A
`
`Dr. Harry V. Bims
`1314 Chilco Street
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`harrybims@me.com
`650-283-4174
`
`
`
`PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
`Harry Bims, PhD, EE, provides expert witness support services for telecommunications-related
`intellectual property litigation. These services include deposition and court testimony, expert reports,
`and infringement research, for patent, copyright, and trade secret litigation matters. He has 30+ years of
`telecommunications industry experience, and holds twenty-two US patents in network architecture and
`chip design for wireless communications.
`
`
`
`EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
`12/2001 - 05/2004 AirFlow Networks, Inc. LLC ● Sunnyvale, California
`Position: CEO/CTO & Founder
`As the sole founder of the company, created the original business plan, raised
`venture capital, and hired the core engineering team. Grew the company to 32
`people and shipped products for revenue in the US and overseas. Fifteen patents
`on the core technology have issued. These patents, which relate to wireless
`network infrastructure based on the 802.11 specification, have been sold to
`Broadcom.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`03/2001 - 12/2001 Bay Partners LLC ● Cupertino, California
`Position: Entrepreneur in Residence
`Reported to the partners of this VC firm as a technology expert on a range of
`wireless and networking subjects. Reviewed business plans and participated in
`due diligence activities related to several startups seeking funding. Developed a
`business plan for a startup that builds network infrastructure for 802.11 enterprise
`networks.
`
`
`
`09/1999 - 03/2001 Symmetry Communications Systems LLC ● San Jose, California
`Position: Director, Software Architecture
`Reporting to the CEO, responsible for the software architecture of their core
`
`
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-1
`
`Page 1 of 41
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1004
`
`

`

`SGSN and GGSN products for the GPRS market. Formulated a software
`technology roadmap, showing the evolution from 2.5G to 3G SGSN and GGSN
`products. Management responsibility for Firmware, Hardware, Performance, and
`Systems Engineering Groups. Provided management support of early field trials
`of the system on a global basis.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`07/1999 - 09/1999 T-SPAN Systems Corporation LLC ● Palo Alto, California
`Position: Member of Technical Staff
`Designed a wireless home LAN protocol for the company. Also designed and
`built a PC-based platform to demonstrate their technology. Company is now
`publicly traded as Atheros Communications.
`
`
`
`07/1992 - 12/1998 Glenayre Technologies-Wireless Access Group ● San Jose, California
`Position: Member of Technical Staff; Sr. Member of Technical Staff; Manager of NOC
`Systems
`Employee #6 at the company, which was acquired by Glenayre Technologies,
`Nov 1997. Designed and built a 4-channel ReFLEX50 pager demonstration in 1
`week. Participated in early field trials and feasibility studies, culminating in a
`Pioneer’s Preference license award from the FCC to SkyTel Corporation for
`Narrowband PCS development.
`Invented, designed, and built from concept through full implementation, a
`patented two-way pager test system for the ReFLEX50 and ReFLEX25
`protocols. This system was used throughout company operations for
`performance testing of the ReFLEX pager designs from Wireless Access, and
`Motorola. Over 16 systems were deployed around the country for manufacturing
`tests, engineering protocol tests, antenna tests, and pager repair tests.
`The project required technical skills in PC hardware design, C++, object-oriented
`programming, signal processing techniques, NT device driver development,
`Win32 user interface development, real-time, multi-threaded control, and
`proficiency with wireless communications lab equipment. Three patents have
`been issued based on technical inventions in this capacity.
`Co-developed a wireless application protocol for sending and receiving
`encrypted email messages over the paging channel. Led the project team that
`deployed a software encryption module based on this protocol for government
`agencies.
`
`
`
`8/2018 – Present CUPP Cybersecurity, LLC ● Palo Alto, California
`Position: CEO
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-2
`
`Page 2 of 41
`
`

`

`Developing a suite of network security products and technologies aimed at
`consumers to protect their online internet access.
`
`
`10/2012 – Present BoughtStuff, Inc ● Palo Alto, California
`Position: Founder
`The company has developed a mobile application for storage and delivery of
`product information to smartphones over wireless networks.
`
`
`
`
`
`Bims Laboratories, LLC Work History
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6/2009 – 7/2009 Eastman Kodak Company ● Rochester, NY
`Position: Technology Consultant
`Providing technology assessment on certain wireless communication patents.
`
`10/2009 – 1/2017 IEEE 802.16 Working Group
`Task Group Secretary, Task Group Vice-Chair, Task Group Chair, Working
`Group Vice-Chair & Secretary, IEEE 802.16 Expert
`Served in several leadership capacities within this group that is working on
`improvements to the IEEE 802.16 standard, otherwise known as WiMAX. The
`802.16 Working Group entered hibernation on March 2018. From that time until
`the present, I am on the roster of Experts designated by the Chair to answer
`questions and provide clarification about the 802.16 standards.
`
`Position:
`
`
`2/2014 – Present Access Network Protocol Development
`Position: Technical Lead Developer
`Developing a C++17-based DES of SDRs for wired and wireless network
`protocols, that includes IMT-2020 channel models. Implementations of the IEEE
`802 and LTE protocol families, plus PTP, PPoE, IPv6, digital cable, Bluetooth,
`DSL, frame relay and many other managed node models for smart grid and
`vertical IoT applications. Used for technical analysis of emerging wireless
`standards amendments.
`
`
`
`Protocomm Systems, LLC Consulting History
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-3
`
`Page 3 of 41
`
`

`

`04/1999–07/1999 Gigabit Wireless, Inc. ● San Jose, California
`Position: Technical Leader
`Technical leader for the Wireless MAC design group. Responsible for
`comparative analysis of competing wireless MAC protocol standards.
`Responsible for the creation of a proprietary MAC protocol specification
`document, simulation of the protocol, and implementation in a prototype.
`Participated in early 802.16 protocol standards. This company was acquired by
`Intel Corporation.
`
`
`
`3/2007 – 10/2009 Apple, Inc. ● Cupertino, CA
`Position: Technology Consultant
`Participating in IEEE 802.16 standards meetings as an affiliate of the client.
`7/2003 – Present Various expert witness engagements (see below)
`Position: Technical Expert Witness
`Testified as a wireless technology expert in patent infringement cases. For a list
`of such cases, see below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Technical Expert Witness Experience
`
`
`05/2021 – Present Client: DLA Piper (representing Motorola Mobility LLC)
`
`Case: U.S. Int’l Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-1253
`Certain LTE-Compliant Cellular Communication Devices
`Motorola v. Evolved Wireless LLC.
`Location: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION –
`Administrative Law Judge Cameron R. Elliot
` Testifying expert in this ITC matter involving LTE cellular device handover.
`
`Nelson Bumgardner Albritton P.C.; Adduci, Mastriani &
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Schaumberg, LLP
`For Defendant: DLA Piper
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-4
`
`Page 4 of 41
`
`

`

`
`04/2021 – Present Client: Desmarais LLP (representing Google LLC and FitBit Inc.)
`
` Case: Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc., No. 4-17-cv-05928-YGR
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA
`Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving the distribution of multimedia
`content.
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Garteiser Honea PLLC and Corcoran IP Law PLLC
`For Defendant: Desmarais LLP
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`02/2021 – Present Client: Fish & Richardson (representing Quectel)
`Client: Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP (representing Thales DIS AIS USA,
`LLC)
`Client: Pearl Cohen LLP (representing Telit)
`Case: U.S. Int’l Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-1240
`Certain UMTS and LTE Cellular Communication Modules and Products
`Containing the Same
`Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Quectel Wireless Solutions Co. Ltd., Thales DIS AIS
`Deutschland GmbH, Thales S.A., Telit Wireless Solutions, Inc., Telit
`Communications PLC, CalAmp Corp, Xirgo Technologies, LLC, Laird
`Connectivity, Inc., Thales DIS AIS USA LLC
`Case No. 1:20-cv-1713 (D. Del)
`Location: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION –
`Administrative Law Judge Hon. David P. Shaw
` Testifying expert on 3GPP mobile device operation.
`Expert Testimony:
`July 21, 2021 Expert Report on Invalidity
`August 6, 2021 Deposition Testimony
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Mayer Brown LLP
`For Defendants: Fish & Richardson; Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-5
`
`Page 5 of 41
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`11/2020– Present Client: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (representing PayPal Holdings,
`Inc.)
`Case: IOENGINE LLC v PayPal Holdings, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-00452-WCB
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`Hon. William C. Bryson
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving peripheral device communication
`to remote servers.
`Expert Reports:
`
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`
`11/2020 – Present Client: Holland & Knight (representing Apple, Inc.)
`Case: Maxell v. Apple Inc. In the Matter of Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and
`Laptop Computers
`U.S. Int’l Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-1215
`Location: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION –
`Administrative Law Judge Hon. Dee Lord
` Testifying expert on 3GPP mobile device operation.
`Expert Report:
`February 24, 2020: Opening Expert Report Regarding Invalidity
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Mayer Brown LLP
`For Defendant: DLA Piper LLP
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`9/2020– Present Client: DickinsonWright (representing Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Co.
`and Essential WiFi, LLC)
`Case: NTT Corp., et. al. v. MediaTek, Acer, and Texas Instruments
`Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00632-ADA
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-6
`
`Page 6 of 41
`
`

`

`TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION – Hon. Alan Albright
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving MIMO technology.
`Expert Reports:
`
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`8/2020– Present Client: Folio Law Group PLLC (representing Dali Wireless)
`Case: Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-06469-EMC
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
`TEXAS – Hon. Edward M. Chen
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving distributed antenna system
`networks.
`Expert Reports:
`November 6, 2020: Declaration Regarding Interpretation of Asserted Claims
`February 12, 2021: Declaration Regarding Interpretation of Asserted Claims
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`
`
`
`3/2020– Present Client: Folio Law Group PLLC (representing Dali Wireless)
`Case: Dali Wireless, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies, LLC and CommScope Holding
`Company, Inc..
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-00952-MN
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`– Hon. Maryellen Noreika
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving distributed antenna system
`networks.
`Expert Reports:
`June 23, 2021: Expert report on infringement.
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`03/2020 – Present Client: Sidley Austin LLP (representing Lenovo and Motorola)
`Case: InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc., InterDigital
`Communications, Inc., InterDigital Holdings, Inc., and InterDigital, Inc. v.
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-7
`
`Page 7 of 41
`
`

`

`Lenovo Holding Company, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., and Motorola
`Mobility LLC
`Civil Action No. 19-1590-LPS
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`Hon. Leonard P. Stark
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving 3G and 4G cellular standards.
`Expert Reports:
`
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`
`3/2020– Present Client: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLC
`(representing Google)
`Case: Google, Inc. (Petitioner) v. Sonos, Inc.
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` Testifying expert in this IPR proceeding involving wireless home speaker
`systems.
`Expert Declarations:
`February 22, 2021: Filed declarations in support of Inter Partes Review.
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`
`08/2019 – Present Client: Fish & Richardson (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-00072-BLF-SVK
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION – Hon. Susan Van Keulen
` As a testifying expert, provided a technology tutorial in this patent case involving
`internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`August 14, 2019 Tutorial expert report on network security technology.
`September 4, 2019 Deposition Testimony
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Fish & Richardson
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-8
`
`Page 8 of 41
`
`

`

`For Defendant:
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`
`
`
`8/2019 – 5/2020 Client: Fish & Richardson (representing LG Electronics, Inc.)
`Case: Bell Northern Research, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc., et. al.
`USDC-SDCA Civil Action No. 18-cv-2864-CAB-BLM
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA – Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo, Magistrate Judge: Hon. Barbara
`L. Major
` Testifying expert on wired/wireless communication in gaming systems.
`Expert Report:
`November 20, 2019 Declaration ISO motion for summary judgment
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`For Defendant: Fish & Richardson
`Status: Case closed
`
`
`7/2019 – 05/2021 Client: O’Melveny & Myers LLP (representing Apple Inc.)
`Case: Maxell, Ltd. v. Apple Inc.,
`Case No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS.
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
`TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION – Hon. Robert W. Schroeder III
` Testifying expert on 3G cellular telephone technology.
`Expert Reports:
`May 7, 2020: Opening Expert Report Regarding Invalidity
`June 4, 2020:
`Rebuttal Expert Report on Non-Infringement
`Deposition Testimony: June 24, 2020
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Mayer Brown LLP
`For Defendant: O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`Status: Case settled.
`
`
`4/2019 – Present Client: Perkins Coie (representing Nintendo of America, Inc.)
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-9
`
`Page 9 of 41
`
`

`

`Case: Genuine Enabling Technology LLC v. Nintendo Company Ltd., and Nintendo of
`America, Inc., W.D. Wash.,
`Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-00351-RSM
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
`WASHINGTON – Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez
` Testifying expert on wired/wireless communication in gaming systems.
`Expert Declarations:
`October 23, 2019 Declaration ISO claim constructions
`November 26, 2019 Sur-reply declaration ISO claim constructions
`January 23, 2020 Declaration ISO motion for summary judgment
`April 20, 2020 Opening Expert Report Regarding Invalidity
`Expert Depositions:
`December 19, 2019
`Claim Construction Hearing Testimony:
`February 24, 2020 Tutorial testimony on the technology of the Asserted
`Patents
`Bayard, P.A.
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant: Perkins Coie
`Status: Case closed
`
`
`12/2019 – 12/2019 Client: Erise IP (representing Apple Inc.), Haynes and Boone, LLP
`(representing Ericsson Inc)
`Case: Ericsson Inc. (Petitioner) v. Uniloc 2017, LLC (Patent Owner)
`Apple Inc. (Petitioner) v. Uniloc 2017, LLC (Patent Owner) Case No. IPR2020-
`00224
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` Testifying expert in this IPR proceeding involving ARQ data exchange on LTE
`networks.
`Expert Declarations:
`April 19, 2019 Declaration ISO Petition for Inter Partes Review of U. S.
`Patent No. 7,075,917
`December 17, 2019 Declaration ISO Petition for Inter Partes Review of U. S.
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-10
`
`Page 10 of 41
`
`

`

`Patent No. 7,075,917
`Attorneys: For Petitioner:
`
`For Patent Owner:
`Status: Case closed
`
`
`
`Erise IP; Haynes and Boone, LLP
`
`
`6/2019 – Present Client: Fish & Richardson (representing Microsoft Corporation)
`Case: Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
`USDC Central District of California, Case Nos. 8:18-cv-2053, 8:18-cv-2054,
`8:18-cv-2224; 8:19-cv-0428, 8:19-cv-0477, 8:19-cv-0196
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA – Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
` Testifying expert involving 3GPP transport formats and channels.
`Expert Declarations:
`August 6, 2019 Declaration in support of claim construction
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Feinberg Day LLP
`For Defendant: Fish & Richardson
`Status: Case ongoing
`
`
`
`10/2018 – Present Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Eset, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION – Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo
` As a testifying expert, provided a technology tutorial in this patent case involving
`internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`October 5, 2018 Tutorial expert report on network security technology.
`March 11, 2020 Jury trial testimony.
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`For Defendant:
`
`Status: Jury Trial Mistrial due to COVID-19.
`Case ongoing
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-11
`
`Page 11 of 41
`
`

`

`
`
`9/2018 – Present Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 15-cv-03295-BLF-SVK
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION – Hon. Beth L. Freeman
` As a testifying expert, provided a technology tutorial in this patent case involving
`internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`September, 11, 2018 Tutorial expert report on network security technology.
`Videotaped Deposition:
`November 7, 2018
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`For Defendant:
`
`Status: Case closed
`
`
`
`9/2017 – 9/2018 Client: (Covington & Burling representing Huawei Device USA, Inc.)
`Case: Optis Wireless Technology, LLC, et. al. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, et. al.
`Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-123-JRG-RSP
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
`TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION – Hon. Roy S. Payne
` Testifying expert regarding 3G and LTE technology.
`Expert Declarations and Reports:
`November 3, 2017: Declaration regarding Claim Construction.
`March 26, 2018: Initial Expert Report Regarding Invalidity
`April 23, 2018:
`
`Rebuttal Expert Report on Non-Infringement
`April 27, 2018:
`
`Rebuttal Expert Report on Secondary Considerations
`Videotaped Deposition: May 10, 2018
`May 14, 2018:
`
`Declaration in support of Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment
`Jury Trial Testimony: August 22, 2018 and August 23, 2018
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff: McKool Smith
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-12
`
`Page 12 of 41
`
`

`

`
`
` For Defendant: Covington & Burling
`
`Status: Jury award
`
`6/2017 – 4/2018 Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-02998-HSG
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
` As a testifying expert, provided a technology tutorial in this patent case involving
`internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`July 27, 2017 Tutorial expert report on security technology.
`Videotaped Deposition:
`August 29, 2017
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant: Quinn Emmanuel
`Status: Case settled
`
`5/2017 – 3/2018 Client: Barnes & Thornburg, LLP (representing Ooma, Inc.)
`Case: Ooma, Inc. (Petitioner) v. Deep Green Wireless, LLC (Patent Owner)
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` As a testifying expert, provided a technology tutorial in this patent case involving
`voice and data communications over wireless networks.
`Expert Declaration:
`June 8, 2017 Expert report on prior art wireless network technology.
`Videotaped Deposition:
`February 15, 2018
`Attorneys: For Petitioner: Barnes & Thornburg LLP
`For Defendant: Mischcon De Reya New York, LLP
`Status: Case closed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-13
`
`Page 13 of 41
`
`

`

`3/2017 – 6/2019 Client: Fish & Richardson (representing Apple, Inc.) / Gibson, Dunn &
`Crutcher LLP (representing Compal Electronics, et. al.)
`Case: Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc.
`Qualcomm Inc. v. Compal Electronics, Inc., et. al.
`Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00108 / Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-01010
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA – Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, Magistrate Judge: Hon. Mitchell D.
`Dembin
` Testifying expert regarding LTE technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`December 11, 2017: Declaration regarding Claim Construction.
`Expert Report:
`June 29, 2018: Opening Expert Report regarding invalidity
`August 3, 2018: Expert Report on infringement
`October 2, 2018: Rebuttal Expert Report on Invalidity
`Videotaped Deposition:
`October 25, 2018
`None
`Fish & Richardson
`
`Attorneys: For Apple:
`For Qualcomm: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP / Cravath, Swaine &
`Moore LLP
`For Compal Electronics, Inc., et. al: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`Status: Case settled.
`
`
`
`3/2017 – 1/2018 Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, LLC
`Civil Action No. 15-cv-03295-BLF-SVK
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION – Hon. Beth L. Freeman
` As a testifying expert, provided an opening technology tutorial at trial in this
`patent case involving internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-14
`
`Page 14 of 41
`
`

`

`March 29, 2017 Tutorial expert report on security technology.
`Videotaped Deposition:
`May 2, 2017
`October 31 – November 2, 2017: Jury Trial Testimony
`January 8-10, 2018: Jury Trial Testimony (retrial after mistrial):
`Live Testimony on Network Security Technology Tutorial
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`For Defendant: Morrison & Forrester & Quinn Emmanuel
`Status: Jury award
`
`1/2017 – 7/2017 Client: Foster Pepper LLP (representing Dali Wireless)
`Case: Dali Wireless, Inc. (Petitioner) v. CommScope Technologies, LLC (Patent
`Owner)
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving RF transport networks.
`Expert Reports:
`4-26-17 Declaration ISO petition for IPR
`6-30-17 Declaration ISO Opening claim construction brief
`Videotaped Deposition:
`July 24, 2017
`Status: Case closed
`
`
`
`
`
`1/2017 – 6/2019 Client: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (representing Dali Wireless)
`Case: CommScope Technologies, LLC (Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant) v. Dali
`Wireless, Inc. (Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff)
`Civil Action No.: 3:16-cv-477
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION – Hon. Barbara M. G. Lynn
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving RF transport networks.
`Expert Reports:
`8-24-18 Expert Report regarding Invalidity of CommScope patents
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-15
`
`Page 15 of 41
`
`

`

`8-24-18 Expert Report regarding Infringement of Dali Wireless patents
`11-5-18 Expert Report regarding Validity of Dali Wireless patents
`11-5-18 Expert Report regarding Non-Infringement of CommScope patents
`1-9-19 Declaration ISO opposition to MSJ
`1-18-19 Declaration ISO partial MSJ on Non-infringement and Invalidity
`5-2-19 Declaration ISO Motion for Sanctions
`Videotaped Deposition:
`November 20, 2018
`Live Testimony at Jury Trial:
`June 10-13, 2019
`Dorsey & Whitney, LLC
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant: Carlson Caspers, P.A.
`Status: Jury award.
`
`
`
`11/2016 – 4/2019 Client: Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP (representing Apple Inc.)
`Case: Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
`Civil Action No.: 1:15-cv-00542-SLR
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`– Hon. Sue L. Robinson
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving LTE wireless networks.
`Expert Reports:
`11-06-17 Declaration ISO Summary Judgment of Validity
`10-05-17 Declaration ISO Summary Judgment of Non-Infringment
`10-03-17 Supplemental Expert Report on Non-Infringement
`07-24-17 Supplemental Expert Report on Secondary Considerations of Non-
`Obviousness
`6-26-17 Expert Report on Non-Infringement
`5-22-17 Expert Report on Invalidity
`Videotaped Deposition:
`August 11, 2017
`Live Testimony at Jury Trial:
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-16
`
`Page 16 of 41
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`March 29 - April 1, 2019
`
`Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant: Robins Kaplan LLP
`Status: Jury verdict of non-infringement.
`
`7/2016 – 4/2018 Client: Jackson Walker LLP (representing D&M Holdings, Inc., et. al.)
`Case: Sonos, Inc., v. D&M Holdings, d/b/a The D+M Group, D&M Holdings U.S. Inc.,
`and Denon Electronics (USA), LLC
`Civil Action No.: 14-1330-RGA
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`– Hon. Richard G. Andrews
` Testifying expert in this patent case involving wireless speaker networks.
`Expert Reports:
`4-17-17 Expert Report on Non-Infringement
`Videotaped Deposition:
`February 7, 2017 and February 8, 2017
`Jury Trial, December 11-15, 2017:
`Live Testimony at Jury Trial on Non-infringement
`March 15, 2018: Post-trial Declaration
`
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant:
`Status: Jury Award
`
`Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
`Jackson Walker LLP
`
`7/2016 – 1/2018 Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (Petitioner) v. Finjan, Inc. (Patent Owner)
`Case IPR2015-02001, Case IPR2016-00157. US Patent No. 8,225,408 B2
`Case IPR2015-01974
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-17
`
`Page 17 of 41
`
`

`

` Testifying expert in this patent case involving wireless speaker networks.
`Expert Declaration:
`8-9-16 Expert Declaration, Patent 7,647,633
`8-9-16 Expert Declaration, Patent 8,225,408
`8-30-16 Supplemental Expert Declaration, 7,647,633
`Status: Case settled
`
`
`
`5/2016 – 7/2018 Client: (Winston & Strawn LLP representing Atlantic Broadband Group,
`LLC, et. al.)
`Case: ChanBond LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, et. al.
`Civil Action No: 15-842-RGA, 15-843-RGA, 15-844-RGA, , 15-845-RGA, , 15-
`846-RGA, , 15-847-RGA, , 15-848-RGA, , 15-849-RGA, , 15-850-RGA, , 15-
`851-RGA, , 15-852-RGA, , 15-853-RGA, , 15-854-RGA
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`– Hon. Richard G. Andrews
` Testifying expert regarding digital cable technology.
`Expert Report:
`10-24-17 Expert Report on Invalidity
`Videotaped Deposition:
`None
`Bayard, P.A.
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant: Winston & Strawn LLP
`Status: Case settled
`
`
`5/2016 – 11/2019 Client: (Torys LLP representing Telus, Bell, and Rogers)
`Case: Wi-LAN Inc. v Telus Communications Company, Rogers Communications
`Canada Inc., and Bell Mobility Inc.
`Court File No. T-301-16; Court File No. T-303-16; Court File No. T-304-16
`Location: CANADIAN FEDERAL COURT – Hon. Mandy Aylen
` Testifying expert regarding LTE technology.
`Expert Report:
`June 14, 2019 Expert Report regarding invalidity
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-18
`
`Page 18 of 41
`
`

`

`Videotaped Deposition:
`None
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant:
`Status: Case settled
`
`Torys LLP
`
`
`
`
`12/2015 – 4/2016 Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Acceleration
`Bay, LLC.)
`Case: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software,
`Inc., 2K Sports, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., and Bungie, Inc., Petitioner v.
`Acceleration Bay, LLC, Patent Owner.
`Case IPR2015-01951, Case IPR2015-01953, Case IPR2015-01964, Case
`IPR2015-01970, Case IPR2015-01996, Case IPR2016-00724, Case IPR2016-
`00747
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` Testifying expert in this IPR patent case involving internet data broadcasting.
`Expert Declaration:
`January 4, 2017 Supplemental Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response -- Case
`IPR2016-00724
`January 4, 2017 Supplemental Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response -- Case
`IPR2016-00747
`December 7, 2016 Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response – Case IPR2016-
`00724; Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness
`December 7, 2016 Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response – Case IPR2016-
`00747; Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness
`July 17, 2016 Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response – Patent 6,714,966;
`Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness
`July 17, 2016 Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response – Patent 6,829,634;
`Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness
`July 17, 2016 Declaration ISO Patent Owner’s Response – Patent 6,701,344;
`Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness
`Videotaped Deposition:
`February 7, 2017 and February 8, 2017
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-19
`
`Page 19 of 41
`
`

`

`For Defendant: DLA Piper
`Status: Case closed
`
`4/2016 – Present Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Acceleration
`Bay, LLC.)
`Case: Acceleration Bay, LLC v Activision Blizzard, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Take-
`Two Interactive Software, Inc.
`Civil Action No.: 14-453 (RGA), 16-454 (RGA), 16-455 (RGA)
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`– Hon. Richard G. Andrews
` Testifying expert in this IPR patent case involving internet data broadcasting.
`Expert Declaration:
`September 24, 2017: Expert Report Regarding Technology Benefits of the
`Asserted Patents
`Videotaped Deposition: January 4, 2018
`July 17, 2018: Reply Report Regarding Technology Benefits of the Asserted
`Patents
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`For Defendant: DLA Piper
`Status: Ongoing
`
`
`
`
`
`12/2015 – 9/2016 Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-01197-WHO
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION – Hon. William H. Orrick
` As a testifying expert, provided a technology tutorial in this patent case involving
`internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`December 21, 2015 Tutorial expert report on network security technology.
`Videotaped Deposition:
`February 22, 2016
`September 5 – 9, 2016 Jury Trial:
`
`Last Update: August 7, 2021
`
`Page A-20
`
`Page 20 of 41
`
`

`

`Live Testimony at Jury Trial regarding tutorial on network security
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Kramer Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel LLP
`For Defendant: DLA Piper
`Status: Jury Trial
`
`
`
`9/2015 – 2/2016 Client: Brinks Gilson & Lione (representing LifeWatch Services, Inc., and
`Card Guard Scientific Survival, Ltd.)
`Case: Card Guard Scientific Survival Ltd.
`Reexam Control No. 12/706,541
`Location: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` Provided testimony in this Patent Office re-examination appeal.
`Expert Declaration:
`November 13, 2015 Declaration under 37 C.F.R §1.132.
`February 13, 2016 Declaration ISO petition for IPR.
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff:
`Brinks Gilson & Lione
`Status: Re-examination appeal decision invalidated the patent.
`
`
`
`9/2015 – 1/2017 Client: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP (representing Finjan, Inc.)
`Case: Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 13:cv-03999-BLF
`Location: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION – Hon. Howard R. Lloyd, Hon. Haywood
`S. Gilliam, Jr.
` As a testifying expert, provided an opening technology tutorial report in this
`patent case involving internet security technology.
`Expert Declaration:
`October 7, 2015 Tutorial expert report on network security technology.
`Videotaped Deposition:
`November 6, 2015
`Attorneys: For Plaintiff: