Apple Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC
`
`1
`
`IPR2022-00031
`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`IPR2022-00033
`U.S. Patent No. 10,423,658
`
`IPR2022-00032
`U.S. Patent No. 9,552,376
`
`PGR2022-00006
`U.S. Patent No. 11,017,020
`
`Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2035
`Apple v. MemoryWeb - IPR 2022-00032
`
`

`

`2
`
`Overview of the Challenged Patents:
`Methods of Organizing and Displaying
`Digital Files that Allow Preservation of
`Memory Details
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Overview of the Challenged Patents
`
`3
`
`[228]EX1001, 1:61-67
`
`[228]EX1001, 13:31-35
`
`[228]EX1001; [658]EX1001;
`[376]EX1001; [020]EX1001
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 1; [658]POR, 1; [376]POR, 1; [228]POR, 1
`
`

`

`Patents Overview – Views
`
`4
`
`Map View
`
`Location View
`
`People View
`
`Person View
`
`Ex. 1001, FIG. 34
`
`Ex. 1001, FIG. 32
`
`Ex. 1001, FIG. 7
`
`Ex. 1001, FIG. 41
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 2-6; [658]POR, 2-5; [376]POR, 2-5; [228]POR, 2-6
`
`

`

`Overview – the “map view” including
`an “interactive map”
`
`5
`
`EX1001, FIG. 41
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[658]POR, 2-3; [376]POR, 2-3; [228]POR, 2-3
`
`[228]EX1001, 29:48 – 55
`
`

`

`Patent Overview – “location view”
`
`6
`
`EX1001, FIG. 34
`
`[228]EX1001, 24:37-41
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[658]POR, 3; [376]POR, 3-4; [228]POR, 3
`
`

`

`Patent Overview – “people view”
`
`7
`
`EX1001, FIG. 32 (excerpted)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 2-3; [658]POR, 4; [376]POR, 4; [228]POR, 3-5
`
`EX1001, FIG. 7
`
`

`

`Patent Overview – “person view”
`
`8
`
`EX1001, FIG. 32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 3; [658]POR, 4-5; [228]POR, 6
`
`EX1001, FIG. 7
`
`

`

`Patent Overview – “detail view”
`
`9
`
`[658]EX1001, 5:64-6:1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, FIG. 2
`
`[658]POR, 5
`
`

`

`Patent Overview – Ease of Navigation and Organization
`
`10
`
`[228]EX2025, ¶63; [658]EX2025, ¶64; [376]EX2025, ¶65; [228]EX2025, ¶63
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 6-7; [658]POR, 6; [376]POR, 5; [228]POR, 6-7
`
`

`

`The ‘020 Patent – Claim 1
`
`11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]EX1001, claim 31; [020]POR, 3-16; [020]POSR, 8-12
`
`

`

`The ‘020 Patent – Claim 31
`
`12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]EX1001, claim 31; [020]POR, 3-16; [020]POSR, 8-12
`
`

`

`The ‘228 Patent – Claim 1
`
`13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[228]EX1001, claim 1
`
`

`

`The ‘376 Patent – Claim 1
`
`14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[376]EX1001, claim 1
`
`

`

`The ‘658 Patent – Claim 1
`
`15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[658]EX1001, claim 1; [658]POR, 15-27; [658]POSR, 8-13
`
`

`

`16
`
`A3UM (Ex. 1005) is not prior art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Public accessibility requires more than
`technical accessibility
`
`17
`
`Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.,
`908 F.3d 765, 773 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
`
`Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Infobridge Pte. Ltd.,
`929 F.3d 1363, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
`
`“The Board then correctly noted that ‘public accessibly’
`requires more than technical accessibility. . . . [D]espite some
`indexing and search functionality on the website, Lin was not
`publicly accessible. . . . ”
`
`“a work is not publicly accessible if the only people
`who know how to find it are the ones who created it”
`
`“Samsung did not offer evidence, apart from the
`speculation of Mr. Bross, that a person of ordinary
`skill, exercising reasonable diligence, would have
`located the JCT-VC website or even known to look for
`it. . . . even a person who found the JCT-VC website
`lacked a reasonable way of locating the WD4
`reference unless they already knew what to look for
`and where to look for it.”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 1; [658]POR, 29; [376]POR, 20; [228]POR, 17
`
`

`

`18
`
`Petitioner failed to
`show that a POSITA
`exercising reasonable
`diligence would have
`located A3UM via
`apple.com
`
`The A3UM HTML
`files on apple.com
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Petitioner relies on a POSITA having a priori knowledge of
`Aperture 3 and A3UM
`
`19
`
`The Petition
`
`[020]Petition, 19; [658]Petition, 16; [376]Petition, 17; [228]Petition, 17
`
`Dr. Terveen
`
`Corning Optical Comm’ns LLC v. Dali Wireless, Inc.
`IPR2021-00762, Paper 37 at 20 (PTAB Oct. 11, 2022)
`
`“we determine whether the evidence before us shows
`persons interested in and ordinarily skilled in the
`subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence,
`would have been able to locate FlexWave Prism Manual
`in the EAS database without a priori knowledge of the
`reference”
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶100; [658]EX1003, ¶101; [376]EX1003, ¶101; [228]EX1003, ¶100
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 1; [658]POSR, 1; [376]POSR, 1; [228]POSR, 1
`
`

`

`There is no evidence that a POSITA would have known of
`Aperture 3 and A3UM
`
`20
`
`Dr. Terveen was unaware of Aperture 3’s existence
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶46; [658]EX1003, ¶ 43; [376]EX1003, ¶ 43; [228]EX1003, ¶ 43
`
`EX2023, 49:14-50:11, 52:2-4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 1; [020]POR, 33-34; [658]POR, 31; [658]POSR, 1; [376]POR, 22; [376]POSR, 2; [228]POR, 19; [228]POSR, 2
`
`

`

`There is no evidence that a POSITA would have known of
`Aperture 3 and A3UM
`
`21
`
`Petitioner’s proposed searches require a priori
`knowledge of Aperture
`
`Corning Optical Comm’ns LLC v. Dali Wireless, Inc.
`IPR2021-00762, Paper 37 at 20 (PTAB Oct. 11, 2022)
`
`“we determine whether the evidence before us shows
`persons interested in and ordinarily skilled in the
`subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence,
`would have been able to locate FlexWave Prism Manual
`in the EAS database without a priori knowledge of the
`reference”
`
`[020]Reply, 10; [658]Reply, 10; [376]Reply, 4; [228]Reply, 4-5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 1; [020]POR, 33-34; [658]POR, 31; [658]POSR, 1; [376]POR, 22; [376]POSR, 2; [228]POR, 19; [228]POSR, 2
`
`

`

`There is no evidence that a POSITA would have known of
`Aperture 3 and A3UM
`
`22
`
`Apple Press Release
`
`EX1048, 1
`
`Corning Optical Comm’ns LLC v. Dali Wireless, Inc.
`IPR2021-00762, Paper 37 at 20 (PTAB Oct. 11, 2022)
`“Mr. Stravitz did not opine and the record evidence
`does not show, whether one of ordinary skill in the art
`or one interested in the subject matter would have
`used ‘ADS Telecommunications’ as a search term,
`absent a priori knowledge of the FlexWave Prism
`Manual”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1089, 204:9-24
`
`[020]POSR, 1-2; [658]POSR, 1-2; [376]POSR, 2-3; [228]POSR, 2-3
`
`

`

`Petitioner cannot establish what was allegedly on its
`website in 2010
`
`23
`
`The website and associated analytics no
`longer exist
`
`The webpage contents were not captured
`by the Internet Archive
`Dr. Terveen
`
`EX2026, 49:14-17
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶102; [658]EX1003, ¶103; [376]EX1003, ¶103; [228]EX1003, ¶102
`
`Mr. Birdsell
`
`EX2026, 49:14-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 38-40; [020]POSR, 3; [658]POR, 35-37; [658]POSR, 2-3; [376]POR, 27-28; [376]POSR, 3-4; [228]POR, 24-26; [228]POSR, 3-4
`
`

`

`Petitioner mischaracterizes Mr. Birdsell’s speculative and
`uncorroborated testimony
`
`24
`
`The Reply
`
`Mr. Birdsell’s Testimony
`
`[020]Reply, 7; [658]Reply, 7; [376]Reply, 1; [228]Reply, 2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX2026, 54:15-55:4
`
`[020]POSR, 7; [658]POSR, 7; [376]POSR, 8; [228]POSR, 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1005 is inconsistent with Petitioner’s Internet Archive
`Ex. 1005 Is inconsistent with Petitioner's Internet Archive
`printout
`orintout
`
`25
`Yao
`
`Ex. 1005
`Ex. 1005
`
`Petitioner’s Internet Archive Printout
`Petitioner’s Internet Archive Printout
`
`Welcome to Aperture
`Aperture is a powerful and easy-to-use digital image management system that can track thousands of
`digital images and provides the avid photographer with high-quality image managementand adjustment
`tools.
`
`With Aperture, you can efficiently import digital images, perform a photo edit, adjust and retouch
`images, publish images for the web orprint, export libraries for use on other Aperture systems, merge
`libraries, and back up your entire imagelibrary for safekeeping. Aperture lets you work with high-quality
`JPEG, TIFF, and RAW image files—and even HD video files—directly from your camera or card reader and
`maintain that high quality throughout your workflow.
`
`Copyright © 2009 Apple Inc. All rights reserved
`
`» Making Brushed Adjustments:
`» Printing Your Images
`» Exporting Your Images
`» Creating Slideshow Presentations
`» Using the Light Table
`» Creating Books
`» Creating Webpages
`» Sharing Your Images Online
`» Backing Up Your Images
`» Customizing the Aperture
`
`Copyright © 2009Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
`EX1005, 1
`EX1005, 1
`
`https!/Wweb.archive.org/web/20 100726 1 52004/http:documentationapple.com/en/aperture/usermanual/
`
`EX1021, 6
`EX1021, 6
`
`Complete Internet Archive Printout
`Complete Internet Archive Printout
`
`Making Brushed Adjustments
`Printing Your Images
`Exporting Your Images
`Creating Slideshow Presentations
`Using the Light Table
`Creating Books
`Creating Webpages.
`‘Sharing Your Images Online.
`Racking Up Your Images
`Customizing the Aperture Workspace
`Appendix A: Calibrating Your Aperture
`System
`Appendix 8: Setting Up an Aperture
`‘System
`Glossary
`
`https://web.archive.org/iweb/20100726 152004/http://documentation.apple.com/en/aperture/usermanual/
`
`All rights reserved.
`
`Copyright & 2011 Apple Inc.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 39-40; [020]POSR, 7; [658]POR, 37-38; [658]POSR, 7; [376]POR, 28-29; [376]POSR, 8; [228]POR, 25-26; [228]POSR, 9
`[O20]POR, 39-40; [020]POSR, 7; [658]POR, 37-38; [658]POSR, 7; [376]POR, 28-29; [376]POSR, 8; [228]POR, 25-26; [228]POSR, 9
`
`EX2009
`EX2009
`
`

`

`Mr. Birdsell’s testimony should be given little weight
`
`26
`
`Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v. All-Tag Sec., S.A.,
`412 F.3d 1331, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
`“Thus, ‘[t]he Supreme Court recognized over one hundred years ago that
`testimony concerning invalidating activities can be ‘unsatisfactory’ due to ‘the
`forgetfulness of witnesses, their liability to mistakes, their proneness to
`recollect things as the party calling them would have them recollect them . . ..’’”
`
`Carella v. Starlight Archery & Pro Line Co.,
`804 F.2d 135, 138 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
`
`Parrot S.A. v. Qfo Labs, Inc.,
`IPR2018-01690, Paper 40 at 63-64 (PTAB Feb. 20, 2020)
`
`“unsupported oral testimony” offered “to prove prior
`knowledge or use…must be regarded with suspicion”
`
`affording party testimony little weight when not
`corroborated by “objective record evidence”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 3
`
`

`

`27
`
`A POSITA exercising
`reasonable diligence
`would not have
`located the hidden
`HTML files on an
`installation DVD
`
`A3UM on an
`installation DVD
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`A3UM was hidden on Aperture 3 installation DVDs
`
`28
`
`Dr. Terveen’s Declaration
`
`Dr. Terveen’s Deposition
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶¶77, 79; [658]EX1003, ¶¶78, 80;
`[376]EX1003, ¶¶78, 80; [228]EX1003, ¶¶77, 79
`
`EX2023, 67:23-68:14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 42-44; [020]POSR, 4; [658]POR, 39-41; [658]POSR, 4-5; [376]POR, 30-32; [376]POSR, 5; [228]POR, 27-29; [228]POSR, 5
`
`

`

`A3UM was hidden on Aperture 3 installation DVDs
`
`29
`
`Dr. Terveen was guided by “tips” from counsel to find the hidden HTML files
`
`EX2023, 63:23-64:5
`
`EX2023, 73:10-16
`
`EX2023, 73:17-23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 42-44; [020]POSR, 4; [658]POR, 39-41; [658]POSR, 4; [376]POR, 30-32; [376]POSR, 5; [228]POR, 27-29; [228]POSR, 5
`
`

`

`A POSITA lacked a reasonable way to locate the hidden
`HTML files
`
`30
`
`There is no search functionality on the DVD for locating the HTML files
`
`Dr. Surati
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶¶118-19; [658]EX2025, ¶¶119-20;
`[376]EX2025, ¶¶125-26; [228]EX2025, ¶¶110-11
`
`Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.,
`908 F.3d 765, 773 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
`“The Board then correctly noted that ‘public accessibly’
`requires more than technical accessibility. . . . [D]espite
`some indexing and search functionality on the website,
`Lin was not publicly accessible. . . . ”
`
`Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Infobridge Pte. Ltd.,
`929 F.3d 1363, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
`“ . . . even a person who found the JCT-VC website lacked a
`reasonable way of locating the WD4 reference unless they
`already knew what to look for and where to look for it.”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 49; [020]POSR, 4; [658]POR, 47; [658]POSR, 4; [376]POR, 38; [376]POSR, 5; [228]POR, 35; [228]POSR, 6
`
`

`

`Accessing the HTML files requires copying and
`decompressing a specific file package
`
`31
`
`Dr. Terveen used “tips” from counsel as a shortcut to finding the HTML files
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶80; [658]EX1003, ¶81; [376]EX1003, ¶81; [228]EX1003, ¶80
`
`EX2023, 79:10-15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 42-44; [020]POSR, 4; [658]POR, 39-41; [658]POSR, 4-5; [376]POR, 30-32; [376]POSR, 5; [228]POR, 27-29; [228]POSR, 5
`
`

`

`Petitioner offered no evidence of Aperture 3 sales
`
`32
`
`Mr. Birdsell’s uncorroborated speculation is insufficient
`
`Mr. Birdsell’s Declaration
`
`Mr. Birdsell’s Deposition
`
`EX1020, ¶5
`
`EX1020, ¶7
`[020]POR, 40-41; [020]POSR, 2-3; [658]POR, 38-39; [658]POSR, 2-3; [376]POR, 29-30; [376]POSR, 3-4; [228]POR, 26-27; [228]POSR, 3-5
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX2026, 53:16-54:14
`
`

`

`There is no evidence that users who upgraded from a
`prior version had the DVD
`
`33
`
`Mr. Birdsell could not remember whether upgrading to Aperture 3 required a DVD
`
`EX2026, 62:23-63:20; 65:5-13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 41, 52, 56-57; [658]POR, 39, 50, 54-55; [376]POR, 30, 41, 46; [228]POR, 27, 38, 42-43;
`
`

`

`34
`
`Petitioner failed to
`show that A3UM as
`installed on a Mac
`computer is a printed
`publication
`
`A3UM after
`installing Aperture 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`The A3UM Help window is a software product, not a
`printed publication
`
`35
`
`Part of an executing software product is not a printed publication
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 52-55; [020]POSR, 5-6; [658]POR, 50-53; [658]POSR, 5-6; [376]POR, 41-44; [376]POSR, 6-7; [228]POR, 52-55; [228]POSR, 7
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶¶86-88; [658]EX1003, ¶¶87-89; [376]EX1003, ¶¶87-89; [228]EX1003, ¶¶86-88
`
`

`

`36
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Motion to Exclude
`
`Petitioner failed to
`properly authenticate
`Ex. 1005
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Petitioner did not authenticate Ex. 1005
`
`37
`
`Dr. Terveen
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶73
`
`Mr. Birdsell
`
`EX1020, ¶4
`
`EX2023, 61:9-17
`
`EX2026, 41:11-16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]Paper 35, 2-6; [658]Paper 34, 2-6; [376]Paper 35, 2-6; [228]Paper 34, 2-6
`
`

`

`38
`
`Petitioner failed to show that the challenged
`claims are unpatentable
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Outline of Presentation: Petitioner failed to show the
`challenged claims are unpatentable
`
`39
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`‘228, claims 8-9
`• Belitz does not disclose modifying the indication feature responsive
`to zooming in or out
`‘658, claim 1:
`• Petitioner did not identify a distinct “application view” in A3UM
`‘228, claim 1; ‘658, claim 1; ‘376, claim 1 (and 12)
`• A POSITA would not combine A3UM and Belitz
`‘020, claims 11 and 43
`• A3UM does not disclose a “group image”
`‘020, claim 3 and 35
`• A POSITA would not have modified the A3UM Places toolbar button
`function
`‘020, claims 7 and 39
`• A POSITA would not have modified the A3UM Places toolbar button
`position
`‘376, claim 5 (and 12)
`• Petitioner failed to show that claim 5 of the ‘376 patent is obvious
`over A3UM
`‘020, claims 6-7 and 38-39
`• These claims do not lack written description
`
`‘020, claim 1
`• A3UM does not disclose displaying a selectable “map image”
`responsive to an input indicative of a selection of the first person
`• A POSITA would not modify the A3UM Faces browser
`• A3UM does not disclose displaying a “slideshow”
`‘020, claims 13-16 and 45-48
`• A3UM does not disclose different “first” and “second” map images
`‘658, claims 7-12
`• A3UM does not disclose displaying a person-location selectable
`element “responsive to” a click or tap of a person selectable
`thumbnail image
`• A3UM does not disclose distinct “first” and “second” person-location
`selectable elements
`‘228, claim 15; ‘658, claims 3-4; ‘376, claim 1 (and 12)
`• Petitioner’s characterizations of the A3UM Places view are incorrect
`‘228, claim 1; 658, claim 5; ‘020, claim 24
`• A3UM does not disclose or render obvious including videos within the
`Faces feature
`‘376, claim 1
`• A3UM does not disclose an interactive map comprising a majority
`portion of a screenshot
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`

`

`40
`
`‘020 Patent, claims 1
`and 31
`
`A3UM does not
`disclose
`“responsive
`to…causing”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘020:“responsive to…causing” requires a cause-effect
`relationship
`
`41
`
`Patent
`
`‘020
`
`‘020
`
`Claim Term
`
`Patent Owner’s Construction
`
`Petitioner’s Construction
`
`“responsive to an input indicative
`of a selection of the first person . . .
`causing a first person view to be
`displayed on the interface” (claims
`1, 31)
`
`“responsive to an input that is
`indicative of a selection of the first
`digital file in the first person view,
`causing a slideshow to be
`displayed on the interface, the
`slideshow including a plurality of
`images associated with the first
`person” (claim 1)
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning: a
`cause-effect relationship between (i)
`an input that is indicative of a
`selection associated with the first
`person and (ii) causing a first person
`view to be displayed on the interface
`
`[020]POR, 8-12
`Plain and ordinary meaning: requiring
`a cause-effect relationship between
`(i) an input that is indicative of a
`selection of the first digital file in the
`first person view and (ii) causing a
`slideshow to be displayed on the
`interface
`
`[020]POR, 15-16
`
`“the [claimed] phrase can
`encompass methods that,
`after the ‘input indicative of
`a selection,’ include
`intervening actions by the
`computer and/or a user
`that enable or are directly
`associated with ‘causing’
`the action”
`
`[020]Reply, 4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘020: “responsive to…causing” requires a cause-effect
`relationship
`Petitioner does not attempt to distinguish any of the authority in Patent Owner’s Response construing “responsive
`to” or “in response to” as requiring a cause-effect relationship
`
`42
`
`Am. Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co.,
`651 F.3d 1318, 1339-40 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
`
`construing the phrase “in response to” as requiring a
`“cause-and-effect relationship”
`
`Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components
`Indus., LLC,
`IPR2018-00180, 2019 WL 2237863, *8 (PTAB May 23, 2019)
`
`“[t]he phrase ‘in response to’ connotes a cause-and-
`effect relationship”
`
`Progressive Semiconductors Sols. LLC v.
`Qualcomm Techs. Inc.,
`2014 WL 4385938, *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2011)
`
`“[t]he plain meaning of ‘in response to’ conveys a
`stimulus and an effect”
`
`Fujitsu ltd. v. Belkin Int’l, Inc.,
`No. 10-CV-03972-LHK, 2012 WL 4497966, at *28
`(N.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2012)
`construing the phase “in response to” as “connoting a
`cause-and effect relationship rather than a straight
`temporal sequence”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 10-11
`
`

`

`‘020: “responsive to…causing” requires a cause-effect
`relationship
`
`43
`
`Dr. Surati’s declaration testimony is unrebutted
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶125
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶135
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 8-12, 15-16
`
`

`

`‘020: “responsive to…causing” requires a cause-effect
`relationship
`
`44
`
`The specification confirms Patent Owner’s construction
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶128
`
`[020]EX1001, FIGS. 6-7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 8-12, 15-16
`
`

`

`‘020: “responsive to…causing” requires a cause-effect
`relationship
`
`45
`
`EX2028
`
`EX2029
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 11-12; [020]POSR, 8
`
`

`

`‘020: Petitioner mischaracterizes Dr. Surati’s testimony
`
`46
`
`[020]Claim 1: “responsive to an input that is indicative of a selection of the first digital file in the first person view,
`causing a slideshow to be displayed on the interface, the slideshow including a plurality of images associated
`with the first person”
`
`Petitioner’s question
`
`Dr. Surati’s answer
`
`EX1089, 379:18-380:12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1089, 381:11-25
`
`[020]POSR, 9
`
`

`

`‘020: “responsive to…causing” requires a cause-effect
`relationship
`
`47
`
`[020]EX1001, 7:15-18
`
`TIP Systems, LLC v. Philips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc.
`529 F.3d 1364, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
`“[T]he claims of the patent need not encompass all disclosed
`embodiments. . . . Our precedent is replete with examples of
`subject matter that is included in the specification, but is not
`claimed. . . . [T]he mere fact that there is an alternative
`embodiment disclosed in the ‘828 patent that is not
`encompassed by the district court’s claim construction does
`not outweigh the language of the claims.”
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶136
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 9-10
`
`

`

`‘020: Petitioner agrees the “map image” is displayed in
`the “person view”
`
`48
`
`The Reply
`
`[020]Reply, 24
`
`Claims 1 and 31
`
`Dr. Surati
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶125
`
`[020]POSR, 15
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does display a “first person view” including a
`“first map image” responsive to an input
`
`49
`
`Claims 1, 31: “responsive to an input that is indicative of a selection associated with the first person, causing a
`first person view to be displayed on the interface, the first person view including: . . . a first map image ”
`
`alleged map image
`
`alleged map image
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]Petition, 30-31
`
`[020]POR, 60-61
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does not disclose a “first person view”
`including a “first map image”
`
`50
`
`Claims 1, 31: “responsive to an input that is indicative of a selection associated with the first person, causing a
`first person view to be displayed on the interface, the first person view including: . . . a first map image ”
`
`Dr. Surati
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶160
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶162
`
`[020]Petition, 30
`
`[020]POR, 60-63; [020]POSR, 13-14
`
`

`

`51
`
`‘020 Patent, claims 1
`and 31
`
`A3UM does not
`disclose a
`selectable “first
`map image”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does not disclose a “first person view”
`including a selectable “first map image”
`
`52
`
`Claims 1, 31: “responsive to an input that is indicative of a selection of the first map image
`in the first person view, causing a first location view to be displayed on the interface”
`
`Claim Term
`
`Patent Owner’s Construction
`
`Petitioner’s Construction
`
`selection of the first map
`image
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning:
`first map image that is
`selectable
`
`N/A
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 12-13; [020]POSR, 11
`
`[020]Reply, 4
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does not disclose a “first person view”
`including a selectable “first map image”
`
`53
`
`A3UM Faces Browser (alleged first person view)
`
`alleged map image
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶174
`
`[020]POR, 8-12; [020]POSR, 8-10
`
`

`

`‘020: The Reply is contradicted by Dr. Terveen’s
`testimony
`
`54
`
`Dr. Terveen’s Deposition
`
`The Reply
`
`[020]Reply, 24
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX2023, 180:20-24, 145:11-16
`
`[020]POSR, 16
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does not disclose a “first person view”
`including a selectable “first map image”
`
`55
`
`Dr. Terveen’s Declaration also confirmed that grayed out buttons are inactive
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 16
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶¶279-280
`
`

`

`56
`
`A POSITA would
`not modify A3UM’s
`Faces Browser
`
`‘020 Patent, claims 1
`and 31
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘020: A POSITA would not modify the A3UM Faces
`Browser
`[020]Claim 1: responsive to an input that is indicative of a selection associated with the first person,
`causing a first person view to be displayed on the interface, the first person view including:
`a first digital file associated with the first person…”
`
`57
`
`The Petition
`
`[020]Petition, 32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 18
`
`[020]POR, 68-78; [020]POSR, 17-20
`
`

`

`‘020: A POSITA would not modify the A3UM Faces
`Browser
`
`58
`
`Dr. Surati
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶¶180-183
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, 80 (annotated)
`
`[020]POR, 68-69; [020]POSR, 17-18
`
`

`

`‘020: A POSITA would not modify the A3UM Faces
`Browser
`
`59
`
`The Reply argument is inconsistent with Dr. Terveen’s testimony
`
`The Reply
`
`[020]Reply, 27-28
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX2024, 208:19-209:16
`
`[020]POSR, 18-19
`
`

`

`‘020: A POSITA would not modify the A3UM Faces
`Browser
`
`60
`
`Dr. Surati’s Unrebutted Testimony
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶189
`
`Plas-Pak Indus., Inc. v. Sulzer Mixpac AG,
`600 F. App'x 755, 758 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
`
`“. . . combinations that change the ‘basic principles under
`which the [prior art] was designed to operate,’ In re Ratti, 46
`CCPA 976, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (1959), or that render the prior art
`‘inoperable for its intended purpose,’ In re Gordon, 733 F.2d
`900, 902 (Fed.Cir.1984), may fail to support a conclusion of
`obviousness.”
`
`In re Fritch,
`972 F.2d 1260, 1265 n.12 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
`
`“A proposed modification [is] inappropriate for an
`obviousness inquiry when the modification render[s] the prior
`art reference inoperable for its intended purpose”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 75-76; [020]POSR, 19-20
`
`

`

`‘020: A POSITA would not modify the A3UM Faces
`Browser
`None of the alleged “benefits” identified in the Petition provide a motivation to modify A3UM
`
`61
`
`Alleged Benefit (Petition, 35)
`
`“examine an image at its full
`size”
`
`“apply adjustments,
`keywords, and metadata to
`an image”
`“customize how images are
`displayed, such as ‘at full
`resolution’ and with
`‘metadata’”
`“use the Loupe tool, i.e., a
`magnifying glass”
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Already Present before
`Modification
`Yes: [020]EX2025, ¶¶199-204;
`EX1005, 80, 425; EX2023,
`130:13-131:24, 137:4-11, 142:8-
`15)
`Yes: [020]EX2025, ¶¶205-208;
`EX1005, 54, 58, 61, 247;
`EX2023, 146:17-147:1
`Yes: [020]EX2025, ¶¶209-210
`
`Yes: [020]EX2025, ¶¶211-212;
`EX1005, 29, 65, 247; EX2023,
`146:9-16
`
`Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
`688 F.3d 1342, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`“[B]oth of these references independently
`accomplish similar functions . . . Because each
`device independently operates effectively, a
`[POSITA], who was merely seeking to create a
`better device . . . would have no reason to
`combine the features of both devices into a single
`device”
`
`In re Fulton,
`391 F.3d 1195, 1200 (Fed. Cir. 2004)
`“the prior art as a whole must ‘suggest the
`desirability’ of the combination”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 74-77; [020]POSR, 20
`
`

`

`62
`
`A3UM does not
`disclose the claimed
`“slideshow”
`
`‘020 Patent, claim 1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘020: The Reply mischaracterizes the Petition
`
`63
`
`The Reply
`
`The Petition
`
`[020]Reply, 29
`
`[020]Petition, 40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 75-76; [020]POSR, 19-20
`
`

`

`‘020: The “input” must be “in the first person view”
`
`64
`
`The Reply
`
`Claim 1
`
`[020]Reply, 31
`
`[020]Petition, 40
`
`[020]EX1001, claim 1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POSR, 21
`
`

`

`‘020: Selecting an image in the Browser does not start a
`slideshow in A3UM
`
`65
`
`The Reply
`
`[020]Reply, 29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, 46
`
`[020]POR, 79-84; [020]POSR, 20-23
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does not disclose the claimed “slideshow”
`
`66
`
`[020]EX1001, 7:15-18
`
`[020]EX1001, FIG. 7
`
`[020]EX1001, FIG. 17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, 46
`
`[020]POR, 79-84; [020]POSR, 20-23
`
`

`

`67
`
`‘020 patent, claims
`13-16 and 45-48
`
`A3UM does not
`disclose different
`“first” and
`“second” map
`images
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘020: The “first” and “second” map images are different
`
`68
`
`Claims 13, 45: “causing a second person view to be displayed on the interface, the second person
`view including: . . . a second map image ”
`Claims 14, 46: “responsive to an input that is indicative of a selection of the second map image in
`the second person view, causing a second location view to be displayed on the interface”
`
`Claim Term
`
`Patent Owner’s Construction
`
`Petitioner’s Construction
`
`second map image
`(claims 13, 45)
`
`second map image that is different than
`the first map image
`
`the map image in the
`[second] person view
`
`selection of the
`second map image
`(claims 14, 46)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 12-14
`second map image that is selectable
`and different than the first map image
`
`[020]Reply, 5
`
`[020]POR, 12-14
`
`

`

`‘020: The “first” and “second” map images are different
`
`69
`
`The first and second person, name, thumbnail image, and digital file are different
`Dr. Terveen’s deposition
`
`EX2024, 287:20-288:2
`
`EX2024, 288:3-9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 14; [020]POSR, 11
`
`

`

`‘020: The “first” and “second” map images are different
`
`70
`
`Claims 14 and 46 reinforce that the “first” and “second” map images are different
`
`13. The method of claim 3, further comprising . . . causing
`a second person view to be displayed on the interface . .
`. including the second digital file associated with the
`second person, the second name associated with the
`second person, and a second map image.
`
`14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:
`. . . causing a second location view to be displayed . . .
`including: the interactive geographic map, a third
`indication positioned at a third location on the
`interactive geographic map, and a fourth indication
`positioned at a fourth location on the interactive
`geographic map.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]EX2025, ¶141
`
`[020]POR, 14; [020]POSR, 12
`
`

`

`‘020: The “first” and “second” map images are different
`
`71
`
`Petitioner ignores authority holding that “first” and “second” distinguish different claim elements
`
`Gillette Co. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.
`405 F.3d 1367, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
`
`Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, LP
`405 F.3d 1367, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
`
`“The terms ‘first, second, and third’ are terms to
`distinguish different elements of the claim”
`
`“Where a claim lists elements separately, the clear
`implication of the claim language is that those
`elements are distinct component[s] of the patented
`invention”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 13-14; [020]POSR, 12
`
`

`

`‘020: The “first” and “second” map images are different
`
`72
`
`Dr. Terveen agreed that the first and second map images are different
`
`Dr. Terveen’s declaration
`
`Dr. Terveen’s deposition
`
`EX2024, 291:16-19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 14; [020]POSR, 11
`
`[020]EX1003, ¶54
`
`

`

`‘020: A3UM does not disclose a “second map image”
`different than the alleged “first map image”
`
`73
`
`Dr. Terveen’s deposition
`
`EX2024, 291:7-12
`
`EX2024, 290:12-21
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[020]POR, 88-89; [020]POSR, 23-24
`
`

`

`74
`
`‘658 Patent,
`claims 8 and 11
`
`A3UM does not
`disclose “first” and
`“second” person-
`location
`selectable
`elements
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘658: “responsive to” requires a cause-effect relationship
`
`75
`
`Claim Term
`
`Patent Owner’s Construction
`
`Petitioner’s Construction
`
`“responsive to a click or tap of
`the [first/second] person
`selectable thumbnail image,
`displaying a [first/second] person
`view” (claims 7, 10)
`
`requiring a cause-effect
`relationship between (i) a click or
`tap of the [first/second] person
`selectable thumbnail image and
`(ii) displaying a [first/second]
`person view
`[658]POR, 19-24; [658]POSR, 9-11
`
`encompasses methods that
`include intervening actions by a
`user to enable or that are
`associated with the displaying
`action
`
`[658]Reply, 4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`‘658: “responsive to” requires a cause-effect relationship
`
`76
`
`Claims 7, 10: “responsive to a click or tap of the [first/second] person selectable thumbnail image,
`displaying a [first/second] person view”
`Claims 8, 11: “the displaying the first person view further includes displaying a [first/second]-person-
`location selectable element”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[658]POR, 23-24
`
`[658]EX1001, FIG. 32, 22:43-55, 22:63-23:10, 23:18-20;
`[658]EX2025, ¶¶140-142
`
`

`

`‘658: “responsive to” requires a cause-effect relationship
`
`77
`
`Dr. Surati’s testimony is unrebutted
`
`[658]EX2025, ¶137
`
`[658]EX2025, ¶138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[658]POR, 20
`
`

`

`‘658: Petitioner agrees the “person-location selectable
`element” is displayed in the person view
`
`78
`
`The Reply
`
`Dr. Surati
`
`[658]Reply, 29-30
`
`[658]EX2025, ¶254
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`[658]POSR, 23; [658]POR, 72
`
`

`

`‘658: A3UM does not disclose the claimed first and
`second “person-location selectable element”
`
`79
`
`A3UM does not disclose displaying the “person-location selectable element” “responsive to” a
`click or tap of a “person selectable thumbnail image