throbber
WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`preferred over those with lower average SNR; SCS/antennas with lower SNR variance are
`
`preferred to those with higher SNR variance; and SCS/antennas with a faster SNR rate of
`change.atthe on-set ofthe transmission are preferred to those with a slowerrate of change.
`The weighting applied to each of these criteria may be adjusted by the operatorofthe
`Wireless Location System to suit the particular design of each system.
`
`The candidate list of SCS’s 10 and antennas 10-1 are selected using a predeterminedset of
`criteria based, for example, upon knowledgeofthe typesofcell sites, types of antennas at
`the cell sites, geometry of the antennas, and a weighting factor that weights certain
`
`10
`
`antennas morethan other antennas. The weighting factor takes into account knowledge of
`
`the terrain in which the Wireless Location System is operating, past empirical data on the
`
`contribution of each antenna has made to goodlocation estimates, and other factors that
`
`maybe specific to each different WLSinstallation. In one embodiment, for example, the
`Wireless Location System mayselect the candidate list to include all SCS's 10 up to a
`maximum numberofsites (max_number_of_sites) that are closer than a predefined
`
`maximum radius from the primary site (max_radius_from_primary). For example, in an
`
`urban or suburban environment, where there may bea large numberof cell sites, the
`
`max_number_of_sites may be limited to nineteen. Nineteen sites would includethe
`primary,the first mng of six sites surrounding the primary (assuming a classic hexagonal
`distribution ofcell sites), and the next ring of twelve sites surroundingthefirst ring. This
`
`is depicted in Figure 9. In another embodiment, in a suburban or rural environment,
`
`max_radius_from_primary maybeset to 40 miles to ensure that the widest possible set of
`
`candidate SCS/antennas is available. The Wireless Location System is provided with
`
`meansto limit the total numberof candidate SCS’s 10 to a maximum number
`
`(max_number_candidates), although each candidate SCS maybe permitted to choose the
`
`best port from amongits available antennas. This limits the maximum time spent by the
`Wireless Location System processing a particular location. Max_number_candidates may
`be set to thirty-two, for example, which meansthatin a typical three sector wireless
`
`communications system with diversity, up to 32*6 = 192 total antennas could be
`
`considered for location processing for a particular transmission. In orderto limit the time
`spent processing a particular location, the Wireless Location System is provided with
`meansto limit the numberof antennas usedin the location processing to
`91
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1208 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1208 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`max_number_antennas_processed. Max_number_antennas_processedis generally less
`
`than max_number_candidates, andis typically set to sixteen.
`
`While the Wireless Location System is provided with the ability to dynamically determine
`
`the candidate list of SCS’s 10 and antennas based uponthe predeterminedsetofcriteria
`described above,the WirelessLocation System can also store a fixed candidate list in a
`table. Thus, for each cell site and sector in the wireless communications system,the
`Wireless Location System has a separate table that defines the candidate list of SCS’s 10
`
`and antennas 10-1 to use whenever a wireless transmitter initiates a transmission in that
`
`cell site and sector. Rather than dynamically choose the candidate SCS/antennas each time
`
`a location requestis triggered, the Wireless Location System reads the candidatelist
`
`directly from the table when location processingis initiated.
`
`In general, a large number of candidate SCS’s 10 is chosen to provide the Wireless
`
`Location System with sufficient opportunity and ability to measure and mitigate multipath.
`On any given transmission, any one or moreparticular antennas at one or more SCS’s 10
`
`may receive signals that have been affected to varying degrees by multipath. Therefore,it
`
`is advantageousto provide this means within the Wireless Location System to
`
`dynamically select a set of antennas which may havereceived less multipath than other
`
`antennas. The Wireless Location System uses various techniques to mitigate as much
`
`multipath as possible from any received signal; howeverit is frequently prudent to choose
`
`a set of antennas that contain the least amount of multipath.
`
`Choosing Reference and Cooperating SCS/Antennas
`in choosingthe set of SCS/antennas to use in location processing, the Wireless Location
`
`System orders the candidate SCS/antennas using severalcriteria, including for example:
`average SNR over the transmission interval used for location processing, the variance in
`the SNR over the sameinterval, correlation of the beginning of the received transmission
`
`against a pure pre-cursor(i.e. for AMPS,the dotting and Barker code) and/or demodulated -
`
`data from the primary SCS/antenna, the time of the on-set of the transmissionrelative to
`
`the on-set reported at the SCS/antenna at which the transmission was demodulated, and
`
`the magnitude andrate of change of the SNR from just before the on-set of the
`92
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1209 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1209 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`transmission to the on-set of the transmission, as well as other similar parameters. The
`
`average SNR is typically determined at each SCS, and for each antennain the candidate
`
`list either over the entire length of the transmission to be used for location processing, or
`
`over a shorterinterval. The average SNR overthe shorter interval can be determined by
`
`performing a correlation with the dotting sequence and/or Barker code and/or sync word,
`
`depending on the particular air interface protocol, and over a short range oftime before,
`
`during, and after the timestamp reported by the primary SCS10. The time range may
`typically be +/- 200 microsecondscentered at the timestamp, for example. The Wireless
`
`Location System will generally order the candidate SCS/antennas using the following
`criteria, each of which may be weighted when combiningthecriteria to determine the final
`decision: average SNR for a given SCS/antenna mustbe greater than a predetermined
`
`threshold to be used in location processing; SCS/antennas with higher average SNR are
`preferred over those with lower average SNR; SCS/antennas with lower SNR variance are
`
`preferred to those with higher SNR variance; SCS/antennas with an on-set closerto the
`
`on-set reported by the demodulating SCS/antennaare preferred to those with an on-set
`
`moredistant in time; SCS/antennas with a faster SNR rate of change are preferred to those
`with a slowerrate of change; SCS/antennas with lower incremental weighted GDOPare
`preferred over those with higher incremental weighted GDOP,where the weighting is
`based upon estimated path loss from the primary SCS. The weighting applied to each of
`these preferences may be adjusted by the operator of the Wireless Location System to suit
`the particular design of each system. The numberofdifferent SCS’s 10 used in the
`jocation processing 1s maximized up to a predetermined limit; the number of antennas
`used at each SCS 10 in limited to a predeterminedlimit; and the total number of
`
`20
`
`SCS/antennas usedis limited to max_number_antennas_processed. The SCS/antenna with
`the highest ranking using the above described processis designated as the reference
`
`25
`
`SCS/antennafor location processing.
`
`Best Port Selection Within an SCS 10
`
`Frequently, the SCS/antennas in the candidate list or in thelist to use in location
`
`30
`
`processing will include only one or two antennas at a particular SCS 10. In these cases, the
`Wireless Location System may permit the SCS 10 to choosethe “best port” from all or
`someofthe antennas at the particular SCS 10. For example, ifthe Wireless Location
`:
`93
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1210 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1210 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`Systemchoosesto use only one antennaata first SCS 10,then thefirstSCS 10 mayselect
`thebest antenna port from the typical six antennaports that are connected to that SCS 10,
`or it may choosethe best antenna port from amongthe two antennaports ofjust one sector
`ofthe cell site. The best antenna port ischosen by using the same process and comparing
`the same parameters as described above for choosing the set of SCS/antennas to use in
`
`location processing, except that all of the antennas being considered for best port are all in
`
`the same SCS10. In comparing antennas.for best port, the SCS 10 mayalso optionally
`divide the received signal into segments, and then measure the SNR separately in each
`segmentofthe received signal. Then, the SCS 10 can optionally choose the best antenna
`port with highest SNR either by(i) using the antenna port with the most segments with the
`highest SNR, (ii) averaging the SNR in all segments and using the antenna port with the
`highest average SNR, or(iii) using the antenna port with the highest SNR in any one
`
`segment.
`
`Detection and Recovery From Collisions
`Because the Wireless Location System will use data from many SCS/antenna ports in
`location processing, there is a chance that the received signal at one or more particular
`SCS/antenna ports contains energy that is co-channelinterference from another wireless
`transmitter (i.e. a partial or full collision between two separate wireless transmissions has
`
`occurred). There is also a reasonable probability that the co-channel interference has a
`
`much higher SNR than the signal from the target wireless transmitter, and if not detected
`
`by the Wireless Location System, the co-channel interference may cause an incorrect
`
`choice of best antenna port at an SCS 10, reference SCS/antenna, candidate SCS/antenna,
`
`or SCS/antennato be used in location processing. The co-channel interference mayalso
`
`cause poor TDOAand FDOAresults, leading to a failed or poor location estimate. The
`
`probability of collision increases with the density of cell sites in the host wireless
`
`communications system, especially in dense suburban or rural environments where the
`
`frequencies are re-used often and wireless usage by subscribersis high.
`
`Therefore, the Wireless Location System includes meansto detect and recover from the
`
`types of collisions described above. For example, in the process of selecting a bestport,
`
`reference SCS/antenna, or candidate SCS/antenna, the Wireless Location System
`94
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1211 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1211 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`determines the average SNR ofthe received signal and the variance of the SNR overthe
`
`interval of the transmission; when the variance of the SNR is above a predetermined
`
`threshold, the Wireless Location System assigns a probability that a collision has occurred.
`
`If the signal received at an SCS/antenna has increased or decreased its SNR in a single
`step, and by an amount greater than a predetermined threshold, the Wireless Location
`System assigns a probability that a collision has occurred.-Further, if the average SNR of
`
`the signal received at a remote SCSis greater than the average SNR that would be
`
`predicted by a propagation model, given the cell site at which the wireless transmitter
`
`initiated its transmission and the known transmit powerlevels and antenna patterns of the
`
`transmitter and receive antennas, the Wireless Location System assigns a probability that a
`
`collision has occurred. If the probability that a collision has occurred is above a
`
`predetermined threshold, then the Wireless Location System performsthe further
`
`processing described below to verify whether and to what extent a collision may have
`impaired the received signal at an SCS/antenna. The advantage of assigning probabilities
`is to reduce or eliminate extra processing for the majority of transmissions for which
`
`collisions have not occurred. It should be noted that the threshold levels,. assigned
`
`probabilities, and other details of the collision detection and recovery processes described
`
`herein are configurable, i.e., selected based on the particular application, environment,
`system variables,etc., that wouldaffect their selection.
`
`For received transmissions at an SCS/antenna for which the probability of a collision is
`above the predetermined threshold and before using RF data from a particular antenna port
`in a reference SCS/antenna determination, best port determination or in location
`
`processing, the Wireless Location System preferably verifies that the RF data from each
`antennaport is from the correct wireless transmitter. This is determined, for example, by
`demodulating segmentsof the received signal to verify, for example, that the MIN, MSID,
`or otheridentifying informationis corrector that the dialed digits or other message
`characteristics match those received by the SCS/antennathat initially demodulated the
`transmission. The Wireless Location System mayalso correlate a short segmentofthe
`received signalat an antennaport with the signal received at the primary SCS 10 to verify
`that the correlation result is above a predetermined threshold. If the Wireless Location
`System detects that the variance in the SNR overthe entire length of the transmission is _
`95
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1212 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1212 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`above a pre-determined threshold, the Wireless Location System may divide the
`
`transmission into segments and test each segment as described herein to determine
`whether the energy in that segmentis primarily from the signal from the wireless
`transmitter for which location processing has been selected or from an interfering
`transmitter.
`
`The Wireless Location System may chooseto use the RF data from a particular
`- §CS/antennain location processing even if the Wireless Location System has detected that
`
`a partial collision has occurred at that SCS/antenna.In these cases, the SCS 10 uses the
`means described abovetoidentify that portion of the received transmission which
`represents a signal from the wireless transmitter for which location processing has been
`
`selected, and that portion of the received transmission which contains co-channel
`
`interference. The Wireless Location System may commandthe SCS 10 to send or use only
`
`selected segments of the received transmission that do not contain the co-channel
`
`interference. When determining the TDOA and FDOAfora baseline using only selected
`
`segments from an SCS/antenna, the Wireless Location System uses only the
`
`corresponding segmentsof the transmission as received at the reference SCS/antenna. The
`
`Wireless Location System may continueto use all segments for baselines in which no .
`
`collisions were detected. In many cases, the Wireless Location System is able to complete
`
`location processing and achieve an acceptable location error using only a portion ofthe
`
`transmission. This inventive ability to select the appropriate subset of the received
`transmission and perform location processing on a segment by segment basis enables the
`Wireless Location System to successfully complete location processing in cases that might
`
`have failed using previous techniques.
`
`Multiple Pass Location Processing
`Certain applications may require a very fast estimate of the general location of a wireless
`transmitter, followed by a more accurate estimate of the location that can be sent
`
`subsequently. This can be valuable, for example, for E9-1-1 systems that handle wireless
`
`calls and must makea call routing decision very quickly, but can wait a little longer for a
`more exactlocation to be displayed upon the E9-1-1 call-taker’s electronic map terminal.
`
`96
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1213 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1213 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`The Wireless Location System supports these applications with an inventive multiple pass
`
`location processing mode.
`
`In manycases, location accuracy is enhanced by using longer segments ofthe
`
`transmission and increasing the processing gain through longerintegration intervals. But
`
`longer segments of the transmission require longer processing periods in the SCS 10 and
`
`TLP 12, as well as longer time periods for transmitting the RF data across the
`
`communications interface from the SCS 10 to the TLP 12. Therefore, the Wireless
`
`10
`
`Location System includes meansto identify those transmissionsthat require a fast but
`rough estimate of the location followed by more complete location processing that
`producesa better location estimate. The Signal of Interest Table includesaflag for each
`SignalofInterest that requires a multiple pass location approach. This flag specifies the
`maximum amountof time permitted by the requesting location application for the first
`estimate to be sent, as well as the maximum amountof time permitted by the requesting
`location application forthe final location estimate to be sent. The Wireless Location
`
`15
`
`System performsthe rough location estimate by selecting a subset of the transmission for
`
`whichto perform location processing. The Wireless Location System may choose, for
`example, the segmentthat was identified at the primary SCS/antenna with the highest
`average SNR. After the rough location estimate has been determined, using the methods
`described earlier, but with only a subset ofthe transmission, the TLP 12 forwardsthe
`location estimate to the AP 14, which then forwards the rough estimate to the requesting
`application with a flag indicating that the estimate is only rough. The Wireless Location
`
`System then performsits standard location processing using all of the aforementioned
`
`methods, and forwardsthis location estimate with a flag indicatingthefinal statusofthis
`location estimate. The Wireless Location System may perform the roughlocation estimate
`andthe final location estimate sequentially on the same DSP in a TLP 12, or may perform |
`the location processing in parallel on different DSP’s. Parallel processing may be
`necessary to meet the maximum time requirements of the requesting location applications.
`The Wireless Location System supports different maximum time requirements from
`different location applications for the same wireless transmission.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`97
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1214 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1214 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`Very Short Baseline TDOA
`The Wireless Location System is designed to operate inurban, suburban,andruralareas.
`In rural areas, when there are not sufficient cell sites available from a single wireless
`carrier, the Wireless LocationSystem can be deployed with SCS’s 10 located at the cell
`
`sites of other wireless carriers or at other types of towers, including AM or FM radio
`station, paging, and two-way wireless towers. In these cases, rather than sharing the
`existing antennas ofthe wireless carrier, the Wireless Location System mayrequire the
`installation of appropriate antennas,filters, and low noise amplifiers to match the
`
`frequency bandof the wireless transmitters of interest to be located. For example, an AM
`
`10
`
`radio station tower may require the addition of 800 MHz antennas to locate cellular band
`
`transmitters. There may be cases, however, where no additional towers of any type are
`
`available at reasonable cost and the Wireless Location System must be deployed onjust a
`
`few towersof the wireless carrier. In these cases, the Wireless Location System supports
`
`an antenna mode known as very short baseline TDOA.This antenna mode becomesactive
`
`whenadditional antennas are installed on a single cell site tower, whereby the antennas are
`
`placed at a distance of less than one wavelength apart. This may require the addition of
`
`just one antennapercell site sector such that the Wireless Location System uses one
`
`existing receive antennain a sector and one additional antenna that has been placed next to
`
`the existing receive antenna. Typically, the two antennas in the sector are oriented such
`that the primary axes,orline ofdirection, of the main beamsareparallel and the spacing
`betweenthe two antenna elements is known with precision.In addition, the two RF paths
`
`from the antenna elements to the receivers in the SCS 10 are calibrated.
`
`In its normal mode,the Wireless Location System determines the TDOA and FDOAfor
`
`pairs of antennathat are separated by many wavelengths. For a TDOAona baseline using
`
`antennas from two difference cell sites, the pairs of antennas are separated by thousands of
`
`wavelengths. Fora TDOAona baseline using antennas at the samecellsite, the pairs of
`
`antennas are separated by tens of wavelengths. In either case, the TDOA determination
`
`effectively results in a hyperbolic line bisecting the baseline and passing through the
`location of the wirelesstransmitter. When antennas are separated by multiple wavelengths,
`the received signal has taken independent paths from the wireless transmitter to each
`
`antenna, including experiencing different multipath and Doppler shifts. However, when
`98
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1215 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1215 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`two antennas are closer than one wavelength, the two received signals have taken
`
`essentially the same path and experienced the same fading, multipath, and Dopplershift.
`Therefore, the TDOA and FDOAprocessing of the Wireless Location System typically
`produces a Doppler shift of zero (or near-zero) hertz, and a time difference on the order of
`zero to one nanosecond.A time difference that short is equivalent to an unambiguous
`
`phase difference between the signals received at the two antennas on the very short
`
`baseline. For example, at 834 MHz, the wavelength of an AMPSreverse control channel
`
`transmission is about 1.18 feet. A time difference of 0.1 nanosecondsis equivalent to a
`
`received phase difference of about 30 degrees. In this case, the TDOA measurement
`
`10
`
`producesa hyperbolathat is essentially a straightline, still passing through the location of
`
`the wireless transmitter, and in a direction that is rotated 30 degrees from the direction of
`
`the parallel lines formed by the two antennas on the very short baseline. Whenthe results
`
`of this very short baseline TDOAatthe single cell site are combined with a TDOA
`measurementon a baseline between twocell sites, the Wireless Location System can —
`determinea location estimate using only twocell sites.
`
`Bandwidth Monitoring Method For Improving Location Accuracy
`
`AMPScellular transmitters presently comprise the large majority of the wireless
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`transmitters used in the U.S. and AMPSreverse voice channel transmissions are generally
`
`FM signals modulated by both voice and a supervisory audio tone (SAT). The voice
`
`modulation is standard FM,andis directly proportional to the speaking voice of the person
`using the wireless transmitter. In a typical conversation, each person speaksless that 35%
`of the time, which meansthat mostofthe time the reverse voice channelis not being
`modulated due to voice. With or without voice, the reverse channel is continuously
`modulated by SAT,which is used by the wireless communications system to monitor
`channel status. The SAT modulationrate is only about 6 KHz. The voice channels support
`in-band messagesthat are used for hand-off control and for other reasons, such as for
`
`establishing a 3-waycall, for answering a second incomingcali while already ona first
`
`call, or for responding to an ‘audit’ message from the wireless communications system.
`
`All of these messages, though carried on the voice channel, have characteristics similar to
`
`the control channel messages. These messagesare transmitted infrequently, and location
`
`99
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1216 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1216 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`systems have ignored these messages and focused on the more prevalent SAT
`
`transmissions as the signalof interest.
`
`In view of the above-described difficulties presented by the limited bandwidth of the FM
`
`voice and SAT reverse voice channel signals, an object of the present inventionis to
`
`provide an improved method by which reverse voice channel (RVC)signals may be
`
`utilized to locate a wireless transmitter, particularly in an emergency situation. Another
`
`object of the invention is to provide alocation methodthat allows the location system to
`
`avoid makinglocation estimates using RVC signals in situations in whichit is likely that
`
`the measurementwill not meet prescribed accuracy andreliability requirements. This
`
`saves system resources and improvesthe location system’s overall efficiency. The
`
`improved method is based upon two techniques. Figure 10A is a flowchart ofa first
`
`method in accordance with the present invention for measuring location using reverse
`
`voice channel signals. The method comprises the followingsteps:
`
`(i) It is first assumed that a user with a wireless transmitter wishes to be located, or
`
`wishesto have his location updated or improved upon. This maybethe case, for
`
`example, if the wireless user has dialed “911” and is seeking emergencyassistance.
`
`It is therefore also assumed that the user is coherent and in communication with a
`
`centrally located dispatcher.
`
`(ii) Whenthe dispatcherdesires a location update for a particular wireless transmitter,
`
`the dispatcher sends a location update command with the identity of the wireless
`
`transmitter to the Wireless Location System over an application interface.
`
`(iii) The Wireless Location System respondsto the dispatcher with a confirmation that
`
`the Wireless Location System has queried the wireless communications system and
`has obtained the voice channel assignmentfor the wireless transmitter.
`
`(iv) The dispatcherinstructs the wireless user to dial a 9 or more digit number and then
`
`the “SEND”button. This sequence may be somethinglike “123456789”or
`
`“911911911”. Two functions happen to the reverse voice channel whenthe
`
`wireless user dial a sequenceofat least 9 digits and then the “SEND”button.First,
`especially for an AMPScellular voice channel, the dialing of digits causes the
`
`sending of dual tone multi-frequency (DTMF) tones over the voice channel. The
`,
`100
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1217 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1217 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`modulation index of DTMF tonesis very high and during the sending of each digit
`
`in the DTMF sequencewill typically push the bandwidth ofthe transmitted signal
`
`beyond +/- 10 KHz. The second function occurs at the pressing of the “SEND”
`
`button. Whether or not the wireless user subscribes to 3-way calling or other
`
`special features, the wireless transmitter will send a message overthe voice using a
`
`“blank and burst” mode where the transmitter briefly stops sending the FM voice
`
`and SAT,and instead sends a bursty message modulated in the same manner as the
`
`control channel (10 Kbits Manchester). If the wireless user dials less than 9 digits,
`
`the messagewill be comprised of approximately 544 bits. If the wireless user dials
`
`9 or moredigits, the message is comprised of approximately 987 bits.
`
`(v) After notification by the dispatcher, the Wireless Location System monitors the
`
`bandwidth of the transmitted signal in the voice channel. As discussed earlier,
`
`when only the SAT is being transmitted, and even if voice and SAT are being
`transmitted, there maynotbe sufficient bandwidth in the transmitted signal to
`calculate a high quality location estimate. Therefore, the Wireless Location System
`conserves location processing resources and waits until the transmitted signal
`
`exceeds a predetermined bandwidth. This may be, for example, set somewhere in
`
`the range of 8 KHz to 12 KHz. When the DTMF dialed digits are sent or when the
`
`bursty messageis sent, the bandwidth would typically exceed the predetermined
`
`bandwidth.In fact, if the wireless transmitter does transmit the DTMF tones during
`_ dialing, the bandwidth would be expected to exceed the predetermined bandwidth
`multiple times. This would provide multiple opportunities to perform a location
`
`estimate. If the DTMF tonesare not sent during dialing, the bursty messageisstill
`sent at the time of pressing “SEND”, and the bandwidth would typically exceed the
`predetermined threshold.
`
`(vi) Only when the transmitted bandwidth of the signal exceeds the predetermined
`
`bandwidth, the Wireless Location System initiates location processing.
`
`Figure 10B is a flowchart of another method in accordancewith the present invention for
`
`measuring location using reverse voice channel signals. The method comprises the
`following steps:
`
`101
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1218 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1218 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`(i) It is first assumed that a user with a wireless transmitter wishes to be located, or
`
`wishesto have their location updated or improved upon. This maybe thecase, for
`
`example, if the wireless user has dialed “911” and is seeking emergencyassistance.
`
`It is assumed that the user may not wish to dial digits or may notbe able to dial any
`
`5
`
`digits in accordance with the previous method.
`
`(ii) When the dispatcher desires a location update for a particular wireless transmitter
`
`user, the dispatcher sends a location update commandto the Wireless Location
`
`System over an application interface with the identity of the wireless transmitter.
`
`(iil) The Wireless Location System responds to the dispatcher with a confirmation.
`(iv) The Wireless Location System commands the wireless communications system to
`makethe wireless transmitter transmit by sending an “audit”or similar message to
`the wireless transmitter. The audit message is a mechanism by whichthe wireless
`
`communications system can obtain a response from the wireless transmitter
`
`without requiring an action by the end-user and without causing the wireless
`
`transmitter to ring or otherwisealert. The receipt of an audit message causes the
`wireless transmitter to respond with an “audit response” message on the voice
`channel.
`
`(v) After notification by the dispatcher, the Wireless Location System monitors the
`
`bandwidth of the transmitted signal in the voice channel. As discussedearlier,
`
`whenonly the SATis being transmitted, and even if voice and SATare being
`transmitted, there may notbe sufficient bandwidth in the transmitted signal to
`calculate a high quality location estimate. Therefore, the radio location conserves
`location processing resources and waits until the transmitted signal exceeds a
`predetermined bandwidth. This may be, for example, set somewherein the range
`of 8 KHz to 12 KHz. Whenthe audit response messageis sent, the bandwidth
`
`would typically exceed the predetermined bandwidth.
`(vi) Only when the transmitted bandwidth ofthe signal exceeds the predetermined
`bandwidth, the Wireless Location System initiates location processing.
`
`Estimate Combination Method For Improving Location Accuracy
`The accuracy ofthe location estimate provided by the Wireless Location System may be
`improved by combining multiple statistically-independent location estimates made while
`102
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1219 of 2414
`
`Apple Exhibit 1002
`Page 1219 of 2414
`
`

`

`WO 00/40992
`
`PCT/US99/29507
`
`the wireless transmitter is maintaining its position. Even when a wireless transmitteris
`
`perfectly stationary, the physical and RF environment around a wireless transmitteris
`
`constantly changing. For example, vehicles may changetheir position or another wireless
`
`transmitter which had caused a collision during one location estimate may have stopped
`transmitting or changedits position so as to no longercollide during subsequent location
`estimates. The location estimate provided by the Wireless Location System will therefore
`
`changefor each transmission, even if consecutive transmissions are made within a very
`short period of time, and each location estimateis statistically independentofthe other
`estimates, particularly with respect to the errors caused by the changing environment.
`
`Whenseveral consecutive statistically independent location estimates are made for a
`wireless transmitter that has not changedits position, the location estimates will tend to
`cluster aboutthe true position. The Wireless Location System combinesthe location
`estimates using a weighted averageor other similar mathematical construct to determine
`the improved estimate. The use of a weighted averageis aided by the assignmentof a
`quality factor to each independentlocation estimate. This quality factor may be based
`upon, for example, the correlation values, confidenceinterval, or other similar
`
`measurements derived from the location processing for e

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket