`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MEMORYWEB, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2021-01413
`Patent 10,621,228
` ____________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES
`
`
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2036
`Apple, Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC - IPR 2022-00031
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01413
`U.S. Patent 10,621,228
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), Unified Patents, LLC (“Unified” or
`
`
`
`“Petitioner”) certifies that Unified is the sole real party-in-interest and certifies that
`
`no other party exercised control or could exercise control over Unified’s
`
`participation in this proceeding, filing this petition, or conduct in any ensuing trial.
`
`On March 8, 2023, the Board issued an order finding “that Apple, Inc. and Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd. are Real Parties in Interest to this Proceeding[.]” Paper 56, 34.
`
`Unified disagrees with this finding and is in the process of seeking review of it. The
`
`Order required Petitioner to update its mandatory notices consistent with the order.
`
`Id. This filing is a response to that requirement.
`
`Petitioner does not waive any rights to seek review, appeal, or otherwise
`
`challenge the findings of Paper 56 by this filing.
`
`The Board has approved of similar actions taken by other petitioners when a
`
`finding regarding real party-in-interest has been contested. Proppant Express
`
`Investments, LLC, et al. v. Oren Techs., LLC, IPR2018-00733, Paper 34, 6 (PTAB
`
`Feb. 20, 2019) (“we see nothing wrong with this approach as the identification
`
`fulfills the key purposes of identifying the real parties in interest—namely,
`
`‘identifying potential conflicts, and to assure proper application of the statutory
`
`estoppel provisions.’”); Intel Corp. v. Hera Wireless S.A., IPR2018-01372, Paper 24
`
`
`
`1
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2036
`Apple, Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC - IPR 2022-00031
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01413
`U.S. Patent 10,621,228
`
`(PTAB Jan. 9, 2019) (allowing Petitioner to update Mandatory Notices “without
`
`conceding that they would be determined to be real parties in interest under the
`
`governing legal standard”); Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756,
`
`48,759 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 10, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Roshan Mansinghani/
`Roshan Mansinghani
`Reg. No. 62,429
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`2
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2036
`Apple, Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC - IPR 2022-00031
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`IPR2021-01413
`U.S. Patent 10,621,228
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies
`
`that a copy of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES was served on March 10,
`
`2023, via electronic mail, as agreed to by counsel, upon the following counsel for
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 10, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jennifer Hayes
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 4100
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3151
`jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com
`
`George Dandalides
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`70 West Madison, Suite 5200
`Chicago, IL 60602-4224
`gdandalides@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Matthew A. Werber
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`70 West Madison, Suite 5200
`Chicago, IL 60602-4224
`mwerber@nixonpeabody.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Ashley F. Cheung/
`Ashley F. Cheung
`Paralegal
`Unified Patents, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2036
`Apple, Inc. v. MemoryWeb, LLC - IPR 2022-00031
`
`