throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`6:21-CV-00023-ADA
`
`6:21-CV-00074-ADA
`
`§§
`
`






`
`§§
`
`






`
`ORDER
`
`TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
` Plaintiff
`
`-vs-
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
` Defendant
`
`TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
` Plaintiff
`
`-vs-
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
` Defendant
`
`Plaintiff Traxcell filed the above-titled two actions against defendants Google and Apple,
`
`asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,549,388 (“the ’388 patent”) and 9,918,196 (“the
`
`’196 patent”) (collectively, “the asserted patents”) against each defendant. On August 6, 2021,
`
`Traxcell filed a Motion to Amend Complaint in both cases, attempting to assert a third patent —
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,820,147 — against both defendants. -023 Action at Dkt. 26; -074 Action at
`
`Dkt. 27. Before the Court ruled on Traxcell’s Motion to Amend Complaint, on October 25, 2021,
`
`Traxcell filed an Unopposed Amended Motion to Dismiss in each action, requesting the Court to
`
`dismiss its infringement claims against Google and Apple regarding the ’388 and ’196 patents
`
`without prejudice. -023 Action at Dkt. 33; -074 Action at Dkt. 38. Neither defendant has filed an
`
`answer in either action. The Court subsequently granted Traxcell’s Motion to Amend Complaint
`
`on November 19, 2021. -023 Action at Dkt. 35; -074 Action at Dkt. 46. Defendants contend that
`
`Traxcell’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss immediately divested this Court of jurisdiction to
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 1019 / IPR2022-00073/ Page 1 of 3
`Apple Inc. v. Traxcell Technologies, LLC
`
`

`

`resolve any motions, rendering all pending motions moot. The Court held hearings on December
`
`6 and 13, 2021, where the parties presented further arguments regarding the defendants’
`
`contentions. After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments during the hearings and the
`
`applicable law, the Court finds that the above-titled two actions should be DISMISSED
`
`WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) states, in pertinent part, that “the plaintiff
`
`may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the
`
`opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`41(a)(1)(A)(i). “[A] plaintiff’s right to file a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) before
`
`the service of an answer or motion for summary judgment is absolute and unconditional.” Int’l
`
`Driver Training Inc. v. J-BJRD Inc., 202 F. App’x 714, 715 (5th Cir. 2006) (quotation omitted).
`
`Furthermore, dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is “immediately self-effectuating” and
`
`requires no response from the Court or the opposing party. Qureshi v. United States, 600 F.3d
`
`523, 525 (5th Cir. 2010).
`
`Although Traxcell filed an unopposed Motion to Dismiss, rather than a “notice of
`
`dismiss,” the Court finds that it is a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in substance.
`
`See Rozelle v. Lowe, No. SA-16-CV-489-XR, 2016 WL 7228768, at *4-5, n.5 (W.D. Tex. Dec.
`
`13, 2016) (“Though [filings may] not [be] formally titled as notices of dismissal, ‘it is its content,
`
`not its label that matters’ in construing a filing as a notice of dismissal under Rule 41.”) (citation
`
`omitted); see also Williams v. Ezell, 531 F.2d 1261, 1263 (5th Cir. 1976) (finding a filing “styled
`
`a ‘Motion for Dismissal’ rather than a ‘Notice of Dismissal’ is, in our opinion, a distinction
`
`without a difference”). Because a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is “immediately self-
`
`effectuating,” “the district court is divested of jurisdiction over the case by the filing of the notice
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 1019 / IPR2022-00073
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`of dismissal itself.” Qureshi, 600 F.3d at 525. Therefore, the Court finds that Traxcell’s claims
`
`against Google and Apple were effectively dismissed on October 25, 2021 when Traxcell filed
`
`its Unopposed Amended Motion to Dismiss.
`
`It is therefore ORDERED that the above-identified two actions be DISMISSED
`
`WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
`
`SIGNED this 16th day of December, 2021.
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`3
`
`Exhibit 1019 / IPR2022-00073
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket