throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Drake, Lauren; Cohen, Alexis; Trials
`Cavanaugh, David; Lantier, Gregory; Graber, Jennifer L.; Smolenski, Gilbert T.; Tran, Jasper; Gindler, David;
`Ramos, Javier
`RE: IPR2021-01532 and IPR2021-01533: Request for Reply to Patent Owner"s Preliminary Responses
`Thursday, January 6, 2022 3:22:13 PM
`
`Counsel, the Board recognizes that Patent Owner opposes Petitioner’s request to file a Reply to
`Patent Owner’s Response. However, the Board would find useful additional briefing from both
`parties in each of IPR2021-01532 and IPR2021-01533. Accordingly, in each case, Petitioner is
`authorized to file a Reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response as requested. The Reply shall be
`limited to 10 pages and may address only the discretionary denial issues raised in the Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response and the proposed claim construction for the phrase “the shape of a
`M.” The Reply is due on or before January 13, 2022. Patent Owner is authorized to file a Sur-reply,
`limited to 10 pages to address Petitioner’s Reply in each case. The Patent Owner’s Sur-reply is due
`on or before January 21, 2022.
`
`The Board will file, as an exhibit in each proceeding, a copy of this email correspondence, including
`the request by Petitioner and the subsequent email by Patent Owner.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria King
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`
`
`
`From: Drake, Lauren <LDrake@milbank.com>
`Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 11:09 AM
`To: Cohen, Alexis <Alexis.Cohen@wilmerhale.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Cavanaugh, David <David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com>; Lantier, Gregory
`<Gregory.Lantier@wilmerhale.com>; Graber, Jennifer L. <Jennifer.Graber@wilmerhale.com>;
`Smolenski, Gilbert T. <Gilbert.Smolenski@wilmerhale.com>; Tran, Jasper <jtran@milbank.com>;
`Gindler, David <DGindler@milbank.com>; Ramos, Javier <JRamos@milbank.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2021-01532 and IPR2021-01533: Request for Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary
`Responses
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`IPR2021-01532 and IPR2021-01533
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`

`

`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board ignore Petitioner’s merits arguments in the email
`below. The “Board practice does not permit merits arguments in e-mail communications” and the
`Board has made clear that “parties are to refrain from addressing the merits of an issue in e-mail
`correspondence with the Board.” Kingston Tech. Co. v. CATR Co., IPR2015-00149, Paper 22, at 2
`(P.T.A.B. June 05, 2015). While Patent Owner disagrees with Petitioner’s argument that “[g]ood
`cause exists to permit the Replies because the Patent Owner raised issues in the POPRs that were
`not foreseeable,” we will reserve our response for the conference call in accordance with the Board
`practice.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Lauren Drake
`
`Lauren Drake | Milbank | Partner
`Pronouns: she/her/hers
`2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor | Los Angeles, CA 90067-3019
`T: +1 424.386.4320
`LDrake@milbank.com | milbank.com
`
`
`From: Cohen, Alexis <Alexis.Cohen@wilmerhale.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 5:06 PM
`To: trials@uspto.gov
`Cc: Cavanaugh, David <David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com>; Lantier, Gregory
`<Gregory.Lantier@wilmerhale.com>; Graber, Jennifer L. <Jennifer.Graber@wilmerhale.com>;
`Smolenski, Gilbert T. <Gilbert.Smolenski@wilmerhale.com>; Cohen, Alexis
`<Alexis.Cohen@wilmerhale.com>; Tran, Jasper <jtran@milbank.com>; Drake, Lauren
`<LDrake@milbank.com>; Gindler, David <DGindler@milbank.com>; Ramos, Javier
`<JRamos@milbank.com>
`Subject: [EXT] IPR2021-01532 and IPR2021-01533: Request for Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary
`Responses
`
`IPR2021-01532 and IPR2021-01533: Request for Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary Responses
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`Petitioners respectfully request authorization to file Replies to Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Responses (POPRs) filed on December 27, 2021 in the above-referenced proceedings.
`
`The POPRs argue that the Panel should exercise discretion to deny the Petitions under Fintiv factors
`and based on multiple petitions. The POPRs include arguments related to events that occurred in a
`pending district court case after the Petitions were filed. Additionally, the POPRs include claim
`construction arguments regarding the “shape of a M” and annotated figures that were not included
`in Patent Owner’s claim construction briefing in the district court and therefore could not be
`foreseeably addressed in the Petition.
`
`Therefore Petitioners request a reply to the POPRs to address:
`
`

`

`The discretionary denial issues raised in the POPRs, including Fintiv factors, multiple petitions,
`and their applicability to these IPRs;
`
`Claim construction issues regarding the “shape of a M.”
`
`
`
`Good cause exists to permit the Replies because the Patent Owner raised issues in the POPRs that
`were not foreseeable and the just disposition of the issues in the IPRs requires the Petitioners
`provide an opportunity to respond.
`
`Petitioners respectfully request 10-pages in Reply for each IPR and that the authorized papers be
`due 10 days after authorization is given for the Replies.
`
`Petitioners have met and conferred with Patent Owner, and Patent Owner opposes Petitioners’
`request.
`
`The parties are available for a call with the Panel on Tuesday, January 11, after 2 PM ET and
`Wednesday, January 12, after 3 PM ET. The parties can make additional time available should the
`Board desire to have the conference at a different time.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Alexis Cohen
`
`
`
`Alexis Cohen | WilmerHale
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20006 USA
`+1 202 663 6864 (t)
`+1 202 663 6363 (f)
`+1 518 225 2705 (m)
`alexis.cohen@wilmerhale.com
`
`Please consider the environment before printing this email.
`
`This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be
`privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to
`postmaster@wilmerhale.com—and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
`
`For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://www.wilmerhale.com.
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket