throbber
RESECTION OF AN ANEURYSM OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA
`Reestablishment of the Continuity by a Preserved Human Arterial Graft, with Result After Five Months
`CHARLES DUBOST, M.D.
`MICHEL ALLARY, M.D.
`AND
`NICOLAS OECONOMOS, M.D.
`PARIS, FRANCE
`
`Mr. Le G., aged 50 years, had an aneurysm of
`the abdominal aorta revealed by gross
`disturbances of function, predominantly in the left leg. Abdominal examination showed a large
`tumor in the left paraumbilical region, pulsating and expansile. The right femoral pulse was
`diminished and the left absent; oscillations were diminished on the right and absent on the left.
`infarction. The blood Wassermann test was negative.
`One year before he had had a myocardial
`The aortograph (Fig. 1) shows that the beginning of the aneurysm is just below the kidneys
`and that
`it extends as far as the bifurcation of
`the aorta. The left common iliac artery is
`blocked in its first 5 or 6 cm. The right common iliac artery, although patent, has at its origin
`two small aneurysmal dilatations. The superior mesenteric and renal arteries, perfectly deline-
`ated by the opaque medium, are clearly above the aneurysm. The inferior mesenteric artery,
`however, is not injected. The left iliac artery seems to receive its blood by the spermatic artery
`or one of
`its branches.
`Operative Intervention (March 29, 1951, Dr. Dubost).—A left
`incision
`thoracoabdominal
`was made, an extraperitoneal approach being used, and resection of
`the 11th rib was carried
`out. Retraction of the peritoneal sac disclosed an enormous aneurysm extending from the origin
`of the renal arteries to the common iliac arteries. It was decided to attempt its complete removal
`and to use a graft to reestablish continuity of the arteries.
`The operation was carried out
`in the following stages : Control of
`the aneurysm was
`obtained by a clamp placed proximally to it,
`immediately below the renal arteries. Next,
`in
`isolation, and provisional hemostasis of both
`the iliac arteries, came exposure,
`the region of
`iliac and both internal
`iliac arteries. Section of both common iliac arteries was
`external
`performed and then dissection of the aneurysm from below upward. The stripping was trouble¬
`some near the common iliac veins and the inferior vena cava, which were adherent
`in places
`fragments of which had to be left
`in some places. The lumbar vessels,
`to the aneurysmal sac,
`thrombosed, were sectioned without
`ligature. The inferior mesenteric artery did not bleed
`from the proximal cut end but did spurt blood from the peripheral end. The aneurysm, entirely
`freed, was turned upward and sectioned 2 cm. from the clamp on the aorta.
`the aorta proximally and the cut end of
`the right common iliac artery
`The cut end of
`(15 cm.
`peripherally were trimmed in order to interpose the graft
`in length and taken from
`three weeks previously). The superior anastomosis
`the thoracic aorta of a 20-year-old girl
`of the aortic graft was carried out with 5/5 silk 0 (Bruneau).
`Since we did not have a Y-shaped graft, it was necessary to make an end-to-end anastomosis
`between the graft and the right common iliac artery (Fig. 2).
`The obstruction in the left common iliac artery was removed, and after section of
`the
`iliac artery, which was itself blocked,
`the graft
`it was anastomosed to the side of
`internal
`(Prof. F. d'Allaines), Paris.
`From the Department of Surgery, No. 1 Broussais Hospital
`This case was previously discussed in La Semaine des h\l=o^\pitauxde Paris, Sept. 18, 1951.
`Permission to report it here and to reproduce the illustrations has been obtained.
`
`TMT 2088
`Medtronic v. TMT
`IPR2021-01532
`
`

`

`Fig. 1.—Preoperative aortograph. The aneurysm begins 2 or 3 cm. below the renal arteries.
`Inferiorly, it involves the aortic bifurcation ;
`the right common iliac artery shows at its origin
`two aneurysmal dilatations, and the left common iliac is obstructed. The inferior mesenteric
`artery is not delineated.
`
`Fig. 2.—Diagram of operation. The 14-cm. graft was anastomosed end-to-end with the aorta
`above and the right common iliac below. After removal of its obstruction, the left common iliac
`artery was anastomosed by its end to the side of the graft.
`
`

`

`Fig. 3.—Postoperative aortograph. The graft has kept a normal caliber ;
`arteries are perfectly delineated.
`
`the two iliac
`
`Fig. 4.—Operative specimen. The specimen is cut
`to demonstrate the importance of
`the
`peripheral clot, which allows the persistence through its center of a canal which was shown on
`the aortograph.
`
`

`

`immediately above the other anastomosis. After removal of the clamps,
`the three anastomoses
`were widely patent, and the femoral pulses were felt to be equal on the two sides.
`A check aortograph was carried out two months later and showed perfect
`function of
`the
`graft, which was not at all dilated but was widely patent, as were also the iliac and femoral
`arteries (Fig. 3).
`Three months after the operation the patient was in perfect health. The femoral pulses
`were strong and equal and also the posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries.
`The specimen, 15 cm.
`long, was made up of a large sac with a very thin wall which was
`calcified in many places and was completely filled by a large clot which had a canal
`through
`in diameter (Fig. 4).
`its center about 3 cm.
`Histological Examination.—The aortic wall, extremely altered, shows the following changes
`from the cavity of the aneurysm outward : There is a much thickened intima, transformed into
`taking up the stain, studded with fatty acid crystals, and showing
`an amorphous mass not
`Immediately under
`calcareous degeneration in the deepest part.
`the calcified areas is the
`beginning of
`recognizable in this region from several areas of elastic fibers
`the media, still
`which are fragmented. The outer four-fifths of the media are totally lacking in elastic tissue.
`In contrast,
`the muscle fibers are almost normal
`fibrous tissue is more
`in appearance but
`prominent. The main feature,
`together with the destruction of elastic tissue,
`is the presence
`lymphocytic cells accompanying the vasa
`throughout
`the outer half of the aorta of masses of
`these cells form concentric sheets but also are seen sometimes to follow the vessels
`vasorum ;
`at right angles to the layers of
`the wall. This periarteritis is accompanied in places with
`endoarteritis obliterans, several vasa vasorum being completely obstructed.
`The narrow adventitious layer contains the same perivascular lymphocytic infiltration, the
`same obliteration of a number of vasa vasorum, and, moreover, a definite lymphocytic hyper-
`plasia in lymph nodules.
`No inflammatory sclerosis was seen.
`In summary, the lesion is an aneurysm with marked changes in the walls and calcium depo¬
`the vasa vasorum would suggest an inflammatory
`sition. The endarteritis and periarteritis of
`process without any specific indication as to its nature.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`A case of aneurysm of the abdominal aorta extending from the renal to the iliac
`arteries is reported. The method chosen for its excision was a combined abdomino-
`thoracic approach on the left ; this gave the necessary exposure of the aortic bifur¬
`cation and the origin of the renal arteries.
`The reestablishment of continuity of the aorta was assured by a graft of human
`aorta which had been preserved for three weeks. An aortograph carried out two
`months after the operation showed perfect permeability of the graft as well as of
`the iliac arteries, of which the left one had been obstructed. Five months after
`surgical
`intervention the pulse and oscillations in both legs were normal and equal.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket