throbber
·1
`
`·2· · · · UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·3· · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·4· · · · · IPR2021-01549 (Patent 9,997,240 B2)
`
`·5· · · · · IPR2021-01547 (Patent 8,891,298 B2)
`
`·6· · · · · IPR2021-01548 (Patent 9,196,385 B2)1
`
`Page 1
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9· ·MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`10· · · · · · · · · · · Petitioner,
`
`11· · · · · · · · · · · v.
`
`12· ·VERVAIN, LLC,
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · · Patent Owner.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16· · · · · REMOTE DEPOSITION OF DR. DAVID LIU
`
`17· · · · · · · ·San Francisco, California
`
`18· · · · · · · · · · ·June 10, 2022
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23· ·Reported by:· BONNIE PRUSZYNSKI, RMR, RPR, CLR
`
`24
`
`25· ·JOB NO. 211775
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.1
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`·1
`
`·2
`
`·3
`
`·4
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·June 10, 2022
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·7:58 A.M.
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · · REMOTE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`
`14· ·DR. DAVID LIU, held remotely from San Francisco,
`
`15· ·California, before Bonnie Pruszynski, CSR No.
`
`16· ·13064, a Registered Professional Reporter,
`
`17· ·Registered Merit Reporter, Certified Livenote
`
`18· ·Reporter, and Notary Public of the State of New
`
`19· ·York.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.2
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`·1· · A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`·2
`
`·3· · ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`
`·4· · Attorneys for Claimant
`
`·5· · · · · · · 222 Berkeley Street
`
`·6· · · · · · · Boston, MA 02116
`
`·7· · BY:· · PARTH SAGDEO, ESQ.
`
`·8· · · · · ·CHRISTOPHER CHILDERS, ESQ.
`
`·9
`
`10· · McKOOL SMITH
`
`11· · Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`12· · · · · 1999 K Street, NW
`
`13· · · · · Washington, DC 20006
`
`14· · BY:· ARVIND JAIRAM, ESQ.
`
`15· · · · ·ALAN WHITEHURST, ESQ
`
`16.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.3
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·(Witness sworn.)
`
`·2· ·DAVID LIU,
`
`·3· · · · · ·called as a witness, having been first
`
`·4· · · · · ·duly sworn, was examined and testified
`
`Page 4
`
`·5· · · · · ·as follows:
`
`·6· ·EXAMINATION
`
`·7· ·BY MR. JAIRAM:
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · Good morning, Dr. Liu.
`
`·9· · · ·A.· · Good morning.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· · I know that you have been in
`
`11· ·depositions before, but I'm going to go over
`
`12· ·some basic information regarding depositions
`
`13· ·so that the record is complete.· Okay?
`
`14· · · ·A.· · Yes, please.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· · Do you understand that you have
`
`16· ·been placed under oath today just as though
`
`17· ·you were in court?
`
`18· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`19· · · ·Q.· · Do you understand that you are
`
`20· ·bound to answer my questions truthfully
`
`21· ·today?
`
`22· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · If a question is unclear, please
`
`24· ·let me know so that I may rephrase as
`
`25· ·necessary.· Otherwise, I will assume that you
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.4
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`·1· ·understood my question.· Okay?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · That's fine with me.· Thank you.
`
`·3· · · ·Q.· · Because your testimony is being
`
`·4· ·transcribed by the court reporter, do you
`
`·5· ·understand you need to answer my questions
`
`·6· ·verbally instead of with gestures?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · I do.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · I'm going to do my best, and I
`
`·9· ·would ask that you do your best, that we each
`
`10· ·speak one at a time, to make the court
`
`11· ·reporter's life easier.· Does that sound
`
`12· ·good?
`
`13· · · ·A.· · Sounds good.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· · Regarding breaks, we will take
`
`15· ·breaks during the deposition, but if you need
`
`16· ·one, please let me know.· If a question is
`
`17· ·pending, I will request that you answer the
`
`18· ·question before taking the break.· Okay?
`
`19· · · ·A.· · Okay.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· · Are you aware of any reason that
`
`21· ·you are unable to answer my questions
`
`22· ·truthfully today?
`
`23· · · ·A.· · I am not aware of any reasons.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· · Are you taking any medications that
`
`25· ·would prevent you from providing honest,
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.5
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`·1· ·accurate, and complete answers?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · No, I'm not.
`
`·3· · · ·Q.· · Or any health conditions that would
`
`·4· ·prevent you from providing such answers?
`
`·5· · · ·A.· · No, not right now.
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· · Do you understand that you have to
`
`·7· ·answer my questions even if your counsel
`
`·8· ·objects, unless he directly instructs you not
`
`·9· ·to answer?
`
`10· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`11· · · · · · ·Excuse me.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· · I would also like to caution you
`
`13· ·not to discuss the substance of your
`
`14· ·testimony during your breaks.· Okay?
`
`15· · · ·A.· · Okay.· I understand.
`
`16· · · ·Q.· · Dr. Liu, is there anyone in the
`
`17· ·room with you today?
`
`18· · · ·A.· · There are two attorneys here with
`
`19· ·me.· One is Parth, and the other is Jason,
`
`20· ·Jason Lang.
`
`21· · · ·Q.· · Do you have any documents with you
`
`22· ·in the room today, either electronic or hard
`
`23· ·copy?
`
`24· · · ·A.· · I have in front of me the hard
`
`25· ·copies that we discussed on Wednesday, the
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.6
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· ·same one we used on Wednesday, which is just
`
`·2· ·unmarked copies of my declaration and the
`
`Page 7
`
`·3· ·exhibit.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · By "Wednesday," you're referring to
`
`·5· ·our deposition regarding IPR 2021-01547 -- I
`
`·6· ·beg your pardon -- 2021-01550, involving the
`
`·7· ·'300 patent IPR; correct?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· · That's correct.
`
`·9· · · ·Q.· · And do you have with you your
`
`10· ·declarations in the IPRs involving the '298
`
`11· ·patent --
`
`12· · · ·A.· · Yes, sir.
`
`13· · · ·Q.· · -- the '385 patent, and the '240
`
`14· ·patent?
`
`15· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`16· · · ·Q.· · For convenience, I will refer to
`
`17· ·the various IPRs that we will be discussing
`
`18· ·today as the '298 IPR, the '385 IPR, and the
`
`19· ·'240 IPR, because those are the patents at
`
`20· ·issue in those IPRs.· Is that okay with you?
`
`21· · · ·A.· · That's fine with me.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· · And similarly, when I am referring
`
`23· ·to your declaration in one of those IPRs, I
`
`24· ·will explain which IPR I mean, and if you
`
`25· ·have any questions, please let me know so
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.7
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· ·that we can make sure you are looking at the
`
`Page 8
`
`·2· ·right declaration.· Okay?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · And you understand that this
`
`·5· ·deposition today is regarding the '298 patent
`
`·6· ·IPR and the '385 patent IPR and the '240
`
`·7· ·patent IPR; correct?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· · Yes, that's correct.
`
`·9· · · ·Q.· · Can you please turn to the '298
`
`10· ·patent, which is Exhibit 1001 in the '298
`
`11· ·patent IPR.
`
`12· · · ·A.· · Excuse me, Counsel.· Is it okay if
`
`13· ·I go get my glasses, just in case?· It's
`
`14· ·right next to me.· I will get it just in case
`
`15· ·I need it, reading glasses.
`
`16· · · ·Q.· · Of course.
`
`17· · · ·A.· · Thank you.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· · Can you please turn to the claims
`
`19· ·of the '298 patent, and please let me know
`
`20· ·when you are there.
`
`21· · · ·A.· · I am there.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· · Let's refer to claim one, please.
`
`23· · · · · · ·Do you see that claim one mentions
`
`24· ·blocks at various places in the claim?
`
`25· · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.8
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· · The word "blocks" is first
`
`·2· ·introduced at the limitation, quote, "at
`
`·3· ·least one MLC non-volatile memory module
`
`·4· ·comprising a plurality of individually
`
`·5· ·erasable blocks," end quote; right?
`
`·6· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · I think that is what -- I believe
`
`·8· ·what you just read is part of the claim
`
`·9· ·element, claim one.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· · And then "blocks" is also
`
`11· ·introduced in the next limitation involving
`
`12· ·an SLC non-volatile memory module; correct?
`
`13· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`14· · · ·A.· · I think the whole sentence or
`
`15· ·limitation is "at least one SLC non-volatile
`
`16· ·memory module comprising a plurality of
`
`17· ·individually erasable blocks."
`
`18· · · ·Q.· · The blocks are described as being
`
`19· ·erasable blocks; right?
`
`20· · · ·A.· · The individual erasable block is in
`
`21· ·the context of non-volatile memory modules,
`
`22· ·yes.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · And the specification of the '298
`
`24· ·patent describes erasing a block; right?
`
`25· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Objection to form.
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.9
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`·1· · · ·A.· · Can you point me to where you are
`
`·2· ·referring to, so I can see the proper
`
`·3· ·context?
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · For example, let's turn to column
`
`·5· ·two, line six of the '298 patent.· Could you
`
`·6· ·please tell me when you are there.
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · I am there.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · The '298 patent describes erasing a
`
`·9· ·block; right?
`
`10· · · ·A.· · Yes.· In that context, yes.
`
`11· · · ·Q.· · The specification also discloses
`
`12· ·that blocks can only be erased in their
`
`13· ·entirety; right?
`
`14· · · ·A.· · Repeat the question again.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· · The specification of the '298
`
`16· ·patent also discloses that blocks can only be
`
`17· ·erased in their entirety; correct?
`
`18· · · ·A.· · Can you put it in proper context?
`
`19· ·I'm not sure of your question.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· · For example, can you please turn to
`
`21· ·column two, line 43 of the '298 patent.
`
`22· · · ·A.· · Line 42?
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · Line 42, I think, the sentence
`
`24· ·beginning, "Blocks can only."
`
`25· · · ·A.· · Yes.· I --
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.10
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· · Do you see that sentence?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · I'm sorry to interrupt you.
`
`·3· ·Please.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · I was just asking if you could see
`
`·5· ·the sentence.
`
`·6· · · ·A.· · Yes.· That's in the context of a
`
`·7· ·NAND flash memory.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · Are you familiar from your
`
`·9· ·experience with erasing blocks in NAND flash
`
`10· ·memory?
`
`11· · · ·A.· · Yes, I am.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· · Can you tell me what erasing a
`
`13· ·block in a NAND flash memory involves?
`
`14· · · ·A.· · Can you please qualify "erase"?
`
`15· ·Certainly in the context of a block in the
`
`16· ·'298, especially in the claim one in '298,
`
`17· ·both writing instruction to a block and
`
`18· ·erasing could refer to both logical and a
`
`19· ·physical block.
`
`20· · · · · · ·So, in that context, erasing,
`
`21· ·generically speaking, just if we assume the
`
`22· ·erased state for the sake of this deposition,
`
`23· ·let's just assume for an SLC memory, erasing
`
`24· ·is through setting the data to be a one,
`
`25· ·logical one, then erasing a block would be
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.11
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`·1· ·setting the data to be a logical one so that
`
`·2· ·the host, when it sees it, accesses it, will
`
`·3· ·see all one.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · So, the specification describes
`
`·5· ·erasing blocks by writing a 1 bit to the
`
`·6· ·blocks; right?
`
`·7· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`·8· · · ·A.· · I would be very careful to use the
`
`·9· ·word "write."· I would -- in my field, I
`
`10· ·believe the proper word would be setting it
`
`11· ·to one or setting it to a zero state.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· · Well, let's look at column two,
`
`13· ·lines 43 through 45.
`
`14· · · · · · ·Do you see the sentence that
`
`15· ·begins, "Blocks can only be erased"?
`
`16· · · ·A.· · I do see that.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· · Can you read that sentence aloud,
`
`18· ·please?
`
`19· · · ·A.· · "Blocks can only be erased in their
`
`20· ·entirety, and, when erased, are usually
`
`21· ·written to 1 bits."
`
`22· · · ·Q.· · That sentence describes writing
`
`23· ·1 bits to blocks; right?
`
`24· · · ·A.· · In the context of erasing, and not
`
`25· ·to be confused with what we call programming,
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.12
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`·1· ·I would prefer, even though the word here
`
`·2· ·used is "written," I would prefer to use the
`
`·3· ·word "set."· Setting to ones will be -- will
`
`·4· ·be in the context of having logical one as
`
`·5· ·the binary state, setting to one will be
`
`·6· ·erased.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· · But you agree that the '298 patent
`
`·8· ·describes writing 1 bits to blocks?
`
`·9· · · ·A.· · I think that is the language that
`
`10· ·is used here, yes.· In that context, that is
`
`11· ·correct.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· · When performing a write to flash
`
`13· ·memory, a memory cell is written to; correct?
`
`14· · · ·A.· · Repeat your question again.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· · When performing a write to flash
`
`16· ·memory, a memory cell is written to; correct?
`
`17· · · ·A.· · Correct, in the sense that data
`
`18· ·will be transferred to the memory array, and
`
`19· ·it could be one or zero.· Data will be --
`
`20· ·will be -- yeah.· Data will be transferred to
`
`21· ·the memory array.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· · As you say transferred to the
`
`23· ·memory array, that is commonly referred to as
`
`24· ·writing to the memory array; correct?
`
`25· · · ·A.· · In certain contexts, that is
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.13
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`·1· ·correct.
`
`·2· · · ·Q.· · In what context?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· · Again, as I was explaining, the
`
`·4· ·data could either be a one or zero.· So, so
`
`·5· ·you would have to have that data transferred
`
`·6· ·to the memory array.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· · And the '298 patent describes
`
`·8· ·writing to the memory array; right.
`
`·9· · · ·A.· · Can you please point me to the
`
`10· ·context of your statement?
`
`11· · · ·Q.· · Throughout the '298 patent, but we
`
`12· ·could look at the same sentence that we just
`
`13· ·now were discussing.· Column two, lines 43
`
`14· ·through 45, the '298 patent is describing
`
`15· ·writing the blocks to a memory array;
`
`16· ·correct?
`
`17· · · ·A.· · I don't think the word "memory
`
`18· ·array" is there.· I just used that word, but
`
`19· ·I think it's using in the context of block.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· · Do you disagree that the flash
`
`21· ·memory that is described in the '298 patent
`
`22· ·is a memory array?· Let me rephrase that.
`
`23· · · · · · ·Are you saying that the flash
`
`24· ·memory described in the '298 patent is not a
`
`25· ·memory array?
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.14
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`·1· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to scope.
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · I don't believe that is my -- what
`
`·3· ·I am saying.· I think I would characterize it
`
`·4· ·that the sentence you just read was in the
`
`·5· ·form of block, and certainly it could be a
`
`·6· ·logical block or a physical block.· So, I
`
`·7· ·just want to distinguish that from the word
`
`·8· ·"memory array," which did not appear in the
`
`·9· ·citation that we just read.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· · When the '298 patent is describing
`
`11· ·writing 1 bits to blocks at column two, lines
`
`12· ·43 through 45, that sentence is referring to
`
`13· ·writing bits into memory; correct?
`
`14· · · ·A.· · The context that you are referring
`
`15· ·to is referring to erasing a block, and use
`
`16· ·the word that I -- as we mentioned in the
`
`17· ·beginning of the convention, erasing is to
`
`18· ·set the logical state that a host will see to
`
`19· ·be one.· So, in the context, erasing, I think
`
`20· ·it says right here, is really just to
`
`21· ·setting, and uses the word "written," just
`
`22· ·setting all the logical state to one.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · Do you disagree with the choice of
`
`24· ·the word "written" at column two, line 45 of
`
`25· ·the '298 patent?
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.15
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`·1· · · ·A.· · I don't necessarily disagree with
`
`·2· ·the word "written."· I am simply cautioning
`
`·3· ·that this word would have to be used in the
`
`·4· ·proper context.· For example, in the flash
`
`·5· ·memory, we tend to distinguish "write" and
`
`·6· ·"erase," and I think it's well known to a
`
`·7· ·POSA, an erase operation to a block will have
`
`·8· ·to be performed before writing.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·So, in that context, I just want to
`
`10· ·caution that the word "write" or "written"
`
`11· ·has to have a proper context.· And in this
`
`12· ·context, it's really setting the logical
`
`13· ·state to be one.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· · And you said that one tends to
`
`15· ·distinguish writing and erasing.· Does one
`
`16· ·tend to distinguish writing and setting a bit
`
`17· ·in flash memory?
`
`18· · · ·A.· · Can you repeat your question,
`
`19· ·please?
`
`20· · · ·Q.· · In your opinion, does one tend to
`
`21· ·distinguish writing a bit versus setting a
`
`22· ·bit in flash memory.
`
`23· · · ·A.· · Again, it depends on the context.
`
`24· ·I use the word "setting" just to -- in the
`
`25· ·context of a logical state, and so that we
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.16
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`·1· ·will understand whether we are putting --
`
`·2· ·logical state, we are putting the memory
`
`·3· ·cells in the array, in -- memory cell in the
`
`·4· ·block to be.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· · By "logical state," you are
`
`·6· ·referring to a binary value of zero or one?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · Assuming it's single level, yes,
`
`·8· ·zero and one.
`
`·9· · · ·Q.· · And by "logical state," you are not
`
`10· ·referring to logical addresses; correct?
`
`11· · · ·A.· · By "logical state," I'm referring
`
`12· ·to the data that would be -- I want to use
`
`13· ·the word carefully -- the data that would be
`
`14· ·utilized by the -- by the host.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· · How does a 1 bit get written into
`
`16· ·flash memory?
`
`17· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`18· · · ·A.· · The data one can only be -- can
`
`19· ·only be done by -- it's done -- I should not
`
`20· ·say can only be done.· It's done by an erase
`
`21· ·operation to set the logical state to one.
`
`22· ·In the context that we just mentioned, that
`
`23· ·one, logical one for a single-level cell is
`
`24· ·the logical state of an erase cell.
`
`25· · · ·Q.· · Have you worked with flash memory?
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.17
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· · · ·A.· · Yes, I have.
`
`·2· · · ·Q.· · You understand how flash memory
`
`Page 18
`
`·3· ·works?
`
`·4· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· · Doctor, can you please explain how
`
`·6· ·a 1 bit gets put into flash memory?
`
`·7· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to the form,
`
`·8· · · ·scope.
`
`·9· · · ·A.· · In the context of what we have been
`
`10· ·discussing, that a logical one is the erase
`
`11· ·state, then it is through an operation that
`
`12· ·would -- in the context here is through an
`
`13· ·operation that will be done on the per-block
`
`14· ·basis, so that every data in the block will
`
`15· ·be set to a logical one.
`
`16· · · ·Q.· · And I am asking, how is the logical
`
`17· ·one bit actually written?
`
`18· · · ·A.· · It would depend, from memory cell,
`
`19· ·what technology that you are referring to.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· · Well, let's take, for example, the
`
`21· ·NAND flash memory device described at column
`
`22· ·two, line 39 of the '298 patent.· In such a
`
`23· ·flash memory, how is a write operation that
`
`24· ·writes a logical one bit implemented?
`
`25· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.18
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`·1· · · ·A.· · I believe I discussed that in my
`
`·2· ·declaration, and I think it would be much
`
`·3· ·easier if I were just to read it to you, so
`
`·4· ·we would have the proper context.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· · Can you point me to a paragraph in
`
`·6· ·your declaration, please.
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · Yes, as soon as I find it.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · And you are referring, just to be
`
`·9· ·clear, to your declaration in the '298 patent
`
`10· ·IPR, and that is Exhibit 1009 in that IPR?
`
`11· · · ·A.· · That's correct.
`
`12· · · · · · ·Paragraph 46, for example.
`
`13· · · ·Q.· · Can you briefly -- without
`
`14· ·repeating verbatim, can you briefly explain
`
`15· ·how flash memory is written to?
`
`16· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`17· · · ·A.· · Sure.· I said, "For example, a
`
`18· ·large amount of charge may represent a value
`
`19· ·of zero, whereas a small amount of charge may
`
`20· ·represent a value of one."
`
`21· · · ·Q.· · And by a charge, a charge where?
`
`22· ·What do you mean, please?
`
`23· · · ·A.· · This will be the charge on the
`
`24· ·floating gate, in the context --
`
`25· · · ·Q.· · What is the floating gate, please?
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.19
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· ·I'm sorry.· I thought you were done speaking.
`
`Page 20
`
`·2· ·What is the floating gate, please?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· · In the context of a NAND flash
`
`·4· ·memory cell, there are variation, but --
`
`·5· ·excuse me -- I believe I illustrated in the
`
`·6· ·declaration on paragraph 45 to show what I
`
`·7· ·would call a conventional floating gate
`
`·8· ·structure.
`
`·9· · · ·Q.· · Is a floating gate structure used
`
`10· ·in a NAND flash memory?
`
`11· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`12· · · ·A.· · It is one of the structures used in
`
`13· ·NAND flash memory.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· · What is another structure used in
`
`15· ·NAND flash memory?
`
`16· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· · For storing logical bit values.
`
`18· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`19· · · ·A.· · In certain advanced technology -- I
`
`20· ·believe I actually describe it in
`
`21· ·paragraph 46 -- other flash memory cell use
`
`22· ·what is known as charge trap technology.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · So, with the floating gate that you
`
`24· ·mentioned, what happens regarding that
`
`25· ·floating gate when a one is written into the
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.20
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`·1· ·flash memory cell?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · As you see in my declaration, on
`
`·3· ·paragraph 46, a one, which in our context, in
`
`·4· ·the context of discussion, is a logical one,
`
`·5· ·is in a state of erase, a small amount of
`
`·6· ·charge will -- small or very little amount of
`
`·7· ·charge would be on the floating gate.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · So, what distinguishes the one
`
`·9· ·state from the zero state regarding the
`
`10· ·charge?
`
`11· · · ·A.· · Again, I refer to paragraph 46, the
`
`12· ·sentence right before what I just read.· "A
`
`13· ·large amount of charge may represent a value
`
`14· ·of zero."
`
`15· · · ·Q.· · So, in order to write a value of
`
`16· ·one, what has to happen to turn a large
`
`17· ·amount of charge into a small amount of
`
`18· ·charge, as you wrote in paragraph 46?
`
`19· · · ·A.· · So, to go from a large amount of
`
`20· ·charge to a small amount of charge, you would
`
`21· ·have to reduce the amount of charge on the
`
`22· ·floating gate.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · How is the amount of charge reduced
`
`24· ·on the floating gate?
`
`25· · · ·A.· · I beg your pardon?· Please repeat
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.21
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`·1· ·the question.
`
`·2· · · ·Q.· · How is the amount of charge reduced
`
`·3· ·on the floating gate?
`
`·4· · · ·A.· · Through means of -- in the field,
`
`·5· ·through the means of extracting the electrons
`
`·6· ·or extracting the charge away from the
`
`·7· ·floating gate.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · When you say a floating gate, what
`
`·9· ·is the floating gate a component of?
`
`10· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`11· · · ·A.· · I am not sure of your question.
`
`12· ·I'm sorry.· Could you please clarify?
`
`13· · · ·Q.· · Well, we have been talking about a
`
`14· ·floating gate.· I'm trying to understand,
`
`15· ·well, floating in what?· A gate of what?
`
`16· ·What is -- I mean, is there just a floating
`
`17· ·gate by itself?· Can you explain the context
`
`18· ·of a floating -- let me rephrase.
`
`19· · · · · · ·Can you explain the context of a
`
`20· ·floating gate, please?
`
`21· · · ·A.· · To explain floating gate, let me
`
`22· ·first explain gate.· A gate in the CMOS
`
`23· ·transistor, the gate is the means which you
`
`24· ·control the conduction of the channel of the
`
`25· ·transistor.· So, to that extent, the means to
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.22
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`·1· ·control will be applying electrical signal to
`
`·2· ·the gate, so that you can facilitate amount
`
`·3· ·of conduction in the channel.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·So, the -- having the way to
`
`·5· ·putting electrical signal on that gate
`
`·6· ·would -- is by means of making electrical
`
`·7· ·contact.· In that case, that gate will be
`
`·8· ·what we call either -- we can call it a gate
`
`·9· ·with control, because you have electrical
`
`10· ·contact to it.
`
`11· · · · · · ·In a similar analogy or similar way
`
`12· ·of explaining, a floating gate, by
`
`13· ·definition, will be -- because it's also
`
`14· ·still with the word "gate," so the function
`
`15· ·is still trying to effect the conduction of
`
`16· ·the channel region, conduction of electrical
`
`17· ·signal so you can detect the state.
`
`18· · · · · · ·So, the floating gate simply means
`
`19· ·that I do not put an electrical or any means
`
`20· ·to connect to that gate, but instead, I use
`
`21· ·the charge on that gate, which is facilitated
`
`22· ·either -- depending on the amount that's
`
`23· ·on -- that I put on there, is through
`
`24· ·physical mechanism, that I put different
`
`25· ·amount of charge on that, quote/quote,
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.23
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`·1· ·floating gate, in order to facilitate the
`
`·2· ·conduction of the channel beneath it.
`
`·3· · · · · · ·I'm not sure if that's clear to
`
`·4· ·you.· I will be happy to clarify it if you
`
`·5· ·have any -- any questions.
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· · Thank you.
`
`·7· · · · · · ·At paragraph 48 of your declaration
`
`·8· ·in the '298 patent IPR, you mentioned
`
`·9· ·changing the threshold voltage of a memory
`
`10· ·cell to program a flash memory cell; right?
`
`11· · · ·A.· · Correct.· In the context of the way
`
`12· ·I just explained it, the amount of charge
`
`13· ·will modulate the conduction of the channel
`
`14· ·beneath -- beneath that floating gate.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· · So, you're describing writing to
`
`16· ·the flash cell by influencing the amount of
`
`17· ·charge; correct?
`
`18· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`19· · · ·A.· · Correct, in the sense that in this
`
`20· ·case, the charge will be electron.· So, I am
`
`21· ·mentioning electron, how we facilitate
`
`22· ·different amount of electron getting onto the
`
`23· ·floating gate to facilitate this modulation
`
`24· ·of the conduction.
`
`25· · · ·Q.· · What is meant by erasing a cell of
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.24
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`·1· ·a flash memory?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · I believe I mentioned it.· Are you
`
`·3· ·talking about the logical state, which is
`
`·4· ·setting to one, or are you talking about the
`
`·5· ·physical state, which is to assert -- as the
`
`·6· ·term would say, which is, to facilitate the
`
`·7· ·amount of charge or electron on the floating
`
`·8· ·gate in this case is to facilitate the
`
`·9· ·reduction of the amount of charge on the
`
`10· ·floating gate.
`
`11· · · ·Q.· · Well, could you show me where in
`
`12· ·your declaration you describe erasing a
`
`13· ·memory cell?
`
`14· · · ·A.· · If we refer to paragraph 46 in
`
`15· ·conjunction with paragraph 48, it's clear
`
`16· ·that in one case, we increase the number of
`
`17· ·charge, again, in the context this electron
`
`18· ·on the floating gate to set a value of zero,
`
`19· ·and conversely, we remove or reduce the
`
`20· ·number of electrons on the floating gate to
`
`21· ·facilitate a logical state of one, in which
`
`22· ·case, in this context of our discussion, is
`
`23· ·erasing.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· · At paragraph 55 of your
`
`25· ·declaration, you describe erasing a memory
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.25
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`·1· ·cell; right?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · I am describing how the flash
`
`·3· ·memory would be done in terms of program and
`
`·4· ·erase.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· · I'm just asking if paragraph 55 of
`
`·6· ·your declaration describes or discusses
`
`·7· ·erasing a memory cell.· Yes or no, please.
`
`·8· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`·9· · · ·Q.· · Does paragraph 55 of your
`
`10· ·declaration discuss erasing memory cells?
`
`11· · · ·A.· · It discuss erase operation will
`
`12· ·cause all cells in the block to be set to one
`
`13· ·for an SLC cell and set to 11 for an MLC
`
`14· ·cell.· And that's why earlier I cautioned
`
`15· ·against just saying one or zero, when you
`
`16· ·mentioned a flash memory cell state, either
`
`17· ·in the logical programs -- logical one or
`
`18· ·logical zero.· I caution that it's not
`
`19· ·necessarily just a binary.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· · So, paragraph 55 of your
`
`21· ·declaration does describe setting memory
`
`22· ·cells in a block of flash memory to a one
`
`23· ·value; correct?
`
`24· · · ·A.· · Perhaps I can better phrase it that
`
`25· ·my exact words were erase operation will
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.26
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
`·1· ·cause the cells, all the cells in the block
`
`·2· ·to be set to a logical one in the case of SLC
`
`·3· ·architecture and to be 11 in the case of MLC.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · When you say "the cells in the
`
`·5· ·block," can you explain, please, the
`
`·6· ·relationship between memory cells and block?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · In the field, the conventional way
`
`·8· ·would be that the block is just -- is used to
`
`·9· ·describe a multitude of cells that a group --
`
`10· ·how they are grouped.· So, block would be one
`
`11· ·quanta, one form of memory elements that are
`
`12· ·classified within a group together, so you
`
`13· ·can group it as a block.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· · In the last sentence of
`
`15· ·paragraph 55, you describe erasing a block;
`
`16· ·right?
`
`17· · · ·A.· · I'm describing, in setting the
`
`18· ·program or erase state, a block has to be --
`
`19· ·typically we use the word "erase" -- a block
`
`20· ·has to be -- all the -- all that quanta of
`
`21· ·memory elements in that block has to be set
`
`22· ·to a logical one together.
`
`23· · · · · · ·That's the architecture of a flash
`
`24· ·memory, that in the quanta -- in the quanta
`
`25· ·of block of memory array, memory elements,
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.27
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`·1· ·those have to be erased or setting to logical
`
`·2· ·state one together.· You cannot only set or
`
`·3· ·erase just a portion of that quanta that has
`
`·4· ·been classified in a group as a block.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· · Dr. Liu, my question is simple.
`
`·6· ·The last sentence of paragraph 55 describes
`
`·7· ·erasing a block; right?· A yes or no will
`
`·8· ·suffice, please.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`10· · · ·A.· · Let me just read it so that we know
`
`11· ·we have a common ground.
`
`12· · · · · · ·Last sentence says:· "A block must
`
`13· ·be erased, setting all cells to one."· In
`
`14· ·that context, if that satisfies your
`
`15· ·question, that's the -- that's what I have on
`
`16· ·the declaration.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· · That sentence says a block must be
`
`18· ·erased, yes or no?
`
`19· · · ·A.· · That's just one phrase.· The block
`
`20· ·must be erased before the program operation
`
`21· ·can accurately write the series of zeros and
`
`22· ·ones to the -- to another quanta, or maybe
`
`23· ·the same quanta of memory elements or
`
`24· ·different quanta.
`
`25· · · ·Q.· · Yes or no, please.· The sentence
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.28
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· ·says, "A block must be erased, setting all
`
`Page 29
`
`·2· ·cells to one."
`
`·3· · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · Do you see that phrase?
`
`·5· · · ·A.· · Yes.· That's what it says right
`
`·6· ·here, yes.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· · And how is the block erased?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· · The best way to explain it, as I
`
`·9· ·have done so, because it's -- the effect is
`
`10· ·really -- in the case of what we just
`
`11· ·discussed, in the case what I mentioned with
`
`12· ·the floating gate, erase is simply having
`
`13· ·smaller amount of electrons on the floating
`
`14· ·gate compared to the program.
`
`15· · · · · · ·That another way, but that's --
`
`16· ·that's just depending on the -- the -- that's
`
`17· ·not the fixed convention.· So, what I am
`
`18· ·trying to say is that the convention of erase
`
`19· ·is really setting the state of all the cells
`
`20· ·to a logical one.· To the extent it is
`
`21· ·reflective of having a large number of charge
`
`22· ·or having a little amount of charge, that
`
`23· ·depends on the architecture.· It depends on
`
`24· ·the cell that you are using.· But suffice to
`
`25· ·say, in this example, with the floating gate,
`
`Vervain Ex. 2015, p.29
`Micron v. Vervain
`IPR2021-01547
`
`

`

`·1· ·it is to -- since we mention small number of
`
`·2· ·charge, it is to set the charge to be a small
`
`Page 30
`
`·3· ·number.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · You said in your response that
`
`·5· ·an erase is simply having a smaller amount of
`
`·6· ·electrons on the floating gate; right?
`
`·7· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`·8· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Sorry.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·MR. SAGDEO:· Object to form.
`
`10· · · · · · ·Go ahead, Dr. Liu.
`
`11· · · ·A.· · In the context what we just
`
`12· ·described in paragraph 46, where, again, to
`
`13· ·the host is really the convention of logical
`
`14· ·state that the host will see.· So, in the
`
`15· ·context of a floating-gate NAND structure,
`
`16· ·the way the host can see a logical one for
`
`17· ·erase is having a small amount of charge on
`
`18· ·the floating gate.· Therefore, it is -- I
`
`19· ·answer by saying that, when you asked about
`
`20· ·that, so the host, in order to see an erase
`
`21· ·state o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket