throbber
I IIIII IIIIIIII II llllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111
`US 20020124502Al
`
`(19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/0124502 Al
`Sep. 12, 2002
`Henderson
`( 43) Pub. Date:
`
`(54) PERIMETER WEIGHTED FOUNDATION
`FOR WIND TURBINES AND THE LIKE
`
`(76)
`
`Inventor: Allan P. Henderson, Bakersfield, CA
`(US)
`
`Correspondence Address:
`JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC
`400 SEVENTH STREET N.W.
`SUITE 600
`WASHINGTON, DC 20004 (US)
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`10/067,999
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Feb. 8, 2002
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(63) Continuation of application No. 09/671,282, filed on
`Sep. 27, 2000, now abandoned.
`
`Publication Classification
`
`Int. Cl.7 ........................... E02D 27/00; E02D 27/32
`(51)
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`...................... 52/296; 52/741.14; 52/741.15
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A perimeter weighted foundation has a central pier pedestal
`and an enlarged base spaced outwardly and extending below
`the pedestal. The enlarged base includes an outer concentric
`perimeter wall section with a radially extending, disk(cid:173)
`shaped spread section interconnecting the bottom of the
`pedestal section and the top of the perimeter wall section.
`The pedestal section includes vertically extending post(cid:173)
`tensioning anchor bolts sleeved through substantially the
`entire height of the cylindrical pedestal in accordance with
`earlier U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,586,417 and 5,826,387 and the
`spread section includes two layers of similarly sleeved
`post-tensioning bolts which extend through the bottom of
`the pedestal section and into or through the top of the
`perimeter wall section, thus tying together the enlarged base
`to the pier pedestal. After the concrete is poured, hardened
`and cured, the vertical bolts of the pedestal section and the
`radially extending horizontal bolts in the spread section are
`post-tensioned to impart a heavy unit compressive loading
`on the concrete in the pier pedestal and enlarged base. After
`back filling soil onto the spread section and to the interior of
`the pedestal section, the foundation is able to withstand high
`upset forces imparted to the foundation by any large struc(cid:173)
`ture supported thereon.
`
`________ ___, __ - - i ' - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . -1
`
`/7'(
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 1 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`20
`
`90
`
`FIG.1
`(PRIOR ART)
`
`12
`
`14
`
`FIG. 2A
`(PRJORART)
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 2 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`0
`t{')
`
`CXJ --+-1-~71
`
`~
`
`.... . .
`
`. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`. ......
`.. .... ·:
`
`.
`. · ..... ·.
`
`. -···· . .- ~-.. -... ,· ··\· .-/'.:·/: :
`
`· . ..,
`
`co
`
`•
`
`"'!·. ·..:.;_·.
`
`""
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 3 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`Jl'l
`
`!---1of
`
`J
`
`I I
`
`/(O
`
`l(Z-
`
`FIG. 3
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 4 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`_9
`~
`
`{!.,
`
`111'1'
`"
`
`G -LL
`
`11
`11
`
`~,
`'~
`,~ !i
`;!~ 'i
`i I
`1:
`irj
`
`0-\
`C
`..............
`
`!'()
`
`a:;, -
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 5 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`~
`l"fhr'~~-:t--:~~~~~r----- --
`
`""' 0 -
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 6 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`FIG. 6
`
`FJG~ 7
`
`----l.Af'----1
`
`8'
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 7
`
`

`

`patent J\.p\l\\cation Publication Se\l· 12, 2002 S1teet 7 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`-
`
`•
`
`Cl -1,l.,,
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 8 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`J--------...~----,.._-
`
`9
`
`(!,l -u..
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 9
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Sep. 12, 2002 Sheet 9 of 9
`
`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`0tJn:R. IOAU. CMP (30 OfA.J:t
`lN~W'1.lLQ.fp
`,~ DIA.):!
`
`FIG. 10
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 10
`
`

`

`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`Sep. 12,2002
`
`1
`
`PERIMETER WEIGHTED FOUNDATION FOR
`WIND TURBINES AND THE LIKE
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0001] 1. Field of the Invention
`
`[0002] This invention relates to concrete foundations, and
`more particularly, to reinforced concrete pier foundations
`useful for the support of tall, heavy and/or large towers
`which may be used to support power lines, communication
`systems, street lighting and signals, bridge supports, com(cid:173)
`mercial signs, freeway signs, ski lifts and the like, and
`especially wind turbines which are subject to very high upset
`forces.
`
`[0003] 2. Background of the Invention
`
`[0004] Various different forms of foundations utilizing
`some of the general structural and operational features of the
`instant invention have been known. However, these previ(cid:173)
`ously known foundations do not include some of the basic
`features of the instant invention. The combination of fea(cid:173)
`tures incorporated in the disclosed embodiments of the
`instant invention enable a heavy duty foundation to be
`formed in situ or be precast and transported to the construc(cid:173)
`tion site, and be placed in position in a manner not requiring
`the use of large drilling rigs or pile drivers. The present
`invention is particularly useful in locations where the ground
`water is high and/or the depth clearance for placement of the
`foundation is low. The foundation of the present invention is
`capable of resisting very high upset loads and in a manner
`independent of the concrete of the foundation experiencing
`alternating localized compression and tension loading.
`
`[0005]
`In a conventional concrete pier foundation the
`concrete bears the compressive loads and the contained
`reinforcing bars (rebar) are sized to bear the tensile loads.
`Anchor bolts are typically utilized solely for the purpose of
`attaching the supported structure to the foundation. The
`anchor bolts are typically placed within a reinforcing steel
`(rebar) matrix or cage using a removable template at the top
`and a separate anchor plate at the bottom of each bolt to
`prevent anchor bolt pullout. The entire module is poured in
`concrete. Conventional foundations typically resist over(cid:173)
`turning movement by their weight.
`
`[0006] Further, when the foundation is loaded by the
`structure supported thereon, the foundation is subjected to
`varying tensile and compressive loads with there being a
`boundary at the bolt anchor plates where the loading on the
`concrete alternates from a compressive load to a tensile load
`depending upon the various forces on the supported struc(cid:173)
`ture. The tensile load from the overturning moment of the
`supported structure is applied near the top of the foundation
`by the anchor bolts and subjects the large portion of the
`foundation below the point of application to tension. The
`large foundation typically requires a great amount of rein(cid:173)
`forcing steel and a large amount of concrete to encase the
`reinforcing steel. Extensive labor is also necessary to
`assemble the reinforcing steel matrix and fill the volume of
`the foundation with concrete and fix the anchor bolts. A
`typical cylindrical foundation also requires the use of a large
`drill to excavate the hole.
`
`[0007] My two prior U.S. patents, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,586,
`417 and 5,826,387, hereby incorporated by reference in their
`entirety as if fully set forth, are hereinafter sometimes
`
`referred to as "my prior patents". My prior patents disclose
`concrete pier foundations under high unit compression
`which eliminate the necessity for large quantities of rein(cid:173)
`forcing steel bars (rebar or tension bars) and substantially
`reduce the amount of concrete necessary. Therefore, the cost
`of these foundations is substantially less when compared to
`conventional designs. Furthermore, the foundations of my
`prior patents simplify the placement of the supported struc(cid:173)
`ture on the foundation and eliminate alternating cyclical
`compression and tension loading on the foundation, thereby
`substantially reducing fatigue. Also, these patented founda(cid:173)
`tions allow for the replacement of the tower anchor bolts in
`the unlikely event of bolt failure and allow for removal of
`the upper four to five feet of the foundation in the event such
`action is desired for decommissioning purposes.
`
`[0008] The foundations of my prior patents are preferably
`in the shape of a concrete cylinder. The outer boundary shell
`of the concrete may be formed by corrugated metal pipe
`(CMP). The inner boundary, preferably in large hollow
`cylinder foundations, also may be formed by CMP of a
`lesser diameter. Elongated high strength steel bolts are
`positioned around the periphery of the concrete cylinder and
`extend from a peripheral anchor plate or ring near the bottom
`of the cylinder vertically up through the concrete portion of
`the foundation to a peripheral connecting plate or flange
`adjacent the upper end of the structure. The bolts are
`received in "hollow tubes" to isolate the bolts from the
`concrete. The steel bolts preferably serve as anchor bolts for
`attachment of the base flange of the supported tower struc(cid:173)
`ture, and the anchor bolt pattern may thus be determined by
`the bolt hole pattern on the lower base plate or flange of the
`supported tower. The steel bolt pattern may also be engi(cid:173)
`neered into the construction of the foundation by a remov(cid:173)
`able template.
`
`[0009] The "hollow tubes" are preferably elongated plas(cid:173)
`tic tubes or sleeves which encase the bolts substantially
`through the entire vertical extent of the concrete and prevent
`the bolts from adhering to the concrete. Then, the bolts can
`be tensioned after the concrete has hardened and cured in
`order to post-tension the entire concrete foundation. Alter(cid:173)
`natively, the elongated bolts can be wrapped in plastic tape,
`or otherwise sheathed to prevent the bolts from adhering to
`the concrete during curing and allow the bolts to stretch
`under tension over the entire operating length of the bolt
`through substantially the full vertical extent of the concrete.
`There is typically no conventional rebar reinforcing steel in
`the foundation, except perhaps in large foundations where a
`small amount of incidental re bar may be used to stabilize the
`bolts during construction of the foundation.
`
`[0010] The center of a large hollow cylindrical foundation
`according to my prior patents is filled with excavated soil
`and then capped. Excavation for the foundation may be done
`using widely available, fast, low cost excavating machines
`instead of relatively rare, slow, costly drills necessary for
`conventional cylindrical foundations.
`
`[0011] The foundations of my prior patents use the
`mechanical interaction with the earth to prevent overturning
`instead of the mass of the foundation typically used by other
`foundations for turbine towers and other large structures
`subject to high upset forces. The high strength anchor bolts
`are tightened to provide heavy tension on the foundation
`from a heavy top flange through which the bolts pass to the
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 11
`
`

`

`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`Sep. 12,2002
`
`2
`
`anchor flange or plate adjacent the bottom of the foundation,
`thereby post-stressing the concrete in great compression and
`placing the entire foundation, between the heavy top plate or
`flange and lower anchor plate or flange, under high unit
`compression loading. The bolts are tightened so as to exceed
`the maximum internal tension expected from overturning
`forces of the tower structure on the foundation. Therefore,
`the entire foundation withstands the various loads with the
`concrete thereof always remaining in compression and the
`bolts always in static tension. The concrete pier foundations
`of my prior patents may be formed in situ in a remote
`location or be formed in a precast concrete section placed
`under heavy compression.
`
`[0012] To describe a portion of the foundation structure
`incorporated in the foundation of the present invention,
`reference is now made to FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 which are taken
`from my prior patents. In these Figures, the numeral 10
`generally designates the pier foundation. The foundation 10
`includes inner and outer upstanding corrugated metal pipe
`(CMP) sections 12 and 14. The outer section 14 is initially
`placed within a hole or excavation 16 formed in the ground
`18 and rests upon the bottom of the excavation 16. The inner
`section 12 is then placed and positioned within the excava(cid:173)
`tion 16. The interior of the inner CMP 12 is partially back
`filled and the excavation 16 outwardly of the outer CMP 14
`is partially back filled to stabilize the CMP sections gener(cid:173)
`ally in position within the excavation and relative to each
`other.
`
`[0013] The foundation 10 additionally includes a series of
`tensioning bolts 20 and 21 spaced circumferentially about
`the annulus defined between sections 12 and 14. The ten(cid:173)
`sioning bolts are preferably in side-by-side pairs which are
`spaced radially from the center of the foundation. In a
`typical embodiment, the inner ring of bolts 20 has a slightly
`shorter diameter than the outer ring of bolts 21. Forty-eight
`tensioning bolts 20 and forty-eight tensioning bolts 21, or a
`total of ninety-six, are provided. The rings of bolts have
`diameters which are several inches apart and which gener(cid:173)
`ally equal about 12 feet.
`
`[0014] The lower ends of the bolts 20 and 21 are anchored
`to a lower annular plate or anchor ring 22, sometimes also
`called an embedment ring, which preferably may be con(cid:173)
`structed of several circumferentially butted and joined sec(cid:173)
`tions. The anchor or embedment ring 22 is radially spaced
`relative to the inner CMP section 12 preferably by utilizing
`circumferentially spaced horizontal and radially extending
`positioning bolts 24 threaded through nuts 26 secured to the
`under side of the anchor ring 22 at points spaced circum(cid:173)
`ferentially thereabout. Further, the bolts 20 and 21 have all
`but their opposite ends slidingly received through hollow
`tubes, such as PVC pipes 30, which are sized to receive and
`loosely grip bolts 20 and 21 but still permit free movement
`therethrough. The hollow tubes or PVC tubing 30 need not
`extend through the entire vertical height of concrete 68, but
`only through as much of the central portions and extending
`as close to the top and bottom as to allow the tensioning bolts
`to extend evenly through the concrete during post-tension(cid:173)
`ing.
`
`[0015] The PVC pipes 30 and other suitable tubing or
`isolating mechanism serve to allow bolts 20 and 21 to move
`relatively freely through the concrete after curing so as to
`allow post-tensioning of the elongate rods. In addition, rebar
`
`wraps 28 are used and secured to the tubes 30 associated
`with outer bolts 21 at approximately five foot intervals along
`the vertical extent of the bolts 21 in order to maintain the
`bolts longitudinally straight during the pour of concrete.
`
`[0016] The upper ends of the bolts 20 are supported from
`a template 32 which consists of upper and lower rings 34 and
`36 or ring sections secured together. Upwardly opening
`radial channel members 38 and mounting blocks 40 received
`in the channel members 38 are clamped between the upper
`and lower rings 34 and 36 through the utilization of upper
`and lower nuts 42 and 44 threaded on the bolts 20 and 21.
`The inner ends of the radial channel members 38 are joined
`by a center circular plate 46. The inner portions of the radial
`channel members 38 include lateral stabilizers 45 in the
`form of inverted channel members downwardly embrac(cid:173)
`ingly engaged thereover and equipped with opposite side set
`screws 47 clamp engaged with the corresponding channel
`members 38. The depending flanges of the channel members
`45 are slotted for stabilizing engagement with adjacent
`upper edge portions of the inner pipe 12 while the outer ends
`of the channel members 38 include threadingly adjustable
`channel member feet 50 abutingly engageable with the
`ground 18. A cylindrical form plate 52 is clamped about the
`upper end of the outer pipe 14 and has its opposite ends
`secured together in overlapped relation.
`
`[0017] Thereafter, concrete 68 may be poured to the
`bottom of each of the radial channel members 38 and to the
`top of each of the blackout bodies 64. After the concrete 68
`has hardened, the upper nuts 42 are removed and the entire
`template 32 including the upper and lower rings 34 and 36,
`the channel members 38 and attached feet 50 are lifted up
`from the bolts 20 and 21 and the form plate 52, the blackout
`bodies 64 being exposed from above by removal of the
`template 32 to thus allow removal of the blackout bodies 64.
`
`[0018] When the concrete 68 has sufficiently hardened, it
`must be determined that the groove 70 is level. If groove 70
`is not level, a coating of high compression hardenable grout
`82 should be placed within the groove 70 to achieve a
`levelness for the tower base. Further, even if groove 70 is
`level, it may be desirable to place grout 82 in the groove 70.
`The nuts 44 are removed or threaded downwardly on the
`bolts 20 and 21 at least % inch. A tower (not shown) to be
`supported from the foundation 10 is thereafter lowered into
`position with the upper exposed ends of the bolts 20 and 21
`upwardly received through suitable bores formed in the
`inner and outer peripheries of the heavy annular plate or base
`flange of the tower and the lower lug defining portion of the
`base flange seated in the groove or grout trough 70. Initially
`the upper nuts 42 are again threaded down onto the upper
`ends of the bolts 20 and 21 and preferably torqued to about
`50 foot pounds. The nuts 42 are thereafter sequentially
`torqued (in a predetermined pattern of tightening) preferably
`to about 600 foot pounds which places each of the bolts 20
`and 21 under approximately 40,000 pounds tension at
`approximately 1/3 the stretch limit of the bolts 20 and 21.
`
`[0019] By placing the bolts 20 and 21 under high tension,
`the cylindrical structure comprising the concrete 68 is placed
`under heavy unit compressive loading from the upper end
`thereof downwardly to a level adjacent the lower end of the
`cylindrical structure, and the unit compressive loading is
`considerably greater than any upset tensional forces which
`must be overcome to prevent upset of the tower and faun-
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 12
`
`

`

`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`Sep. 12,2002
`
`3
`
`dation 10. As a result, the concrete foundation 68 is always
`under compression and never subject to alternating com(cid:173)
`pression and tension forces.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0020] The perimeter weighted foundation of the present
`invention incorporates the above described post-stressed
`annular foundation of my prior patents as a pier pedestal or
`pedestal section of the foundation of the present invention.
`The present invention differs from the structures disclosed in
`my prior patents in that the foundation of the present
`invention includes an expanded base positioned adjacent the
`bottom of the pedestal section which has a cylindrical
`perimeter wall that is substantially larger in diameter than
`the cylindrical wall of the pedestal section and that extends
`to a depth substantially below the bottom of the pedestal
`section. The expanded base also includes a generally hori(cid:173)
`zontal disk-like spread section which interconnects the bot(cid:173)
`tom of the pedestal section and the top of the perimeter wall
`or perimeter wall section. This combination greatly
`increases the foundation's resistance to an overturning
`moment by use of skin friction along the exterior sides of the
`perimeter wall and pedestal section and by the additional
`weight and size concentration at the perimeter of the foun(cid:173)
`dation, including the back fill on top of the horizontal spread
`section.
`
`[0021] The foundation of the present invention also elimi(cid:173)
`nates alternating cyclical compression and tension loading
`stresses, thereby substantially increasing internal stiffness
`and reducing fatigue. Vertically extending anchor bolts in
`the pedestal section are sleeved in PVC or equivalent
`shielding to prevent bolt bonding with concrete for com(cid:173)
`pression of the concrete as disclosed in my prior patents.
`Radially extending bolts are embedded horizontally in the
`disk-like spread section for reinforcement. The radially
`extending horizontal bolts are also sleeved in PVC or
`equivalent sheathing for high compression loading of the
`annular spread section. It has not been found necessary to
`post-tension the cylindrical perimeter wall and post-tension
`bolts are preferably omitted from this section. However,
`such bolts may be included as part of the present invention
`if high unit compression of the exterior perimeter wall
`section is desired.
`
`[0022] The foundation of the present invention reduces
`time, and reduces cost by allowing excavation by conven(cid:173)
`tional backhoes and/or truck excavators. Further, the ten(cid:173)
`sionless pedestal section can be assembled and poured at a
`fabrication yard and shipped as a precast component to the
`foundation site. The corrugated metal pipe (CMP) forms
`provide reinforcing steel and establish a boundary for the
`concrete pour. The bolt holes in the CMP provide support
`and positioning for the horizontal radial arrangement of the
`laterally extending bolts in the spread section, along with
`eliminating the need for temporary perimeter forms and
`reinforcing steel supporting chairs and blocks. The founda(cid:173)
`tion may be poured continuously (monolithically) or sequen(cid:173)
`tially, first the perimeter wall, then the spread section and
`finally the pedestal section. Alternatively, the pedestal sec(cid:173)
`tion can be poured first, then the perimeter wall and finally
`the spread section in two separate pours.
`
`[0023] The exterior cylindrical or perimeter wall section is
`made of concrete preferably formed between two corrugated
`
`metal pipes (CMPs). In one embodiment, the outer CMP of
`the perimeter wall is a few feet taller than the inner CMP of
`the perimeter wall in order to define the outer circumference
`of the horizontal spread section. Initially, a circular excava(cid:173)
`tion having a diameter slightly greater than the diameter of
`the perimeter wall is dug to the depth of the pedestal section.
`An annular shaped trench for forming the perimeter wall is
`excavated to a depth of the desired bottom of the perimeter
`wall. In this embodiment, the initial circular excavation to
`the depth of the pedestal section leaves a raised perimeter
`section whose inner diameter is greater than the outer
`diameter of the pedestal section and whose outer diameter
`extends to the outer wall of the circular excavation. Then
`when the annular shaped trench for forming the perimeter
`wall is dug, a slightly raised annular berm-like earth ring is
`left inside the perimeter wall trench and above the bottom of
`the excavation for supporting the pedestal section.
`
`[0024] The two CMPs forming the exterior and interior of
`the perimeter wall are placed into the perimeter wall exca(cid:173)
`vation. Sand cement slurry is placed between the exterior of
`the CMPs and the sides of the perimeter wall excavation.
`The CMPs to form the pedestal section are then placed on
`the bottom of the interior circular shaped excavation and
`plumbed and properly centered within the interior of the
`CMPs for the perimeter wall section.
`
`[0025] A first or lower set of radially extending bolts
`extend through the interior and exterior CMPs of the ped(cid:173)
`estal section and pass preferably to a mid-point between the
`interior and exterior CMPs of the perimeter wall section, at
`which point, the lower bolts are bent 90 degrees to extend
`downwardly between the two CMPs forming the perimeter
`wall. The horizontally extending portion of the radially
`extending lower bolts is jacketed to prevent engagement
`with
`the subsequently poured concrete. Threading is
`included on the terminal end of the lower bolts passing
`through the interior CMP of the pedestal section to receive
`suitable posttensioning fasteners such as a large washer and
`nut. The opposite ends of the lower bolts which project
`downwardly between the CMPs of the perimeter wall do not
`include a protective sleeve so as to be able to form a strong
`bond with the subsequently poured concrete to strengthen
`the perimeter wall.
`
`[0026] Progressively
`larger diameter circles of high
`strength cable are placed on top of the lower layer of radially
`extending bolts and secured at the cross-over intersections.
`These cables referred to as "tendons", are used instead of
`rebar to strengthen the horizontal spread section. The ten(cid:173)
`dons are placed such that each successive tendon diameter
`preferably is approximately two feet greater than the pre(cid:173)
`ceding tendon diameter. The opposed ends of each tendon
`are preferably overlapped by approximately 60° or about
`eight feet.
`
`[0027] Located above the first or lower layer of radially
`extending bolts is a second or upper layer of radially
`extending PVC sleeved bolts passing through the inner CMP
`of the pedestal section and out to the outer CMP of the
`perimeter wall section. The opposed ends of the upper
`radially extending bolts are secured interiorly of the pedestal
`section and exteriorly of the perimeter wall by suitable
`fastening, such as a large washer and nut, for post-tensioning
`of these bolts. These bolts also have a series of increasing
`
`Exhibit - 1011
`NV5, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
`Page 13
`
`

`

`US 2002/0124502 Al
`
`Sep. 12,2002
`
`4
`
`diameter circles of tendons on their upper surface which are
`preferably aligned with the tendons on the lower layer of
`radially extending bolts.
`
`[0028] Once the upper layer of radially extending bolts are
`secured to the circularly extending tendons, concrete is
`poured for the perimeter wall section and the steel reinforced
`slab forming the spread section. The annular earth berm
`below the underside of the spread section forms a depending
`annular shoulder on the bottom surface of the spread section
`adjacent the base of the pedestal section. Electrical and
`communication conduits are installed. The surrounding soil
`is backfilled to a finish grade from the edge of the excavation
`to the exterior CMP of the pedestal section. Concrete is then
`poured between the CMPs for the pedestal section to within
`about two feet of the finish grade. The radially extending
`bolts passing through sleeves in the spread section are
`post-tensioned preferably to about fifty percent of their yield
`strength. This places the concrete in the spread section under
`high unit compression load. The interior of the pedestal is
`backfilled. No compaction of the soil is required.
`
`[0029] As in my prior patents, the center drain pipe, form
`rings, styrofoam block outs and leveling nuts are installed.
`The remaining pedestal portion is poured along with the
`concrete tower floor. The form rings and templates are
`removed for subsequent securing of the supported tower into
`place, and the vertical anchor bolts are post-tensioned to
`place the pedestal section in high unit load as described in
`my prior patents.
`
`[0030]
`In an alternate embodiment of the present inven(cid:173)
`tion, the perimeter wall section and spread section can be
`formed as separate components. In addition, the annular
`shoulder on the bottom of the spread section can be omitted
`if desired. Instead of the interior and exterior CMPs for
`forming the perimeter wall having different heights, the
`interior and exterior CMPs of the perimeter wall section are
`about the same height. The two layers of posttensioning
`bolts extend horizontally through the interior and exterior
`CMPs of the perimeter wall section as well as the interior
`and exterior CMPs of the pedestal section. The concrete for
`the perimeter wall section and spread section can then be
`poured separately and the generally horizontal bolts embed(cid:173)
`ded in the spread section can be post-tensioned as described
`in the previous embodiment.
`
`[0031] The concrete foundation of the present invention
`can be utilized on all sizes of wind turbines currently being
`commercially marketed and constructed, which range in size
`from 500 KW to 2500 KW. These towers range in height
`from the ground to the hub from 40 to 100 meters, and the
`weight of the towers, including the tower, blades, and
`nacelle ( containing gear boxes, generators, etc.) connected
`atop the tower, range from 150,000 pounds to 700,000
`pounds. The overturning moments for the larger units are
`from 6,000,000 to 50,000,000 ft-lbs. Further, by expanding
`the outer diameter of the perimeter wall in the present
`invention to 50 feet and increasing the thickness of the
`spread section to 6 feet, it is believed that the concrete
`foundation of the present invention could be designed to
`handle overturning moments up to as much as 100,000,000
`ft-lbs, which would be encountered with tower heights in the
`neighborhood of 400 feet.
`
`[0032]
`It is believed that the concrete foundation of the
`present invention is adaptable to very large overturning
`
`moments and is capable of supporting larger turbines than
`the tensionless foundations of my prior patents, which
`currently have depth limitations imposed by economic fac(cid:173)
`tors of around 35 feet. While the pedestal portion of the
`present invention can always be the same size as the
`tensionless hollow cylinder of my prior patents, the perim(cid:173)
`eter foundation of the present invention has the ability to
`extend the diameter of the perimeter wall to even greater
`diameters. The depth of the perimeter wall could approach
`30 feet and the moment resistance of such a wall depth
`coupled with the increased diameters could support any
`foreseeable size tubular wind turbine tower.
`
`[0033] Accordingly, it is a first object of the present
`invention to provide a post-tensioned concrete foundation
`which has increased resistance to overturning moments,
`especially for larger wind turbines and other large tower
`structures.
`
`[0034] A further object of the present invention is to
`provide a post-tensioned concrete foundation which maxi(cid:173)
`mizes resistance to overturning by situating weight concen(cid:173)
`tration and skin friction resistance at the perimeter of the
`foundation.
`[0035] A still further object of the present invention is to
`provide a post-tensioned concrete foundation which has high
`upset resistance by including an expanded base to a pedestal
`section of the foundation.
`[0036] Another object of the present invention is to pro(cid:173)
`vide a foundation in accordance with the preceding objects
`and in which the expanded base includes a cylindrical
`perimeter wall section spaced a substantial distance outward
`from the wall of the pedestal section and a horizontal spread
`section which interconnects the bottom of the pedestal
`section and the top of the perimeter wall section.
`[0037] Still another object of the present invention is to
`utilize excavated soil as backfill to add weight to the pedestal
`section, the top of the spread section and the top of the
`perimeter wall section to resist overturning forces while
`using inexpensive on-site materials.
`[0038] Yet another object of the present invention is to
`provide a post-tensioned concrete tower foundation having
`an expanded base which can be constructed without tempo(cid:173)
`rary independent forms and shoring.
`[0039] Still a further object of the present invention is to
`provide a post-tensioned concrete foundation for weak soils
`such as with shallow ground water in which the top of the
`expanded base of the foundation can be positioned at, above,
`or below the ground water surface.
`[0040] Yet a further object of the present invention is to
`provide a post-tensioned concrete foundation adaptable for
`areas with deep frost depths in which the top of the expanded
`base of the foundation is set below the frost line.
`[0041] Stil

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket