devices that result in much lower on-resistance.22
`Lower losses in the active components of a power
`converter allow for higher power densities ðW=m3Þ:
`While several high-frequency converter designs
`operate without magnetics, considerations such as
`galvanic
`isolation and the scaling limitations
`associated with air core inductors suggest
`the
`need to further develop advanced magnetics.18
`Currently, no commercial magnetic materials can
`match the performance level of the wide band gap
`semiconductors.23
`A successful design minimizes the combined los-
`ses of the passive magnetic material, the windings,
`and the switching circuit for a given power output.
`Typically,
`loss mechanisms are complex and
`designers rely on empirical rather than analytical
`models. High-frequency losses in magnetic materi-
`als are dominated by classical and anomalous eddy
`currents caused by the motion of domain walls.24
`Eddy currents generate heat by I2R losses in the
`magnetic material. For continuous operation, this
`heat must be dissipated through the component
`surface to prevent excessive temperatures. Scaling
`limitations result when surface area decreases
`while the amount of generated heat remains con-
`stant. Improvements in power density for a given
`power rating and efficiency require increased cool-
`ing due to the reduced surface area available to
`smaller components. With currently available soft
`magnetic materials, thermal management limits
`converter power density below levels possible with
`advanced switching circuits. The steady-state tem-
`perature rise in the magnetic material for a given
`shape and power loss is a function of the material’s
`thermal conductivity and emissivity, the local heat
`transfer conditions surrounding the material, and
`the surface area of the material exposed to these
`conditions.
`Scaling models describe the effects of size reduc-
`tions for given design constraints and require
`descriptions
`of heat generation and thermal
`responses to losses. Passive components (inductors
`and capacitors) operate in concert with active com-
`ponents in a power converter and scaling relation-
`ships must consider both. A geometric factor, such
`
`Losses (%)
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
` Power
` Losses
`
`4000
`
`3500
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`Electrical Power Generated (Billion kWh)
`
`1950
`
`1960
`
`1970
`
`1980
`
`1990
`
`2000
`
`2010
`
`Fig. 1. Total retail electrical power generated (NAICS 22) in the
`United States and estimated transmission and distribution losses, as
`measured by the ratio of power sold to power generated. Data taken
`from Ref. 5 includes independent power producers starting in 1989.
`
`weaknesses. This article explores the use of soft
`magnetic materials in power conversion applica-
`tions. The first section describes the high-frequency
`limitations of soft magnetic materials, the ‘‘Materials
`Survey’’ section surveys the current state-of-the-
`art materials, and the ‘‘Future Processing Oppor-
`tunities’’ section highlights opportunities for future
`improvements.
`
`HIGH-FREQUENCY SWITCHING
`AND POWER CONVERSION
`
`¼ L
`
`dB
`dI
`¼ LI0x cosðxtÞ
`dt
`dt
`I0x cosðxtÞ
`
`(1)
`
`Soft magnetic materials enable low loss inductive
`switching, which is useful in inductor, transformer
`and filter applications. The basic design challenge
`for inductive components becomes evident after
`considering Eq. 1, which relates Faraday’s law of
`induction to the voltage response of an ideal toroidal
`core with inductance L driven by an AC current,
`I = I0 sin(xt).
`V ¼ NA
`¼ lN2A
`
`l
`
`For constant maximum voltage (V), permeability (l),
`number of turns (N), and effective length (l), the
`cross-sectional area (A) is inversely proportional to
`the frequency (x = 2pf). This relation motivates the
`use of high-frequency switching to reduce size and
`weight of passive inductive components in power
`converters. However, nonlinear material properties
`limit scaling reductions in power magnetics, espe-
`cially for applications above the kilowatt power
`range. Several studies examine these limitations to
`guide transformer and inductor design.14–19 Addi-
`tionally, high-frequency power converters rarely use
`purely sinusoidal currents to drive the magnetic
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 2 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`Soft Magnetic Materials in High-Frequency, High-Power Conversion Applications
`
`Fig. 2. Tape wound ring core geometry used for loss modeling.
`
`as the area product25 or a component volume, com-
`bines the dimensions of passive and active compo-
`nents into a single variable. Here, we consider
`magnetic material property effects on scaling for the
`simple tape wound core geometry shown in Fig. 2 of
`outer and inner diameters (R1 and R2) and the core
`depth d. We choose the outer diameter of the ring
`core R1 as the geometric variable and fix the inner
`diameter and depth to 0.7R1 and 0.3R1.
`The time averaged core loss is given by the well-
`known variation of the Steinmetz Eq. 2 where k, a,
`and b are empirical fits to loss data.
`PC ¼ kf aBb
`This loss, usually determined from a sinusoidal
`driving frequency, incorporates the hysteresis and
`eddy current losses due to changes of magnetization
`at a frequency f. The windings produce a field H
`that is amplified by B = lH in the core.
`H ¼ /IN
`l
`
`m
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`where N is the number of turns over an effective
`length l and / is a geometric constant. We assume
`no DC bias and the useful portion of the induction is
`expressed as DB ¼ 2Bm. For a single layer of closely
`packed windings where l = Nw, winding losses for a
`
`
`given conductor resistivity (q) can be described as
`2 ql
`Ac
`
`rmsR ¼ 1
`PW ¼ I2
`2
`
`Bml
`l/N
`
`(4)
`
`Fig. 3. Power loss for R1 = 7 cm core for two relative permeabilities.
`Added power rating (orange) for a lower permeability material com-
`pared with additional winding losses (yellow) leads to higher effi-
`ciency for constant core loss (Color figure online).
`
`PW ¼ I2RFr where Fr ¼ 1 þ p2x2l20N2n2d6
`
`c k
`768q2b2
`c
`
`(5)
`
`The wire on the model core occupies a window with
`2 and uses Litz wire with
`an areal dimension bc
`n = 300 strands of diameter dc = 0.2 mm wire. We
`first consider a case where Litz wire windings fill
`the center core area with N ¼ ðpR2
`2=w2Þ and the
`wire crosssection is 50% copper ðq ¼ 2lX cmÞ. Each
`wire occupies a square area w2 within the winding
`2. To account for additionalwindow of size bc2 = p R2
`
`
`winding layers, the length per turn increases by 8w
`for each additional layer. The DC winding resis-
`tance is small compared with the AC resistance. A
`more detailed winding loss model for tape cores is
`found in Ref. 27.
`For magnetic materials with constant permeabil-
`ity over the flux range DB, the power rating (PVA)
`can be used to estimate the inductive efficiency for a
`single core (gc) of volume Vc
`PVA ¼ VrmsIrms ¼ p/AlB2
`mf
`l
`
`¼ dðBHÞ
`
`dt
`
`¼ VcB2
`mf
`2l
`
`(6)
`
`The conductor cross section (Ac) decreases with
`increasing frequency due to the skin effect.
`Increasing N decreases the maximum drive current,
`but for high-frequency and power applications,
`smaller cores may limit the available winding space.
`Multiple winding layers lead to additional losses
`due to AC proximity effects. Sullivan26 accounts for
`these losses by defining Fr, a dimensionless factor
`that relates DC to AC resistance for a core wound
`with Litz wire.
`
`gc ¼ PVA ðPC þ PWÞ
`
`PVA
`
`(7)
`
`Assuming Steinmetz coefficients to be constant over
`the frequency range of interest, core loss is linear on
`a log–log loss versus frequency plot. Winding losses
`change slope with increased frequency due to skin
`and proximity effects. Figure 3 shows these losses
`and the output of a core with R1 = 7 cm and 308
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 3 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`Leary, Ohodnicki, and McHenry
`
`Fig. 4. (a) Efficiency versus frequency and (b) power density in kW=dm3 for the core geometry of Fig. 2.
`
`turns for Bm = 0.5T with core loss values from
`Ref. 28. The two shaded areas show the difference
`between output power (VA) and total losses for two
`different relative permeabilities. We assume the
`same core loss for lower and higher permeability
`cores and discuss the assumption in the ‘‘Materials
`Survey’’ section. By lowering permeability, the
`material stores more inductive energy per cycle but
`also requires higher current (or more turns) to reach
`a desired induction. For this model, the additional
`stored inductive energy is greater than the added
`winding losses. If core loss is greater than winding
`loss, then materials with low permeability give
`efficiency benefits at high frequencies, as shown in
`Fig. 4a. For volume and weight limited applications,
`low permeability also gives high power density.
`Figure 4b shows the theoretical power density for
`this core geometry over a range of inductions and
`relative permeabilities. The 60 kW DC–DC converter
`in Ref. 29 has a 40 kW=dm3 power density. Kolar
`et al.23 show a 10-fold increase in converter power
`density every 20 years. Published power density
`values vary depending on the inclusion of a cooling
`system. Magnetic components occupy a significant
`portion of the volume. In the following, we extend this
`core model to estimate desirable magnetic material
`properties for high-frequency, high-power conver-
`sion. Reasonable designs must consider thermal
`limitations. In Refs. 14, 18, and 30, the relation
`between temperature rise and power loss relies on
`extrapolations from experimental data. We can also
`estimate the temperature rise DT for a material
`based on the thermal conductivity k as in Ref. 31.
`kDT ¼ PTh
`A
`
`(8)
`
`The cooling system determines the heat transfer
`conditions at the surface, but the heat generated by
`the power loss PT = Pc + Pw must first conduct
`
`through the thermal path h within the material. We
`assume a cooling system to be able to remove PT
`from the surface at T1 and use the thermal param-
`eter ðkDTÞ
`to describe the maximum possible
`efficiency of the inductive components in a 1 MVA
`power converter.
`Ring core geometries with many windings present
`a challenge because the windings limit heat transfer
`from the core. For this reason, we consider ring
`cores with three winding layers and define the
`thermal path length as h = R1 R2. Each core and
`winding form a subcomponent within the converter
`and losses for the model subcomponents were cal-
`culated using the Monte Carlo method by randomly
`assigning model parameters over the following de-
`sign space: (I) f ¼ 1 kHz ! 1 MHz; (II) Bm ¼ 0:5 !
`(III) lr ¼ 200 ! 5000; and (IV) R1 ¼ 7 !
`1:3T;
`20 cm. Core losses were calculated in mW=cm3 units
`from Eq. 2 using Finemet loss values from Ref. 28
`with k = 3.935, a = 1.585, and b = 1.88 where the
`frequency is in kHz and the induction in Tesla. The
`measured core losses were accurate within 1% to
`500 kHz. For converters that require multiple sub-
`components to achieve a desired power rating, the
`connection arrangement effects the overall efficiency
`(gt). Figure 5a shows the efficiencies for individual
`subcomponents compared with the thermal param-
`eter from Eq. 8. These efficiency values correspond to
`the gt for subcomponents connected in parallel and
`successful designs have high efficiencies and require
`low thermal parameters. The power ratings (PVA)
`form a banded pattern, and the 20 kVA and 80 kVA
`lines
`indicate
`the
`respective boundaries. For
`gc > 0.95, higher frequencies (Fig. 5b) and lower
`permeabilities (Fig. 5c) produced higher power rat-
`ings but require higher thermal parameters. The
`allowable temperature rise and thermal conductivity
`varies for different soft magnetic materials. Ferrites
`with k  4W=mK have operating limits below 200°C
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 4 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`Soft Magnetic Materials in High-Frequency, High-Power Conversion Applications
`
`Fig. 5. Performance measures for randomly designed sub-components with (a) efficiency versus thermal parameter and power rating (PVA)
`versus thermal parameter. Higher frequencies (b) and lower permeabilities (c) yield higher PVA ratings.
`
`MATERIALS SURVEY
`Magnetic materials store inductive energy ð1
`2 LI2Þ
`and filter unwanted signals in power converters. The
`majority of heat generated in a circuit arises from
`this storage function and a good inductive material
`stores the most energy with the lowest loss. As shown
`in Eq. 1, L is largely a function of the permeability (l).
`Figure 7 shows the energy stored for different per-
`meabilities. The area enclosed in the BH hysteresis
`curve for a material equals the core loss per cycle. The
`high induction levels approaching 2T commonly used
`at 50/60 Hz in Si steels are not achievable at higher
`frequency with currently available materials due to
`high coercivities (Hc). High-permeability materials
`(lr > 10,000) store very little energy prior to satu-
`ration. Materials with lower permeabilities store
`more energy per cycle at lower inductions but require
`higher driving fields and increased winding losses.
`Designers can achieve low-permeability cores by
`introducing an air gap or cutting a core made of high-
`permeability material. Cut cores introduce additional
`losses through flux fringing around the gaps that can
`also induce eddy currents in nearby conductive
`material.28 Poor manufacturing techniques greatly
`influence cut core properties and can lead to much
`higher losses than expected.33 Materials with low
`permeability with respect to the driving field direction
`are preferred in order to avoid complications due to cut
`cores. Cores with induced anisotropies transverse to
`the drive field restrict domain wall motion and show
`low losses at high frequency.34 Alves et al.35 demon-
`strated improved performance in a low power flyback
`converter design with a low permeability stress an-
`nealed Finemet core compared to a gapped ferrite
`core. The nanocomposite core was half the size of the
`ferrite core and produced 333% more power. For high-
`power, low-loss applications, low permeability is best
`achieved by inducing a controlled anisotropy perpen-
`dicular to the drive field in a material that exhibits a
`high permeability and low coercivity as measured
`along the easy axis. Therefore, figures of merit for low-
`frequency applications including high saturation
`
`1.00
`
`0.99
`
`0.98
`
`0.97
`
`0.96
`
` Efficiency
`
` f > 40 kHz
` 20 kHz < f ≤ 40 kHz
` f ≤ 20 kHz
`
`102
`
`104
`103
` 1 MVA Mass (kg)
`
`105
`
`Fig. 6. 1 MVA efficiency versus total mass of soft magnetic material
`required. With the modeled material, higher frequencies reduce the
`amount of material required but result in lower efficiencies.
`
`and nanocomposites maintain low losses above 200°C
`with k  9W=mK.32 The improved thermal proper-
`ties of nanocomposite materials greatly expand the
`envelope of acceptable designs. The total converter
`power level and the individual core power rating
`determine the number of subcomponents required
`for a converter design. Figure 6 shows the converter
`efficiency compared with the mass of soft magnetic
`material (density = 7.9 g/cm3) required to obtain 1
`MVA. For the modeled material, higher frequencies
`reduce the required mass but sacrifice efficiency.
`This illustrates the need for improved high-fre-
`quency magnetics to maintain high efficiency. A cost
`analysis is needed to determine the best overall de-
`sign and is the subject of future work. The shape
`ratios used to define R2 and d may not be optimal and
`were chosen based on assumed manufacturing limi-
`tations, such as ribbon width and structural integrity.
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 5 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`Leary, Ohodnicki, and McHenry
`
`The empirical constants are defined as in Ref. 28 to
`describe core loss in mW=cm3. Materials with a high
`power ratio must store large amounts of power
`efficiently. Although the actual amount of power
`stored in the material will differ due to the pulse
`width modulation and the duty cycle used, sinusoi-
`dal excitations are assumed here as most loss data is
`published using this waveform.
`Losses in soft magnetic materials consist of both
`static and dynamic hysteresis losses. To limit static
`hysteretic losses in bulk metal alloys such as silicon
`steels, metallurgists have sought to obtain large grain
`sizes in order to minimize domain wall pinning, lower
`coercivity, and hence reduce low-frequency losses.
`Hasegawa36 showed the advantages of magnetic
`materials with small crystalline grains within amor-
`phous alloys. The random anisotropy model developed
`by Alben et al.37 for amorphous ferromagnets was
`applied by Herzer38 to nanocrystalline ferromagnets
`and showed that a reduction in grain size well below
`the ferromagnetic exchange length can lead to a rapid
`decrease in coercivity. The review of amorphous and
`nanocomposite soft magnets in Ref. 39 describes the
`properties of these alloys in more detail.
`Dynamic losses consist of classical eddy current
`and anomalous or excess losses. Bertotti40 describes
`the classical eddy current power loss in Eq. 11,
`where t is the material thickness and q is the
`resistivity, as
`
`Pcl ¼ p2t2B2mf 2
`
`6q
`
`(11)
`
`This expression is valid when the material thick-
`ness is much less than the skin depth. Nanocom-
`posite materials with q  130 lX cm and lr = 1,000
`have a skin depth of 61 lm at 100 kHz and ribbons
`produced by rapid solidification are usually<30 lm
`thick suggesting that this expression is approxi-
`mately valid. Engineering approaches to limiting
`these losses focus on reducing thickness with thin
`laminations and increasing resistivity.
`Figure 8 shows the power ratio from 10 for dif-
`ferent soft magnetic materials described in Table I.
`Materials with poor performance at high frequen-
`cies, such as Si steels, and high permeability have
`low power ratios. The distributed air gap in powder
`cores allow for very low effective permeabilities
`and soft saturation, which can be beneficial for
`some applications. Ferrites can also achieve low
`permeability, but their low saturation induction
`and thermal conductivity restricts their use in
`high-power converters. Nanocomposite alloys con-
`sist of nanocrystals precipitated in an amorphous
`matrix and offer an extended set of processing
`dimensions such as grain size and volume fraction
`to tailor properties. Nanocomposite alloys of the
`FINEMET type41 have been most
`intensively
`studied, and hence, they represent the majority of
`data points in Fig. 8. The highest power ratios
`in the nanocomposites exhibit low permeabilities
`
`Fig. 7. Inductive energy storage for low-coercivity materials with
`different permeabilities. Low permeability materials store more en-
`ergy per cycle but must maintain low coercivity to prevent losses.
`
`magnetization and high permeability may not directly
`apply to power magnetic materials for relatively high
`frequency applications (10 kHz–1 MHz), though high
`permeability prior to inducing anisotropy is a good
`predictor of low losses. Therefore, materials with
`tunable permeabilities through carefully designed
`thermomagnetic or thermomechanical processing al-
`low designers to optimize the magnetic material to the
`active components.
`Several factors determine the performance of a
`magnetic material as a high-frequency inductor.
`The quality factor (Q) in Eq. 9 where l0 and l00 are
`the real and imaginary parts of complex perme-
`ability is a performance measure for an inductor.
`Q ¼ xL
`R
`
`¼ l0
`l00
`
`(9)
`
`High permeability materials saturate under low
`fields. For high power applications, the amount of
`energy stored must be considered as well as the
`losses, but the quality factor does not account for
`magnetic saturation. A figure of merit in Eq. 10
`compares the inductive energy stored per unit
`volume during a half cycle to the measured losses
`for a sinusoidal driving field during that period.
`Power Ratio ¼ Stored Power

`
`
`Power Loss
`1a
`
`
`
`12
`
`BmH2f
`
`
`
`1;000k
`
`f
`1;000
`
`¼ B2b
`
`m
`
`f
`1;000
`kl0lr
`
`a
`
`Bb
`m
`
`ð10Þ
`
`This quantity is valid for materials with constant
`permeability over the frequency range of interest.
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 6 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`Soft Magnetic Materials in High-Frequency, High-Power Conversion Applications
`
` Nanocomposite
` Ferrite
` Powder
` Amorphous
` Steel
` Cut Core
` Stress Annealed
` Field Annealed
`
`µr = 200
`
`µr = 2000
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5 6 7 8 9
`105
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5 6 7 8 9
`106
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Frequency (Hz)
`
`23456789
`
`23456789
`
`100
`
`10
`
`Power Ratio
`
`1
`
`104
`
`Fig. 8. Survey of published soft magnetic material performance. Dotted lines indicate Eq. 10 with k = 3.935, a = 1.585, and b = 1.888
`for l = 200, 2000 at Bm = 0.1T.
`
`thereby enhancing the maximum potential stored
`energy. In practice, this can be accomplished by
`cutting the core to induce an air gap or by engi-
`neering transverse anisotropy. Gapped Finemet
`cores42 and stress annealed material43,44 approach
`the calculated power ratio for the modeled material
`with low permeability and Bm = 0.1T as indicated.
`The field annealed Co-rich FeCo nanocomposite in
`Ref. 45 shows comparable performance with stress
`annealed Fe-rich alloys.
`
`Several published high frequency, high power
`converter designs demonstrate the advantages of
`et al.46
`nanocomposite
`core materials. Zhang
`describe a 100-kW bidirectional DC–DC power con-
`verter that switches at 25 kHz with 97.8% efficiency.
`This design uses three Finemet cores that account
`for 32% of the total loss. The advantages of high
`induction can be seen in Ref. 17, where a 30-kW
`converter with a Finemet core showed three times
`higher power density than a ferrite design at
`
`Table I. References and material descriptions from Fig. 8
`
`Reference
`
`Author
`
`Material
`
`[12] 1
`[12] 2
`[12] 3
`[49] 1
`[49] 2
`[42] 1
`[42] 2
`[43]
`[47]
`[31]
`[44]
`[50] 1
`[50] 2
`[51] 1
`[51] 2
`[51] 3
`[45]
`[52]
`[53]
`
`Li et al., 2010
`Li et al., 2010
`Li et al., 2010
`Rylko et al., 2010
`Rylko et al., 2010
`Fukunaga et al., 1990
`Fukunaga et al., 1990
`Yanai et al., 2008
`Long et al., 2008
`Rylko et al., 2009
`Fukunaga et al., 2002
`Yoshida et al., 2000
`Yoshida et al., 2000
`Endo et al., 2000
`Endo et al., 2000
`Endo et al., 2000
`Yoshizawa et al., 2003
`Kolano-Burian et al., 2008
`Martis and Rogers, 1994
`
`MnZn ferrocube 3F51
`NiZn ferrocube 4F1
`Cool Mu
`METGLAS 2605SA1
`JFE 10JNHF600
`FINEMET FT-1M cut core
`Ferrite TDK H3ST cut core
`Stress annealed FINEMET
`Cut core FeCo HTX-002
`MPP 26 powder
`Stress annealed FINEMET
`Amorphous Fe70Al5Ga2P9:65C5:75B4:6Si3 powder
`Mo-permalloy powder
`Mn-Zn ferrite
`ðFe0:97Cr0:03Þ76ðSi0:5B0:5Þ22C2 amorphous powder
`Sendust
`Field annealed Fe8:8Co70Cu0:6Nb2:6Si9B9 nanocomposite
`Field annealed Fe14:7Co58:8Cu1Nb3Si13:5B9 nanocomposite
`METGLAS 2705M
`
`Ex.1024 / IPR2022-00117 / Page 7 of 10
`APPLE INC. v. SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
`
`

`

`200 kHz. A 25-kW converter with a FeCo nanocom-
`posite core was 39% lighter than a Finemet-based
`design.47 Inoue shows a 6% efficiency improvement
`for a Finemet core compared with a previous ferrite
`design and predicts improved efficiencies with SiC
`switching.48
`
`FUTURE PROCESSING OPPORTUNITIES
`
`Low resistivities of electrical steels and thermal
`conductivity of ferrites limit their high-frequency
`power applications. Of the various bulk materials,
`amorphous alloys and nanocrystalline/amorphous
`nanocomposites are best suited for high-frequency
`and high-power applications because of the combi-
`nation of high resistivity, saturation induction, and
`thermal conductivity. Nanocomposites can be engi-
`neered with distinct advantages over amorphous
`alloys in terms of high-temperature stability making
`them superior candidates for long-term operation.
`The high Curie temperature of the amorphous phase
`in FeCo compositions54,55 allows for reduced cooling
`requirements and expands the allowable design
`space from Fig. 5. Conde et al.56,57 explore composi-
`tion modifications to FeCo nanocomposites to opti-
`mize microstructures. Processing considerations for
`nanocomposites are focused primarily on achieving
`thin and consistent ribbon cross sections through
`melt spinning or planar flow casting techniques as
`discussed in Ref. 58. Thin, high-quality ribbons al-
`low for a reduction in eddy current losses and an
`improved packing factor that will enable designers
`to take advantage of the higher induction levels in
`these materials and reduce component size. Two
`additional areas where high-frequency losses and
`the power ratio of Eq. 10 can be improved for nano-
`composite materials involve tuning permeability
`through advanced thermomechanical or thermomag-
`netic processing techniques and increasing resistivity
`through careful alloy selection.
`Because of the important role of the permeability
`in optimizing the performance of a magnetic core, a
`number of processing techniques has been devised
`to control the permeability for a given magnetic
`material. Adjustments to the annealing conditions
`produce hysteresis loops with constant permeability
`as a function of applied field up to core saturation.
`The two typical methods are magnetic field pro-
`cessing, where an external field is applied in either
`a parallel or circumferential direction with respect
`to the core axis, and stress annealing in which the
`sample is placed under tension during crystalliza-
`tion. In both cases, a controlled anisotropy induces
`permeability changes while maintaining random
`anisotropy and low coercivity. Induced anisotropy
`transverse to the field direction restricts domain
`wall movement and promotes low-loss rotational
`magnetization changes. For high-frequency and high-
`power applications, transverse induced anisotropy
`is desirable for minimizing anomalous eddy current
`losses and increasing the maximum stored energy.
`
`Leary, Ohodnicki, and McHenry
`
`Stress-induced anisotropy presents a promising
`method to tune anisotropy59 by magnetoelastic
`effects. However, while hardness is improved in
`Fe-based nanocomposite materials,60
`they can
`become brittle after crystallization. Co-based com-
`positions show improved mechanical properties61
`and large responses to transverse field anneal-
`ing,62,63 but the cost of Co may preclude widespread
`use. It is important to point out, however, that high-
`frequency power converters require significantly
`less material and may justify the use of more
`expensive compositions and processing techniques.
`The stress annealed materials in Fig. 8 illustrate
`the advantages of low permeability, but permeabil-
`ities <100 are not practical due to winding consid-
`erations. Research that focuses on mechanisms to
`limit eddy current losses presents the greatest
`opportunity to improve material performance.
`Resistivity and thermal conductivity are related to
`the atomic structure and in amorphous materials
`the disorder leads to increased electron scattering
`and increases resistivity. Composition adjustments
`to nanocomposite materials can further effect resistiv-
`ity by impacting grain size.64 Very high resistivities
`are correlated with decreased thermal conductivities
`that limit ferrite materials from use in high-power
`applications. This thermal conductivity limitation
`may also apply to nanogranular-based material
`approaches where an insulating oxide phase is
`continuous.19
`The kinetics of nanocrystallization and the
`sequence of crystallization events impact the prop-
`erties of nanocomposite materials.65 Recent work
`has demonstrated that large isotropic pressures on
`the order of 1 GPa can have a pronounced impact on
`the kinetics of crystallization from amorphous pre-
`cursors. In some cases, a large applied pressure
`enhances crystallization kinetics,66,67,68 while in
`other cases, it tends to inhibit crystallization.69,70
`Crystallization at elevated pressures is relevant for
`compaction to form bulk parts of arbitrary shape
`from rapidly solidified ribbons of amorphous metals.
`As a result, most fundamental investigations of the
`effects of large isotropic pressure on crystallization
`have focused on Al-based compositions with attrac-
`tive mechanical properties. In Ref. 68, the effects of
`applied pressure on crystallization were described
`by using the specific nucleation work (W) shown in
`Eq. 12, which is the sum of the activation e

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket