throbber
12 Robieux I, Kumar R, Radhakrishnan S, Koren G. Assessing pain and
`analgesia with a lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion in infants and toddlers
`during venipuncture. J Pediatr 1991; 118: 971-73.
`13 Puglisi CV, Pao J, Ferrara FJ, de Silva JAF. Determination of
`midazolam (Versed R) and its metabolites in plasma by high-
`performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1985; 344: 199-209.
`14 Burtin P, Daoud P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Mussat P, Moriette G.
`Hypotension with midazolam and fentanyl in the newborn. Lancet
`1991; 337: 1545-46.
`15 Heikkila J, Arola M, Kanto J, Laaksonen V. Midazolam as adjunct to
`high dose fentanyl anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting
`operation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1984; 28: 683-89.
`16 Ben-Shlomo I, Abd-El-Khalim H, Ezry J, Zohar S, Tverskoy M.
`Midazolam acts synergistically with fentanyl for induction of
`anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 45-47.
`17 Crevoisier CH, Ziegler WH, Eckert M, Heizmann P. Relationship
`between plasma concentration and effect of midazolam after oral and
`intravenous administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1983; 16: 51-61.
`18 Persson MP, Nilsson A, Hartvig P. Relation of sedation and amnesia to
`plasma concentrations of midazolam in surgical patients. Clin
`Pharmacol Ther 1988; 43: 324-31.
`19 Tolia V, Brennan S, Aravind MK, Kauffman RE. Pharmacokinetic
`and pharmacodynamic study of midazolam in children during
`esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Pediatr 1991; 119: 467-71.
`
`20 Hartwig S, Roth B, Theisohn M. Clinical experience with continuous
`intravenous sedation using midazolam and fentanyl in the paediatric
`intensive care unit. Eur J Pediatr 1991; 150: 784-88.
`21 Booker PD, Beechey A, Lloyd-Thomas AR. Sedation of children
`requiring ventilation using an infusion of midazolam. Br J Anaesth
`1986; 58: 1104-08.
`22 Shelly MP, Sultan MA, Bodenham A, Park GR. Midazolam infusions
`in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1991; 8: 21-27.
`23 Reves JG, Samuelson PN, Lewis S. Midazolam maleate induction in
`patients with ischemic heart disease: haemodynamic observations. Can
`Anesth Soc J 1979; 26: 402-09.
`24 Fragen RJ, Meyers SN, Barresi V, Caldweel NJ. Hemodynamic effects
`of midazolam in cardiac patients. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: 172-76.
`25 Stork EK, Carlo WA, Kliegman RM. Hypertension redefined for
`critically ill neonates. Pediatr Res 1985; 18: 321A.
`26 Gemelli M, Manganaro R, Mami C, De Luca F. Longitudinal study of
`blood pressure during the 1st year of life. Eur J Pediatr 1990; 149:
`318-20.
`27 Kuban KCK, Epi SM, Volpe JJ. Intraventricular hemorrhage: an
`update. J Intensive Care Med 1993; 8: 157-76.
`28 Vacanti JP, Crone RK, Murphy JD, et al. The pulmonary
`hemodynamic response to perioperative anesthesia in the treatment of
`high-risk infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg
`1984; 19: 672-78.
`
`Short reports
`
`Transfemoral endoluminal repair of
`abdominal aortic aneurysm with
`bifurcated graft
`
`Traditional open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has
`disadvantages. We present our experience of transfemoral
`endoluminal repair with a bifurcated graft system. 29 patients
`with aortic aneurysm over 5·5 cm in diameter and 1 with a
`3·2 cm aneurysm and bilateral iliac stenosis were assessed;
`5 were suitable for the procedure. The operation was
`all the patients, without haemodynamic
`successful
`in
`compromise or major complications. This technique has the
`potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from abdominal
`aortic aneurysm. Further modifications are required to make it
`applicable to most aneurysms.
`
`Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a new
`technique for transfemoral graft placement and aneurysm
`exclusion. This minimally invasive approach avoids
`laparotomy, retroperitoneal dissection, and clamping of the
`aorta required for open repair. Instead of being sutured to
`the aorta, the graft is secured by self-expanding metal stents
`deployed under angiographic control. We report use of
`a bifurcated endoluminal graft for abdominal aortic
`aneurysm.
`29 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm greater
`than 5cm in diameter and 1 with a 32 cm aneurysm and bilateral
`iliac stenosis were assessed with ultrasound, contrast-enhanced
`computed
`tomography,
`transfemoral
`and
`aortogram.
`Measurements included the distance from the lowest renal artery to
`the neck of aneurysm and to the aortic bifurcation, distance from
`aortic to iliac bifurcation, diameter of aneurysm neck, and
`minimum and maximum diameters ofthe iliac arteries (table). The
`
`650
`
`system we used is suitable for an aneurysm neck up to 25 cm in
`diameter with a minimum neck length of 1cm. The right iliac
`artery has to be straight and open to allow passage of the delivery
`system and the maximum diameter of the iliac limb of the graft
`cannot exceed 1 -5 cm. None of our patients had a non-aneurysmal
`segment of aorta between the aneurysm and aortic bifurcation to
`allow deployment of a straight graft and only 5 (17%) patents were
`found suitable for the bifurcated system. The major reasons for
`unsuitability were short neck (8), wide neck (7), iliac aneurysms (6),
`and wide (2) and too tortuous (2) an iliac artery.
`Modified Gianturco-z-stents (Cook) were used to secure the top
`end of the soft-dacron bifurcated graft (Meadox) in the non-
`aneurysmal infrarenal aorta and the bottom end of the two limbs
`into the common iliac artery. Siremobil 2000 (Siemens) C-armwas
`used for angiographic imaging. The procedure was under general
`anaesthesia in the operating theatre. Both the common femoral
`arteries were exposed and 10 000 U heparin was administered in an
`intravenous bolus before arteriotomy. A transfemoral catheter was
`introduced from the left femoral artery and passed over the aortic
`bifurcation and pulled out of the right common femoral
`arteriotomy with a stone-retrieval basket. The delivery system (an
`inner shaft and an outer sheath containing the graft and stent) was
`introduced through the right common femoral arteriotomy. Care
`was required in deployment of the top stent between the renal
`artery and the aneurysm, by withdrawing the outer sheath with the
`inner shaft stabilised in the correct position by angiographic
`screening. Complete withdrawal of the outer sheath exposed the
`catheter between the left limb of the graft and the inner shaft at the
`right femoral arteriotomy. This catheter was disconnected from
`the inner shaft and sutured to the transfemoral catheter. The left
`graft limb was guided into the left iliac artery as the transfemoral
`catheter was withdrawn from the left femoral arteriotomy. After
`the deployment of both limbs of the grafts, Wallstents (Schneider)
`were used for additional support.
`Bifurcated aorto-iliac grafts were successfully inserted in
`all patients (table). All remained haemodynamically stable
`during operation. 2 patients required extraperitoneal
`exposure of the common iliac on one side to assist accurate
`deployment of the bottom stent. All resumed normal diet
`within 24 hours of the procedure and were mobile within 48
`hours. All remained well at 1-4 months’ follow-up. In 1
`patient the left limb of the graft occluded at 3 months and
`was successfully treated by a femoro-femoral bypass graft.
`The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm has
`increased over the past three decades.Nearly 23% of men
`between the ages of 65 and 75 years have abdominal aortic
`
`MEDTRONIC 1021
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`*Symptomatic bilateral ostial iliac stenotic disease with coexisting small aneurysm.
`Table: Patients’ details
`
`aneurysm greater than 4 cm in diameter. The overall
`mortality rate of patients in the community with rupture of
`an aortic aneurysm is 85-95 %.3 Although screening is being
`used to detect symptom-less aneurysms before they
`rupture, most surgeons operate only on aneurysms over
`55 cm in diameter; the management of smaller aneurysms
`remains controversia1.4 The reluctance to operate on
`smaller aneurysm is mainly due to the high risk of
`postoperative morbidity and mortality. Patients with aortic
`aneurysm often have generalised arterial disease and
`angiography shows a 47-65% frequency of coronary artery
`disease.5 During open repair, infrarenal abdominal aortic
`cross-clamping increases systemic vascular resistance by
`about 40% and decreases stroke volume and cardiac output
`by 15-35%, with renal hypoperfusion and subsequent
`hypotension during declamping.6 Less invasive techniques
`with lower morbidity and mortality would therefore be of
`value; transfemoral endovascular aneurysm repair is thus
`an important development.
`Parodi et al’ reported the successful use of endoluminal
`transfemoral repair with non-bifurcated grafts in patients
`with abdominal aortic aneurysm. A limitation of their
`technique is that deployment of a straight aorto-aortic graft
`requires a segment of non-aneurysmal aorta above and
`below the aneurysm. Most substantial aneurysms do not
`have such a segment because the aneurysm usually extends
`to the aortic bifurcation. None of our patients was suitable
`for a straight graft. A bifurcated graft can be used in such a
`situation because the limbs of the graft are deployed in
`the unaffected common iliac arteries. The endoluminal
`placement of bifurcated graft used in this study has been
`developed by Chuter8 and its successful clinical use has
`been reported.99
`Endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair takes no longer than
`traditional open repair and experience may shorten the
`procedure.
`require
`postoperative
`Patients
`do
`not
`management in the intensive-care unit. Shorter hospital
`stay and early resumption of normal activities add to the
`potential economic benefit. Transfemoral endoluminal
`aneurysm repair with a bifurcated graft could reduce
`morbidity and mortality from surgery for abdominal aortic
`aneurysm and allow treatment of patients who would not
`tolerate the open procedure.
`However, only limited follow-up is available on our
`patients and it remains to be seen whether this technique
`can prevent rupture of the aneurysm. Further refinement
`involving development of thinner grafts is in progress to
`allow packing of wider grafts into the sheath, to enable
`inclusion of patients with aneurysm neck over 2-5 cm in
`diameter. Also, with further experience, it may be possible
`to deploy the top stent in necks under 1 -5 cm in length. With
`these two improvements, it would be possible to treat most
`patients.
`We acknowledge the contributions made to this study by Dr R H S Gregson
`and Mr G S Makin, University Hospital, Nottingham.
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`References
`Fowkes FGC, MacIntyre CCA, Ruckley CV. Increasing incidence of
`1
`aortic aneurysms in England and Wales. BMJ 1989; 298: 33-35.
`Collin J, Araujo L, Walton L, Lindsell D. Oxford screening
`programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years.
`Lancet 1988; ii: 613-15.
`Johansson G, Sedenberg J. Ruptured aortic aneurysms: a study of
`incidence and mortality. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 101-03.
`Greenhalgh RM. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. BMJ 1990;
`301: 136.
`Hertzer NR. Basic data concerning associated coronary artery disease
`in peripheral vascular patients. Ann Vasc Surg 1987; 1: 616-20.
`Clark NJ, Stanley TH. Anaesthesia for vascular surgery. In:
`Miller RD, ed. Anaesthesia. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone,
`1994: 1851-95.
`Parodi JC, Plamaz JC, Burone TD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft
`implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991; 5:
`491-99.
`Chuter TAM. Transfemoral aneurysm repair (DM thesis).
`Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 1994.
`Scott RAP, Chuter TAM. Clinical endovascular placement of
`bifurcated graft in abdominal aortic aneurysm without laparotomy.
`Lancet 1994; 343: 413.
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
`NG7 2UH, UK (S W Yusuf FRCS, D M Baker FRCS, S C Whitaker FRCR,
`P W Wenham FRCS, B R Hopkinson FRCS); and Department of Surgery,
`Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York,
`USA (T A M Chuter DM)
`Correspondence to: Mr S W Yusuf
`
`Smoking and growth rate of small
`abdominal aortic aneurysms
`
`Smoking is an important risk factor for abdominal aortic
`aneurysm. Limiting the growth rate of small aneurysms has the
`potential to prevent them reaching a size at which surgical
`repair is considered. In 43 patients, with small aneurysms,
`growth rates were studied by serial ultrasound over 3 years.
`The median expansion rate of these small aneurysms was
`0·13 cm per year. Growth rates were higher in those who
`continued to smoke (0·16 vs 0·09 cm per year in those who no
`longer smoked, p=0·038).
`Higher growth
`rates were
`significantly correlated with the concentration of serum
`cotinine. Stopping smoking could reduce the growth rate of
`small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
`
`Abdominal aortic aneurysm is common in the elderly.
`Rupture may be the first sign, and that disaster carries a
`fatality rate of over 90% . Many die before admission and of
`those who undergo emergency repair, mortality is over
`40%. Ultrasound screening has been advocated to allow
`elective repair before rupture. It would be better to prevent
`small aneurysms enlarging to a dangerous size. Most
`aneurysms detected by screening are small,4 which provides
`the opportunity to modify risk factors to reduce aneurysm
`growth.
`We have reported the high yield of aneurysms detected by
`ultrasound in patients with peripheral arterial disease.5 43 of these
`patients (median age 72, range 68-78; 33 men) were available for
`serial follow-up of aneurysm size. The median follow-up was 2
`years (range 1-4). The initial aneurysm diameter was under 5 cm in
`
`651
`
`- 2 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket